Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Early Access

Enhancing salt stress tolerance in tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) through biostimulants

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10854
Submitted
23 July 2025
Published
12-03-2026

Abstract

Biostimulants are substances or microorganisms applied in small quantities, improve plant growth and productivity by modulating their natural biological processes, distinct from fertilisers and pesticides. Derived from natural sources such as plant extracts, algae or beneficial microorganisms, they enhance nutrient uptake and tolerance to abiotic stress. In tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) exposed to salt stress, the application of biostimulants, including a combination of 70 % biofertilizer and 30 % biocompost (Bf70/Bc30), improved vegetative growth, photosynthesis and membrane stability while reducing malondialdehyde and excessive proline accumulation. These treatments also regulate the expression of genes related to proline biosynthesis and antioxidant activity, enhancing tolerance to salt stress. Thus, biostimulants constitute a sustainable approach to improve yield, quality and resilience of tomatoes, while reducing dependence on chemical inputs.

References

  1. 1. Du Jardin P. Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci Hortic. 2015;196:3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021
  2. 2. Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil. 2014;383(1-2):3-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8
  3. 3. Zavarzina AG, Danchenko NN, Demin VV, Artemyeva ZS, Kogut BM. Humic substances: hypotheses and reality (a review). Eurasian Soil Sci. 2021;54(12):1826-54. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321120164
  4. 4. Ricci M, Tilbury L, Daridon B, Sukalac K. General principles to justify plant biostimulant claims. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:494. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00494
  5. 5. Lucini L, Cattivelli L, Gallo M. Biostimulants: A new opportunity for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:100.
  6. 6. Ali S, Akhtar MS, Siraj M, Zaman W. Molecular communication of microbial plant biostimulants in the rhizosphere under abiotic stress conditions. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(22):12424. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212424
  7. 7. Boutaleb N. Biostimulants for sustainable crop production. In: Y Rouphael, P du Jardin, P Brown, S De Pascale, G Colla, editors [Book review]. J Environ Sci Health. 2024;1-3.
  8. 8. Kauffman GL, Kneivel DP, Watschke TL. Effects of a biostimulant on the heat tolerance associated with photosynthetic capacity, membrane thermostability and polyphenol production of perennial ryegrass. Crop Sci. 2007;47(1):261-7. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.03.0171
  9. 9. Franzoni G, Cocetta G, Prinsi B, Ferrante A, Espen L. Biostimulants on crops: Their impact under abiotic stress conditions. Horticulturae. 2022;8(3):189. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8030189
  10. 10. Colla G, Cardarelli M, Bonini P, Rouphael Y. Foliar applications of protein hydrolysate, plant and seaweed extracts increase yield but differentially modulate fruit quality of greenhouse tomato. HortScience. 2017;52(9):1214-20. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI12200-17
  11. 11. El Malahi S, Touhami D, Ganoudi M, Ennami M, Maach M, Idrissi Hassani LM, et al. Harnessing the power of microbial allies: AMF and PGPR as biostimulants for sustainable bioeconomy development in the global south. In: Sustainable bioeconomy development in the global south: volume I status and perspectives. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2025. p. 261-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0640-5_10
  12. 12. Vaseva II, Simova-Stoilova L, Kostadinova A, Yuperlieva-Mateeva B, Karakicheva T, Vassileva V. Heat-stress-mitigating effects of a protein-hydrolysate-based biostimulant are linked to changes in protease, DHN and HSP gene expression in maize. Agronomy. 2022;12(5):1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051127
  13. 13. Bulgari R, Cocetta G, Trivellini A, Vernieri P, Ferrante A. Biostimulants and crop responses: A review. Biol Agric Hortic. 2015;31(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2014.964649
  14. 14. Caradonia F, Battaglia V, Righi L, Pascali G, La Torre A. Plant biostimulant regulatory framework: Prospects in Europe and current situation at international level. J Plant Growth Regul. 2018;37(1):1-11.
