Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Synergistic use of biochar, Trichoderma harzianum and Pseudomonas fluorescens to combat biotic stress by Phomopsis vexans in brinjal

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11943
Submitted
24 September 2025
Published
12-01-2026

Abstract

The present study focuses on induced systemic resistance (ISR), where secondary metabolites and pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins are activated after the application of resistance inducers following the salicylic acid pathway. Biochar was used as an inducer to activate phenolic compounds and pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, helping to combat Phomopsis vexans, which causes Phomopsis blight in brinjal. Physical and biochemical analysis showed biochar has significantly improved the yield of traits of the plant and reduced the amount of infection by increasing levels of total proteins, total phenols and sugar content. Increased levels of proteins and phenolic compounds with decreased levels of disease severity as shown by regression analysis, indicating a negative correlation (r) between soil pH, soil electrical conductivity (EC), plant height, number of branches, fruit yield, peroxidase activity, total protein content, total phenols and disease severity. The treatment T13 with 3  % biochar, Trichoderma harzianum and Pseudomonas fluorescens was found to be the best treatment that exhibited positive effects on yield attributing traits and managed disease severity (22.2  %), followed by biochar concentrations of 3.5  % (T6) and 3  % (T5) alone with disease severities of 24.42  % and 26.6  %, respectively. Mixed application of biochar, T. harzianum and P. fluorescens has shown a synergistic effect on yield attributing traits and contributed to improving final yield and reducing disease severity. The data indicated a negative correlation between disease severity and yield attributing parameters, underscoring the effectiveness of this integrated approach in promoting plant resilience and productivity.

