Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp3 (2025): Advances in Plant Health Improvement for Sustainable Agriculture

Weed suppression and yield response of high-density cotton to herbicides and spray fluid volumes through drone spraying

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10314
Submitted
27 June 2025
Published
14-10-2025

Abstract

Drone application of herbicides is an emerging concept in weed management. For drone spraying, spray volume needs to be optimized to improve its efficacy. The present study was conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, during summer, 2024 to optimize spray volumes for drone spraying of herbicides in high-density cotton. The study was designed in a strip-plot with 3 horizontal plots (herbicides: H1 - PE application of pendimethalin 1kg/ha followed by hand weeding at 25DAS, H2 - PE application of pendimethalin 1kg/ha followed by EPoE application of quizalafop-ethyl 50 g/ha + pyrithiobac-sodium 62.5 g/ha and H3 - EPoE application of quizalafop-ethyl 50 g/ha + pyrithiobac-sodium 62.5 g/ha), 5 vertical plots (spray volumes: S1 - 30 L/ha, S2 - 35 L/ha, S3 - 40 L/ha, S4 - 45 L/ha, S5 - 50 L/ha) and replicated thrice. A weed-free check and an unweeded check were maintained separately. Regarding herbicides, pendimethalin followed by quizalafop-ethyl + pyrithiobac-sodium and pendimethalin followed by hand weeding, recorded lower total weed density and dry weight and higher drymatter production of cotton and seed cotton yield. Application of herbicides with 45 L/ha and 50 L/ha recorded lower total weed density and dry weight, higher drymatter production of cotton and seed cotton yield. The results revealed that the drone spraying of pendimethalin 1.0 kg ha-1 as pre-emergence followed by EPoE application of quizalafop ethyl 50g/ha + pyrithiobac sodium 62.5 g/ha with spray volume of 45 L/ha was found to be effective in combating the weeds in high-density cotton.

References

  1. 1. Meng Y, Wang X, Zhang L, Zhou Z. Global cotton production trends and economic significance. Journal of Cotton Research. 2019;2(1):1–12.
  2. 2. IndiaStat. Area, production and yield of cotton in India (1957–1958 to 1992–1993 and 1996–1997 to 2023–2024). 2025.
  3. 3. Oliveira JT, Maradini PS, Borges AC, Gava R. Viabilidade da fertirrigação por pivô central com uso de efluentes tratados em diferentes níveis. Nativa. 2023;9(1):23–9. https://doi.org/10.31413/nativa.v9i1.10884
  4. 4. Iqbal N, Manalil S, Chauhan BS, Adkins SW. Investigation of alternate herbicides for effective weed management in glyphosate-tolerant cotton. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2019;65:1885–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1579904
  5. 5. Pratap V, Verma SK, Dass A, Yadav DK, Jaysawal PK, Madane AJ. Productivity, economics and resource-use efficiency of direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) under varying crop establishment methods and weed management practices. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2021;91(4):537–41. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v91i4.112635
  6. 6. Ren D, Yang W, Lu Z, Chen D, Shi H. Improved weed detection in cotton fields using enhanced YOLOv8s with modified feature extraction modules. Symmetry. 2024;16(4):450. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16040450
  7. 7. Kwaghtyo DK, Eke CI. Smart farming prediction models for precision agriculture: a comprehensive survey. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2023;56:5729–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10266-6
  8. 8. Cao C, Li P, Wang X, Zhang J. Challenges in manual herbicide application and the need for mechanization in cotton farming. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 2017;54(3):210–25.
  9. 9. Kumar V, Nayak AK, Poonam A, Khanam R. Unmanned aerial vehicle and its application in Indian Agriculture: a perspective. Indian Farming. 2020;70(8):34–7.
  10. 10. Pon Arasan A, Radhamani S, Pazhanivelan S, Kavitha R, Raja R, Kumaraperumal R. Mapping and monitoring of weeds using unmanned aircraft systems and remote sensing. Plant Protection Science. 2025;61:44–55.
  11. https://doi.org/10.17221/74/2024-PPS
  12. 11. Rejeb A, Abdollahi A, Rejeb K, Treiblmaier H. Drones in agriculture: a review and bibliometric analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2022;198:107017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107017
  13. 12. Chen Y, Qi H, Li G, Lan Y. Weed control effect of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) application in wheat field. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation. 2019;2(2):25–31. https://doi.org/10.33440/j.ijpaa.20190202.45
  14. 13. Jeevan N, Pazhanivelan S, Kumaraperumal R, Ragunath K, Arthanari PM, Sritharan N, et al. Effect of different spray volumes on deposition characteristics of a fuel-operated UAV sprayer using herbicides in transplanted rice (Oryza sativa). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2023;93:720–5. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i7.133995
  15. 14. Paul RA, Arthanari PM, Pazhanivelan S, Kavitha R, Djanaguiraman S. Drone-based herbicide application for energy saving, higher weed control and economics in direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2023;93(7):704–9. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i7.137859
  16. 15. Pranaswi K, Singh VP, Kumar M, Yadav R. Herbicide application via UAV in wheat: efficiency and cost analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2024;44(3):1–15.
  17. 16. Abd Ghani MN, Ismail WI, Ahmad K, Omar D. Efficacy of UAV-sprayed systemic herbicides in weed management: a comparative study with conventional methods. Precision Agriculture. 2024;25(1):112–25.
  18. 17. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1984.
  19. 18. Chaudhary A, Patel RK, Meena RS, Singh V, Yadav RK. Weed suppression efficacy of pendimethalin in high-density cotton systems. Agronomy Journal. 2022;114(3):1450–60.
  20. 19. Kumar S, Jat RS, Choudhary V, Singh S, Rajpoot SK. Sequential herbicide applications for broad-spectrum weed control in cotton. Weed Science. 2023;71(1):45–53.
  21. 20. Singh A, Kumar V, Singh M. Herbicide coverage efficiency at different spray volumes in cotton. Weed Biology and Management. 2022;22(3):145–56.
  22. 21. Maity A, Das TK, Ghosh S, Paul R. Integrated weed management in high-density cotton systems: herbicide sequence and timing effects. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2023;43(2):78–92.
  23. 22. Patel B, Sharma R, Yadav S, Singh M. Spray volume optimization for herbicide deposition and absorption in cotton. Weed Research. 2021;61(4):298–310.
  24. 23. Ghosheh H, Al-Hajaj N, Al-Jamali K, Al-Dalain S. Impact of weed-free periods on cotton growth and yield. Weed Technology. 2022;36(2):210–8.
  25. 24. Jha P, Kumar S, Reddy MD, Singh AK, Sharma PC. Optimizing spray volume for herbicide efficacy in cotton. Crop Protection. 2023;165:106–15.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.