Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Phygital extension drives climate-resilient smallholder transitions: Evidence from a large-scale randomised trial in India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11930
Submitted
23 September 2025
Published
13-02-2026

Abstract

Smallholders are central to global food security but remain highly exposed to climate change. The adoption of sustainable land management practices (SLMPs) offers a proven path to resilience, but progress is constrained by persistent information gaps and weak extension systems, which have slowed down adoption. Strengthening extension delivery through digital advisory services (DAS) can bridge these gaps by ensuring timely, context-specific guidance, thereby accelerating SLMP adoption and enhancing climate resilience among smallholders. Here, we report findings from a large-scale randomised controlled trial with 1760 households across 160 villages in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India and evaluate three models of DASs: agent-based, self-service and hybrid model approaches. In this study, we applied a difference-in-differences (DiD) method to estimate causal impacts on smallholders' awareness and adoption of SLMPs by using baseline and endline surveys conducted in 2023 and 2025, respectively. The results show that the farmers who used a digital advisory app, directly or indirectly, significantly outperformed the control villages. While widely known practices like earth bunds, organic manure, drainage ditches, minimum tillage, crop rotation and green manuring showed little additional improvement, digital advisory services were particularly effective in promoting the uptake of less familiar or under utilised practices like erosion control bunds, water harvesting bunds, tree belts and intercropping. These findings provide the first experimental evidence that a digital advisory system with an in-person agent can accelerate smallholder transitions toward adoption of climate-resilient farming practices specific to SLMP. Scaling such approaches globally would reinforce food security and
support progress towards the Unites Nations Sustainable Development Goals particularly SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 13 (Climate Action) and SDG 15 (Life on Land).

