Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Refuge in bag: A smart strategy for outpacing bollworm resistance in Bt cotton

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11496
Submitted
27 August 2025
Published
26-02-2026

Abstract

Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins effectively control major insect pests; however, the emergence of pest resistance can diminish their long-term effectiveness. The predominant strategy for delaying the progression of pest resistance to Bt crops boosts the survival of susceptible insects through “refuges” of host plants that do not produce cry toxins. Ideally, most of the resistant insects emerging from Bt crops will mate with the more abundant susceptible insects from nearby refuges. As Bt cotton has been widely adopted by Indian farmers since 2002, a proactive strategy was introduced to delay resistance to Bt proteins by planting 20 % of the field area with non-Bt cotton as a structured refuge. But to increase yields, farmers forego refuge planting. This reluctance resulted in short-term gains through increased yields but led the pink bollworm (PBW) to develop resistance to single-stacked gene Bt cotton by 2010 and to BGII by 2015. Thus, an extensive study assessing and comparing different refugia-in-bag (RIB) patterns for the bollworm complex, with special emphasis on PBW was conducted at Agricultural Research Station (ARS), Dharwad. Isogenic lines of Bt cotton hybrid (KCH-14K59 BG II) and its non-Bt were planted, following recommended agronomic practices. The pooled results indicated that the commercial RIB, fixed 5 % RIB, and fixed 10 % RIB treatments were statistically at par in terms of good boll opening (GBO), bad boll opening (BBO), and locule damage across all treatments. However, the highest seed cotton yield was recorded in T1 (13.45 q/ha), followed by T5 (12.37 q/ha) and T4 (11.78 q/ha), while the lowest yield was observed in T2 (6.62 q/ha). There was no infestation of Helicoverpa on Bt plants across the different treatments; however, PBW incidence and damage were predominant in all the blocks of both Bt and non-Bt plants.

References

  1. 1. Priyadarshini BJ, Sinha DK, Ahmed N, Singh KM, Kumar M, Singh SP. Socio-economic status of cotton farmers in Bhadradri Kothagudem district of Telangana. Pharma Innovations. 2022;11(3):1699-703.
  2. 2. India Stat. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India; 2025.
  3. 3. Amy L, Agri JS, Mahaffey JR, Bradley JJ, Van DW. Efficacy of seed mixes of transgenic Bt and non-transgenic cotton against bollworm, Helicoverpa zea Boddie. J Cotton Sci. 2001;5:74-80.
  4. 4. Mohan K. Refuge-in-bag for Bt cotton India. Curr Sci. 2018;114:726-27.
  5. 5. Tabashnik BE, Carrière Y. Global patterns of resistance to Bt crops highlighting pink bollworm in the United States, China, and India. J Econ Entomol. 2019;112:2513-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toz173
  6. 6. Wan P, Xu D, Cong S, Jiang Y, Huang Y, Wang J, et al. Hybridizing transgenic Bt cotton with non-Bt cotton counters resistance in pink bollworm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700396114
  7. 7. Wang L, Ma Y, Guo X, Wan P, Liu K, Cong S, et al. Pink bollworm resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac associated with an insertion in cadherin exon 20. Toxins. 2019;11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11040201
  8. 8. Tabashnik BE, Liesner LR, Ellsworth PC, Unnithan GC, Fabrick JA, Naranjo SE, et al. Transgenic cotton and sterile insect releases synergize eradication of pink bollworm a century after it invaded the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021532118
  9. 9. Mohan K. An area-wide approach to pink bollworm management on Bt cotton in India: A dire necessity with community participation. Curr Sci. 2017;112(10):1988-89.
  10. 10. Naik V, Kumbhare S, Kranthi S, Satija U, Kranthi KR. Field-evolved resistance of pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), to transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis cotton expressing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab in India. Pest Manag Sci. 2018;74(11):2544-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4939
  11. 11. Fand BB, Nagrare VS, Gawande SP, Nagrale DT, Naikwadi BV, Daware V, et al. Widespread infestation of pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), on Bt cotton in Central India: A new threat and concerns for cotton production. Phytoparasitica. 2019;47(3):313–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-019-00738-x
  12. 12. Sivarama Krishna S, Srujana MY, Lakshmi Kalyani D, Venkataramanamma K, Arun Kumar K, Mohan Vishnuvardhan K. Evaluation and comparison of different refugia-in-bag patterns against bollworm complex with special reference to pink bollworm in Bt cotton. Ecol Environ Conserv. 2023;29:1-6.
  13. 13. Hanchinal SG, Shudeer, Nidagundi JM, Ajaykumar MC. Comparison and evaluation of bagged and structured refugia against cotton bollworms. J Adv Biol Biotech. 2024;27(9):889-97. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i9.1245
  14. 14. Guan F, Dai X, Hou B, Wu S, Yang Y, Lu Y, et al. Refuges of conventional host plants counter dominant resistance of cotton bollworm to transgenic Bt cotton. iScience. 2023;26:106768.
  15. 15. Tabashnik BE, Brévault T, Carrière Y. Delayed resistance to transgenic cotton in pink bollworm. J Econ Entomol. 2005;98(6):1965–72.
  16. 16. Porter P, Gould F. Effects of refuge contamination by transgenes on Bt resistance in pink bollworm. J Econ Entomol. 2008;101(2):504–11.
  17. 17. Debashis P, Kumar R, Prasad YG. Blending procedure is crucial for BG-II cotton hybrids to adhere to the prescribed refugia-in-bag standards. Curr Sci. 2024;127:1.
  18. 18. Kumar R, Kranthi S, Prasad Rao GMV, Desai H, Bheemanna H, Dharajothi B, et al. Assessment of bollworm damage and yield loss in seed blends of Bollgard-II with corresponding non-Bt hybrid as built-in refuge in cotton. Phytoparasitica. 2020;49:253-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-020-00851-0
  19. 19. Shahid MR, Farooq M, Shakeel M, Ashraf M, Zia ZU, Ahmad S, Mahmood A. Need for growing non-Bt cotton refugia to overcome Bt resistance problem in targeted larvae of cotton bollworms, Helicoverpa armigera and Pectinophora gossypiella. Egypt J Biol Pest Control. 2021;31:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00388-9
  20. 20. Muralimohan K, Mahesh HM. Cry toxin expression in Bt cotton hybrid seeds: Impact on refuge-in-bag strategy for managing resistance in bollworms. Curr Sci. 2020;118:1494-95.
  21. 21. Wan P, Huang Y, Wu H, Huang M, Cong S. Increased frequency of pink bollworm resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac in China. PLoS ONE. 2012;7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029975

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.