Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Stress physiology of onion genotypes: Insights into waterlogging tolerance and susceptibility

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10532
Submitted
8 July 2025
Published
21-09-2025 — Updated on 10-10-2025
Versions

Abstract

Waterlogging is a major abiotic stress that significantly impairs onion (Allium cepa L.) productivity, particularly during critical growth stages such as seedling establishment, vegetative growth (including leaf and bulb development) and bulbing (bulb formation). This study evaluated the physiological and yield responses of multiple onion genotypes under waterlogging conditions. Various genotypes viz. Bhima Dark Red, Accession 1666, Accession 1630, W-355, Bhima Super, Bhima Shubhra, Bhima Red and Phule Samarth were evaluated. The genotypes Bhima Dark Red, Acc. 1666 demonstrated high tolerance capacity as evident through parameters such as plant height, leaf retention, chlorophyll content, Membrane Stability Index (MSI) and bulb yield under stress. In contrast, cultivars like Bhima Shubhra and Bhima Super, exhibited susceptibility via pronounced reductions in growth and yield parameters. In contrast, susceptible genotypes suffered from oxidative damage, metabolic disruption, showed poor assimilate allocation, resulting in significant yield reduction. The findings highlight the importance of genotype selection and targeted agronomic interventions for mitigating waterlogging-induced yield losses in flood-prone regions. These insights provide a foundation for breeding programs with an aim of enhancing waterlogging tolerance in onion, thereby supporting sustainable production in the context of increasing climate variability.

