Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Assessing of soil quality index of Holihosur sub-watershed using principal component analysis and geo-statistical techniques

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10479
Submitted
6 July 2025
Published
08-10-2025

Abstract

Soil quality is defined as the capacity of soil to function effectively within an ecosystem to sustain plant productivity, maintain or enhance water and air quality and support human health and habitation. This study assessed soil quality and its spatial heterogeneity in the Holihosur sub-watershed, Belagavi district, Karnataka, using 490 surface soil samples. These samples were analyzed through principal component analysis (PCA) and geospatial methods. PCA identified 5 components with eigenvalues greater than one, collectively explaining 60.76 % of the total variance in soil properties. From 12 evaluated parameters, a minimum data set revealed key soil quality indicators: pH, available potassium, organic carbon, available nitrogen, iron and boron. Geostatistical analysis selected the circular semi-variogram model as optimal based on minimal root mean square error, enabling ordinary kriging interpolation. The spatial autocorrelation range of 608.96 m, with a 320 m grid sampling interval, provided sufficient resolution for capturing spatial dependence patterns. This facilitated the creation of detailed thematic maps to support targeted soil management. The moderate nugget-to-sill ratio (0.65) indicated that spatial heterogeneity arose from both systematic pedogenic processes and random environmental influences (climate and management of crops). Spatial distribution results showed that approximately 16 % of the watershed had moderate soil quality (SQI: 0.35-0.55), while the majority (76.35 %) exhibited higher soil quality (SQI: 0.55-0.75), indicating generally favorable conditions for agriculture.

References

  1. 1. Karlen DL, Mausbach MJ, Doan JW, Cline RG, Harris RF, Schuman GE. Soil quality: A concept, definition and framework for evaluation. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1997. p. 4-10. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100010001x
  2. 2. Andrews SS, Karlen DL, Mitchell JP. A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2002;90(1):25-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00174-8
  3. 3. Karlen DL, Andrews SS, Doran JW. Soil quality: Current concepts and applications. Adv Agron. 2001;74:1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(01)74029-1
  4. 4. Marques JJr, Alleoni LRF, Teixeira DDB, Siqueira DS, Pereira GT. Sampling planning of micronutrients and aluminum of the soils of São Paulo. Geoderma. 2015. p. 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2014.12.004
  5. 5. Richards LA. Diagnosis and improvement of saline alkali soils, USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 60. 1954. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1954.03615995001800030032x
  6. 6. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  7. 7. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci. 1956;25:259-260.
  8. 8. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture Circular No. 939. 1954.
  9. 9. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India (Pvt.) Ltd., New Delhi. 1973.
  10. 10. Tabatabai MA. Sulfur. In: Sparks DL, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Madison (WI): Soil Science Society of America. 1996. p. 921-60. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser8.c3
  11. 11. Lindsay WL, Norwell WA. Development of DTPA of soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1978. p. 421-8. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
  12. 12. Berger KC, Truog E. Boron determination in soils and plants using the quinalizar in reaction. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition. 1939;11:540-5. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac50138a007
  13. 13. Wander MM, Bollero GA. Soil quality assessment of tillage impacts in Illinois. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1999. p. 961-71. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.634961x
  14. 14. Andrews SS, Karlen DL, Cambardella CA. The soil management assessment framework: A quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2004. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.1945
  15. 15. Andrews SS, Mitchell JP, Mancinelli R, Karlen DL, Hartz TK, Horwath WR, et al. On-farm assessment of soil quality in California's Central valley. Agron J. 2002;94:12-23. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.1200
  16. 16. Webster R, Oliver MA. Geostatistics for environmental scientists. New York: Wiley. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470517277
  17. 17. Mabit L, Bernard C. Assessment of spatial distribution of fallout radionuclides through geostatistics concept. J Environ Radioact. 2007;97(2–3):206–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.05.008
  18. 18. Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Novak JM, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Turco RF, et al. Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1994;58(5):1501-11. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800050033x
  19. 19. Yadav MB, Patil PL, Rundan V, Vyas RV, Nthebere K. Assessing the spatial variability of soil quality index of Ganjigatti sub-watershed using GIS-based geostatistical modeling. Indian J Ecol. 2024;51(1):96-103. https://doi.org/10.55362/IJE/2024/4201
  20. 20. Andrews SS, Carroll CR. Designing a soil quality assessment tool for sustainable agroecosystem management. Ecol Appl. 2001;11:1573-85. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1573:DASQAT]2.0.CO;2
  21. 21. Mukherjee A, Lal R. Comparison of soil quality index using three methods. PLoS One. 2014. p. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105981
  22. 22. Harsha M, Sathish A, Ananthakumar MA. Assessment of soil quality indicators of Channegowdarapalya micro watershed, Tumkur, Karnataka. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2021;69(3):233-47. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0228.2021.00047.5
  23. 23. Yadav KK, Mali NL, Kumar S, Surya JN, Moharana PC, Nogiya M, et al. Assessment of soil quality and spatial variability of soil properties using geo-spatial techniques in sub humid Southern Plain of Rajasthan, India. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2022;70(1):69-85. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0228.2022.00004.4
  24. 24. Abebe G, Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, Takeshi T, Wondie M, Adgo E, et al. Effects of land use and topographic position on soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks in different agro ecosystems of the upper Blue Nile Basin. Sustainability. 2020;12:2425. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062425
  25. 25. Zhang W, Lee SY, Song X. Local polynomial fitting in semi varying coefficient models. J Multivar Anal. 2002;82:166-88. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmva.2001.2012
  26. 26. Hati KM, Swarup A, Dwivedi AK, Misra AK, Bandyopadhyay KK. Changes in soil physical properties and organic carbon status at the topsoil horizon of a Vertisol of central India after 28 years of continuous cropping, fertilization and manuring. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2007;119:127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.06.017
  27. 27. Sathish A, Madhu L. Assessment of soil quality based on relationship of soil carbon stocks with different soil parameters in Lakkampura mini-watershed in Davanagere under semi-arid Alfisols in India. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2021;69(4):354-68. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0228.2021.00057.8
  28. 28. El Bourhrami B, Ibno Namr K, Et-Tayeb H, Duraisamy V. Application of soil quality index to assess the status of soils submitted to intensive agriculture in the irrigated plain of Doukkala, Moroccan Semiarid Region. Ecol Eng Environ Technol. 2022. p. 23. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/145754
  29. 29. Amorim HC, Ashworth AJ, Wienhold BJ, Savin MC, Allen FL, Saxton AM, et al. Soil quality indices based on long-term conservation cropping systems management. Agrosystems Geosci Environ. 2020;3(1):e20036. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20036
  30. 30. Liu D, Wang Z, Zhang B, Song K, Li X, Li J. Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon and analysis of related factors in croplands of the black soil region, Northeast China. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2006;113(1-4):73-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20036

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.