References

  1. 1. Gangwar GP, Sinha AP. Effect of fungal and bacterial bioagent application on total phenolic content in rice leaves pre-inoculated with Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Uyeda and Ishiyama) Dowson. J Appl Nat Sci. 2014;6(1):254. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v6i1.410
  2. 2. Goutam E, Kumar A, Tripathi V, Bharti, Kumar L, Raj A. Unveiling mechanisms for induced systemic resistance, resistance breeding and molecular marker-assisted breeding against Phomopsis blight of Solanum melongena. Plant Pathol. 2024;73(4):777-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13860
  3. 3. Tiwari JK, Karkute SG, Tiwari SK, Singh M. Brinjal: Breeding and genomics. Veg Sci. 2023;50:166-76. https://doi.org/10.61180/vegsci.2023.v50.spl.04
  4. 4. Gupta A, Bano A, Pandey N, Rai S, Sharma S, Pathak N. Recent advances in biotic and abiotic stresses of Solanum melongena L. In: Solanum melongena: Production, cultivation and nutrition. 2021. p.151-71.
  5. 5. Chalkley D. Systematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory, ARS, USDA. Invasive fungi: Tip over disease of eggplant – Diaporthe vexans. 2010.
  6. 6. Kumar N, Kumar A, Chand G, Biswas SK. Diseases of brinjals (eggplant) and their management. In: Diseases of fruits and vegetable crops. 2020. p.303-22. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429322181-18
  7. 7. Mahadevakumar S, Janardhana GR. Phomopsis vexans (Sacc. & Syd.) Harter: Current research and future perspectives (1914-2015). Res Rev J Bot Sci. 2016;5(S3):1-9.
  8. 8. Ashwani Kumar AK, Aulakh KS, Grewal RK. Incidence of fungal fruit rots of brinjal in Punjab.
  9. 9. Manda RR, Addanki VA, Srivastava SE. Phomopsis blight of Solanum melongena – brinjal/eggplant. Plant Cell Biotechnol Mol Biol. 2020;21(55):7-12.
  10. 10. Kumar M, et al. J Pharmaco Phytochem. 2019;2:832-5.
  11. 11. Kumar SU, Sugha SK. Effect of fertilizers on phomopsis disease (Phomopsis vexans) of brinjal (Solanum melongena). Indian J Agric Sci. 2003;73(1):32-4.
  12. 12. Reddy YP, Jakhar SS, Dahiya OS. Ecofriendly measures for control of Phomopsis vexans and other mycoflora of brinjal. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2018;7(5):3667-73. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.423
  13. 13. Vaghasiya TP. Studies on induced systemic resistance against Phomopsis vexans in brinjal. MSc thesis. Phagwara: Lovely Professional University.
  14. 14. Phansawan B, Prapamontol T, Thavornyutikarn P, Chantara S, Mangklabruks A, Santasup C. A sensitive method for determination of carbendazim residue in vegetable samples using HPLC-UV and its application in health risk assessment. Chiang Mai J Sci. 2015;42(3):681-90.
  15. 15. Ramesh Singh RS, Singh PC, Dinesh Kumar DK, Sachan NS. Management of phomopsis leaf blight of brinjal through different fungicides and biopesticide.
  16. 16. Omprakash S, Raju SV. A brief review on abundance and management of major insect pests of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). Int J Appl Biol Pharm Technol. 2014;5(1):228-34.
  17. 17. Ahmed SH, Sharma SH, Kumar AD, Sharma AD, Rana TA. The perspectives of induced resistance in brinjal against Phomopsis vexans causing phomopsis blight: a review. Biopesticides Int. 2022;18(1):9-21.
  18. 18. Alaylar B, Güllüce M, Egamberdieva D, Wirth S, Bellingrath-Kimura SD. Biochar mediated control of soil-borne phytopathogens. Environ Sustain. 2021;4(2):329-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-021-00187-5
  19. 19. Kookana RS. The role of biochar in modifying the environmental fate, bioavailability and efficacy of pesticides in soils: a review. Soil Res. 2010;48(7):627-37. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR10007
  20. 20. Luigi M, et al. Effects of biochar on the growth and development of tomato seedlings and on the response of tomato plants to the infection of systemic viral agents. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:862075. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.862075
  21. 21. Poveda J, Eugui D. Combined use of Trichoderma and beneficial bacteria (mainly Bacillus and Pseudomonas): Development of microbial synergistic bio-inoculants in sustainable agriculture. Biol Control. 2022;176:105100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.105100
  22. 22. Snyder WC, Hansen HN. The species concept in Fusarium. Am J Bot. 1940;27:64-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1940.tb14217.x
  23. 23. Jayaramaiah KM, Mahadevakumar S, Raj AC, Janardhana GR. PCR based detection of Phomopsis vexans – the causative agent of leaf blight and fruit rot disease of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.).
  24. 24. Hossain MI. Control of phomopsis blight of eggplant through fertilizer and fungicide management. Doctoral dissertation.
  25. 25. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193(1):265-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6
  26. 26. Bray HG, Thorpe W. Analysis of phenolic compounds of interest in metabolism. Methods Biochem Anal. 1954;1:27-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470110171.ch2
  27. 27. Chance B, Maehly AC. Assay of catalases and peroxidases.
  28. 28. Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949;24(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1
  29. 29. Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959;31(3):426-28. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
  30. 30. Xu P, Wang Q, Duan C, Huang G, Dong K, Wang C. Biochar addition promotes soil organic carbon sequestration dominantly contributed by macro-aggregates in agricultural ecosystems of China. J Environ Manage. 2024;359:121042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121042