  15. 15. Van Oosten MJ, Pepe O, De Pascale S, Silletti S, Maggio A. The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2017;4:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-017-0089-5
  16. 16. Nardi S, Carletti P, Pizzeghello D, Muscolo A. Biological activities of humic substances. In: Senesi N, Xing B, Huang PM, editors. Biophysico-chemical processes involving natural nonliving organic matter in environmental systems. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2009. p. 305-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470494950.ch8
  17. 17. Kumar A, Patel JS, Meena VS. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: strategies to improve abiotic stresses under sustainable agriculture. J Plant Nutr. 2019;42(11):1383-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.1616757
  18. 18. Bhat MA, Kumar V, Wani IA, Dar FL. Mechanistic insights of the interaction of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) with plant roots toward enhancing plant productivity by alleviating salinity stress. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1952. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01952
  19. 19. Adesemoye AO, Torbert HA. Enhanced plant nutrient use efficiency with PGPR and AMF in an integrated nutrient management system. Can J Microbiol. 2008;54(10):875-9. https://doi.org/10.1139/W08-081
  20. 20. Diagne N, Djighaly PI, Ngom M, Hocher V. Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant growth and performance: Importance in biotic and abiotic stressed regulation. Diversity. 2020;12(10):370. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12100370
  21. 21. Mitra D, Pellegrini M, Guerra-Sierra BE. Interaction between plants and growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for sustainable development. Bacteria. 2024;3(3):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria3030009
  22. 22. Enebe MC, Babalola OO. The influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in plant tolerance to abiotic stress: A survival strategy. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102(18):7821-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9214-z
  23. 23. Zhang H, Kim MS, Sun Y, Dowd SE, Shi H, Paré PW. Soil bacteria confer plant salt tolerance by tissue-specific regulation of the sodium transporter HKT1. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2008;21(6):737-44. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-21-6-0737
  24. 24. Rose MT, Patti AF, Little KR, Brown AL, Jackson WR, Cavagnaro TR. A meta-analysis and review of plant-growth response to humic substances: practical implications for agriculture. In: Sparks DL, editor. Advances in Agronomy. Vol 124. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2014:37-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800138-7.00002-4
  25. 25. Eyheraguibel B, Silvestre J, Morard P. Effects of humic substances derived from organic waste enhancement on the growth and mineral nutrition of maize. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(10):4206-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.08.082
  26. 26. Jindo K, Suto K, Matsumoto K, García C, Sonoki T, Sánchez-Monedero MA. Chemical and biochemical characterisation of biochar-blended composts prepared from poultry manure. Bioresour Technol. 2012;110:396-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.120
  27. 27. Olivares FL, Aguiar NO, Rosa RCC, Canellas LP. Substrate biofortification in combination with foliar sprays of plant growth promoting bacteria and humic substances boosts production of organic tomatoes. Sci Hortic. 2015;183:100-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.11.012
  28. 28. Schiavon M, Pizzeghello D, Muscolo A, Vaccaro S, Francioso O, Nardi S. High molecular size humic substances enhance phenylpropanoid metabolism in maize (Zea mays L.). J Chem Ecol. 2010;36(6):662-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9790-6
  29. 29. Canellas LP, Olivares FL, Aguiar NO, Jones DL, Nebbioso A, Mazzei P, et al. Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic. 2015;196:15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013
  30. 30. Ali O, Ramsubhag A, Jayaraman J. Biostimulant properties of seaweed extracts in plants: Implications towards sustainable crop production. Plants. 2021;10(3):531. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030531
  31. 31. Vranova V, Rejsek K, Skene KR, Janous D, Formanek P. Non-protein amino acids: Plant, soil and ecosystem interactions. Plant Soil. 2011;342(1-2):31-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0673-y
  32. 32. Chen THH, Murata N. Glycinebetaine protects plants against abiotic stress: mechanisms and biotechnological applications. Plant Cell Environ. 2011;34(1):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02232.x
  33. 33. Colla G, Nardi S, Cardarelli M, Ertani A, Lucini L, Canaguier R, et al. Protein Hydrolysates as Biostimulants in Horticulture. Sci Hortic. 2015;196:28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.08.037
  34. 34. Schiavon M, Ertani A, Nardi S. Effects of an Alfalfa protein hydrolysate on the gene expression and activity of enzymes of the Tricarboxylic Acid (TCA) Cycle and nitrogen metabolism in Zea mays L. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(24):11800-08. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf802362g
  35. 35. Craigie JS. Seaweed extract stimuli in plant science and agriculture. J Appl Phycol. 2011;23(3):371-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9560-4
