Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Integrated organic nutrient management and modified atmosphere packaging improve postharvest quality and shelf life of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11396
Submitted
21 August 2025
Published
23-10-2025

Abstract

Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) is an important vegetable crop widely consumed for its nutritional and culinary value, yet it suffers from significant postharvest deterioration. This study investigated the combined effects of farmyard manure (FYM), organic modules and storage conditions on postharvest performance of okra fruits. The trials were conducted during 2021-22 and 2022-23 at the College of Horticulture, Rajendranagar, India. The experiment followed a factorial completely randomised design with 18 treatment combinations comprising three FYM levels (100 %, 75 % and 50 % of the recommended dose of nitrogen), three organic modules and two storage conditions: ambient storage and modified atmosphere packaging (MAP). Results demonstrated that higher FYM levels coupled with organic module 1 (Trichoderma viride enrichment, panchagavya and neem-based inputs) significantly improved fruit weight retention, minimised physiological loss in weight (PLW) and extended shelf life. Fruits from L1M1 stored under MAP recorded the longest shelf life (11.0 days) compared with less than 5.5 days in open storage. MAP effectively restricted PLW to below 3.5 % up to day 8, whereas open storage exceeded 20 % loss by day 4. Biochemical attributes, including total soluble solids, ascorbic acid and chlorophyll content, were also better preserved under MAP, particularly in fruits from 100 % FYM treatments. These results highlight the synergistic role of soil fertility management and protective packaging in maintaining okra quality. The adoption of integrated organic nutrient practices with MAP offers a practical strategy to reduce postharvest losses, improve nutritional retention and enhance the marketability of perishable vegetables.