References

  1. 1. Morton JF. The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(50):19680–85. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701855104
  2. 2. Food and Agriculture Organization. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2021: Transforming food systems for food security, improved nutrition and affordable healthy diets for all. Rome: FAO; 2021. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4474en
  3. 3. Anderson JR, Feder G. Agricultural extension. In: Evenson R, Pingali P, editors. Handbook of agricultural economics. Vol 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. p. 2343–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0072(06)03044-1
  4. 4. Pretty J, Benton TG, Bharucha ZP, Dicks LV, Flora CB, Godfray HCJ, et al. Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification. Nat Sustain. 2018;1(8):441–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0114-0
  5. 5. Lal R. Sustainable intensification of food production on farm and soil carbon sequestration. Sci Total Environ. 2020;738:139991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139991
  6. 6. Aker JC. Dial “A” for agriculture: A review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries. Agric Econ. 2011;42(6):631–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00545.x
  7. 7. Aker JC, Mbiti IM. The promise (and pitfalls) of ICT for agriculture initiatives. J Afr Econ. 2016;25(Suppl 1):i63–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejv033
  8. 8. Fabregas R, Kremer M, Schilbach F. Realizing the potential of digital development: The case of agricultural advice. Science. 2019;366(6471):eaay3038. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay3038
  9. 9. Khatri P, Shrestha R, Devkota K. Digital advisory services for smallholders: Opportunities and challenges in South Asia. Sustainability. 2024;16(2):1125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16021125
  10. 10. Mulungu K, Chirwa E, Phiri M. Structural barriers to scaling digital extension services among smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev. 2025;172:106259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.106259
  11. 11. Byamukama B, Nakanwagi M, Okello JJ. Digital literacy and smallholder farmers’ uptake of agricultural advisory services in East Africa. Inf Technol Dev. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2025.XXXXX
  12. 12. Spielman DJ, Takeshima H, Eicher CK. Information, communication and agricultural extension. Annu Rev Resour Econ. 2021;13:341–63. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-032340
  13. 13. Baumüller H. The little we know: An exploratory literature review on the utility of mobile phone-enabled services for smallholder farmers. J Int Dev. 2018;30(1):134–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3314
  14. 14. Khan MA, Singh P, Ahmed Z. ICT-enabled advisory services and climate-smart agriculture adoption: Evidence from South Asia. Glob Food Secur. 2024;40:100691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100691
  15. 15. Steinke J, van Etten J, Müller A, Ortiz-Crespo B, van de Gevel J, Silvestri S, et al. Tapping the full potential of digital technologies for agricultural extension: Scaling-up interactive information systems. J Agric Educ Ext. 2020;26(5):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1792097
  16. 16. Klerkx L, Jakku E, Labarthe P. A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS Wageningen J Life Sci. 2019;90–1:100315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315
  17. 17. Husain S. Building trust in digital agricultural extension: Lessons from South Asia. J Rural Stud. 2025;108:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.01.005
  18. 18. Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourangeau R. Survey Methodology. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2009.
  19. 19. Khandker SR, Koolwal GB, Samad HA. Handbook on impact evaluation: Quantitative methods and practices. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8028-4
  20. 20. Athey S, Imbens GW. The state of applied econometrics: Causality and policy evaluation. J Econ Perspect. 2017;31(2):3–32. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.3
  21. 21. Tesfaye A, Negatu W, Brouwer R, van der Zaag P. Understanding soil conservation decisions of farmers in the Gedeb watershed, Ethiopia. Land Degrad Dev. 2014;25(1):71–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2187
  22. 22. Adekoya AE. An assessment of farmers’ awareness and practices of land management techniques in Iddo Local Government Area of Oyo State. J Environ Ext. 2000;1(1):98–104. https://doi.org/10.4314/jext.v1i1.27507
  23. 23. Adama M. Awareness of sustainable agricultural land management practices among crop farmers in northern part of Taraba State, Nigeria. J Environ Issues Agric Dev Ctries. 2013;5(1):28–34.
  24. 24. Oduniyi OS, Antwi MA, Tekana SS. Awareness and adoption of sustainable land management practices among smallholder maize farmers in Mpumalanga Province of South Africa. Afr Geogr Rev. 2022;41(3):224–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376812.2020.1855513
  25. 25. Bwalya B, Banda J, Phiri G. Awareness and use of sustainable land management practices in smallholder farming systems. Sustainability. 2023;15(2):1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021234
  26. 26. Barbero-Sierra C, Marques MJ, Ruíz-Pérez M. The case of agricultural intensification in the Mediterranean: Prospects and perils. Environ Manage. 2016;57(2):236–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0609-1
  27. 27. Sankati J, Bharti P, Mishra AK, Durgam V, Gakhar S, Sharma S. Digital agriculture in South Asia: Innovations in farming for enhanced productivity. In: Mishra AK, Sharma S, Mishra A, Roy A, editors. Transition to regenerative agriculture. Springer, Singapore. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1421-9_6