  36. 36. Khan W, Rayirath UP, Subramanian S, Jithesh MN, Rayorath P, Hodges DM, et al. Seaweed extracts as biostimulants of plant growth and development. J Plant Growth Regul. 2009;28(4):386-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-009-9103-x
  37. 37. Craigie JS, MacKinnon SL, Walter JA. Liquid seaweed extracts identified using ¹H NMR profiles. J Appl Phycol. 2008;20(5):665-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-007-9232-1
  38. 38. Wally OSD, Critchley AT, Hiltz D, Craigie JS, Han X, Zaharia LI, et al. Regulation of phytohormone biosynthesis and accumulation in Arabidopsis following treatment with commercial extract from the marine macroalga Ascophyllum nodosum. J Plant Growth Regul. 2013;32(2):324-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-012-9301-9
  39. 39. Battacharyya D, Babgohari MZ, Rathor P, Prithiviraj B. Seaweed extracts as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic. 2015;196:39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.012
  40. 40. Bulgari R, Trivellini A, Ferrante A. Effects of two doses of organic extract-based biostimulant on greenhouse lettuce grown under increasing NaCl concentrations. Front Plant Sci. 2019;9:1870. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01870
  41. 41. Seiber JN, Coats J, Duke SO, Gross AD. Biopesticides: state of the art and future opportunities. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62(48):11613-19. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf504252n
  42. 42. Hasanuzzaman M, Parvin K, Bardhan K, Nahar K, Anee TI, Masud AAC, et al. Biostimulants for the regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolism in plants under abiotic stress. Cells. 2021;10(10):2537. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102537
  43. 43. Azad MOK, Park BS, Adnan M, Germ M, Kreft I, Woo SH, et al. Silicon biostimulant enhances the growth characteristics and fortifies the bioactive compounds in common and Tartary Buckwheat Plant. J Crop Sci Biotechnol. 2021;24(1):51-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-020-00058-1
  44. 44. Savvas D, Ntatsi G. Biostimulant activity of silicon in horticulture. Sci Hortic. 2015;196:66-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.010
  45. 45. Pilon-Smits EAH, Quinn CF. Physiological functions of beneficial elements. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009;12(3):267-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.04.009
  46. 46. Ruzzi M, Aroca R. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria act as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic. 2015;196:124-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.08.042
  47. 47. Turan M, Yildirim E, Kitir N, Unek C, Nikerel E, Ozdemir BS, et al. Beneficial role of plant growth-promoting bacteria in vegetable production under abiotic stress. In: Zaidi A, Khan MS, editors. Microbial Strategies for Vegetable Production. Cham: Springer; 2017:151-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54401-4_7
  48. 48. Glick BR. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica. 2012;2012:963401. https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401
  49. 49. Khan MN. Nano-titanium Dioxide (Nano-TiO₂) mitigates NaCl stress by enhancing antioxidative enzymes and accumulation of compatible solutes in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). J Plant Sci. 2016;11(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.3923/jps.2016.1.11
  50. 50. Juárez-Maldonado A, Ortega-Ortíz H, Morales-Díaz A, González-Morales S, Morelos-Moreno Á, Cabrera-De la Fuente M, et al. Nanoparticles and nanomaterials as plant biostimulants. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(1):162. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20010162
  51. 51. Raliya R, Nair R, Chavalmane S, Wang WN, Biswas P. Mechanistic evaluation of translocation and physiological impact of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles on the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plant. Metallomics. 2015;7(12):1584-94. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5MT00168D
  52. 52. Staykov D, Ivanov S, Petrov V. Mechanisms of action of biostimulants in plant stress responses. Biol Agric Hortic. 2021;37(3):174-88.
  53. 53. Omidbakhshfard MA, Sujeeth N, Gupta S, Omranian N, Guinan KJ, Brotman Y, et al. A biostimulant obtained from the seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum protects Arabidopsis Thaliana from severe oxidative stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(2):474. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020474
  54. 54. Mariani L, Ferrante A. Agronomic management for enhancing plant tolerance to abiotic stresses—drought, salinity, hypoxia and lodging. Horticulturae. 2017;3(4):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae3040052
  55. 55. Campobenedetto C, Mannino G, Beekwilder M, Contartese V, Karlova R, Bertea CM. The application of a biostimulant based on tannins affects root architecture and improves tolerance to salinity in tomato plants. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):354. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79770-5
  56. 56. Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48(12):909-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016
  57. 57. Moncada A, Vetrano F, Esposito A, Miceli A. Protein hydrolysates and their role in salinity stress mitigation in horticultural crops. Biol Agric Hortic. 2020;36(1):76-90.