References

  1. 1. Carney J, Richard NR. The shadow of slavery: African’s botanical legacy in the Atlantic world. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press. 2009. https://doi.org/1353/tech.2011.0144
  2. 2. Kumar DS, Tony DE, Kumar AP, Kumar KA, Rao DBS, Nadendla R. A review on: Abelmoschus esculentus (okra). Int Res J Pharm App Sci. 2013;3:129–32.
  3. 3. Saifullah M, Rabbani MG. Evaluation and characterization of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench.) genotypes. SAARC J Agric. 2009;7:92–99.
  4. 4. Martin WF. Okra: Potential multiple-purpose crop for the temperate zones and tropics. Econ Bot. 1979;36(3):340–45. https://doi.org/1007/BF02858558
  5. 5. Sengkhamparn N, Sagis LMC, De Vries R, Schols HA, Sajjaanantakul T, Voragen AGJ. Physicochemical properties of pectins from okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). Food Hydrocoll. 2010;24:35–41. https://doi.org/1016/j.foodhyd.2009.07.007
  6. 6. Hu SM, Lai HS. Developing low-fat banana bread by using okra gum as a fat replacer. J Culin Sci Technol. 2016;15:36–42. https://doi.org/1080/15428052.2016.1188192
  7. 7. Markose BL, Peter V. Review of research on vegetable and tuber crops. Tech Bull 16. Mannuthy. Kerala Agricultural University Press. 1990.
  8. 8. Bose TK, Kabir J, Maity TK, Parthasarathy VA, Som MG. Vegetable crops, Vol. 3. Calcutta, India. Naya Prokash. 2003. p. 209–40.
  9. 9. Adeboye OC, Oputa CO. Effects of Galex on growth and fruit nutrient composition of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). J Agric. 1996;18(2):1–9.
  10. 10. Abubakari M, Rees D. The effects of postharvest handling and storage temperature on the quality and shelf life of tomato. Afr J Food Sci. 2011;5(7):340–48. https://doi.org/5897/ajfs.9000283
  11. 11. Kabir MSN, Rasool K, Lee WH, Cho SI, Chung S. Influence of delayed cooling on the quality of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) stored in a controlled chamber. AIMS Agric Food. 2020;5(2):272–85. https://doi.org/3934/agrfood.2020.2.272
  12. 12. Genanew. Effect of post-harvest treatments on storage behavior and quality of tomato fruits. Int J Agric Food Sci. 2013;9(1):29–37. https://doi.org/5829/idosi.wjas.2013.9.1.1719
  13. 13. Kumar V, Shankar R, Kumar. Strategies used for reducing postharvest losses in fruits and vegetables. Int J Sci Eng Res. 2015;6(5):130–37.
  14. 14. Kader AA. Postharvest technology of horticultural crops. Oakland. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources. 2002. p. 535.
  15. 15. Caleb OJ, Opara UL, Witthuhn CR. Modified atmosphere packaging of pomegranate fruit and arils: A review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012;5:15–30. https://doi.org/1007/s11947-011-0525-7
  16. 16. Ravi Teja R, Kiran Kumar A, Suresh Kumar T, Naveen Kumar B, Sathish G. Effect of integrated crop management and modified atmosphere packaging on shelf life and quality of okra fruits (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). Plant Arch. 2025;25(Suppl 2):1646–59. https://doi.org/51470/plantarchives.2025.v25.supplement-2.207
  17. 17. Mampholo BM, Sivakumar D, Beukes M, van Rensburg WJ. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on the quality and bioactive compounds of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. chinensis). J Sci Food Agric. 2013;93(8):2008–15. https://doi.org/1002/jsfa.6007
  18. 18. Singh A, Lal Banerjee S. Polymer composites as packaging materials. In: Bhandari S, Gupta P, Dey A, editors. Industrial applications of polymer composites. Vol. 1. Frontiers in Polymer Science. Sharjah (UAE): Bentham Books. 2023. p. 20–57. https://doi.org/2174/9789815124811123010005
  19. 19. Dujmović M, Kurek M, Mlinar Z, Radman S, Opačić N, Pišonić P, et al. Packaging matters: Preservation of antioxidant compounds of fresh stinging nettle leaves (Urtica dioica L.). Appl Sci. 2024;14(15):6563. https://doi.org/3390/app14156563
  20. 20. Fang Y, Wakisaka M. A review on the modified atmosphere preservation of fruits and vegetables with cutting-edge technologies. Agriculture. 2021;11(10):992. https://doi.org/3390/agriculture11100992
  21. 21. Prabhadharshini MK, Anand M, Vethamoni PI, Amuthaselvi G, Janaki P. Fresh insight: Enhancing verdant leafy vegetable's shelf life via modified atmosphere packing and storage. Int J Environ Climate Change. 2023;13(10):1298–307. https://doi.org/9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102782
  22. 22. Ranganna S. Handbook of analysis and quality control of fruit and vegetable products. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd. 1986.
  23. 23. Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949;24:1–15. https://doi.org/1104/pp.24.1.1
  24. 24. Bhattarai DR, Budathoki K. Effect of organic manures on pre- and postharvest physiology and consumers' acceptability of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis). Nepal J Sci Technol. 2005;6(1):11–14.
