Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Transforming coastal deltaic agriculture: A pathway to doubling farmers’ income in Karaikal

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11511
Submitted
28 August 2025
Published
06-01-2026

Abstract

Rice cultivation in coastal river deltaic regions faces increasing challenges due to declining on-time river water availability, soil salinity and stagnating yields, which limit income growth for smallholder farmers. This study hypothesised that integrating water-saving irrigation, hydrogel application and intercropping could significantly improve aerobic rice performance and economic returns in coastal conditions. A field experiment was conducted during the summer season of 2022 at Karaikal, a coastal region in southern India, to assess the effects of two irrigation methods (drip irrigation and surface irrigation), two hydrogel levels (with and without application) and four intercropping systems (no intercrop, black gram, green gram and onion) on aerobic rice. The treatments were arranged in two separate two-factor randomised block designs under each irrigation method. The results showed that hydrogel application increased the grain yield of aerobic rice by 2.5 % from 4807 to 4923 kg ha-1. Surface irrigation produced 28 % higher yield of aerobic rice (5464 kg ha-1) than drip irrigation (4266 kg ha-1). The most profitable treatment was surface-irrigated aerobic rice intercropped with black gram and supplemented with hydrogel, which achieved the highest gross return (₹ 219450 ha-1), net return ( ₹ 162103 ha-1) and benefit-cost ratio (3.83). Here, we demonstrate that the strategic integration of surface irrigation, hydrogel application and legume intercropping can substantially improve rice yield and profitability under coastal conditions. This is the first study to evaluate such combined interventions for aerobic rice in the deltaic ecosystem of Karaikal. The findings offer a practical and scalable approach to enhance resource-use efficiency, income and sustainability in climate-vulnerable rice farming systems.  

