Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp9 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Effects of farmyard manure and zinc application on yield and quality of kharif fodder sorghum

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12447
Submitted
28 October 2025
Published
12-11-2026

Abstract

A field study was conducted during the kharif season of 2024 at the Main Forage Research Station, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, to assess the effects of farmyard manure (FYM) and zinc application on the yield and quality of kharif fodder sorghum. The experiment comprised twelve treatment combinations involving two FYM levels (0 and 10 t/ha) and six zinc treatments: Z1 (0 kg Zn/ha), Z2 (12.5 kg Zn/ha), Z3 (25 kg Zn/ha), Z4 (12.5 kg Zn/ha followed by zinc-solubilising bacteria (ZnSB) soil application), Z5 (12.5 kg Zn/ha followed by 0.05 % Zn foliar application) and Z6 (12.5 kg Zn/ha followed by ZnSB soil application and 0.05 % Zn foliar application). The experiment was conducted in a factorial randomised block design (FRBD) with three replications. Application of 10 t FYM/ha significantly increased green fodder yield (421.50 q/ha), dry matter yield (128.93 q/ha), crude protein yield (11.94 q/ha), plant zinc content (29.91 mg/kg) and zinc uptake (41.07 g/ha), along with post-harvest available soil zinc (2.96 mg/kg) and ZnSB count, compared with the control. Among zinc treatments, Z6 produced higher green fodder yield (376.33 q/ha), dry matter yield (123.36 q/ha), crude protein yield (11.59 q/ha) and zinc content (29.64 mg/kg), while Z5 and Z6 recorded higher post-harvest available zinc (2.75 and 2.84 mg/kg respectively) and zinc uptake (41.99 g/ha) respectively. The FYM × zinc interaction was significant. F2Z5 produced higher dry matter (180.73 q/ha) and crude protein yield (18.61 q/ha), whereas F2Z6 recorded higher zinc uptake (64.03 g/ha) and post-harvest available zinc (3.40 mg/kg).

