Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Effect of sun and convective drying under different temperature–time conditions on the physicochemical and bioactive properties of Mexican Forastero cocoa beans (Theobroma cacao L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12255
Submitted
14 October 2025
Published
31-10-2026

Abstract

Drying is a vital postharvest stage in cocoa processing because it reduces moisture content and affects the physicochemical and bioactive properties of the beans. This study evaluated the effects of traditional sun drying and controlled convective drying under different temperature–time regimes on fermented Mexican Forastero cocoa beans from Chiapas, Mexico. Beans that had been fermented for 168 hr were either sun-dried (STS) or convectively dried at 35, 40, 45 and 50 °C (SC-35–SC-50). We measured proximate composition, Commission Internationale de l'Éclairage L*a*b* (CIELAB) colour parameters, total polyphenol content (TPC) and antioxidant capacity using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-azinobis- (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS) assays. Pearson correlations were used to examine the associations between the drying conditions and the bioactive responses. All treatments reduced moisture content to less than 7 %, but drying time decreased from 56 hr for STS to 14 hr for SC-50. Several physicochemical, colour and bioactive properties were significantly influenced by the drying conditions. SC-50 caused the most marked darkening and had the lowest TPC and antioxidant activity. SC-35 and SC-45 had the highest TPC and DPPH radical-scavenging activity. Total polyphenol content was strongly correlated with DPPH (r = 0.906), while drying temperature and time were strongly inversely correlated (r = -0.944), showing that both factors should be considered together. These findings support the development of standardised drying criteria based on temperature–time conditions, final moisture content and relevant quality attributes in order to obtain more consistent Mexican Forastero cocoa beans for further processing.