  58. 58. Sorrentino M, Panzarová K, Spyroglou I, Apone F, Colucci MG. Enhancing salinity tolerance in crops with protein hydrolysates. Biol Agric Hortic. 2021;37(1):85-100.
  59. 59. Hamaoui B, Abbadi JM, Burdman S, Rashid A, Sarig S, Okon Y. Effects of inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) and faba beans (Vicia faba) under different growth conditions. Agronomie. 2003;21(6-7):553-60. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2001144
  60. 60. Foyer CH, Noctor G. Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell. 2005;17(7):1866-75. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.033589
  61. 61. Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:373-99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701
  62. 62. Keunen E, Peshev D, Vangronsveld J, Van Den Ende W, Cuypers A. Plant sugars are crucial players in the oxidative challenge during abiotic stress: extending the traditional concept. Plant Cell Environ. 2013;36(7):1242-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12061
  63. 63. Sun C, Gao X, Chen X, Fu J, Zhang Y. Metabolic response of maize (Zea mays L.) plants to combined drought and salt stress. Plant Soil. 2013;368(1-2):507-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2309-0
  64. 64. Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta. 2003;218(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5
  65. 65. Petrussa E, Braidot E, Zancani M, Peresson C, Bertolini A, Patui S, et al. Plant flavonoids—biosynthesis, transport and involvement in stress responses. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(7):14950-73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140714950
  66. 66. Gallie DR. The role of L-ascorbic acid recycling in responding to environmental stress and in promoting plant growth. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:263. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers330
  67. 67. Singh M, Singh PK. Enhancing growth and drought tolerance in tomato through arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Rodriguésia. 2024;75:e00482024. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860202475079
  68. 68. Havaux M. Carotenoid oxidation products as stress signals in plants. Plant J. 2014;79(4):597-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12386
  69. 69. Wasternack C, Hause B. Jasmonates: biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. Ann Bot. 2013;111(6):1021-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct067
  70. 70. Peleg Z, Blumwald E. Hormone balance and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011;14(3):290-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2011.02.001
  71. 71. Choudhury FK, Rivero RM, Blumwald E, Mittler R. Reactive oxygen species, abiotic stress and stress combination. Plant J. 2017;90(5):856-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13299
  72. 72. Szőllősi R. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and abiotic stress tolerance in plants: An overview. In: Ahmad P, editor. Oxidative Damage to Plants. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2014:89-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799963-0.00003-4
  73. 73. Aziz A, Poinssot B, Daire X, Adrian M, Bezier A, Lambert B, et al. Laminarin elicits defense responses in grapevine and induces protection against Botrytis cinerea and Plasmopara viticola. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2003;16(12):1118-28. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.12.1118
  74. 74. Spann TM, Little HA. Applications of a commercial extract of the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum increases drought tolerance in container-grown 'Hamlin' sweet orange nursery trees. HortScience. 2011;46(4):577-82. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.46.4.577
  75. 75. Mancuso S, Azzarello E, Mugnai S, Briand X. Marine bioactive substances (IPA extract) improve foliar ion uptake and water stress tolerance in potted Vitis vinifera plants. Adv Hortic Sci. 2006;20(2):156-61.
  76. 76. Billard V, Etienne P, Jannin L, Garnica M, Cruz F, Garcia-Mina JM, et al. Two biostimulants derived from algae or humic acid induce similar responses in the mineral content and gene expression of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). J Plant Growth Regul. 2014;33(2):305-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-013-9372-2
  77. 77. Miceli A, Moncada A, D'Anna F. Effect of salt stress in lettuce cultivation. Acta Hortic. 2003;609:371-5. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.609.56
  78. 78. Kaya C, Higgs D, Sakar E. Response of two leafy vegetables grown at high salinity to supplementary potassium and phosphorus during different growth stages. J Plant Nutr. 2002;25(12):2663-76. https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-120015530
  79. 79. Taïbi K, Taïbi F, Ait Abderrahim L, Ennajah A, Belkhodja M, Mulet JM. Effect of salt stress on growth, chlorophyll content, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant defence systems in Phaseolus vulgaris L. S Afr J Bot. 2016;105:306-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.03.011
  80. 80. Yarsi G, Sivaci A, Dasgan HY, Altuntas O, Binzet R, Akhoundnejad Y. Effects of salinity stress on chlorophyll and carotenoid contents and stomata size of grafted and ungrafted galia C8 melon cultivar. Pak J Bot. 2017;49(2):421-6.