References

  1. 1. Kumar S, Kumar N, Satpal, Kumar P, Kharor N, Dahiya P. Effect of Nano urea on sustainable production of fodder sorghum. Forage Res. 2024;50(1):70–76.
  2. 2. Dagar JC. Potentials for fodder production in degraded lands. In: Ghosh PK, Mohanta SK, Singh JB, Vijay D, Kumar RV, Yadav VK, Kumar S, editors. Approaches towards fodder security in India. New Delhi: Studera Press; 2017. p. 334–64.
  3. 3. Singh DN, Bohra JS, Tyagi V, Singh T, Banjara TR, Gupta G. A review of India's fodder production status and opportunities. Grass Forage Sci. 2022;77(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12561
  4. 4. Roy D, Shankaranarayan KA, Pathak RS. The fodder trees of India and their importance. Indian Forester. 2022; 106:306–311.
  5. 5. Suruthi S, Sujatha K, Menaka C. Effect of organic and inorganic foliar nutrition on growth and yield attributes of barnyard millet. Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7(3):851–3.
  6. 6. Soni PG, Yadav RK, Kumar A, Kumar R, Gajender, Yadav T, Sharma A, Kushwaha M. Effect of water quality regimes, irrigation schedules, RSC levels and neutralizer on physiological and biochemical behaviour of fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Indian J Agric Sci. 2020;90(9):1702–7. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i9.106600
  7. 7. Thakral SK. Response of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) to different sources of nutrition under semi-arid ecosystem. Forage Res. 2008;34(1):39–40.
  8. 8. Hussain A, Subhanullah, Ali M, Ali W, Tariq M, Muhammad S, et al. Impression of disparate levels of poultry manure and humic acid on the yield and yield traits of maize (Zea mays L.). Eur J Exp Biol. 2018;8(4):23. https://doi.org/10.21767/2248-9215.100064
  9. 9. Tariq Aziz, Abdul Qadir Gola, Muhammad Ali Mahesar, Abdul Nabi Domki, Barkat Ali, Muhammad Kashif, et al. Effect of humic acid levels on fodder production of maize (Zea mays) varieties under agro-climatic conditions of Tandojam-Sindh Pakistan. Pure and Appl Biol. 2019;8(2):1661–7. https://doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2019.80108
  10. 10. Rathod DD, Meena MC, Patel KP. Evaluation of different zinc-enriched organics as source of zinc under wheat-maize (fodder) cropping sequence on zinc-deficient Typic Haplustepts. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2012;60(1):50–5.
  11. 11. Singh S, Singh A, Hasanain M. Effect of zinc fertilisation on growth and yield of basmati rice (Oryza sativa) varieties. Indian J Agron. 2022;67(3):227–32. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v67i3.11
  12. 12. Begum MC, Islam M, Sarkar MR, Azad MAS, Huda AKMN, Kabir AH. Auxin signalling is closely associated with Zn-efficiency in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Plant Interact. 2016;11(1):124–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2016.1220026
  13. 13. de Valença AW, Bake A, Brouwer ID, Giller KE. Agronomic biofortification of crops to fight hidden hunger in sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Food Secur. 2017;12:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.12.001
  14. 14. White PJ, Broadley MR. Biofortification of crops with seven mineral elements often lacking in human diets - iron, zinc, copper, calcium, magnesium, selenium and iodine. New Phytol. 2009;182(1):49–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02738.x
  15. 15. Nubé M, Voortman RL. Simultaneously addressing micronutrient deficiencies in soils, crops, animal and human nutrition: opportunities for higher yields and better health. Amsterdam: Centre for World Food Studies; 2006. Staff Working Paper No. WP-06–02.
  16. 16. Jat SL, Shivay YS, Parihar CM. Effect of dual-purpose summer legumes and zinc fertilisation on system productivity, economics and nutrient use-efficiencies of rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian J Agric Sci.2014;84(8):942–50. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i8.43075
  17. 17. Cochran WG, Cox GM. Experimental designs. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1957. p. 546–68.
  18. 18. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.; 1973.
  19. 19. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  20. 20. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci. 1956; 25:259–60.
  21. 21. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture; 1954. Circular No. 939. p. 1–19.
  22. 22. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1978;42(3):421–8. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
  23. 23. Van Soest PJ, Goering HD. Forage fibre analysis. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service; 1970. Agriculture Handbook No. 379.
  24. 24. Hogg PG, Ahlgren HL. A rapid method for determining hydrocyanic acid content of single plants of Sudan grass. Agron J. 1942;34(2):199–200. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1942.00021962003400020011x
  25. 25. Dhingra OD, Sinclair JB. Basic plant pathology methods. New Delhi: CBS Publishers; 1993. p. 179–90.
  26. 26. Shah KA, Balodariya KK, Patel NN, Salunkhe S. Effect of variety, FYM and nitrogen levels on growth, yield and quality of summer fodder pearl millet under South Gujarat conditions. Forage Res. 2022;48(1):104–10. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-4433.2023.00096.X
  27. 27. Pandey A, Patel PM, Shinde RD, Jakasaniya MS, Chaudhary R. Effect of biochar and FYM on growth, yield and chemical composition of fodder sorghum. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(1):2974–9. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i1as.8722
  28. 28. Teshome T, Alemayehu Y, Regasa A. Integrated use of farmyard manure and NPS influenced soil chemical properties, yield and yield attributes of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) in Assosa district, western Ethiopia. East Afr J Sci. 2023;17(2):185–98.