References

  1. 1. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. Food and agricultural organization of the United Nations statistical database. 2021. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/
  2. 2. Gedam PA, Shirsat DV, Arunachalam T, Ghosh S, Gawande SJ, Mahajan V, et al. Screening of onion (Allium cepa L.) genotypes for waterlogging tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:727262. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.727262
  3. 3. Wakchaure GC, Minhas PS, Kumar S, Khapte PS, Meena KK, Rane J, et al. Quantification of water stress impacts on canopy traits, yield, quality and water productivity of onion (Allium cepa L.) cultivars in a shallow basaltic soil of water scarce zone. Agric Water Manag. 2021;249:106824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106824
  4. 4. Gornall J, Betts R, Burke E, Clark R, Camp J, Willett K, et al. Implications of climate change for agricultural productivity in the early twenty-first century. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365(1554):2973-89. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0158
  5. 5. Kaur G, Singh G, Motavalli PP, Nelson KA, Orlowski JM, Golden BR. Impacts and management strategies for crop production in waterlogged or flooded soils: A review. Agron J. 2020;112(3):1475-501. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20093
  6. 6. Kumar P, Sharma PK. Soil salinity and food security in India. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2020;4:533781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.533781
  7. 7. Ghodke PH, Shirsat DV, Thangasamy A, Mahajan V, Salunkhe VN, Khade Y, et al. Effect of water logging stress at specific growth stages in onion crop. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(1):3438-48. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.405
  8. 8. Pasley HR, Huber I, Castellano MJ, Archontoulis SV. Modeling flood-induced stress in soybeans. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:62. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00062
  9. 9. Posso DA, Borella J, Reissig GN, Bacarin MA. Root flooding-induced changes in the dynamic dissipation of the photosynthetic energy of common bean plants. Acta Physiol Plant. 2018;40:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-018-2790-9
  10. 10. Garcia N, da-Silva CJ, Cocco KLT, Pomagualli D, de Oliveira FK, da Silva JVL, et al. Waterlogging tolerance of five soybean genotypes through different physiological and biochemical mechanisms. Environ Exp Bot. 2020;172:103975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.103975
  11. 11. Majeed JA, Mahmood A, Bibi S, Jabeen A, Javaid MM, Ahmad HB, et al. Waterlogging and crop productivity. In: Climate-Resilient Agriculture, Vol. 1: Crop Responses and Agroecological Perspectives. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2023. p. 237-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37424-1_11
  12. 12. Vasanthi S, Perke D, More S, Bharati S. Price behaviour of selected onion markets in Maharashtra. Biol Forum Int J. 2024;16(9):148.
  13. 13. Prithiani S, Dighe SS, Jakhar RK, Pushpa K, Gautam D. Evaluation of different varieties on growth characteristics of onion (Allium cepa L.). Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(3):386-8.
  14. 14. Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority. Fresh Onions. 2025.
  15. 15. Salunkhe VN, Gedam P, Pradhan A, Gaikwad B, Kale R, Gawande S. Concurrent waterlogging and anthracnose-twister disease in rainy-season onions (Allium cepa): Impact and management. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1063472. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1063472
  16. 16. Gökçe ZNÖ, Gökçe AF, Junaid MD, Chaudhry UK. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of onion (Allium cepa L.) breeding lines to single and combined salt and drought stresses. Euphytica. 2022;218(3):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-022-02980-7
  17. 17. Sairam RK, Shukla DS, Saxena DC. Stress-induced injury and antioxidant enzymes in relation to drought tolerance in wheat genotypes. Biol Plant. 1997;40(3):357-64. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001009812864
  18. 18. Acevedo M, Pixley K, Zinyengere N, Meng S, Tufan H, Cichy K, et al. A scoping review of adoption of climate-resilient crops by small-scale producers in low- and middle-income countries. Nat Plants. 2020;6:1231-41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00783-z
  19. 19. Gedam PA, Khandagale K, Shirsat D, Thangasamy A, Kulkarni O, Kulkarni A, et al. Elucidating the molecular responses to waterlogging stress in onion (Allium cepa L.) leaf by comparative transcriptome profiling. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1150909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1150909
  20. 20. Kumar A, Singh R, Sharma P. Enhanced aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in Bhima Dark Red onion genotype under waterlogging stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2023;46(3):567-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14678
  21. 21. Kale RB, Khandagale K, Ramadas S, Gavhane AD, Gedam P, Mahajan V. Unravelling physiological disorders in onion and garlic: Critical assessment and bibliometric visualization. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1500917. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1500917
  22. 22. Hiscox JD, Israelstam GF. A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Can J Bot. 1979;57(12):1332-4. https://doi.org/10.1139/b79-163
  23. 23. Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949;24(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1
  24. 24. El-Sherif AA, Abd El-Kareem FS, Hegazi SA. Evaluation of onion (Allium cepa L.) cultivars for their tolerance to waterlogging stress. Sci Hortic. 2019;243:369-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.08.038
  25. 25. Luo J, Yu W, Xiao Y, Zhang Y, Peng F. Strawberry FaSnRK1α regulates anaerobic respiratory metabolism under waterlogging. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(9):4914. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094914
  26. 26. Zarbakhsh S, Shahsavar AR, Afaghi A, Hasanuzzaman M. Predicting and optimizing reactive oxygen species metabolism in Punica granatum L. through machine learning: Role of exogenous GABA on antioxidant enzyme activity under drought and salinity stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):4740. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04740-2
  27. 27. Sachdev S, Ansari SA, Ansari MI, Fujita M, Hasanuzzaman M. Abiotic stress and reactive oxygen species: Generation, signaling and defense mechanisms. Antioxidants. 2021;10(2):277. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10020277
  28. 28. Mohanbabu N, Veldhuis MP, Jung D, Ritchie ME. Integrating defense and leaf economic spectrum traits in a tropical savanna plant. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1185616. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1185616
  29. 29. Hasanuzzaman M, Al Mahmud J, Nahar K, Anee TI, Inafuku M, Oku H, et al. Responses, adaptation and ROS metabolism in plants exposed to waterlogging stress. In: Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Systems in Plants: Role and Regulation under Abiotic Stress. Singapore: Springer. 2017. p. 257-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5254-5_10
  30. 30. Wang SJ, Zhai S, Xu XT, Lu YT, Yuan TT. Hydrogen peroxide participates in leaf senescence by inhibiting CHLI1 activity. Plant Cell Rep. 2024;43(11):3350-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-024-03350-4
  31. 31. Mukherjee S. Plant growth-definition & stages. Science Facts. 2022.
  32. 32. Dubey S, Kuruwanshi V, Ghodke P, Mahajan V. Biochemical and yield evaluation of onion (Allium cepa L.) genotypes under waterlogging condition. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(4):2036-40. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4v.9926

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.