References

  1. 1. United States Department of Agriculture, World Agricultural Outlook Board. World agricultural supply and demand estimates. Washington (DC): USDA; 2022.
  2. 2. Mainuddin M, Kirby M, Gan TY. Climate change impacts on food security and livelihood in the Ganges delta. Clim Change. 2019;154(3-4):327-43.
  3. 3. Mandal S, Sarangi SK, Mainuddin M, Mahanta KK, Mandal UK, Burman D, et al. Cropping system intensification for smallholder farmers in coastal West Bengal. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2022;6:1001367. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.1001367
  4. 4. Tuong TP, Bouman BAM. Rice production in water-scarce environments. In: Kijne JW, Barker R, Molden D, editors. Water productivity in agriculture. Wallingford (UK): CABI; 2003. p. 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851996691.0053
  5. 5. Bouman BAM, Humphreys E, Tuong TP, Barker R. Rice and water. Adv Agron. 2007;92:187-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(04)92004-4
  6. 6. Wang H, Bouman BAM, Zhao D, Wang C, Moya PF. Aerobic rice in northern China. In: Bouman BAM, et al., editors. Water-wise rice production. Los Baños: IRRI; 2002. p. 143-5.
  7. 7. Pinheiro BS, Castro EM, Guimaraes CM. Sustainability and profitability of aerobic rice production in Brazil. Field Crops Res. 2006;97:34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.08.013
  8. 8. Bouman BAM, Peng S, Castaneda AR, Visperas RM. Yield and water use of irrigated tropical aerobic rice systems. Agric Water Manag. 2005;74:87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.11.007
  9. 9. Yang X, Bouman BAM, Wang H, Wang Z, Zhao J, Chen B. Performance of temperate aerobic rice under different water regimes in north China. Agric Water Manag. 2005;74:107-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.11.008
  10. 10. Tuong DF, Bouman BAM. On-farm strategies for reducing water input in irrigated rice. Agric Water Manag. 2003;56(2):93-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00007-0
  11. 11. Singh AK, Sinha SK, Kumar A. Water-saving technologies in rice: a review. Indian J Agron. 2020;65(1):1-7.
  12. 12. Sharma R, Dixit A, Rani M. Aerobic rice production: an alternative approach for water saving and sustainable agriculture. Agric Rev. 2021;42(2):107-13.
  13. 13. Gaikwad G, Soniya C, Vilhekar M, Mane PN, Vaidya ER. Impact of organic manures and hydrophilic polymer hydrogel on conservation of moisture and sunflower production under rainfed condition. Adv Res J Crop Improv. 2017:31-35. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/ARJCI/8.1/31-35
  14. 14. Patra SK, Poddar R, Brestic M, Acharjee PU, Bhattacharya P, Sengupta S, et al. Prospects of hydrogels in agriculture for enhancing crop and water productivity under water deficit condition. Int J Polym Sci. 2022:4914836. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4914836
  15. 15. Patel P, Shah D, Patel C. Drip fertigation in field crops. Int J Agric Sci. 2019;11(10):8804-7.
  16. 16. Meena RK, Yadav RK, Jatav RS. Hydrogel application in water-scarce rice ecosystem. J Soil Water Conserv. 2022;21(1):45-52.
  17. 17. Choudhary M, Nayak HS, Barman K. Productivity and profitability of rice-based intercropping systems under coastal saline soils. J Indian Soc Coastal Agric Res. 2020;38(1):35-40.
  18. 18. Kumar V, Tripathi RS, Singh RK. Intercropping for income and resource enhancement in rice-based systems. Legume Res. 2021;44(9):1065-71.
  19. 19. Kumari A, Jha SK, Singh RK. Impact of integrated farming systems on farmers' income in eastern India. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2023;36(1):70-78.
  20. 20. Government of India. Doubling farmers' income report. New Delhi: Ministry of Agriculture; 2018.
  21. 21. Verma SP, Modgal SC. Use of equivalent yields in cropping systems. Himachal J Agric Res. 1983;9(2):89-92.
  22. 22. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Wiley; 2010.
  23. 23. Flinn JC, Surya KJ, Maranan C. Agro-economic budgeting procedures. Los Baños: IRRI; 1984.
  24. 24. Gonzales KA, Van Der Veen MG. Cropping pattern design. Sci Hortic. 1989;78:127-57.
  25. 25. Yangyuoru M, Boateng E, Adiku SGK, Acquah D, Adjadeh TA, Mawunya F. Effects of natural and synthetic soil conditioners on soil moisture retention and maize yield. West Afr J Appl Ecol. 2006;9(1):186-94. https://doi.org/10.4314/wajae.v9i1.45676
  26. 26. Abobatta W. Impact of hydrogel polymer in agricultural sector. Adv Agric Environ Sci. 2018;1(2):59-64. https://doi.org/10.30881/aaeoa.00011
  27. 27. Roy T, Kumar S, Chand L, Kadam DM, Bihari B, Shrimali SS, et al. Impact of Pusa hydrogel application on yield and productivity of rainfed wheat in North West Himalayan region. Curr Sci. 2019;116(7):1246-51. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v116/i7/1246-1251
  28. 28. Saini R, Umesha C. Influence of hydrogel and different sowing methods on growth and yield of aerobic rice. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(7):34-39. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i72859
  29. 29. Padmaja B, Reddy M. Drip irrigation and fertigation effects on aerobic rice (Oryza sativa) in semi-arid conditions of Telangana State, India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(8):1156-71. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.131
