Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria from vegetable-cultivated soils in Namakkal district: Isolation, characterization and biocontrol potential

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10813
Submitted
22 July 2025
Published
28-10-2025

Abstract

This study investigated plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) isolated from soil samples collected across 5 villages in Namakkal district, a region known for cereal and vegetable cultivation, with the aim of evaluating their plant growth promoting (PGP) traits and biocontrol potential as sustainable alternatives to agrochemicals. A total of 21 bacterial isolates were obtained and screened for key PGP traits, including indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and ammonia (NH3) production, hydrogen cyanide (HCN) production, phosphate solubilization (PS), nitrogen fixation (NF) and enzymatic activities (amylase, protease and cellulase), while antagonistic activity against Xanthomonas sp. was also assessed. Identification by 16S rRNA sequencing revealed that an unclassified isolate belonged to Bacillus paramycoides, which exhibited all positive PGP traits and demonstrated strong antagonistic activity against Xanthomonas sp. Molecular docking further showed that IAA had a binding affinity of -6.6 kcal/mol with the Xanthomonas sp. (6K62) protein, indicating antimicrobial potential. These findings highlight the application of PGPR, particularly B. paramycoides, in improving soil fertility, enhancing plant growth and providing biocontrol against phytopathogens, thereby reducing reliance on chemical fertilizers and pesticides.