  81. 81. Xu C, Mou B. Responses of spinach to salinity and nutrient deficiency in growth, physiology and nutritional value. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2016;141(1):12-21. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.141.1.12
  82. 82. Bano S, Ashraf M, Akram NA, Al-Qurainy F. Regulation in some vital physiological attributes and antioxidative defense system in carrot (Daucus carota L.) under saline stress. J Appl Bot Food Qual. 2012;85(2):105-15.
  83. 83. Lucini L, Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Canaguier R, Kumar P, Colla G. The effect of a plant-derived biostimulant on metabolic profiling and crop performance of lettuce grown under saline conditions. Sci Hortic. 2015;182:124-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.11.022
  84. 84. Barassi CA, Ayrault G, Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Sobrero MT. Seed inoculation with Azospirillum mitigates NaCl effects on lettuce. Sci Hortic. 2006;109(1):8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.02.025
  85. 85. Del Amor FM, Cuadra-Crespo P. Plant growth-promoting bacteria as a tool to improve salinity tolerance in sweet pepper. Funct Plant Biol. 2012;39(1):82-90. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP11173
  86. 86. Fasciglione G, Casanovas EM, Quillehauquy V, Yommi AK, Goñi MG, Roura SI, et al. Azospirillum inoculation effects on growth, product quality and storage life of lettuce plants grown under salt stress. Sci Hortic. 2015;195:154-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.015
  87. 87. Guinan KJ, Sujeeth N, Copeland RB, Jones PW, O’Brien NM, Sharma HSS, et al. Discrete roles for extracts of Ascophyllum nodosum in enhancing plant growth and tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses. Acta Hortic. 2013;1009:127-35. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.1009.15
  88. 88. El Arroussi H, Benhima R, Elbaouchi A, Sijilmassi B, El Mernissi N, Aafsar A, et al. Dunaliella salina exopolysaccharides: a promising biostimulant for salt stress tolerance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). J Appl Phycol. 2018;30(5):2929-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-017-1382-1
  89. 89. Abdel Latef AAH, Srivastava AK, Saber H, Alwaleed EA, Tran LSP. Sargassum muticum and Jania rubens regulate amino acid metabolism to improve growth and alleviate salinity in chickpea. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10537. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07692-w
  90. 90. Rady MM, Varma B, Howladar SM. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seedlings overcome NaCl stress as a result of presoaking in Moringa oleifera leaf extract. Sci Hortic. 2013;162:63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.07.046
  91. 91. Rady MM, Desoky ESM, Elrys AS, Boghdady MS. Can licorice root extract be used as an effective natural biostimulant for salt-stressed common bean plants? S Afr J Bot. 2019;121:294-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2018.11.019
  92. 92. Yildirim E, Taylor AG, Spittler TD. Ameliorative effects of biological treatments on growth of squash plants under salt stress. Sci Hortic. 2006;111(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.08.003
  93. 93. Çimrin KM, Türkmen Ö, Turan M, Tuncer B. Phosphorus and humic acid application alleviate salinity stress of pepper seedling. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9(36):5845-51.
  94. 94. Maach M, Boudouasar K, Akodad M, Skalli A, Moumen A, Baghour M. Application of biostimulants improves yield and fruit quality in tomato. Int J Veg Sci. 2020;27(3):288-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2020.1780536
  95. 95. Maach M, Boudouasar K, Akodad M, Skalli A, Moumen A, Bellahcen S, et al. The effect of Tecamin Brix-V2 in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit under salt stress. Plant Sci Today. 2023;10(4):72-7. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2320
  96. 96. Splittstoesser WE. Vegetable growing handbook: Organic and traditional methods. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1990.