References

  1. 1. Febrianto NA, Wang S, Zhu F. Chemical and biological properties of cocoa beans affected by processing: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(30):8403–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1928597
  2. 2. Kongor JE, Owusu M, Oduro-Yeboah C. Cocoa production in the 2020s: Challenges and solutions. CABI Agric Biosci. 2024;5(1):102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-024-00310-6
  3. 3. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. 2025. https://nube.siap.gob.mx/cierreagricola/
  4. 4. Soto PL, Colmenares SE, Kanter MB, Cruz AL, Lugo EE, Hernández BH, et al. Contributions of agroforestry systems to food provisioning of peasant households: Conflicts and synergies in Chiapas, Mexico. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2022;5:756611. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.756611
  5. 5. Sántiz TR, Nadal A, Salvatierra IB, Nazar BDA, Bello BE. Análisis de los factores que limitan a los pequeños productores en el desarrollo de la actividad cacaotera en México. Agroalimentaria. 2023;29(56):39–63. https://doi.org/10.53766/Agroalim/2023.01.56.03
  6. 6. Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. Cacao, riqueza del campo mexicano: Gobierno de México. 2021. https://www.gob.mx/agricultura/articulos/cacao-riqueza-del-campo-mexicano
  7. 7. Badrie N, Bekele F, Sikora E, Sikora M. Cocoa agronomy, quality, nutritional and health aspects. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr.2015;55(5):620–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.669428
  8. 8. Molina MR, Martínez RMF. Variables que impiden incrementar las exportaciones de cacao en grano del estado de Tabasco. CIMEXUS. 2020;15(2):63–81. https://doi.org/10.33110/cimexus150203
  9. 9. de Souza SPT, Braga AVU, de Brito ADC, Tonin IP, Martins MOP, Efraim P. Influence of variety and harvest on the sensory characteristics of chocolate made from cocoa fermented with different pulp contents. LWT. 2024;210:116768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116768
  10. 10. Fang Y, Li R, Chu Z, Zhu K, Gu F, Zhang Y. Chemical and flavour profile changes of cocoa beans (Theobroma cacao L.) during primary fermentation. Food Sci Nutr. 2020;8(8):4121–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1701
  11. 11. Rottiers H, Tzompa SDA, De Winne A, Ruales J, De Clippeleer J, De Leersnyder I, et al. Dynamics of volatile compounds and flavour precursors during spontaneous fermentation of fine flavour Trinitario cocoa beans. Eur Food Res Technol. 2019;245(9):1917–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03307-y
  12. 12. Mbakouop AN, Nzoundja Fapi CB, Siéwé AD, Tchakounté H, Ankungha AI. Improving cocoa drying efficiency with a mixed forced convection solar dryer in an equatorial climate. Thermo.2025;5(2):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/thermo5020018
  13. 13. Obinze S, Ojimelukwe PC, Eke BA. Box fermentation and solar drying improve the nutrient composition and organoleptic quality of chocolate from cocoa beans. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2022;6:1023123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.1023123
  14. 14. Santander M, Chica V, Correa HAM, Rodríguez J, Villagran E, Vaillant F, et al. Unravelling cocoa drying technology: A comprehensive review of the influence on flavour formation and quality. Foods. 2025;14(5):721. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14050721
  15. 15. Afoakwa EO, Budu AS, Mensah BH, Felix J. Changes in biochemical and physico-chemical qualities during drying of pulp preconditioned and fermented cocoa (Theobroma cacao) beans. J Nutrition Health Food Sci. 2014;2(3):1–8. https://doi.org/10.15226/jnhfs.2014.00121
  16. 16. Haruna L, Abano EE, Teye E, Tukwarlba I, Adu S, Agyei KJ, et al. Effect of partial pulp removal and fermentation duration on drying behaviour, nib acidification, fermentation quality and flavour attributes of Ghanaian cocoa beans. J Agric Food Res.2024;17:101211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101211
  17. 17. Porras BLD, Oquendo TJD, Garzón GMA, Álvarez MOL. Effect of the solar drying process on the sensory and chemical quality of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) cultivated in Antioquia, Colombia. Food Res Int. 2019;115:259–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.084
  18. 18. Afoakwa EO, Quao J, Budu AS, Takrama J, Saalia FK. Effect of pulp preconditioning on acidification, proteolysis, sugars and free fatty acids concentration during fermentation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) beans. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2011;62(7):755–64. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637486.2011.581224
  19. 19. Mougang NN, Tene ST, Zokou R, Kohole HAF, Solefack EN, Mboukap AN, et al. Influence of fermentation time, drying time and temperature on cocoa pods (Theobroma cacao L.) marketability. Appl Food Res. 2024;4(2):100460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2024.100460
  20. 20. Djikeng FT, Teyomnou WT, Tenyang N, Tiencheu B, Morfor AT, Touko BAH, et al. Effect of traditional and oven roasting on the physicochemical properties of fermented cocoa beans. Heliyon.2018;4(2):e00533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00533
  21. 21. Cerit İ, Demirkol O, Avcı A, Arkan BS. Phenolic content and oxidative stability of chocolates produced with roasted and unroasted cocoa beans. Food Sci Technol Int. 2024;30(5):450–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/10820132231154429
  22. 22. Jiménez RDJ, García AP, Márquez RFJ, Vázquez MR, Carrera LA, González AFA, et al. Temperature effect of Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) drying on energy consumption, bioactive composition and vibrational changes. Processes. 2024;12(11):2523. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112523
  23. 23. Utrilla-Vázquez M, Rodríguez-Campos J, Avendaño-Arazate CH, Gschaedler A, Lugo-Cervantes E. Analysis of volatile compounds of five varieties of Maya cocoa during fermentation and drying processes by Venn diagram and PCA. Food Res Int. 2020;129:108834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108834
