Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Enhancing the biogas generation potential of Cumbu Napier grass through hydrothermal pretreatment

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13027
Submitted
2 December 2025
Published
20-04-2026

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the feasibility of hydrothermal pretreatment of cumbu napier grass for biochemical methane production. The hydrothermal pretreatment of the cumbu napier grass was carried out with 10 % total solids loading rate at various pressures (1, 5 and 10 bar) to disrupt the lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose bonding. The hydrothermal pretreated cumbu napier grass is mixed with cow dung at different ratios, such as (1:0, 3:1, 1:1 and 1:3).  The study evaluates the hydrothermal pretreatment effectiveness of cumbu napier grass treated at 10 bar and mixed with an equal ratio of cow dung, resulting in the highest biogas yield of 18.64 L/kg with 44 to 56 % methane content. Also, this pretreatment condition confirmed high total solids (66.00 %), cellulose (79.64 %), hemicellulose (67.20 %) and lignin (56.40 %) destruction efficiency. Additionally, the FT-IR analysis and SEM analysis results indicated structural modification in the pretreated biomass, in turn enhancing the biodigestibility and confirmed the best approach to convert waste to energy in a sustainable way with a 3-year payback for a 1000 kg/day biodigester.

References

  1. 1. Abu-Dahrieh J, Orozco A, Groom E, Rooney D. Batch and continuous biogas production from grass silage liquor. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(23):10922–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.072
  2. 2. Akhtar N, Gupta K, Goyal D, Goyal A. Recent advances in pretreatment technologies for efficient hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2016;35(2):489–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12257
  3. 3. Gitanjali J, Pugalendhi S, Kamaraj S, Karthikeyan S, Kumar VJF. Feasibility test of agricultural residues through characterization for utilization in plasma gasification. Indian J Agric Sci. 2015;85(12):1534–9. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i12.54290
  4. 4. Anex RP, Lynd LR, Laser MS, Heggenstaller AH, Liebman M. Potential for enhanced nutrient cycling through coupling of agricultural and bioenergy systems. Crop Sci. 2007;47(4):1327–35. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0406
  5. 5. Antonopoulou G, Vayenas D, Lyberatos G. Biogas production from physicochemically pretreated grass lawn waste: Comparison of different process schemes. Molecules. 2020;25(2):296. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020296
  6. 6. Beausang C, McDonnell K, Murphy F. Assessing the environmental sustainability of grass silage and cattle slurry for biogas production. J Clean Prod. 2021;298:126838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126838
  7. 7. Bedoić R, Čuček L, Ćosić B, Krajnc D, Smoljanić G, Kravanja Z, et al. Green biomass to biogas–A study on anaerobic digestion of residue grass. J Clean Prod. 2019;213:700–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.224
  8. 8. Bharathiraja B, Sudharsana T, Jayamuthunagai J, Praveenkumar R, Chozhavendhan S, Iyyappan J. Biogas production–A review on composition, fuel properties, feed stock and principles of anaerobic digestion. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;90:570–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.093
  9. 9. Blokhina YN, Prochnow A, Plöchl M, Luckhaus C, Heiermann M. Concepts and profitability of biogas production from landscape management grass. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(2):2086–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.002
  10. 10. Choi Y, Ryu J, Lee SR. Influence of carbon type and carbon to nitrogen ratio on the biochemical methane potential, pH and ammonia nitrogen in anaerobic digestion. J Anim Sci Technol. 2020;62(1):74. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.1.74
  11. 11. Dalpaz R, Konrad O, da Silva Cyrne CC, Barzotto HP, Hasan C, Guerini Filho M. Using biogas for energy cogeneration: An analysis of electric and thermal energy generation from agro-industrial waste. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2020;40:100774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100774
  12. 12. Dar RA, Parmar M, Dar EA, Sani RK, Phutela UG. Bio-methanation of agricultural residues: Potential, limitations and possible solutions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;135:110217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110217
  13. 13. Das A, Mondal C, Roy S. Pretreatment methods of ligno-cellulosic biomass: A review. J Eng Sci Technol Rev. 2015;8(5):20. https://doi.org/10.25103/jestr.085.20
  14. 14. Fazal MA, Rubaiee S, Al-Zahrani A. Overview of the interactions between automotive materials and biodiesel obtained from different feedstocks. Fuel Process Technol. 2019;196:106178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106178
  15. 15. Ferdeș M, Zăbavă BȘ, Paraschiv G, Ionescu M, Dincă MN, Moiceanu G. Food waste management for biogas production in the context of sustainable development. Energies. 2022;15(17):6268. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176268
