Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp3 (2025): Advances in Plant Health Improvement for Sustainable Agriculture

Microbial assisted chromium mitigation: Impacts on germination, yield and quality of Amaranthus

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10244
Submitted
25 June 2025
Published
10-12-2025

Abstract

The disposal of chromium (Cr) rich tannery sludge onto agricultural lands possesses a significant environmental threat. Oxidation of Cr often resulted in yields hexavalent chromium (Cr6+), a component that is extremely dangerous and cancer-causing. On the other hand, trivalent chromium (Cr3+) is considered to be a crucial trace element in human nutrition and is the most stable form of Cr that can be found naturally making it less toxic than hexavalent form. This study employed a pot experiment to evaluate the effects of hexavalent (Cr6+) and trivalent chromium (Cr3+) with and without the influence of microorganisms, on the germination, growth, uptake, biochemical properties and yield of Amaranthus gangeticus. Nine chromium concentrations were tested: 0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 mg/kg of Cr6+ as K₂Cr₂O₇ and 50, 100, 150 and 200 mg/kg of Cr3+ as [KCr(SO₄)₂]. These treatments were combined with four microbial treatments: a control (no microbes), Azospirillum, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and potassium-releasing bacteria (KRB). The results showed that irrespective forms the increasing chromium concentrations led to a consistent decline in germination, growth and yield parameters. Hexavalent chromium caused a more pronounced reduction in germination percentages compared to Cr3+, However, treatments supplemented with KRB exhibited a mitigating effect on Cr toxicity and significantly improved growth and yield parameters.

