Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Engagement of youth in coconut farming and its entrepreneurial behaviour assessment in FPO

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11136
Submitted
5 August 2025
Published
22-10-2025

Abstract

Coconut-based Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs) have emerged as vital platforms for promoting youth entrepreneurship in India’s agricultural sector. Given the crop’s economic significance and value chain potential, particularly in Tamil Nadu, this study examines the entrepreneurial behaviour of rural youth engaged in coconut-focused FPOs. An Entrepreneurial Behaviour Index (EBI) was developed, comprising ten dimensions: innovativeness, achievement motivation, decision-making ability, risk-taking, leadership, market perception, entrepreneurial orientation, information-seeking behaviour, knowledgeability and feedback usage. Each dimension was represented by statements rated on a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Content validity was ensured through expert judgment and items with a relevancy weightage ≥ 0.75 were retained. Weighted scores were normalised and aggregated to derive the overall EBI. The study surveyed 200 rural youth affiliated with coconut FPOs across Coimbatore, Tiruppur, Erode and Dindigul districts using a structured questionnaire. Reliability testing with Cronbach’s alpha yielded coefficients above 0.70, confirming internal consistency, while construct validity was established through expert review and theoretical alignment. Findings revealed that 62 % of respondents exhibited medium levels of entrepreneurial behaviour, 27 % high and 11 % low. Stronger competencies were observed in feedback usage, achievement motivation and decision-making, while innovativeness and risk-taking showed scope for improvement. This study differs from earlier work by focusing on coconut-based FPOs, an underexplored crop-specific context and by adopting a youth-centric lens. Moreover, it introduces a validated EBI offering a rigorous tool to assess entrepreneurial competencies in rural agripreneurship.

