Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Effect of humic acid and vermicompost levels on agronomic performance and soil nutrient dynamics in Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10775
Submitted
22 July 2025
Published
13-02-2026

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the kharif season of 2024 at Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, to evaluate the effects of humic acid (HA) and vermicompost (VC) on the growth, yield and soil nutrient status of Bajra (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.). The trial followed a randomized block design (RBD) with nine treatments and three replications, including combinations of HA (5 and 10 L ha-1) and VC (2 and 4 t ha-1), along with a control. The treatment combining HA at 10 L ha-1 and VC at 4 t ha-1 showed a significantly improvement in plant height (198.4 cm), tiller number (3.2 per plant) and yield-related traits. It produced the highest grain yield (2065.8 kg ha-1) and stover yield (2706.2 kg ha-1). Nutrient uptake was also maximized under this treatment, with nitrogen (67.8 kg ha-1), phosphorus (14.2 kg ha-1) and potassium (66.4 kg ha-1) uptake being highest. Post-harvest soil analysis revealed improved fertility, with increased available N, P, K and organic carbon. These findings suggest that the combined application of HA and VC substantially enhances crop performance and soil health, offering a sustainable approach for Bajra cultivation in Typic Haplustept soils.

References

  1. 1. Acharya Balkrishna RS, Prajapati UB, Srivastava A, Joshi RA, Tripathi P. A review on bajra/pearl millet (Cenchrus americanus (L.) Morrone). J Sci Innov Res. 2024;13(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.31254/jsir.2024.13101
  2. 2. Banerjee R, Das P, Barman S, Devi S. Comprehensive analysis of millets in India: Area, production, cost of production and export statistics. Curr Agric Res J. 2024;12(3). https://doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.12.3.13
  3. 3. Abdulameer OQ, Ahmed SA. Role of humic acid in improving growth characters of corn under water stress. Iraqi J Agric Sci. 2019;50(1):420–30.
  4. 4. Blouin M, Barrere J, Meyer N, Lartigue S, Barot S, Mathieu J. Vermicompost significantly affects plant growth: A meta-analysis. Agron Sustain Dev. 2019;39(4):34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0579-x
  5. 5. Ampong K, Thilakaranthna MS, Gorim LY. Understanding the role of humic acids on crop performance and soil health. Front Agron. 2022;4:848621. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2022.848621
  6. 6. Rana KS, Choudhary AK, Sepat S, Bana RS, Dass A. Methodological and analytical agronomy. New Delhi (India): Post Graduate School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute; 2014. 276. p.
  7. 7. Rana SS, Kumar S. Research techniques in agronomy. Palampur (India): Dept. of Agronomy, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya; 2014. 64. p. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27074.58562
  8. 8. Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, editors. Methods of soil analysis. Part 3: Chemical methods. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2020.
  9. 9. Olsen SR, Sommers EL. Phosphorus soluble in sodium bicarbonate. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. 1982;2:404–30. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c24
  10. 10. Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS. Nitrogen—total. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. 1982;9:595–624. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c31
  11. 11. El-Shazly MM, Hegab RH, Ahmed AE. Effect of vermicompost, mineral and biofertilization on soil fertility and productivity of pearl millet grown in sandy soil. Egypt J Desert Res. 2023;73(2):395–410. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejdr.2023.191271.1124
  12. 12. Khan RU, Khan MZ, Khan A, Saba S, Hussain F, Jan IU. Effect of humic acid on growth and crop nutrient status of wheat on two different soils. J Plant Nutr. 2018;41(4):453–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2017.1385807
  13. 13. Kłeczek A. Agricultural use of natural biostimulants–humic substances: A review. Rocz Ochr Sr. 2022;24. https://doi.org/10.54740/ros.2022.001
  14. 14. Mansuri SA, Patel AM, Patel KN, Shakhela RR, Patel KM. Effect of zinc enriched organics on growth, yield and quality of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) in loamy sand.
  15. 15. Mohammed AA. Effect of humic acid on growth and yield of cucurbit crops: A review article. Iraq J Agric Res. 2024;28(1):89–101.
  16. 16. Toor MD, Ay A, Ullah I, Demirkaya S, Kızılkaya R, Mihoub A, et al. Vermicompost rate effects on soil fertility and morpho-physio-biochemical traits of lettuce. Horticulturae. 2024;10(4):418. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10040418
  17. 17. Rehman SU, De Castro F, Aprile A, Benedetti M, Fanizzi FP. Vermicompost: Enhancing plant growth and combating abiotic and biotic stress. Agronomy. 2023;13(4):1134. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041134
  18. 18. Saruhan V, Kusvuran A, Babat S. Effect of different humic acid fertilization on yield and yield components of common millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Sci Res Essays. 2011;6(3):663–9. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE10.1153
  19. 19. Habib A. Response of pearl millet to fertilization by mineral phosphorus, humic acid and mycorrhiza under calcareous soil conditions. Egypt J Soil Sci. 2021;61(4):399–411. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejss.2021.104285.1474
  20. 20. Daur I. Effect of humic acid on growth, protein and mineral composition of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.) fodder. Pak J Bot. 2014;46(2):505–9.
  21. 21. Paul N, Datta A, Giri U, Saha D. Effect of organic matter vis-a-vis humic acid on nutrient availability and yield attributes of rice–mustard cropping sequence. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2017;65(2):210–21.
  22. 22. Parvin L, Gharineh MH, Khodaei Joghan A, Moshatati A. Effect of different concentrations of humic acid foliar application at developmental stages on morphological characteristics and yield of triticale. J Crop Prod. 2020;12(4):77–92. https://doi.org/10.22069/ejcp.2020.16070.2201
  23. 23. Shen J, Guo MJ, Wang YG, Yuan XY, Wen YY, Song XE, et al. Humic acid improves physiological and photosynthetic characteristics of millet seedlings under drought stress. Plant Signal Behav. 2020;15(8):1774212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2020.1774212
  24. 24. Choudhary R, Yadav LR, Parihar S. Effect of vermicompost and fertility levels on growth and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.). Ann Arid Zone. 2015;54(1):59–61. https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v54i1%262.62854
  25. 25. Canellas LP, Canellas NO, da Silva Irineu LE, Olivares FL, Piccolo A. Plant chemical priming by humic acids. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2020;7(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-020-00178-4
  26. 26. Arslan E, Agar G, Aydin M. Humic acid as a biostimulant in improving drought tolerance in wheat: Expression patterns of drought-related genes. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2021;39(3):508–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-020-01266-3
  27. 27. Chethan GS, Hugar AY, Sarvajna BS, Dushyantha Kumar BM. Influence of biostimulants on growth and productivity of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) genotypes. Environ Conserv J. 2023;24(3):109–15. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.15332480

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.