References

  1. 1. Shanker AK, Cervantes C, Loza-Tavera H, Avudainayagam S. Chromium toxicity in plants. Environ Int. 2005;31(5):739-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.02.003
  2. 2. Li W, Khan MA, Yamaguchi S, Kamiya Y. Effects of heavy metals on seed germination and early seedling growth of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant growth Regul. 2005;46(1):45-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-005-6324-2
  3. 3. Seregin I, Kozhevnikova A. Distribution of cadmium, lead, nickel and strontium in imbibing maize caryopses. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2005;52(4):565-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11183-005-0084-8
  4. 4. Steyn N, Olivier J, Winter P, Burger S, Nesamvuni C. A survey of wild, green, leafy vegetables and their potential in combating micronutrient deficiencies in rural populations: Research in action. S Afr J Sci. 2001;97(7):276-78. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC97355
  5. 5. Idris OA, Wintola OA, Afolayan AJ. Phytochemical and antioxidant activities of Rumex crispus L. in treatment of gastrointestinal helminths in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2017;7(12):1071-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2017.10.008
  6. 6. Vara Prasad MN, de Oliveira Freitas HM. Metal hyperaccumulation in plants: biodiversity prospecting for phytoremediation technology. Electron J biotechnol. 2003;6(3):285-321. https://doi.org/10.2225/vol6-issue3-fulltext-6
  7. 7. Qi Y, Li J, Fu G, Zhao C, Guan X, Yan B, et al. Effects of sublethal herbicides on offspring germination and seedling growth: Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) vs. velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Sci Total Environ. 2018;645:543-49.
  8. 8. Jackson WA, Flesher D, Hageman RH. Nitrate uptake by dark-grown corn seedlings: some characteristics of apparent induction. Plant Physiol. 1973;51(1):120-27. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.51.1.120
  9. 9. Piper J. Diffusion of hydrogen in copper-palladium alloys. J Appl Phys. 1966;37(2):715-21. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1708243
  10. 10. AΟΑC. Methods of analysis. Association of official Agricultural Chemists. Washington D. (USA). 1962.
  11. 11. Ranganna S. Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. 1986.
  12. 12. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John wiley & sons. New York. 1984. https://tinyurl.com/2hmb5pb5
  13. 13. Shahid M, Shamshad S, Rafiq M, Khalid S, Bibi I, Niazi NK, et al. Chromium speciation, bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and detoxification in soil-plant system: A review. Chemosphere. 2017;178:513-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.074
  14. 14. Jahan S, Iqbal S, Jabeen K, Sadaf S. Ameliorating influence of sulfur on germination attributes of Canola (Brassica napus L.) under chromium stress. Pak J Bot. 2015;47(2):407-11. http://www.pakbs.org/pjbot/PDFs/47(2)/03.pdf
  15. 15. Chow Y, Lee L, Zakaria N, Foo K. Phytotoxic effects of trivalent chromium-enriched water irrigation in Vigna unguiculata seedling. J Clean Prod. 2018;202:101-08. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.144
  16. 16. Farid M, Ali S, Akram NA, Rizwan M, Abbas F, Bukhari SAH, et al. Phyto-management of Cr-contaminated soils by sunflower hybrids: physiological and biochemical response and metal extractability under Cr stress. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24(20):16845-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9247-3
  17. 17. Gupta K, Jain V, Bhardwaj S. Effect of chromium (VI) on growth and lipid components in developing seeds of Brassica juncea. Indian J Plant Physiol. 2005;10(3):241.
  18. 18. Coelho LC, Bastos ARR, Pinho PJ, Souza GA, Carvalho JG, Coelho VA, et al. Marigold (Tagetes erecta): The potential value in the phytoremediation of chromium. Pedosphere. 2017;27(3):559-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60351-5
  19. 19. Han H, Lee K. Phosphate and potassium solubilizing bacteria effect on mineral uptake, soil availability and growth of eggplant. Res J Agric Biol Sci. 2005;1(2):176-80. https://tinyurl.com/5xb7ha8d
  20. 20. Zong H, Liu J, Wang F, Song N. Root morphological response of six peanut cultivars to chromium (VI) toxicity. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27(15):18403-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08188-3
  21. 21. Bahadur A, Afzal A, Ahmad R, Nasir F, Khan A, Suthar V, et al. Influence of metal-resistant Rhizobacteria on the growth of Helianthus annuus L. in Cr (VI)-contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2016;227(12):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-3174-7
  22. 22. Hussain I, Saleem MH, Mumtaz S, Rasheed R, Ashraf MA, Maqsood F, et al. Choline chloride mediates chromium tolerance in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) by restricting its uptake in relation to morpho-physio-biochemical attributes. J Plant Growth Regul. 2022;41(4):1594-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10401-7
  23. 23. Devi P, Kumar P. Effect of bioremediation on internodal length and leaf area of maize plant cultivated in contaminated soil with chromium metal. J Pharm Phytochem. 2020;9(4):1408-13. https://tinyurl.com/y3yt6rcj
  24. 24. Saeed-ur-Rehman K, Abdul W, Tareen RB, Kakar SA, Marriam T, Kayani SA. Impact of municipal waste water of Quetta city on biomass, physiology and yield of canola (Brassica napus L.). Pak J Bot. 2010;42(1):317-28. http://www.pakbs.org/pjbot/PDFs/42(1)/PJB42(1)317.pdf
  25. 25. Rendina A, Barros JM, Fabrizio de Iorio A. Changes in the speciation, partitioning and phytoavailability of chromium induced by organic soil amendments. Chem Speciat Bioavail . 2011;23(1):53-60. https://doi.org/10.3184/095422911X12971977268431
  26. 26. Wyszkowski M, Radziemska M. Effects of chromium (III and VI) on spring barley and maize biomass yield and content of nitrogenous compounds. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2010;73(17-18):1274-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2010.492016
  27. 27. Babu AG, Shea PJ, Sudhakar D, Jung I-B, Oh B-T. Potential use of Pseudomonas koreensis AGB-1 in association with Miscanthus sinensis to remediate heavy metal (loid)-contaminated mining site soil. J environ manage. 2015;151:160-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.045
  28. 28. Ghani A, Hussain M, Ikram M, Yaqoob M, Shaukat R, Munawar A, et al. Effect of chromium toxicity on the growth and mineral composition of brown mustard (Brassica juncea L.). World Wide J Multidiscip Res Dev. 2017;3(10):36-38.
  29. 29. Yassen A, Nadia BM, Zaghloul M. Role of some organic residues as tools for reducing heavy metals hazards in plant. World J Agric Sci. 2007;3(2):204-07. http://www.idosi.org/wjas/wjas.htm
  30. 30. Ali S, Zeng F, Qiu L, Zhang G. The effect of chromium and aluminum on growth, root morphology, photosynthetic parameters and transpiration of the two barley cultivars. Biol Plant. 2011;55(2):291-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-011-0041-7
  31. 31. Etesami H, Alikhani HA. Co-inoculation with endophytic and rhizosphere bacteria allows reduced application rates of N-fertilizer for rice plant. Rhizosphere. 2016;2:5-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2016.09.003
  32. 32. Khan MS, Zaidi A, Wani PA. Role of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture-A review. Sustain Agric. 2009;551-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_34
  33. 33. Patra RC, Malik S, Beer M, Megharaj M, Naidu R. Molecular characterization of chromium (VI) reducing potential in Gram positive bacteria isolated from contaminated sites. Soil Biol Biochem. 2010;42(10):1857-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.07.005
  34. 34. Thatoi H, Das S, Mishra J, Rath BP, Das N. Bacterial chromate reductase, a potential enzyme for bioremediation of hexavalent chromium: A review. J Environ Manage. 2014;146:383-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.014
  35. 35. Javed MT, Saleem MH, Aslam S, Rehman M, Iqbal N, Begum R, et al. Elucidating silicon-mediated distinct morpho-physio-biochemical attributes and organic acid exudation patterns of cadmium stressed Ajwain (Trachyspermum ammi L.). Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;157:23-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.10.010
  36. 36. Ahmad R, Ali S, Rizwan M, Dawood M, Farid M, Hussain A, et al. Hydrogen sulfide alleviates chromium stress on cauliflower by restricting its uptake and enhancing antioxidative system. Physiol Plant. 2020;168(2):289-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13001
  37. 37. Gill RA, Zang L, Ali B, Farooq MA, Cui P, Yang S, et al. Chromium-induced physio-chemical and ultrastructural changes in four cultivars of Brassica napus L. Chemosphere. 2015;120:154-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.029

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.