  97. 97. Chanthini KM, Senthil-Nathan S, Pavithra G, Asahel AS, Malarvizhi P, Murugan P, et al. The Macroalgal biostimulant improves the functional quality of tomato fruits produced from plants grown under salt stress. Agriculture. 2023;13(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13010006
  98. 98. Choi SH, Kim DS, Kozukue N, Kim HJ, Nishitani Y, Mizuno M, et al. Protein, free amino acid, phenolic, β-carotene and lycopene content in 12 greenhouse-grown cherry tomato varieties. J Food Compos Anal. 2014;34(1):115-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2014.03.005
  99. 99. Shrivastava P, Kumar R. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2015;22(2):123-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001
  100. 100. Hussein MH, Eltanahy E, Al Bakry AF, Elsafty N, Elshamy MM. Seaweed extracts as prospective plant growth bio-stimulant and salinity stress alleviator for Vigna sinensis and Zea mays. J Appl Phycol. 2021;33(2):1273-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02330-x
  101. 101. Kalaivani K, Kalaiselvi MM, Senthil-Nathan S. Effect of Methyl Salicylate (MeSA) induced changes in rice plant that affect growth and development of the rice leaffolder. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;101:116-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2017.07.001
  102. 102. Abdelaziz ME, Abdelsattar M, Abdeldaym EA, Atia MA, Mahmoud AW, Saad MM, et al. Piriformospora indica alters Na+/K+ homeostasis, antioxidant enzymes and LeNHX1 expression of greenhouse tomato grown under salt stress. Sci Hortic. 2019;256:108532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.05.059
  103. 103. Crozier A, Jaganath IB, Clifford MN. Phenols, polyphenols and tannins: an overview. In: Crozier A, Clifford MN, Ashihara H, editors. Plant secondary metabolites: occurrence, structure and role in the human diet. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2006. p. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470988558.ch1
  104. 104. Sharma HSS, Fleming C, Selby C, Rao JR, Martin T. Plant biostimulants: A review on the processing of macroalgae and use of extracts for crop management to reduce abiotic and biotic stresses. J Appl Phycol. 2014;26(1):465-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-013-0101-9
  105. 105. Tavallali V, Rahemi M, Eshghi S, Kholdebarin B, Ramezanian A. Zinc alleviates salt stress and increases antioxidant enzyme activity in the leaves of pistachio (Pistacia vera L. ‘Badami’) seedlings. Turk J Agric For. 2012;34(4):349-59.
  106. 106. Di Mola I, Ottaiano L, Cozzolino E, El-Nakhel C, Fiorentino N, Pelosi ME, et al. Impact of salinity and biostimulants on cherry tomato yield and quality. Horticulturae. 2024;10(12):1239. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10121239
  107. 107. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Soil Salinization as a Global Major Challenge [Internet]. Rome: FAO; 2021 [cited 2025 Jul 10]. https://www.fao.org/soils-portal
  108. 108. Naeem M, Waseem M, Zhu Z, Zhang L. Downregulation of SlGRAS15 manipulates plant architecture in tomato. Dev Genes Evol. 2020;230(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-019-00643-7
  109. 109. Han X, Li D, Kang Y, Wan S. Effect of saline water drip irrigation on tomato yield. Irrig Sci. 2024;42(3):387-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00870-x
  110. 110. Hernández-Herrera RM, Sánchez-Hernández CV, Palmeros-Suárez PA, Ocampo-Alvarez H, Santacruz-Ruvalcaba F, Meza-Canales ID, et al. Seaweed extract improves growth of tomato. Agronomy. 2022;12(10):2495. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102495
  111. 111. Ikuyinminu E, Goñi O, O’Connell S. Enhancing irrigation salinity stress tolerance in tomato. Agronomy. 2022;12(4):809. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040809
  112. 112. Malash NM, Flowers TJ, Ragab R. Effect of irrigation methods and water salinity on tomato yield. Irrig Sci. 2008;26(4):313-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-007-0095-7
  113. 113. Gedeon S, Ioannou A, Balestrini R, Fotopoulos V, Antoniou C. Application of biostimulants in tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) to enhance plant growth and salt stress tolerance. Plants. 2022;11(22):3082. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223082
  114. 114. Machado R, Serralheiro R. Soil salinity: Effect on vegetable crop growth. Management practices to prevent and mitigate soil salinization. Horticulturae. 2017;3(2):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae3020030
  115. 115. Zhang P, Senge M, Dai Y. Effects of salinity stress on growth, yield, fruit quality and water use efficiency of tomato under hydroponics system. Rev Agric Sci. 2016;4:46-55. https://doi.org/10.7831/ras.4.46
  116. 116. Rachidi F, Benhima R, Sbabou L, El Arroussi H. Microalgae polysaccharides bio-stimulating effect on tomato plants: Growth and metabolic distribution. Biotechnol Rep. 2020;25:e00426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00426