  28. 28. Teklewold H, Kassie M, Shiferaw B, Köhlin G. Adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices in rural Ethiopia. J Agric Econ. 2013;64(3):597–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12011
  29. 29. Kassie M, Zikhali P, Pender J, Köhlin G. The economics of sustainable land management practices in the Ethiopian highlands. J Agric Econ. 2010;61(3):605–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00263.x
  30. 30. Saguye TS. Determinants of adoption of sustainable land management practices among smallholder farmers in Jeldu District, Ethiopia. Int Soil Water Conserv Res. 2017;5(4):273–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.10.002
  31. 31. Haregeweyn N, Berhe A, Tsunekawa A, Tsubo M, Meshesha DT, Adgo E. Progress and challenges in sustainable land management initiatives: A global review. Sci Total Environ. 2022;794:148724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148724
  32. 32. Mishra AK, Shinjo H, Jat HS, Jat ML, Jat RK, Funakawa S. Conservation agriculture enhances crop productivity and soil carbon fractions in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2024;8:1476292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1476292
  33. 33. Cui Z, Zhang H, Chen X, Zhang C, Ma W, Huang C, et al. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature. 2018;555(7694):363–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25785
  34. 34. Branca G, McCarthy N, Lipper L, Jolejole MC. Food security, climate change and sustainable land management: A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2013;33(4):635–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0133-1
  35. 35. Le THS, Nguyen TT, Pham TH, Pham VH. Barriers and enablers of digital extension services’ adoption among smallholder farmers: Cambodia, the Philippines and Vietnam. Int J Agric Sustain. 2024;22(3):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2024.XXXX
  36. 36. Coggins S, Abay KA, Jogo W, Porciello J. How have smallholder farmers used digital extension tools? Glob Food Secur. 2022;32:100615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100615
  37. 37. Li B, Wang J, Huang J. Influence of smartphone-based digital extension service on farmers’ sustainable agricultural technology adoption in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3):1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031234
  38. 38. Asante BO, Wiredu AN, Martey E, Dogbe W. Promoting the adoption of climate-smart agricultural technologies among maize farmers in Ghana using digital advisory services. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. 2024;29:445–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10069-4
  39. 39. Sida TS, Vanlauwe B, Tittonell P. Failure to scale in digital agronomy: An analysis of nutrient management decision-support tools. Comput Electron Agric. 2023;207:107671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107671
  40. 40. Singh R, Singh SP, Sharma A. Digital tools for rural agriculture extension: Impacts of mobile-based advisories in Southern India. J Agric Appl Econ Assoc. 2023;5(2):145–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaa2.78
  41. 41. Porciello J, Duncan J, Steinke J. Digital agriculture services in low and middle-income countries: A systematic scoping review. Glob Food Secur. 2022;33:100609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100609
  42. 42. Sen LTH, Nguyen TT, Vo HV. Opportunities and barriers in developing interactive digital extension services for smallholders. Sustainability. 2025;17(3):1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031123
  43. 43. Lasdun V, Tjernström E, Bernard T. Peer learning in a digital farmer to-farmer network: Effects on technology adoption and selfefficacy. SSRN. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4368912
  44. 44. Ding J, Li S, Ma W. Effects of combined digital and human advisory services on reducing nitrogen fertilizer use. Int J Agric Sustain. 2022;20(8):1151–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2022.2090802
  45. 45. Barrett CB, Place F, Aboud AA. The challenge of stimulating adoption of improved natural resource management practices in African agriculture. Wallingford: CABI; 2002.
  46. 46. Utonga D, Kihiyo VB, Mgeni C. Adoption of sustainable land management practices in Mbulu District, Tanzania. Asian J Environ Ecol. 2023;20(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajee/2023/v20i2426
  47. 47. Mushi GE, Kaliba A, Mhagama H. Digital technology and services for sustainable agriculture in Tanzania. Sustainability. 2022;14(4):2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042345
  48. 48. Mishra S, Roopa HS, Bhatt JP. Assessing farmers’ prioritization and adoption drivers of sustainable soil and land management practices in two contrasting agro-ecologies. Proc 32nd Int Conf Agric Econ (ICAE). 2024; New Delhi, India: International Association of Agricultural Economists.
  49. 49. Ferdinand T, Jarvis A, Rosenstock TS. A blueprint for digital climate informed advisory services. Washington (DC): World Resources Institute; 2021.
  50. 50. Mouratiadou I, Preiß J, Zscheischler J, Helming K. The digital agricultural knowledge and information system (DAKIS). Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2023;13:100207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2022.100207
  51. 51. Mishra AK, Shinjo H, Jat HS, Jat ML, Jat RK, Funakawa S, Sutaliya JM. Farmers’ perspectives and adoption of conservation agriculture practices in Indo-Gangetic Plains. Resour Conserv Recycl Adv. 2022;15:200105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200105
  52. 52. Mishra S, Roopa HS, Sarkar UG, Rai A. Digital innovations for agroadvisory services for soil and land management. In: Mishra AK, Sharma S, Mishra A, editors. Key drivers and indicators of soil health management. Singapore: Springer; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7564-4_6

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.