  24. 24. Velásquez RD, Rodríguez CJ, Avendaño AC, Gschaedler A, Alcázar VM, Lugo CE. Forastero and Criollo cocoa beans, differences on the profile of volatile and non-volatile compounds in the process from fermentation to liquor. Heliyon.2023;9(4):e15129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15129
  25. 25. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. Gaithersburg: AOAC International; 2002.
  26. 26. International Organisation for Standardisation. Cocoa beans - Specification and quality requirements (ISO Standard No. 2451:2017). 2017.
  27. 27. Andrade AJ, Rivera GJ, Chire FGC, Ureña PMO. Physical and chemical properties of cacao cultivars Theobroma cacao L. from Ecuador and Peru. Enfoque UTE. 2019;10(4):1–12.
  28. 28. Fematt FGE, Aguiló AI, Marcos B, Camargo OBA, Sánchez VR, Soto CMC, et al. Milk Protein-Based Edible Films: Influence on Mechanical, Hydrodynamic, Optical and Antioxidant Properties. Coatings. 2022;12(2):196. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12020196
  29. 29. Womeni HM, Tonfack DF, Iruku NSSP, Karuna MSL, Prasad RBN, Linder M. Valorisation of soursop flowers (Annona muricata L.) as potent source of natural antioxidants for stabilisation of palm olein during accelerated storage. Food Sci Nutr. 2016;4(6):802–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.349
  30. 30. Kim SJ, Cho AR, Han J. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of leafy green vegetable extracts and their applications to meat product preservation. Food Control. 2013;29(1):112–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.05.060
  31. 31. Calvo MA, Botina LB, García CM, Cardona AW, Montenegro CA, Criollo J. Dynamics of cocoa fermentation and its effect on quality. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):16746. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95703-2
  32. 32. Brunetto MR, Gallignani M, Orozco W, Clavijo S, Delgado Y, Ayala C, et al. The effect of fermentation and roasting on free amino acids profile in Criollo cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) grown in Venezuela. Braz J Food Technol. 2020;23:e2019150. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-6723.15019
  33. 33. Hinneh M, Semanhyia E, Van de Walle D, De Winne A, Tzompa-Sosa DA, Scalone GLL, et al. Assessing the influence of pod storage on sugar and free amino acid profiles and the implications on some Maillard reaction related flavour volatiles in Forastero cocoa beans. Food Res Int. 2018;111:607–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.05.064
  34. 34. Ho VTT, Zhao J, Fleet G. Yeasts are essential for cocoa bean fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014;174:72–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.12.014
  35. 35. Asiedu BK, Tutu CO, Afoakwa EO, Akonor PT, Budu AS, Saalia FK. Effect of manual depulping and roasting on functional, rheological and sensory characteristics of cocoa liquor. Appl Food Res. 2026;6(1):102033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2026.102033
  36. 36. Aldas MJ, Otero TV, Revilla CK, Carrillo PM, Sánchez AD. Incidencia del tostado sobre las características fisicoquímicas y alcaloides de la cascarilla de cacao (Theobroma cacao) y su efecto en las propiedades organolépticas de una infusión. Agroind Sci. 2023;13(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.17268/agroind.sci.2023.01.02
  37. 37. Shahanas E, Panjikkaran S, Sharon C, Aneena E, Suma B, Minimol J, et al. Influence of drying methods on primary processing techniques of cocoa beans based on free fatty acid content. Indian J Nutr Diet. 2019;56(3):312–21. https://doi.org/10.21048/ijnd.2019.56.3.23579
  38. 38. Assa A, Rosniati, Yunus M. Effects of cocoa clones and fermentation times on physical and chemical characteristics of cocoa beans (Theobroma cacao L.). IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2019;673:012012.
  39. 39. Cabrera ZJB, Encalada MC, Guerrero QJ, Reyes HS, Castillo MA, Toro LJ. Influencia de la madurez de las mazorcas de cacao: calidad nutricional y sensorial del cultivar CCN-51. Rev Bases Cienc. 2021;6(2):27–40. https://doi.org/10.33936/rev_bas_de_la_ciencia.v6i2.2706
  40. 40. Lin LY, Chen KF, Changchien LL, Chen KC, Peng RY. Volatile variation of Theobroma cacao Malvaceae L. beans cultivated in Taiwan affected by processing via fermentation and roasting. Molecules. 2022;27(10):3058. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27103058
  41. 41. Chavez MA, Pérez MD, Montalvo GI, Medina SMA, Bautista HE. Evaluación del Proceso Fermentativo Tradicional del Theobroma bicolour en Teotitlán del Valle, Oaxaca, México. Cienc Lat Rev Cient Multidiscipl. 2025;9(2):7899–909. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i2.17507
  42. 42. Quelal VMA, Lerma GMJ, Pérez EÉ, Talens P, Barat JM. Roadmap of cocoa quality and authenticity control in the industry: A review of conventional and alternative methods. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020;19(2):448–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12522
  43. 43. Hu S, Byung YK, Moo YB. Physicochemical properties and antioxidant capacity of raw, roasted and puffed cacao beans. Food Chem. 2016;194:1089–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.126
  44. 44. Oracz J, Nebesny E. Antioxidant properties of cocoa beans (Theobroma cacao L.): influence of cultivar and roasting conditions. Int J Food Prop. 2016;19(6):1242–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2015.1071840
  45. 45. Aprotosoaie AC, Luca SV, Miron A. Flavour chemistry of cocoa and cocoa products-an overview. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2016;15(1):73–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12180
  46. 46. Afoakwa EO, Ofosu AE, Budu AS, Mensah BH, Takrama JF. Roasting effects on phenolic content and free-radical scavenging activities of pulp preconditioned and fermented cocoa (Theobroma cacao) beans. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev. 2015;15(1):9635–50.
  47. 47. García AP, Lagunes GLM, Barajas FJ, García AR. Physicochemical Changes of Cocoa Beans during Roasting Process. J Food Qual. 2017;2017:2969324. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2969324
  48. 48. Hernández HC, Viera AI, Morales SAM, Fernández BJ, Rodríguez GG. Bioactive compounds in Mexican genotypes of cocoa cotyledon and husk. Food Chem. 2018;240:831–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.08.018

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.