Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Life cycle and host-dependent rearing efficiency of Thrips tabaci on onion and runner bean

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10751
Submitted
19 July 2025
Published
26-12-2025

Abstract

Onions are the second most widely produced vegetable globally, after tomatoes and are vulnerable to both biotic and abiotic stresses. Among the key pests, Thrips tabaci is a polyphagous species that poses a major threat to onion production, causing direct damage and acting as a vector for tospoviruses. This study used ITS2-based PCR and Sanger sequencing to molecularly confirm the identity of field-collected T. tabaci, showing 100 % identity with reference T. tabaci sequences. The life cycle of T. tabaci was evaluated under controlled conditions on onion (Allium cepa) and runner bean (Phaseolus coccineus). Developmental parameters including egg, nymphal, pupal stages and adult longevity, were recorded on both hosts. Development was significantly faster on runner bean leaves (29.33 ± 5.58 days), while adult longevity was greater on onion leaves (20.07 ± 5.10 days). Mass rearing trials on single-host systems showed that onion leaves supported a higher multiplication fold (4.34 ± 0.63) compared with bean leaves (2.75 ± 0.50) when 100 adults were released. This indicates that the onion is more suitable for oviposition and overall colony buildup than the runner bean under controlled conditions. These findings show how the life cycle of T. tabaci can be regulated by its host. Collectively, onion favoured oviposition and overall colony build-up, while runner bean accelerated immature development-complementary traits that can be leveraged for laboratory culture and bioassay logistics.

