Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Economic assessment of drone technology in wheat cultivation: A comparative study of traditional and modern approaches in Jaipur district of Rajasthan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11802
Submitted
16 September 2025
Published
20-11-2025

Abstract

India's increasing agricultural problems, such as declining productivity, acute labor shortages and the consequences of climate change, necessitate the adoption of precision agriculture technologies. Wheat cultivation plays a vital role in ensuring food security for millions of people in Rajasthan, particularly in the Jaipur area. This study evaluated the economic viability and efficiency of deploying drone technology in wheat production compared with traditional farming methods. A comparative study was conducted using a sample of 100 farmers (50 traditional and 50 drone users) selected by stratified random sampling in the Jaipur district during the Rabi season of 2024-25. Constraint analysis and efficiency assessment were conducted using the response priority index (RPI) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) approaches respectively. The findings show that drone technology provides substantial economic benefits, including a 37.31 % rise in net revenue (from ₹50035 to ₹68705 per ha), a 15.72 % increase in yield (from 3180 to 3680 kg/ha) and an 11.42 % decrease in production costs. Efficiency analysis revealed superior performance
across all three parameters: economic efficiency (72 to 91 %), allocative efficiency (68 to 89 %) and technical efficiency (76 to 92 %). Significant input optimization was accomplished via drone technology, resulting in a 40 % drop in pesticide use, a 51 % reduction in labor needs and 12 % savings in water use. Constraint analysis identified the high initial investment cost (RPI- 0.867) and lack of technical knowledge (RPI- 0.752) as the primary adoption barriers. The study concluded that drone technology represents a transformative solution for sustainable wheat production, offering substantial economic, environmental and operational benefits despite the challenges associated with initial investment.