  31. 31. Simiele M, Argentino O, Baronti S, Scippa GS, Chiatante D, Terzaghi M, et al. Biochar enhances plant growth, fruit yield and antioxidant content of cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in a soilless substrate. Agriculture. 2022;12(8):1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081135
  32. 32. Kumar AD, Biswas SK. Biochemical evidences of induced resistance in tomato plant against Fusarium through inorganic chemicals. J Mycopathol Res. 2010;48(2):213-9.
  33. 33. Kumar A, Sri RD, Krishna VP, Goutam E. Induced resistance to mitigate phomopsis blight of brinjal using inorganic chemicals. Vegetos. 2025;38(3):1039-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-024-00889-1
  34. 34. Aslam M, Habib A, Sahi ST, Khan RR. Effect of bion and salicylic acid on peroxidase activity and total phenolics in tomato against Alternaria solani. Pak J Agric Sci. 2020;57(1).
  35. 35. Upamanya GK, Dutta P. Screening of biocontrol agents against pathogens causing diseases of brinjal. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2019;8(6):1232-40. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.806.150
  36. 36. Ahmad, et al. Demonstration of the synergistic effect of biochar and Trichoderma harzianum on the development of Ralstonia solanacearum in eggplant. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1360703. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1360703
  37. 37. Shanmugaraj C, Jaiganesh V, Biswas MK, Kumar HM. Biochar in agriculture: Enhancing crop productivity and disease resistance. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2024;27(6):221-34. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i6881
  38. 38. Ahmed SH, Sharma SH, Kumar AD, Sharma AD, Rana TA. The perspectives of induced resistance in brinjal against Phomopsis vexans causing phomopsis blight: a review. Biopesticides Int. 2022;18(1):9-21.
  39. 39. Jaiswal AK, Alkan N, Elad Y, Sela N, Graber ER, Frenkel O. Molecular insights into biochar-mediated plant growth promotion and systemic resistance in tomato against Fusarium crown and root rot disease. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13934. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70882-6
  40. 40. Kumari R, Kumar V, Kumar A. Soil and biochar: Attributes and actions of biochar for reclamation of soil and mitigation of soil borne plant pathogens. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2024;24(2):1924-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01810-0
  41. 41. Singh N, Kumar A. A review on bio-char: A byproduct of bio-wastes. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2020;11:1678-91.
  42. 42. Isaac, et al. Biomass source of biochar and genetic background of tomato influence plant growth and development and fruit quality. Horticulturae. 2024;10(4):368. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10040368
  43. 43. Paveen P, Kumar V, Masurkar P, Kumar D, Assouguem A, Mehta CM, et al. Evaluation of potential biochar as a carrier for Trichoderma and its efficacy against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum of chickpea. Front Agr Sci Eng. 2024:1-14.
  44. 44. Boyno G, Demir S, Danesh YR. Effects of some biological agents on the growth and biochemical parameters of tomato plants infected with Alternaria solani (Ellis & Martin) Sorauer. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2022;162(1):19-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-021-02398-2
  45. 45. Kumar A, Rana T, Goutam E, Prakash S, Koshariya AK. Evidences of induced resistance in tomato against Alternaria solani: An investigation. Trends Hortic. 2023;6:2677. https://doi.org/10.24294/th.v6i2.2677
  46. 46. Bhatt B, Gupta SK, Mukherjee S, Kumar R. A comprehensive review on biochar against plant pathogens: Current state-of-the-art and future research perspectives. Heliyon. 2024;10(17). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37204
  47. 47. Salwan R, Sharma M, Sharma A, Sharma V. Insights into plant beneficial microorganism-triggered induced systemic resistance. Plant Stress. 2023;7:100140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2023.100140
  48. 48. Singh N, Kumari P, Kumar A, Kumar V. Biochar led induced resistance to control Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Future. 2022;4:8-18.
  49. 49. Ahlawat YK, Singh M, Manorama K, Lakra N, Zaid A, Zulfiqar F. Plant phenolics: neglected secondary metabolites in plant stress tolerance. Braz J Bot. 2024;47(3):703-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-023-00949-x
  50. 50. Wang J, Wang J, Yue Z, Luo S, Zhang B, Yu J, et al. Disease and pest resistance through phenolic substances in the Solanaceae. J Plant Growth Regul. 2024;43(7):2121-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-024-11265-3
  51. 51. Khanday AH, Badroo IA, Wagay NA, Rafiq S. Role of phenolic compounds in disease resistance to plants. In: Plant phenolics in biotic stress management. 2024. p.455-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3334-1_19
  52. 52. Akila, et al. Biological control of tomato bacterial leaf spots and its impact on some antioxidant enzymes, phenolic compounds and pigment content. Biology. 2024;13(6):369. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13060369
  53. 53. Meena, et al. Role of elicitors to initiate the induction of systemic resistance in plants to biotic stress. Plant Stress. 2022;5:100103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2022.100103
  54. 54. Rasool M, Akhter A, Haider MS. Molecular and biochemical insight into biochar and Bacillus subtilis induced defense in tomatoes against Alternaria solani. Sci Hortic. 2021;285:110203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110203

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.