Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Evaluating bio-intensive cropping systems for enhanced profitability and sustainability in garden land ecosystems

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10653
Submitted
15 July 2025
Published
22-10-2025

Abstract

Mounting challenges such as excessive use of synthetic inputs, poor resource use efficiency and declining soil health undermine the sustainability of conventional agriculture. Bio-intensive complementary cropping, an ecologically sound approach offers a sustainable alternative by integrating synergetic crop species and their integration with appropriate nutrient management boost productivity and improves soil health. In this context, the present study was conducted in a split-plot design with four main plots and five subplots, replicated thrice to assess the performance of different bio-intensive complementary cropping. Results revealed that maize intercropped with cowpea and sunnhemp recorded the highest productivity with cotton equivalent yield of 2556 kg/ha. This system also showed greater competitiveness with a land equivalent ratio of 1.13, indicating a clear advantage over sole cropping. Among the nutrient management practices, application of 50 % recommended NPK through chemical fertilizers along with 50 % recommended N through vermicompost on N equivalent basis and 5 % fermented fish extract as foliar spray showed the most significant improvement with soil available nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium reaching 209.5, 14.7 and 622.3 kg/ha, respectively. The study concludes that bio-intensive system involving legumes, green manures integrated with organic amendments plays a significant role in enhancing agricultural sustainability. Among the tested combinations, maize intercropped with cowpea and sunnhemp supplemented with 50 % NPK through chemical fertilizers and 50 % N through vermicompost along with 5 % fermented fish extract foliar spray resulted in highest cotton equivalent and nutrient uptake. This integrated approach not only significantly increases the productivity of the system but also improved soil health by boosting nutrient availability and enhanced resource use efficiency.

References

  1. 1. Belete T, Yadete E. Effect of mono cropping on soil health and fertility management for sustainable agriculture practices: a review. Plant Sci. 2023;11:192-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20231106.13
  2. 2. Manna MC, Ghosh PK, Acharya CL. Sustainable crop production through management of soil organic carbon in semiarid and tropical India. J Sustain Agric. 2003;21(3):85-114. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v21n03_07
  3. 3. Pujar AM, Angadi VV. Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield attributes, yield and production efficiency of cotton and soybean intercropping system. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2017;5(4):543-9. https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2885
  4. 4. Hu J, Seiler G, Kole C, editors. Genetics, genomics and breeding of sunflower. CRC Press; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10192
  5. 5. Kandel HJ, Schneiter AA, Johnson BL. Intercropping legumes into sunflower at different growth stages. Crop Sci. 1997;37(5):1532-7. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700050020x
  6. 6. Gudadhe NN, Imade SR, Thanki JD. Effect of integrated nutrient management on rice-greengram cropping sequence. Legume Res. 2022;45(11):1421-7. https://doi.org/10.18805/lr-4307
  7. 7. Bhayal D, Khaddar VK, Bhayal L, Yadav TC, Bangar KS, Singh B. Effect of sunhemp green manuring and intercropping on soil properties. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(12):371-84. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.712.046
  8. 8. Willey RW, Natarajan M, Reddy MS, Rao MR, Nambiar PT, Kannaiyan J, et al. Intercropping studies with annual crops. In: Ciba Foundation Symposium 97 - Better Crops for Food. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1983. p. 83-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470720783.ch7
  9. 9. McGilchrist CA. Analysis of competition experiments. Biometrics. 1965;21(4):975-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528258
  10. 10. Willey RW, Rao MR. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Exp Agric. 1980;16(2):117-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479700010802
  11. 11. Begam A, Pramanick M, Dutta S, Paramanik B, Dutta G, Patra PS, et al. Inter-cropping patterns and nutrient management effects on maize growth, yield and quality. Field Crops Res. 2024;310:109363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109363
  12. 12. Jayakumar M, Surendran U. Intercropping and balanced nutrient management for sustainable cotton production. J Plant Nutr. 2017;40(5):632-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1245327
  13. 13. Singh NK, Sachan K, Bp M, Panotra N, Katiyar D. Building soil health and fertility through organic amendments and practices: a review. Asian J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2024;10(1):175-97. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajsspn/2024/v10i1224
  14. 14. Anyoni OG, Susan T, Joseph E, Barnabas M, Alfred O. Effects of intercropping on maize and soybean yield performance, land equivalent ratio and maize leaf area in conservation agriculture. J Agric Sci. 2023;16(1):37. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v16n1p37
  15. 15. Awais M, Wajid A, Bashir MU, Habib-ur-Rahman M, Raza MA, Ahmad A, et al. Nitrogen and plant population change radiation capture and utilization capacity of sunflower in semi-arid environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24(21):17511-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9308-7
  16. 16. Suhi AA, Mia S, Khanam S, Mithu MH, Uddin MK, Muktadir MA, et al. How does maize-cowpea intercropping maximize land use and economic return? A field trial in Bangladesh. Land. 2022;11(4):581. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11040581
  17. 17. Rizzardi MA, Fleck NG, Vidal RA, Merotto A Jr, Agostinetto D. Competition between weeds and crops by soil resources. Cienc Rural. 2001;31:707-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782001000400026
  18. 18. Sandhya Rani Y, Jamuna P, Triveni U, Patro TS, Anuradha N. Effect of in situ incorporation of legume green manure crops on nutrient bioavailability, productivity and uptake of maize. J Plant Nutr. 2022;45(7):1004-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2021.2005802
  19. 19. Uzoh IM, Igwe CA, Okebalama CB, Babalola OO. Legume-maize rotation effect on maize productivity and soil fertility parameters under selected agronomic practices in a sandy loam soil. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):8539. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43679-5
  20. 20. Lalrinsangi JK, Singh S, Chaudhary KP, Nawhal A, Kumari R. Effect of intercropping with cowpea and maize with organic manure application on the physiological parameters. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2024;36(6):601-15. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i64663
  21. 21. Kumar A, Paul SC, Rakshit R, Singh M, Kumar S. Effect of vermicompost application on nitrogen transformation in soil. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing; 2019. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2018/45988
  22. 22. Chatterjee R, Debnath A, Mishra S. Vermicompost and soil health. In: Soil Health. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44364-1_4
  23. 23. Yli-Halla M. Fate of fertilizer P in soils: inorganic pathway. In: Phosphorus in agriculture: 100% zero. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2016. p. 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7612-7_3
  24. 24. Aruna P, Reddy GP, Sagar GK. Effect of integrated nitrogen management on growth, yield, quality and post-harvest nutrient status of soil in aerobic rice (Oryza sativa L.). Crop Res. 2012;43(1–3):1-4.
  25. 25. Singh AK, Chauhan RK, Bisen JS. Role of soil organic matter in soil health sustainability. Int J Agric Sci. 2014;5(2):219-27.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.