References

  1. 1. Ministry of agriculture and farmer welfare. Kisan drone initiative: implementation guidelines and progress report. Government of India, New Delhi; 2024. https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/pmreleases.aspx?mincode=27
  2. 2. Agricultural statistics at a glance. Department of agriculture and cooperation, ministry of agriculture and farmer welfare, Government of India, New Delhi; 2024. https://desagri.gov.in/wpcontent/uploads/2024/09/Agricultural-Statistics-at-a-Glance-2023.pdf
  3. 3. Rajasthan agricultural statistics. Directorate of agriculture, government of Rajasthan, Jaipur; 2024. https://rajas.rajasthan.gov.in/PDF/11222024122534PMAgriculturalStatistics.pdf
  4. 4. Singh T, Kumar L, Mishra A. Resource use efficiency in traditional wheat cultivation systems. Wheat Res. 2023;15(2):78-89. https://doi.org/10.25174/0976-6502.2023.15.2.78
  5. 5. Sharma A, Kumar D. Health implications of pesticide exposure in agricultural workers: a comprehensive study. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2024;28(6):782. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23174-5
  6. 6. Patel A, Singh K, Kumar V. Traditional farming constraints in semiarid regions of India. Indian J Dryland Agric Res Dev. 2023;38(4):558. https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6701.2023.00008.5
  7. 7. Gupta S, Kumar A, Singh R. Precision agriculture technologies in Indian farming systems: a comprehensive review. Indian J Agric Sci. 2024;94(12):3138. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i21844
  8. 8. Kumar P, Singh M. Economic viability of UAV technology in crop production: a systematic review. Precision Agric. 2024;25:167–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-09876-5
  9. 9. Agri-tech intelligence. Agricultural technology market report 2024: global agricultural drone market analysis and forecast 2024-2030. Agri-Tech Intelligence. 2024;15:234–48. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/agriculture-drones market-102589
  10. 10. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). Impact assessment of drone technology in Indian agriculture. ICAR, New Delhi; 2024. p. 1156. https://www.icar.org.in/en/kisan-mela-drone-technologyagriculture
  11. 11. Kalaiselvi P, Chaurasia J, Krishnaveni A, Krishnamoorthi A, Singh A, Kumar V, et al. Harvesting efficiency: the rise of drone technology in modern agriculture. J Sci Res Rep. 2024;30(6):191–207. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i62033
  12. 12. Kendall H, Clark B, Li W, Jin S, Jones GD, Chen J, et al. Precision agriculture technology adoption: a qualitative study of small-scale commercial “family farms” located in the north China Plain. Precis Agric. 2022;1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-021-09839-2
  13. 13. Department of agriculture, government of Rajasthan. Agricultural statistics report 2021–2022. https://agriculture.rajasthan.gov.in
  14. 14. Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1977. p. 1–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316856
  15. 15. Kothari CR. Research methodology: methods and techniques. 2nd ed. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers; 2004. p. 1–401. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1980.1203
  16. 16. Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H, Lokhnygina Y. Sample size calculations in clinical research. 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series. CRC Press; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315183084
  17. 17. Singh R, Mangat NS. Elements of survey sampling. 1st ed. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013:1–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4159-9
  18. 18. Hunt ER Jr, Hively WD, Fujikawa SJ, Linden DS, Daughtry CS, McCarty GW. Acquisition of NIR–green–blue digital photographs from unmanned aircraft for crop monitoring. Remote Sens. 2017;9(3):290. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9030290
  19. 19. Chatterjee S, Mohanty B. Socio-economic determinants of precision agriculture adoption among Indian farmers. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2021;34(2):215-24. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2021.00026.7
  20. 20. Paul S, Banerjee R, Kumar V. Profitability and resource efficiency of drone-based input application in Indian agriculture. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2024;37(1):33-46. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2024.00005.3
  21. 21. Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005:349. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-24265-1
  22. 22. Kumari P, Sharma R, Singh S. Prioritization of constraints in technology adoption among smallholder farmers using response priority index. Indian J Ext Educ. 2021;57(4):89–94. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJEE/article/view/episode/81484
  23. 23. Singh R, Sharma P, Kumar V. Economic analysis of drone-based pesticide application in cereal crops. Indian J Agric Econ. 2022;77(2):201–15. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2022.00016.4
  24. 24. Zhang S, Sun Y, Li H. Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) spraying for pesticide reduction in crop protection. Precision Agric. 2019;20(5):914–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-018-9618-0
  25. 25. Fikri MR, Candra T, Saptaji K, Noviarini AN, Wardani DA. A review of implementation and challenges of unmanned aerial vehicles for spraying applications and crop monitoring in Indonesia. ArXiv. 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.00379
  26. 26. Kumar R, Sharma P, Patel N. Cost–benefit analysis of precision agriculture adoption in wheat cultivation. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2024;37:89–104. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2024.00011.3
  27. 27. Guebsi R, Mami S, Chokmani K. Drones in precision agriculture: a comprehensive review of applications, technologies and challenges. Drones. 2024;8(11):686. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/drones8110686
  28. 28. Precision agriculture research consortium. Global trends in precision agriculture technology adoption and economic impacts. Precision Agric Today. 2024;18:234–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-09123-4
  29. 29. Singh R, Patel S. Efficiency measurement in precision agriculture: DEA applications and insights. Agric Syst. 2024;218:103567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103567
  30. 30. Erat O, Isop WA, Kalkofen D, Schmalstieg D. Drone-augmented human vision: exocentric control for drones exploring hidden areas. IEEE Trans Vis Computer Graph. 2018;24(4):1437-46. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2794058
  31. 31. Eissa M. Precision agriculture using artificial intelligence and robotics. J Res Agric Food Sci. 2024;1(2):35-52. https://doi.org/10.5455/JRAFS.20240404014009
  32. 32. Gabriel-Valentin G, Dragoș-Nicolae D, Radu C, Marinela M, Stefano Andrea M, Elisabeta P, Alin H. Best practices in precision agriculture implementation: global perspectives. Precision Farming Int. 2024;12:123–45. https://doi.org/10.35633/inmateh-74-89
  33. 33. Zhou Q, Zhang S, Xue X, Cai C, Wang B. Performance evaluation of UAVs in wheat disease control. Agronomy. 2023;13(8):2131. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13082131
  34. 34. Yoshida K, Fuzesi I, Suzan M, Nagy L. Measurements of surface contamination of spray equipment with pesticides after various methods of application. J Environ Sci Health Part B. 1990;25(2):235-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601239009372682

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.