  25. 25. Arivazhagan E, Kandasamy R, Maniram S. Influence of organic inputs on the growth, yield and quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cv. Sivam. Ann Plant Soil Res. 2019;21:367–70.
  26. 26. Ravi Teja R, Kiran Kumar A, Suresh Kumar T, Naveen Kumar B, Sathish G. Effect of different levels of farmyard manure (FYM) integrated with organic modules on yield, quality and pest incidence of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench). J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2024;27(8):1043–57. https://doi.org/9734/jabb/2024/v27i81227
  27. 27. Singh S, Chaurasia SNS, Prasad I. Nutritional quality and shelf life extension of capsicum (Capsicum annuum) in expanded polyethylene biopolymer. Asian J Dairy Food Res. 2020;39:40–48. https://doi.org/18805/ajdfr.DR-1506
  28. 28. Negi PS, Roy SK. The effect of conditions of storage on shelf-life of green leafy vegetable. Eur Food Res Technol. 2004;215:485–88.
  29. 29. Kanwal R, Ashraf H, Sultan M, Babu I, Yasmin Z, Nadeem M, et al. Effect of 1-Methyl cyclopropane and modified atmosphere packaging on the storage of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.): Theory and experiments. Sustainability. 2020;12(18):7547. https://doi.org/3390/su12187547
  30. 30. Indore HD, Garande VK, Dhumal SS, Patgaonkar DR, Patil VS, Sonawane PN. Effect of packaging materials and storage conditions on shelf life and quality of okra. Int J Adv Res. 2016;4(11):257–65. https://doi.org/21474/IJAR01/2078
  31. 31. Hidayati N. Combined effect of vermicompost and earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus inoculation on the yield and quality of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.) using organic growing media. J Basic Appl Res Int. 2017;22:148–56.
  32. 32. Sushanta KT, Mrityunjoy B, Abdul Alim M, Asit BM. The effects of organic nutrient sources on yield and shelf life of broccoli. Int J Hortic Sci Technol. 2023;10(1):87–96. https://doi.org/18488/cras.v9i1.3020
  33. 33. Vanndy M, Buntong B, Acedo A, Weinberger K. Modified atmosphere packaging to improve shelf life of tomato fruit in Cambodia. Acta Hortic. 2008;804:453–58. https://doi.org/17660/ActaHortic.2008.804.65
  34. 34. Shankarprasad KS, Shivanand H. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on shelf life and post-harvest quality of Coccinia indica Wight & Arn: A least known medicinal plant. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018;3:266–70.
  35. 35. Ambani MR, Soundy P, Araya HT, Mudau FN. Influence of modified atmosphere packaging on postharvest quality of baby spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaves. HortScience. 2018;53(2):224–30. https://doi.org/21273/hortsci12589-17
  36. 36. Abiso E, Satheesh N, Hailu A. Effect of storage methods and ripening stages on postharvest quality of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill) cv. Chali. Ann Food Sci Technol. 2015;6(1):127–37.
  37. 37. Munhuewyi K. Postharvest losses and changes in quality of vegetables from retail to consumer: a case study of tomato, cabbage and carrot. Master’s [thesis]. Stellenbosch (South Africa). Stellenbosch University. 2012.
  38. 38. Mahajan BV, Dhillon WS, Siddhu MK. Effect of packaging and storage environments on quality and shelf life of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Indian J Agric Sci. 2016;86:738–42. https://doi.org/56093/ijas.v86i6.58845
  39. 39. Nascimento IB, Ferreira LE, Medeiros JF. Post-harvest quality of okra submitted to different saline water laminas. Agropecu Sci Semiárido. 2013;9:88–93. https://doi.org/10.30969/acsa.v9i2.277
  40. 40. Tigist M, Workneh TS, Woldetsadik K. Effects of variety on the quality of tomato stored under ambient conditions. J Sci Technol. 2013;50(3):477–86. https://doi.org/1007/s13197-011-0378-0
  41. 41. Patel N, Patel NL, Sangani SL. Effect of postharvest treatments, packaging materials and storage conditions on shelf life and quality of okra. Int J Agric Sci. 2016;8(52):2601–05.
  42. 42. Mota WF, Finger FL, Cecon PR. Preservation and postharvest quality of okra under different temperatures and forms of storage. Hortic Bras. 2010;28:12–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362010000100003
  43. 43. Saito M, Rai DR. Qualitative changes in radish (Raphanus spp.) sprouts under modified atmosphere packaging in micro-perforated films. J Food Sci Technol. 2005;42:70–72.
  44. 44. Rai DR, Balasubramanian S. Qualitative and textural changes in fresh okra pods (Hibiscus esculentus L.) under modified atmosphere packaging in perforated film packages. Food Sci Technol Int. 2009;15(2):131–38. https://doi.org/1177/1082013208106206

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.