Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2026)

Window-aware chill and heat requirements in olive: Partial least squares-derived thermal windows validated using Sentinel-2 NDVI

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13072
Submitted
16 December 2025
Published
14-04-2026 — Updated on 21-04-2026
Versions

Abstract

Olive flowering depends on two sequential thermal phases: winter chilling for endodormancy release, followed by spring heat accumulation for pre-anthesis development. Under increasing inter-annual variability, fixed calendar sums may misrepresent the true periods of thermal control. This study proposes a window-aware framework that objectively identifies the most influential chilling and forcing windows and cross-validates their phenological coherence using satellite greenness dynamics. Five seasons (2019–2020 to 2023–2024) were analysed for three olive cultivars (Picholine Marocaine, Haouzia, Menara) in the Middle Atlas (Morocco) with field observations of full bloom (BBCH scale stage 65; BBCH 65). Daily minimum/maximum temperatures (Tmin/Tmax) were reconstructed to hourly series to compute Chill Portions (Dynamic Model) and Growing Degree Hours (GDH; base 4.5 °C) for quantifying chill and heat requirements. Partial least squares (PLS) regression with leave-one-year-out stability screening isolated two robust windows: late November–mid-January (chilling) and late February–late March (forcing). Mean chilling requirements were similar across cultivars (~69 Chill Portions (CP); Coefficient of Variation (CV) ~10–13 %), whereas forcing demand differed (mean GDH ≈ 7864 for Haouzia, 8524 for Menara, 8967 for Picholine Marocaine). Sentinel-2 normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) (moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS), fallback) showed that the spring NDVI peak occurs ~1 month before BBCH 65 and therefore does not directly indicate full bloom timing in evergreen olive canopies. In contrast, BBCH 65 consistently fell within the start/end of season (SOS–EOS) envelope, providing a robust coherence check. This workflow provides objective thermal windows, cultivar-specific forcing fingerprints and an earth-observation (EO)-based coherence check for climate-ready cultivar selection in Mediterranean conditions for phenological forecasting and varietal adaptation.