  117. 117. Zou P, Lu X, Zhao H, Yuan Y, Meng L, Zhang C, et al. Polysaccharides derived from the brown algae Lessonia nigrescens enhance salt stress tolerance to wheat seedlings by enhancing the antioxidant system and modulating intracellular ion concentration. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00048
  118. 118. Huot B, Yao J, Montgomery BL, He SY. Growth–defense tradeoffs in plants: A balancing act to optimize fitness. Mol Plant. 2014;7(8):1267-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssu049
  119. 119. Alfosea-Simón M, Zavala-Gonzalez EA, Camara-Zapata JM, Martínez-Nicolás JJ, Simón I, Simón-Grao S, et al. Effect of foliar application of amino acids on the salinity tolerance of tomato plants cultivated under hydroponic system. Sci Hortic. 2020;272:109509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109509
  120. 120. Gharbi F, Zribi L, Daly A, Rejeb S, Hanchi B. Photosynthetic responses of tomato leaves to salt and cadmium stresses: Growth and chlorophyll a fluorescence kinetic analyses. Pol J Environ Stud. 2018;27(6):2499-508. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/81066
  121. 121. Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR. Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2004;42(6):565-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.05.009
  122. 122. Cerdán M, Sánchez-Sánchez A, Jordá JD, Juárez M, Sánchez-Andreu J. Effect of commercial amino acids on iron nutrition of tomato plants grown under lime-induced iron deficiency. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2013;176(6):859-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201200525
  123. 123. Koleška I, Hasanagić D, Todorović V, Murtić S, Klokić I, Paradiković N, et al. Biostimulant prevents yield loss and reduces oxidative damage in tomato plants grown on reduced NPK nutrition. J Plant Interact. 2017;12(1):209-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2017.1319503
  124. 124. Qi M, Liu Y, Li T. Nano-TiO₂ improve the photosynthesis of tomato leaves under mild heat stress. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2013;156(1-3):323-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-013-9833-2
  125. 125. Ogweno JO, Song XS, Shi K, Hu WH, Mao WH, Zhou YH, et al. Brassinosteroids alleviate heat-induced inhibition of photosynthesis by increasing carboxylation efficiency and enhancing antioxidant systems in Lycopersicon esculentum. J Plant Growth Regul. 2008;27(1):49-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-007-9030-7
  126. 126. Goñi O, Quille P, O'Connell S. Ascophyllum nodosum extract biostimulants and their role in enhancing tolerance to drought stress in tomato plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018;126:63-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.02.024
  127. 127. El Boukhari MEM, Barakate M, Bouhia Y, Lyamlouli K. Trends in seaweed extract based biostimulants: Manufacturing process and beneficial effect on soil-plant systems. Plants. 2020;9(3):359. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9030359
  128. 128. Petrozza A, Summerer S, Di Tommaso G, Di Tommaso D, Piaggesi A. An evaluation of tomato plant root development and morpho-physiological response treated with VIVA® by image analysis. Acta Hortic. 2013;1009:155-9. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.1009.19
  129. 129. Assouguem A, Lahlali R, Meddich A. Comparative effects of compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi versus npk on agro-physiological, biochemical and tolerance responses of tomatoes to drought. Phyton-Int J Exp Bot. 2024;93:1-20. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2024.057881
  130. 130. Shahrajabian MH, Sun W. The importance of salicylic acid, humic acid and fulvic acid on crop production. Lett Drug Des Discov. 2024;21(9):1465-80. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570180820666230411102209
  131. 131. Nkebiwe PM, Stevens Lekfeldt JD, Symanczik S, Thonar C, Mäder P, Bar-Tal A, et al. Effectiveness of bio-effectors on maize, wheat and tomato performance and phosphorus acquisition from greenhouse to field scales in Europe and Israel: a meta-analysis. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1333249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1333249
  132. 132. David-Rogeat N. The growth and nutritional quality of the African eggplant under abiotic stress [doctoral dissertation]. Nottingham: University of Nottingham; 2021. http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/77844
  133. 133. Kanojia A, Lyall R, Sujeeth N, Alseekh S, Martínez-Rivas FJ, Fernie AR, et al. Physiological and molecular insights into the effect of a seaweed biostimulant on enhancing fruit yield and drought tolerance in tomato. Plant Stress. 2024;14:100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2024.100692

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.