  16. 16. Ferrer A, Alciaturi C, Faneite A, Ríos J. Analyses of biomass fibers by XRD, FT-IR and NIR. In: Vaz J S, editor. Analytical techniques and methods for biomass. 2016. p.45–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41414-0_3
  17. 17. Hu F, Ragauskas A. Pretreatment and lignocellulosic chemistry. BioEnergy Res. 2012:1043–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9208-0
  18. 18. Idrees M, Adnan A, Qureshi FA. Comparison of acid and alkali catalytic efficiency during enzymatic saccharification of corncob and lactic acid production. Pak J Agric Sci. 2014;51(4).
  19. 19. Ioelovich M. Methods for determination of chemical composition of plant biomass. J SITA. 2015;17(4):208–14.
  20. 20. Jomnonkhaow U, Sittijunda S, Reungsang A. Influences of size reduction, hydration and thermal-assisted hydration pretreatment to increase the biogas production from Napier grass and Napier silage. Bioresour Technol. 2021;331:125034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125034
  21. 21. Kainthola J, Kalamdhad AS, Goud VV. A review on enhanced biogas production from anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass by different enhancement techniques. Process Biochem. 2019;84:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2019.05.023
  22. 22. Kalinichenko A, Havrysh V, Perebyynis V. Evaluation of biogas production and usage potential. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2016;23(3):387–400. https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2016-0027
  23. 23. Kammoun M, Margellou A, Toteva VB, Aladjadjiyan A, Sousa AF, Luis SV, et al. The key role of pretreatment for the one-step and multi-step conversions of European lignocellulosic materials into furan compounds. RSC Adv. 2023;13(31):21395–420. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA01533E
  24. 24. Kasulla S, Malik SJ, Yadav A, Kathpal G. Potential of biogas generation from hybrid Napier grass. Int J Trend Sci Res Dev. 2022;6(2): 277–81.
  25. 25. Khan IU, Othman MH, Hashim H, Matsuura T, Ismail AF, Rezaei-DashtArzhandi M, et al. Biogas as a renewable energy fuel–A review of biogas upgrading, utilisation and storage. Energy Convers Manag. 2017;150:277–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.035
  26. 26. Pugalendhi S, Gitanjali J, Shalini R, Subramanian P. Handbook on renewable energy and green technology. CRC Press; 2024. p.20. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781032711911
  27. 27. Kumar V, Yadav SK, Kumar J, Ahluwalia V. A critical review on current strategies and trends employed for removal of inhibitors and toxic materials generated during biomass pretreatment. Bioresour Technol. 2020;299:122633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122633
  28. 28. Manfredini A, Chiariotti A, Santangelo E, Rossi E, Renzi G, Dell’Abate MT. Assessing the biological value of soluble organic fractions from tomato pomace digestates. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2021;21(1):301–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00361-4
  29. 29. Manyi-Loh CE, Lues R. Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: Substrate characteristics (challenge) and innovation. Fermentation. 2023;9(8):755. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9080755
  30. 30. Mirmohamadsadeghi S, Karimi K, Azarbaijani R, Yeganeh LP, Angelidaki I, Nizami AS, et al. Pretreatment of lignocelluloses for enhanced biogas production: A review on influencing mechanisms and the importance of microbial diversity. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;135:110173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110173
  31. 31. Mukherjee A, Patra BR, Pattnaik F, Okolie JA, Sonil N, Dalai AK. Biomethane production through anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass and organic wastes. In: Nanda S, Sarangi PK, editors. Biomethane. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2022. p. 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003277163-4
  32. 32. Mussatto SI, Fernandes M, Milagres AM, Roberto IC. Effect of hemicellulose and lignin on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose from brewers’ spent grain. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2008;43(2):124–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.11.006
  33. 33. Narendra N, Ramakrishnan V, Thomas A, Lambodhar UA, Suhas K. Characterization and feasibility of biogas yield using mango fruit peels and durva grass. Mater Today Proc. 2021;47:4624–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.479
  34. 34. Paritosh K, Yadav M, Kesharwani N, Pareek N, Karthyikeyan OP, Balan V, et al. Strategies to improve solid state anaerobic bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: An overview. Bioresour Technol. 2021;331:125036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125036
  35. 35. Pinpatthanapong K, Boonnorat J, Glanpracha N, Rangseesuriyachai T. Biogas production by co-digestion of sodium hydroxide pretreated Napier grass and food waste for community sustainability. Energy Sources A. 2022;44(1):1678–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2022.2055232
  36. 36. Poddar BJ, Nakhate SP, Gupta RK, Chavan AR, Singh AK, Khardenavis AA, et al. A comprehensive review on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes for improved biogas production by anaerobic digestion. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2022:1–28.