References

  1. 1. FAO. Agricultural production statistics 2010–2023. United Nations: The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2023.
  2. 2. Loredo Varela RC, Fail J. Host plant association and distribution of the onion thrips, Thrips tabaci cryptic species complex. Insects. 2022;13(3):298. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13030298
  3. 3. Batuman O, Turini TA, LeStrange M, Stoddard S, Miyao G, Aegerter BJ, et al. Development of an IPM strategy for thrips and Tomato spotted wilt virus in processing tomatoes in the Central Valley of California. Pathogens. 2020;9(8):636. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9080636
  4. 4. Pandi A, Perumal R, John Samuel K, Subramanian J, Malaichamy K. Orthotospovirus iridimaculaflavi (iris yellow spot virus): An emerging threat to onion cultivation and its transmission by Thrips tabaci in India. Microb Pathog. 2024;193:106716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2024.106716
  5. 5. Jenber A, Birhanu E, Teferi B. Integrated management of onion thrips (Thrips tabaci L.) and its effect on onion growth and yield (Allium cepa L.) under irrigation conditions in Gubalafto district, Northeastern Ethiopia. Int J Agric Nat Sci. 2024;17(1):61–79.
  6. 6. Wakil W, Gulzar S, Wu S, Rasool KG, Husain M, Aldawood AS, et al. Development of insecticide resistance in field populations of onion thrips, Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Insects. 2023;14(4):376. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14040376
  7. 7. Kumar B, Omkar. Thrips. In: Omkar, editor. Polyphagous Pests of Crops. Singapore: Springer. 2021. p. 373–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8075-8_9
  8. 8. Murunde RW. Biological control of western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis Thysanoptera: Thripidae: Frankliniella) in French beans using plant and soil dwelling mite. [Thesis]. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology–College of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 2023.
  9. 9. Gao Y, Zhao Y, Wang D, Yang J, Ding N, Shi S. Effect of different plants on the growth and reproduction of Thrips flavus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Insects. 2021;12(6):502. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060502
  10. 10. Fathi SAA, Gholami F, Nouri-Ganbalani G, Mohiseni A. Life history parameters of Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on six commercial cultivars of canola. Appl Entomol Zool. 2011;46(4):505–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-011-0069-3
  11. 11. Woldemelak WA. The major biological approaches in the integrated pest management of onion thrips, Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). J Hortic Res. 2020;28(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.2478/johr-2020-0002
  12. 12. van Rijn PCJ, Mollema C, Steenhuis-Broers GM. Comparative life history studies of Frankliniella occidentalis and Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on cucumber. Bull Entomol Res. 1995;85(2):285–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300034386
  13. 13. Kim YS, Park CG, Kwon T, Lee D. An improved mass rearing method for western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis. Korean J Appl Entomol. 2024;63(4):367–71.
  14. 14. Thaenkham U, Chaisiri K, Hui En Chan A. Challenges of species identification for parasitic helminths. In: Thaenkham U, Chaisiri K, Hui En Chan A, editors. Molecular Systematics of Parasitic Helminths. Singapore: Springer Nature. 2022. p. 131–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1786-8_5
  15. 15. Yeh WB, Tseng MJ, Chang NT, Wu SY, Tsai YS. Agronomically important thrips: development of species-specific primers in multiplex PCR and microarray assay using internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) sequences for identification. Bull Entomol Res. 2015;105(1):52–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000748531400073X
  16. 16. Farkas P, György Z, Tóth A, Sojnóczki A, Fail J. A simple molecular identification method of the Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) cryptic species complex. Bull Entomol Res. 2020;110(3):397–405. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485319000762
  17. 17. Yeh WB, Tseng MJ, Chang NT, Wu SY, Tsai YS. Development of species-specific primers for agronomical thrips and multiplex assay for quarantine identification of western flower thrips. J Econ Entomol. 2014;107(5):1728–35. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC14027
  18. 18. Sørensen JG, Addison MF, Terblanche JS. Mass-rearing of insects for pest management: challenges, synergies and advances from evolutionary physiology. Crop Prot. 2012;38:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.03.023
  19. 19. Muvea AM, Meyhöfer R, Subramanian S, Poehling HM, Ekesi S, Maniania NK. Colonization of onions by endophytic fungi and their impacts on the biology of Thrips tabaci. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(9):e108242. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108242
  20. 20. Morales-Ramos JA, Tomberlin JK, Miranda C, Rojas MG. Rearing methods of four insect species intended as feed, food and food ingredients: a review. J Econ Entomol. 2024;117(4):1210–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toae040
  21. 21. Jacobson AL, Nault BA, Vargo EL, Kennedy GG. Restricted gene flow among lineages of Thrips tabaci supports genetic divergence among cryptic species groups. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(9):e0163882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163882
  22. 22. Garcia AG, Godoy WAC, Cônsoli FL, Ferreira CP. Modelling movement and stage-specific habitat preferences of a polyphagous insect pest. Move Ecol. 2020;8(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-020-00198-7
  23. 23. Manape TK, Soumia PS, Khade YP, Satheesh V, Anandhan S. A glossy mutant in onion (Allium cepa L.) shows decreased expression of wax biosynthesis genes. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1245308. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1245308
  24. 24. Yasmin S. Bio-ecology, taxonomic characterization and management of thrips infesting mungbean [thesis]. Dhaka (Bangladesh): Department of Entomology, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University. 2018.
  25. 25. Basri R, Ansari MS, Moraiet M, Muslim M. Influence of host plants on biological parameter of Thrips tabaci. Ann Plant Prot Sci. 2019;27. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0163.2019.00006.5
  26. 26. Ansari MS, Basri R, Shekhawat SS. Insect pests infestation during field and storage of fruits and vegetables. In: Malik A, Erginkaya Z, Erten H, editors. Health and Safety Aspects of Food Processing Technologies. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 121–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24903-8_7
  27. 27. Bernays EA, Jarzembowski EA, Malcolm SB. Evolution of insect morphology in relation to plants. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1997;333(1267):257–64. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1991.0075
  28. 28. Trichilo PJ, Leigh TF. Influence of resource quality on the reproductive fitness of flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1988;81(1):64–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/81.1.64
  29. 29. van Haperen P, Voorrips RE, van Loon JJA, Vosman B. The effect of plant development on thrips resistance in Capsicum. Arthropod-Plant Interactions. 2019;13(1):11–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-018-9645-6

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.