References

  1. 1. Lang GA. Dormancy: A new universal terminology. HortScience. 1987;22:817–20. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.22.5.817
  2. 2. Dennis FG. Dormancy-what we know (and don’t know). HortScience. 1994;29:1249–55. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.29.11.1249
  3. 3. Rohde A, Bhalerao R. Plant dormancy in the perennial context. Trends Plant Sci. 2007;12:217–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.03.012
  4. 4. Faust M, Erez A, Rowland LJ, Wang SY, Norman HA. Bud dormancy in perennial fruit trees: physiological basis for dormancy induction, maintenance and release. HortScience. 1997;32:623–9. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.32.4.623
  5. 5. Hackett WP, Hartmann HT. The influence of temperature on floral initiation in the olive. Physiol Plant. 1967;20:430–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1967.tb07183.x
  6. 6. Badr SA, Hartmann HT. Effect of diurnally fluctuating vs. constant temperatures on flower induction and sex expression in the olive (Olea europaea). Physiol Plant. 1971;24:40–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1971.tb06712.x
  7. 7. Rallo L, Martin GC. The role of chilling in releasing olive floral buds from dormancy. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1991;116:1058–62. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.116.6.1058
  8. 8. Garcia-Mozo H, Orlandi F, Galan C, Fornaciari M, Romano B, Ruiz L, et al. Olive flowering phenology variation between different cultivars in Spain and Italy: modeling analysis. Theor Appl Climatol. 2009;95:385–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-008-0016-6
  9. 9. Rojo J, Orlandi F, Ben Dhiab A, Lara B, Picornell A, Oteros J, et al. Estimation of chilling and heat accumulation periods based on the timing of olive pollination. Forests. 2020;11:835. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080835
  10. 10. De Melo-Abreu J. Modelling olive flowering date using chilling for dormancy release and thermal time. Agric For Meteorol. 2004;125:117–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.02.009
  11. 11. Moriondo M, Ferrise R, Trombi G, Brilli L, Dibari C, Bindi M. Modelling olive trees and grapevines in a changing climate. Environ Model Softw. 2015;72:387–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.016
  12. 12. Picornell A, Abreu I, Ribeiro H. Trends and future projections of Olea flowering in the western Mediterranean: the example of the Alentejo region (Portugal). Agric For Meteorol. 2023;339:109559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109559
  13. 13. Campoy JA, Ruiz D, Egea J. Dormancy in temperate fruit trees in a global warming context: a review. Sci Hortic. 2011;130:357–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.07.011
  14. 14. El Yaacoubi A, Malagi G, Oukabli A, Hafidi M, Legave J-M. Global warming impact on floral phenology of fruit tree species in Mediterranean region. Sci Hortic. 2014;180:243–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.10.041
  15. 15. Abou-Saaid O, El Yaacoubi A, Moukhli A, El Bakkali A, Oulbi S, Delalande M, et al. Statistical approach to assess chill and heat requirements of olive tree based on flowering date and temperature data: towards selection of adapted cultivars to global warming. Agronomy. 2022;12:2975. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12122975
  16. 16. Boulouha B, Loussert R, Saadi R. Phenotypic variation of the ‘Picholine Marocaine’ olive cultivar in the Haouz region. Olivæ. 1992;43:30–3.
  17. 17. Khadari B, Charafi J, Abdelmajid M, Ater M. Substantial genetic diversity in cultivated Moroccan olive despite a single major cultivar: a paradoxical situation evidenced by the use of SSR loci. Tree Genet Genomes. 2008;4:213–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-007-0102-4
  18. 18. Luedeling E, Brown PH. A global analysis of the comparability of winter chill models for fruit and nut trees. Int J Biometeorol. 2011;55:411–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-010-0352-y
  19. 19. Richardson E, Seeley S, Walker D. A model for estimating the completion of rest for ‘Redhaven’ and ‘Elberta’ peach trees. HortScience. 1974;9:331–2. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.9.4.331
  20. 20. Meier U. Growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous plants: BBCH monograph. 2018. https://doi.org/10.5073/20180906-074619
  21. 21. Luedeling E, Gassner A. Partial least squares regression for analyzing walnut phenology in California. Agric For Meteorol. 2012;158–159:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.10.020
  22. 22. El Yaacoubi A, Oukabli A, Boulouha B, Hadiddou A, Ouaggas Y. Variation phénotypique des stades de floraison des variétés marocaines d’olivier (Olea europaea L.) en culture. Al Awamia. 2014;128.
  23. 23. Fernandez E, Whitney C, Luedeling E. The importance of chill model selection-a multi-site analysis. Eur J Agron. 2020;119:126103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126103
  24. 24. Fishman S, Erez A, Couvillon GA. The temperature dependence of dormancy breaking in plants: mathematical analysis of a two-step model involving a cooperative transition. J Theor Biol. 1987;124:473–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(87)80221-7
  25. 25. Erez A, Fishman S, Linsley-Noakes G, Allan P. The dynamic model for rest completion in peach buds. Acta Hortic. 1990;276:165–74. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1990.276.18
  26. 26. Drusch M, Del Bello U, Carlier S, Colin O, Fernandez V, Gascon F, et al. Sentinel-2: ESA’s optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services. Remote Sens Environ. 2012;120:25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.026
  27. 27. Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. Washington DC; 1974 [cited 2025 Sept 3]. p. 309–13.
  28. 28. Davies BFR, Oiry S, Rosa P, Zoffoli ML, Sousa AI, Thomas OR, et al. A sentinel watching over inter-tidal seagrass phenology across Western Europe and North Africa. Commun Earth Environ. 2024;5:382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01543-z
  29. 29. Grabska-Szwagrzyk E, Tymińska-Czabańska L. Sentinel-2 time series: a promising tool in monitoring temperate species spring phenology. Forestry. 2024;97:267–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpad039
  30. 30. Vrieling A, Meroni M, Darvishzadeh R, Skidmore AK, Wang T, Zurita-Milla R, et al. Vegetation phenology from Sentinel-2 and field cameras for a Dutch barrier island. Remote Sens Environ. 2018;215:517–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.03.014
  31. 31. Ashcroft GL, Richardson EA, Seeley SD. A statistical method of determining chill unit and growing degree hour requirements for deciduous fruit trees. HortScience. 1977;12:347–8. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.12.4.347
  32. 32. Viti R, Andreini L, Ruiz D, Egea J, Bartolini S, Iacona C, et al. Effect of climatic conditions on the overcoming of dormancy in apricot flower buds in two Mediterranean areas: Murcia (Spain) and Tuscany (Italy). Sci Hortic. 2010;124:217–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.01.001
  33. 33. Elloumi O, Ghrab M, Chatti A, Chaari A, Ben Mimoun M. Phenological performance of olive tree in a warm production area of central Tunisia. Sci Hortic. 2020;259:108759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108759
  34. 34. Aybar VE, De Melo-Abreu JP, Searles PS, Matias AC, Del Rio C, Caballero JM, et al. Evaluation of olive flowering at low latitude sites in Argentina using a chilling requirement model. Span J Agric Res. 2015;13:e0901. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2015131-6375
  35. 35. Ramos A, Rapoport HF, Cabello D, Rallo L. Chilling accumulation, dormancy release temperature and the role of leaves in olive reproductive budburst: evaluation using shoot explants. Sci Hortic. 2018;231:241–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.11.003
  36. 36. Gong Z, Ge W, Guo J, Liu J. Satellite remote sensing of vegetation phenology: progress, challenges and opportunities. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2024;217:149–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.08.011
  37. 37. Luedeling E, Schiffers K, Fohrmann T, Urbach C. PhenoFlex—an integrated model to predict spring phenology in temperate fruit trees. Agric For Meteorol. 2021;307:108491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108491

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.