References

  1. 1. Sharma S. Precision agriculture: reviewing the advancements, technologies andapplications in precision agriculture for improved crop productivity and resource management. RFNA. 2023;4(2):45-9. https://doi.org/10.26480/rfna.02.2023.45.49
  2. 2. Mir TA, Jan M, Rabani MS. Microbial intervention for degradation of agricultural wastes. In: Environmental biotechnology. Apple Academic Press; 2022. p. 87-111. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003277279-4
  3. 3. Nath A, Bhuyan P, Gogoi N, Deka P. Pesticides and chemical fertilizers: role in soil degradation, groundwater contamination and human health. In: Xenobiotics in urban ecosystems: sources, distribution and health impacts. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p.131-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35775-6_7
  4. 4. Hamed AS, Hidayah N. Global trade and pesticide use. In: The interplay of pesticides and climate change: environmental dynamics and challenges. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2025. p.111-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81669-7_5
  5. 5. Suleman M, Yasmin S, Rasul M, Yahya M, Atta BM, Mirza MS. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria with glucose dehydrogenase gene for phosphorus uptake and beneficial effects on wheat. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0204408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204408
  6. 6. Abdelaziz S, Belal EE, Al-Quwaie DA, Ashkan MF, Alqahtani FS, El-Tarabily KA, et al. Extremophilic bacterial strains as plant growth promoters and biocontrol agents against Pythium ultimum and Rhizoctonia solani. Plant Pathol J. 2023;105(4):1347-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-023-01460-8
  7. 7. Patani A, Prajapati D, Ali D, Kalasariya H, Yadav VK, Tank J, et al. Evaluation of the growth-inducing efficacy of various Bacillus species on the salt-stressed tomato Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1168155. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1168155
  8. 8. Chauhan PK, Upadhyay SK, Tripathi M, Singh R, Krishna D, Singh SK, et al. Understanding the salinity stress on plant and developing sustainable management strategies mediated by salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and CRISPR/Cas9. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2023;39(2):311-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2022.2131958
  9. 9. Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang S. Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology. 2004;94(11):1259-66. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto.2004.94.11.1259
  10. 10. Senthamil Selvi R, Thangaraj N. Isolation, characterization and antagonistic activity of multifaceted plant growth-promoting bacteria, including metal-tolerant Lysinibacillus macroides, from vegetable-cultivated soils in Namakkal District, Tamil Nadu, India. Biol Forum Int J. 2023;15(10):938-44.
  11. 11. Das K, Prasanna R, Saxena AK. RhizFobia: a potential biocontrol agent for soilborne fungal pathogens. Folia Microbiol. 2017;62(5):425-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-017-0513-z
  12. 12. Bonaterra A, Badosa E, Daranas N, Francés J, Roselló G, Montesinos E. Bacteria as biological control agents of plant diseases. Microorganisms. 2022;10(9):1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091759
  13. 13. Wu D, Wang W, Yao Y, Li H, Wang Q, Niu B. Microbial interactions within beneficial consortia promote soil health. Sci Total Environ. 2023;900:165801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165801
  14. 14. Krishnan KS, Rangasamy A, Arunan YE, Dananjeyan B, Subramanium T, Saminathan V. Microbial inoculants-fostering sustainability in groundnut production. Sci Prog. 2025;108(2):1-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504251338943
  15. 15. Chai R, Li F, Gao Y, Liu D, Shang D, Yang Y, et al. Unveiling preferred chemoattractants for rhizosphere PGPR colonization by molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. Comput Electron Agric. 2024;225:109266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109266
  16. 16. Holt JG, Kriey NR, Sneath PHA, Staley JT. Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. 9th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1994.
  17. 17. Bric JM, Bostock RM, Silverstone SE. Rapid in situ assay for indoleacetic acid production by bacteria immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991;57(2):535-8. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.57.2.535-538.1991
  18. 18. Cappuccino JG, Sherman N. Microbiology: a laboratory manual. 3rd ed. California: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Inc; 1992.
  19. 19. Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS. Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth-promoting activities. Microbiol Res. 2008;163(2):173-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2006.04.001
  20. 20. Oo KT, Khai AA, Kyaw EP, Win TT, Htet WT. Isolation and screening of multifunctional plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria from rhizosphere of different crop fields. J Sci Innov Res. 2021;10(2):53-62. https://doi.org/10.31254/jsir.2021.10205
  21. 21. Geetha K, Venkatesham E, Hindumathi A, Bhadraiah B. Isolation, screening and characterization of plant growth-promoting bacteria and their effect on Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2014;3(6):799-99.
  22. 22. Ponmurugan K, Sankaranarayanan A, Al-Dharbi NA. Biological activities of plant growth-promoting Azotobacter sp. isolated from vegetable crop rhizosphere soils. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2012;6(4):1-10.
  23. 23. Kumar M, Giri VP, Pandey S, Gupta A, Patel MK, Bajpai AB, et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria emerging as an effective bioinoculant to improve the growth, production and stress tolerance of vegetable crops. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(22):12245. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212245
  24. 24. Singh D, Thapa S, Singh JP, Mahawar H, Saxena AK, Singh SK, et al. Prospecting the potential of plant growth-promoting microorganisms for mitigating drought stress in crop plants. Curr Microbiol. 2024;81(3):84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03606-4
  25. 25. Ahmad E, Sharma PK, Khan MS. IAA biosynthesis in bacteria and its role in plant-microbe interaction for drought stress management. In: Plant stress mitigators: action and application. 2022. p.235-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7759-5_12
  26. 26. Pongsilp N, Nimnoi P. Effects of co-inoculation of indole-3-acetic acid- and ammonia-producing bacteria on plant growth and nutrition, soil elements and the relationships of soil microbiomes with soil physicochemical parameters. Open Agric. 2024;9(1):20220248. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0248
  27. 27. Schippers B, Bakker AW, Bakker PA, Van Peer R. Beneficial and deleterious effects of HCN-producing pseudomonads on rhizosphere interactions. Plant Soil. 1990;129(1):75-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011693
  28. 28. Shaikh SS, Sayyed RZ. Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their formulation in biocontrol of plant diseases. In: Plant microbes symbiosis: applied facets. New Delhi: Springer India; 2014. p.337-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2068-8_18
  29. 29. Fatima T, Verma P, Verma S, Alaylar B, Arora NK. Role of metabolites produced by plant growth-promoting bacteria in biocontrol of phytopathogens under saline conditions. In: Microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture. Volume 1. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2022. p.287-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4843-4_9
  30. 30. Chea L, Pfeiffer B, Schneider D, Daniel R, Pawelzik E, Naumann M. Morphological and metabolite responses of potatoes under various phosphorus levels and their amelioration by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(10):5162. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105162
  31. 31. Timofeeva A, Galyamova M, Sedykh S. Prospects for using phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms as natural fertilizers in agriculture. Plants. 2022;11(16):2119. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162119
  32. 32. Choudhury D, Tarafdar S, Dutta S. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their eco-friendly strategies for plant growth regulation: a review. Plant Sci Today. 2022;9(3):524-37. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.1604
  33. 33. Mghazli N, Bruneel O, Zouagui R, Hakkou R, Sbabou L. Characterization of plant growth-promoting activities of indigenous bacteria of phosphate mine wastes: a first step toward revegetation. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1026991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1026991
  34. 34. El-Sersawy MM, Hassan SE, El-Ghamry AA, El-Gwad AMA, Fouda A. Implication of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria of Bacillus spp. as biocontrol agents against wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlecht. in Vicia faba L. Biomol Concepts. 2021;12(1):197-214. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmc-2021-0020
  35. 35. Ngalimat MS, Mohd Hata E, Zulperi D, Ismail SI, Ismail MR, Mohd Zainudin NA, et al. Plant growth-promoting bacteria as an emerging tool to manage bacterial rice pathogens. Microorganisms. 2021;9(4):682. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040682
  36. 36. Duhan L, Pasrija R. Phytohormone-regulated defense mechanisms in plants against Macrophomina phaseolina infection. Plant Pathol J. 2025;28:1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-025-01974-3
  37. 37. Nguyen-Ngoc H, Nguyen CQ, Vo KA, Nguyen TT, Nghiem DT, Ha NT, et al. Insight into the role of phytoalexin naringenin and phytohormone abscisic acid in defense against phytopathogens Phytophthora infestans and Magnaporthe oryzae: in vitro and in silico approaches. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2023;127:102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2023.102123

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.