References

  1. 1. Akrong R, Mbogoh SG, Irungu P. Youth agripreneurship in the horticultural value-chain: The case of small-scale mango farmers in Southern Ghana. Afr Dev Rev. 2020;32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12483
  2. 2. Anitha S. Agricultural innovations to scale up productivity and income from coconut farming. Indian Farming. 2021;71(11). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IndFarm/article/view/118185.
  3. 3. Coconut Development Board. New Delhi: Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India. 2016. www.coconutboard.nic.in
  4. 4. Coconut Development Board. All India final estimates of area and production of coconut.2023 - 24. New Delhi: Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India. 2024. https://coconutboard.gov.in/Statistics.
  5. 5. Deepthi V, Karunasree E, Venkata Subbaiah K, Reddy RVSK, Shali Raju G, Devivaraprasad Reddy A, et al. Impact of FoCT training on adoption of coconut tree climbing device for harvesting coconuts. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2017;6(6S):530–2.
  6. 6. Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports. National Youth Policy 2021. Press Information Bureau. Government of India. 2021. https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/specificdocs/documents/2022/may/doc20225553401.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
  7. 7. Choithani C, van Duijne RJ, Nijman J. Changing livelihoods at India’s rural–urban transition. World Dev. 2021;146:105617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105617
  8. 8. Ezeudu TS, Tukur B. Examining the effects of high poverty and unemployment on rural-urban migration in Nigeria and its consequences on urban resources and rural decline. J Child Adult Vacc Immunol. 2024;8:1–13. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jcavi.1001012
  9. 9. White B. Agriculture and the generation problem: rural youth, employment and the future of farming. IDS Bull. 2012;43(6):9–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00375.x
  10. 10. Lindsjö K, Mulwafu W, Andersson Djurfeldt A, Joshua MK. Generational dynamics of agricultural intensification in Malawi: Challenges for the youth and elderly smallholder farmers. Int J Agric Sustain. 2021;19(5–6):423–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2020.1721237
  11. 11. Apriyanto M, Marlina, Susanto BF, Rifa A, Riono Y. A SWOT analysis to improve the marketing of young coconut chips. Ann Rom Soc Cell Biol. 2021;13232–40.
  12. 12. Reynolds P, Hay M, Bygrave W, Camp S, Autio E. Global entrepreneurship monitor: Executive report. USA: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. 2000.
  13. 13. Dioneo-Adetayo EA. Factors influencing attitude of youth towards entrepreneurship. Int J Adolescence Youth. 2006;13(1-2):127–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2006.9747970
  14. 14. Vijayakumar AN. Coconut farmer producer organisation in socio-economic transformation of rural economy in Karnataka. Int J Agric Resour Governance Ecol. 2020;16(3–4):301–19. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijarge.2020.115344
  15. 15. Arifin ZA. The analysis of coconut market value chain. Int J Law Policy Governance. 2022;1(1):33–9. https://doi.org/10.54099/ijlpg.v1i1.255
  16. 16. Patil S, Mehta M, Pancholi G, Saxena A. Unveiling the dynamics of farmer producer Organisations in India: a systematic review of status, challenges and future directions. Hum Soc Sci Commun. 2025;12(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05063-9
  17. 17. Henning JI, Jammer BD, Jordaan H. Youth participation in agriculture, accounting for entrepreneurial dimensions. S Afr J Entrep Small Bus Manag. 2022;14(1):461. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajesbm.v14i1.461
  18. 18. Kothari CR. Research methodology: Methods and techniques. 2nd ed. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers. 2004.
  19. 19. Trebbin A, Hassler M. Farmers' producer companies in India: a new concept for collective action?. Environ Plann A. 2012;44(2):411–27. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44143
  20. 20. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  21. 21. Feder G, Umali DL. The adoption of agricultural innovations: A review. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 1993;43(3–4):215–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(93)90053-A
  22. 22. Bhattacharjee U, Saha A, Tiwari PK, Dhakre DS, Gupta RK. Achievement motivation of organic farmers of Birbhum district of West Bengal. Indian J Ext Educ. 2021;57(1):38–42.
  23. 23. Lago A, dos Santos Amorim G, Boscardin M, Zucatto LC, Spanevello RM. Analyzing decision-making factors in the generational succession of rural youth. J Coop Organ Manag. 2022;10(2):100187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2022.100187
  24. 24. Zulu LC, Djenontin IN, Grabowski P. From diagnosis to action: Understanding youth strengths and hurdles and using decision-making tools to foster youth-inclusive sustainable agriculture intensification. J Rural Stud. 2021;82:196–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.023
  25. 25. Priya KS. Impact of FPOs on empowerment of rural women entrepreneurs in Andhra Pradesh: A quantitative analysis. IUP J Entrep Dev. 2024;21(2):5–27.
  26. 26. MacDonald R, Coffield F. Risky business?: Youth and the enterprise culture. Abingdon (UK): Routledge. 2015. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203973219
  27. 27. Macko A, Tyszka T. Entrepreneurship and risk taking. Appl Psychol. 2009;58(3):469–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00402.x
  28. 28. Prasad CS, Dutta D. Fields of change: Managerial insights on FPOs in India. 2023. https://www.academia.edu/68232302/Fields_of_Change_Managerial_Insights_on_FPOs_in_India.
  29. 29. Hastings LJ, Barrett LA, Barbuto Jr JE, Bell LC. Developing a paradigm model of youth leadership development and community engagement: A grounded theory. J Agric Educ. 2011;52(1):19–29. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.01019
  30. 30. Puxley TS, Chapin LA. Building youth leadership skills and community awareness: Engagement of rural youth with a community-based leadership program. J Community Psychol. 2021;49(5):1063–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22501
  31. 31. Lee CS. Influence of community participation of rural students on leadership skill. J Agric Ext Community Dev. 2012;19(2):355–80. https://doi.org/10.12653/jecd.2012.19.2.355
  32. 32. Chowdhury SR, Ghosh D, Rao TJ. Sentiment and success potential of farmers’ producer organisations: A systematic literature review. Local Econ. 2024;39(1-2):92–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/02690942241292724
  33. 33. Ajith A, Binoo BP. Comparative analysis of entrepreneurial orientation and perceived gains in marketing of farmer producer company shareholders of Kerala, India. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Sociol. 2022;40(9):176-82. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2022/v40i930991
  34. 34. NABARD. State of Sector Report – Farmer Producer Organisations in India 2022. Mumbai: National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development & NAFPO. 2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362468691.
  35. 35. Venkatesan P, Sontakki B, Shenoy NS, Sivaramane N, Sivakumar PS. Impact of farmer producer organisations in fostering community entrepreneurship. Indian J Ext Educ. 2020;56(2):111–7. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32520.75525

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.