  30. 30. Aruna L, Surekha K, Brajendra. Soil quality and productivity assessment for bridging the yield gap in farmers' fields of coastal deltaic region of Karaikal. In: Lama T, Burman D, Mandal UK, Sarangi SK, Sen H, editors. Transforming coastal zone. Cham: Springer; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95618-9_59
  31. 31. Sudhir Y, Humphreys E, Kukal SS, Gill G, Rangarajan R. Effect of water management on dry-seeded and puddled transplanted rice. Field Crops Res. 2011;120:112-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.09.002
  32. 32. Natarajan SK, Duraisamy VK, Thiyagarajan G, Manikandan M. Evaluation of drip fertigation system for aerobic rice in western zone of Tamil Nadu. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2020;32:41-47. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2020/v32i730303
  33. 33. Sharma H, Shukla MK, Bosland PW, Steiner R. Soil moisture sensor calibration, actual evapotranspiration and crop coefficients for drip-irrigated greenhouse chile peppers. Agric Water Manag. 2017;179:81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.07.001
  34. 34. Habimana S, Mbaraka SR, Karangwa A, Rucamumihigo FX, Musana FR, Mutamuliza E, et al. Effect of intercropping aerobic rice with leafy vegetables on crop growth, yield and economic efficiency. Afr J Biotechnol. 2021;20(7):313-17. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2021.17360
  35. 35. Midya A, Bhattacharjee K, Ghose SS, Banik P. Deferred seeding of black gram (Phaseolus mungo) in rice (Oryza sativa) field on yield advantages and smothering of weeds. J Agron Crop Sci. 2005;191(3):195-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2005.00157.x
  36. 36. Banik P, Bagchi DK. Evaluation of rice (Oryza sativa) and legume intercropping in upland situation of Bihar plateau. Indian J Agric Sci. 1994;64(3):175-82.
  37. 37. Saeed M, Shahid MRM, Jabbar A, Ullah E, Bismillah M. Agro-economic assessment of different cotton-based inter/relay cropping systems in two geometrical patterns. Int J Agric Biol. 1999;4(1):234-37.
  38. 38. Joshi M. Dynamics of rice-based cropping systems in the southern transitional zone of Karnataka. Int Rice Res Notes. 2002.
  39. 39. Ahmad R, Jabbar A, Ahmad A, Ehsanullah, Hussain IB. Evaluation of direct-seeded upland rice-based intercropping systems under strip planting geometry. Pak J Agric Sci. 2007;44(2):189-90.
  40. 40. Maniruzzaman M, Sarangi SK, Mainuddin M, Biswas JC, Bell RW, Hossain MB, et al. A novel system for boosting land productivity and income of smallholder farmers by intercropping vegetables in waterlogged paddy fields of the Ganges Delta. Land Use Policy. 2024;139:107066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107066
  41. 41. Erythrina E, Susilawati S, Slameto S, Resiani NMD, Arianti FD, Jumakir J, et al. Yield advantage and economic performance of rice-maize, rice-soybean and maize-soybean intercropping in rainfed areas of Western Indonesia. Agronomy. 2022;12(10):2326. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102326
  42. 42. Ghosh RK, Mandal BK, Dasgupta B. Studies on mixed and intercropping of black gram with direct-seeded rainfed upland rice varieties. Oryza. 1990;27:258-66.
  43. 43. Ramamurthy K, Balasubrananian A, Arokiaraj A. Effect of intercrop and row ratio on growth, yield parameters and economics of direct-sown rice. Indian J Agric Sci. 1992;67(6):280-81.
  44. 44. Ram B, Punia SS, Tetarwal JP, Meena DS, Singh P, Chaudhary HR. Effect of hydrogel and foliar nutrition sprays on productivity and profitability of lentil under rainfed conditions of Rajasthan. Int J Adv Sci Res Manag. 2018;1:67-70.
  45. 45. Mishra A, Behera B, Pal AK, Mohanty SK, Rath BS, Subudhi CR, et al. Performance of rice and black gram under different nutrient management practices in rainfed upland. Oryza. 2012;49(4):273-79.
  46. 46. Singh RS, Srivastava GP. Effect of fertilizer levels and pigeon pea-based intercropping systems on yield, nutrient removal and economics under rainfed condition. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7:3554-61.
  47. 47. Maharajan M, Subramanian E, Gurusamy A, Senthil K. Irrigation scheduling and intercrop practices on yield, water use efficiency and economics of aerobic rice. Madras Agric J. 2020;107(7):254-59. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.2020.000381
  48. 48. Srinivasa Reddy D, Savitha MS, Ramesh PR, Bhandi NH, Teggelli RG, Ravi S. Climate-resilient technology for sustainable livelihood and production. Mysore J Agric Sci. 2023;57(2):294-300.
  49. 49. Ray S, Umesha C, Meshram MR, Sanodiya LK. Influence of irrigation and hydrogel application on yield and economics of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) under eastern UP conditions. Environ Conserv J. 2021;22(3):31-36. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2021.22304
  50. 50. Songara JC, Patel JN. Impact of guar gum-based hydrogel on yield and economics of sugarcane. Agron J. 2023;115(5):2533-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21400

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.