  37. 37. Prasad RK, Sharma A, Mazumder PB, Dhussa A. A comprehensive pre-treatment strategy evaluation of ligno-hemicellulosic biomass to enhance biogas potential in the anaerobic digestion process. RSC Sustain. 2024;2(9):2444–67. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SU00099D
  38. 38. Qian P, Schoenau JJ. Availability of nitrogen in solid manure amendments with different C:N ratios. Can J Soil Sci. 2002;82(2):219–25. https://doi.org/10.4141/S01-018
  39. 39. Rabi Prasad B, Polaki S, Padhi RK, Manoja D. Comprehensive characterization of lignocellulosic biomass and their effective delignification for sustainable bioenergy. Res J Chem Environ. 2024;28:1. https://doi.org/10.25303/281rjce57067
  40. 40. Ramos A, Monteiro E, Rouboa A. Biomass pre-treatment techniques for the production of biofuels using thermal conversion methods–A review. Energy Convers Manag. 2022;270:116271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116271
  41. 41. Rangseesuriyachai T, Boonnorat J, Glanpracha N, Khetkorn W, Thiamngoen P, Pinpatthanapong K. Anaerobic co-digestion of elephant dung and biological pretreated Napier grass: Synergistic effect and kinetics of methane production. Biomass Bioenergy. 2023;175:106849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106849
  42. 42. Rodriguez C, Alaswad A, Benyounis KY, Olabi AG. Pretreatment techniques used in biogas production from grass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;68:1193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.022
  43. 43. Sahay S. Impact of pretreatment technologies for biomass to biofuel production. In: Substrate analysis for effective biofuels production. 2020. p.173–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9607-7_7
  44. 44. Sawasdee V, Pisutpaisal N. Feasibility of biogas production from Napier grass. Energy Procedia. 2014;61:1229–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.1064
  45. 45. Scherzinger M, Kaltschmitt M. Thermal pre-treatment options to enhance anaerobic digestibility–A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;137:110627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110627
  46. 46. Singh RP, Gautam M, Vaish B, Agrahari RK, Singh P, Singh RP. Explicating the fertilizing potential of anaerobic digestate on soil quality, growth and yield responses of Solanum lycopersicum var. Kashi Aman. Int J Environ Res. 2025;19(1):65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-024-00733-z
  47. 47. Tsapekos P, Kougias PG, Angelidaki I. Biogas production from ensiled meadow grass; effect of mechanical pretreatments and rapid determination of substrate biodegradability via physicochemical methods. Bioresour Technol. 2015;182:329–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.025
  48. 48. Wang J, Ma D, Lou Y, Ma J, Xing D. Optimization of biogas production from straw wastes by different pretreatments: Progress, challenges and prospects. Sci Total Environ. 2023:166992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166992
  49. 49. Warade H, Nagarnaik PB, Daryapurkar R. Feasibility of biogas production from napier grass using animal manure as co-substrate on pilot scale reactor. Water Energy Int. 2019;62(3):36–41.
  50. 50. Woiciechowski AL, Neto CJ, de Souza Vandenberghe LP, de Carvalho Neto DP, Sydney AC, Letti LA, et al. Lignocellulosic biomass: Acid and alkaline pretreatments and their effects on biomass recalcitrance–Conventional processing and recent advances. Bioresour Technol. 2020;304:122848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122848
  51. 51. Xu JK, Sun RC. Recent advances in alkaline pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Biomass fractionation technologies for a lignocellulosic feedstock based biorefinery. 2016. p.431–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802323-5.00019-0
  52. 52. Yang K, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Li S, Chen D, Li Z. Biomass-based porous composites with heat transfer characteristics: Preparation, performance and evaluation–A review. J Porous Mater. 2022;29(6):1667–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-022-01296-0
  53. 53. You T, Xu F. Applications of molecular spectroscopic methods to the elucidation of lignin structure. In: Stauffer MT, editor. Applications of molecular spectroscopy to current research in the chemical and biological sciences [Internet]. London: IntechOpen; 2016 [cited 2026 Mar 14]. p. 161–191. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/51761 https://doi.org/10.5772/64581
  54. 54. Zeshan KO, Visvanathan C. Effect of C/N ratio and ammonia-N accumulation in a pilot-scale thermophilic dry anaerobic digester. Bioresour Technol. 2012;113:294–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.028
  55. 55. Zheng Y, Zhao J, Xu F, Li Y. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2014;42:35–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2014.01.001
  56. 56. Souvannasouk V, Shen MY, Trejo M, Bhuyar P. Biogas production from Napier grass and cattle slurry using a green energy technology. Int J Innov Res Sci Stud. 2021;4(3):174–80. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v4i3.74

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.