  29. 29. Bayu W, Rethman NFG, Hammes PS, Alemu G. Effects of farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizers on sorghum growth, yield and nitrogen use in a semi-arid area of Ethiopia. J Plant Nutr.2006;29(2):391–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160500320962
  30. 30. Nagar K, Patel HK, Raval CH, Badi AR, Lakshman N, Chaudhary N. Response of FYM and split application of nitrogen on growth and green yield of fodder maize (Zea mays L.). Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2022;34(23):245–53. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2331585
  31. 31. Sheoran RS, Rana DS. Relative efficacy of vermicompost and farmyard manure integrated with inorganic fertilisers for sustainable productivity of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Acta Agron Hung. 2005;53(3):303–8. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.53.2005.3.7
  32. 32. Sabhad HV, Sakarvadia HL, Hirpara DV, Jadeja AS, Vekaria LC. Influence of cadmium and FYM on growth, yield and quality of fodder sorghum. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(6):546–9. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i6h.10832
  33. 33. Patel VN, Mistry GJ, Patel DH, Ramani VP. Effect of Cd and FYM on growth and yield of forage sorghum and forage maize. Int J Chem Stud. 2017;5(2):504–9.
  34. 34. Patel PC, Patel JR. Effect of zinc with and without farmyard manure on production and quality of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Indian J Agron. 1992;37(4):729–35.
  35. 35. Marvaniya PP, Jetpara PI, Sakarvadia HL. Effect of sewage and well water on yield and micronutrients uptake by sorghum under variable fertilisation. Prog Res Int J. 2016;11(2):223–7.
  36. 36. Kumar R, Narwal RK, Singh S. Integrated response of organic and inorganic fertilisers on wheat in normal and saline soils. In: Extended summaries Vol 1: Second International Agronomy Congress; 2002 Nov 26-30 p.177-178; Published by Indian Society of Agronomy, New Delhi, India
  37. 37. Choudhary A, Sharma S, Rathi N. Effects of integrated nutrient management on fibre fractions in oats and maize. Crop Sci Pract. 2024;11(3):210–220.
  38. 38. Sher A, Adnan M, Sattar A, Ul-Allah S, Ijaz M, Hassan MU, et al. Combined application of organic and inorganic amendments improved the yield and nutritional quality of forage sorghum. Agronomy. 2022;12(4):896. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040896
  39. 39. Bolo P, Mucheru-Muna MW, Mwirichia RK, Kinyua M, Ayaga G, Kihara J. Influence of farmyard manure application on potential zinc solubilising microbial species abundance in a Ferralsol of Western Kenya. Agriculture. 2023;13(12):2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13122217
  40. 40. Goteti PK, Emmanuel LDA, Desai S, Shaik MHA. Prospective zinc solubilising bacteria for enhanced nutrient uptake and growth promotion in maize (Zea mays L.). Int J Microbiol. 2013;2013:869697. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/869697
  41. 41. Ramakrishna CH, Lata AM, Murali B, Madhavi A, Venkateswarlu M. Yield and silage quality of fodder maize (Zea mays L.) as influenced by zinc fertilisation. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(5):1799–802.
  42. 42. Bhoya M, Chaudhari PP, Raval CH, Bhatt PK. Effect of nitrogen and zinc on yield and quality of fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) varieties. Forage Res. 2013;39(1):24–26.
  43. 43. Jamil M, Sajad A, Ahmad M, Akhtar MF, Abbasi GH, Arshad M. Growth, yield and quality of maize (Zea mays L.) fodder as affected by nitrogen-zinc interaction in arid climate. Pak J Agric Sci. 2015;52(3):637–43.
  44. 44. Sewhag M, Pawar N, Kumar R, Kumar J, Singh A, Malhi S, et al. Effect of foliar spray of zinc and iron on fodder yield of sorghum. Forage Res. 2023;49(3):329–335.
  45. 45. Bhanuprakash N, Yadav JS, Kumar A, Satpal, Akshit, Surbhi. Rathore A. Effect of different phosphorus and zinc levels on yield and quality of forage sorghum. Forage Res. 2021;47(1):89–94.
  46. 46. Dambiwal D, Katkar RN, Kumawat KR, Hakla CR, Bairwa B, Kumar K, et al. Effect of soil and foliar application of zinc on sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) yield, agronomic efficiency and apparent recovery efficiency. Int J Chem Stud. 2017;5(4):435–8.
  47. 47. Soleymani A, Shahrajabian MH. The effects of Fe, Mn and Zn foliar application on yield, ash and protein percentage of forage sorghum in climatic conditions of Esfahan. Int J Biol. 2012;4(3):92–6. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijb.v4n3p92
  48. 48. Prasad R, Shivay YS, Kumar D. Interactions of zinc with other nutrients in soils and plants- a review. Indian J Fertil. 2016;12(5):16–26.
  49. 49. Devarajan R, Savithri P, Manickam TS, Kothandaraman GV. Effect of FYM and zinc on yield sorghum. Madras Agric J. 1987;74(4-5):193–7. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.A02167
  50. 50. Kashyap S, Kumar R, Ram H, Kumar A, Basak N, Sheoran P, et al. Quantitative and qualitative response of fodder maize to use of bulk and nano-fertilisers in North Western Plains of India. Agronomy. 2023;13(7):1889. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071889
  51. 51. Faujdar RS, Sharma M. Effect of FYM, biofertilisers and zinc on dynamics of available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in soil under maize-wheat cropping system. Asian J Soil Sci. 2013;8(1):121–6.
  52. 52. Meena NR, Meena MK, Sharma KK, Meena MD. Effect of zinc enriched farm yard manures on yield of mung bean and physico-chemical properties of soil. Legume Res. 2018;41(5):734–9. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-3929

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.