Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)

In vitro mass production of banana bunchy top virus-free clonal Champa colla (Musa AAB) plantlets

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13231
Submitted
16 December 2025
Published
02-07-2026 — Updated on 09-07-2026
Versions

Abstract

Banana bunchy top virus (BBTV) poses a major threat to global banana production, often leading to complete yield loss in severely infected plants, thereby affecting the global economy. This study aimed to develop a reliable in vitro regeneration protocol for Musa AAB cv. Champa (Champa colla) using immature male flowers (IMFs) as explants, while ensuring the production of genetically stable and BBTV-free plantlets. Immature male flowers (IMFs) were collected from BBTV-free mother plants, confirmed through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using DNA-R-specific primers. Explants were cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) media supplemented with different dose combinations of plant growth regulators (PGR). Initial development white body-like structures (WBLs) was observed within 15 days on PBT-62 medium (0.5 mg/L α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 2 mg/L 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), 2 mg/L thidiazuron (TDZ)), with a maximum mean of 9.20 WBLs. Subsequently elongation was achieved on PBT-70 (0.2 mg/L NAA, 1 mg/L BAP) and PBT-71 (0.2 mg/L NAA, 2 mg/L BAP) media, yielding a mean of 15.40 WBLs. The maximum shoot regeneration and rooting occurred on PBT-81 medium (0.1 mg/L NAA, 2 mg/L BAP), producing an average of 24.20 shoots and 12.60 roots and on PBT-80 (0.1 mg/L NAA, 1 mg/L BAP), producing an average 23.00 shoots and 13.40 roots. Genetic fidelity and ploidy stability of regenerated plantlets were validated using inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) markers and flow cytometry. The BBTV-free status of the regenerated plantlets were further confirmed via PCR amplification using DNA-R-specific primers. The study successfully demonstrates a protocol for the regeneration of genetically stable and virus-free Musa AAB cv. Champa colla plantlets, offering a viable strategy for banana cultivation in BBTV-endemic regions and contributing to global food security.

References

  1. 1. Heslop-Harrison JS, Schwarzacher T. Domestication, genomics and the future for banana. Ann Bot. 2007;100(5):1073–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm191
  2. 2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Markets and trade: Bananas; 2022.
  3. 3. Qamar S, Shaikh A. Therapeutic potentials and compositional changes of valuable compounds from banana – A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2018;79:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.06.016
  4. 4. Ranjha MMAN, Irfan S, Nadeem M, Mahmood S. A comprehensive review on nutritional value, medicinal uses and processing of banana. Food Rev Int. 2022;38(2):199–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2020.1725890
  5. 5. Ajijolakewu KA, Ayoola AS, Agbabiaka TO, Zakariyah FR, Ahmed NR, Oyedele OJ, et al. A review of the ethnomedicinal, antimicrobial and phytochemical properties of Musa paradisiaca (plantain). Bull Natl Res Cent. 2021;45(1):86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-021-00549-3
  6. 6. Hikal WM, Said-Al Ahl HA, Bratovcic A, Tkachenko KG, Sharifi-Rad J, Kačániová M, et al. Banana peels: A waste treasure for human being. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022;2022:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7616452
  7. 7. Simmonds NW, Shepherd K. The taxonomy and origins of the cultivated bananas. J Linn Soc Lond. 1955;55:302–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1955.tb00015.x
  8. 8. Brown A, Tumuhimbise R, Amah D, Uwimana B, Nyine M, Mduma H, et al. Bananas and plantains (Musa spp.). In: Campos H, Caligari PDS, editors. Genetic improvement of tropical crops. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 219–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59819-2_7
  9. 9. Amah D, van Biljon A, Brown A, Perkins-Veazie P, Swennen R, Labuschagne M. Recent advances in banana (Musa spp.) biofortification to alleviate vitamin A deficiency. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(21):3498–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1495175
  10. 10. Ploetz RC, Pegg KG. Fusarium wilt of banana and Wallace’s line: Was the disease originally restricted to his Indo-Malayan region? Australas Plant Pathol. 1997;26:239–49. https://doi.org/10.1071/AP97039
  11. 11. Lockhart BEL, Olszewski NE. Serological and genomic heterogeneity of Banana streak badnavirus: implications for virus detection in Musa germplasm. In: Ganry J, editor. Breeding banana and plantain for resistance to diseases and pests. Montpellier: CIRAD-INIBAP; 1993. p. 102–13.
  12. 12. Vishnoi R, Raj SK, Prasad V. Molecular characterization of an Indian isolate of Banana bunchy top virus based on six genomic DNA components. Virus Genes. 2009;38:334–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-009-0331-8
  13. 13. Aritua V, Parkinson N, Thwaites R, Heeney JV, Jones DR, Tushemereirwe W, et al. Characterization of the Xanthomonas sp. causing wilt of Ensete and banana and its proposed reclassification as a strain of X. vasicola. Plant Pathol. 2008;57:170–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2007.01687.x
  14. 14. Menon R. Banana breeding. In: Mohandas S, Ravishankar K, editors. Banana: Genomics and transgenic approaches for genetic improvement. Singapore: Springer; 2016. p. 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1585-4_2
  15. 15. Wehunt EJ, Edwards DI. Radopholus similis and other nematode species on banana. In: Smart GC, Perry VC, editors. Tropical nematology. Gainesville: University of Florida Press; 1968. p. 1–19.
  16. 16. Imran QM, Falak N, Hussain A, Mun BG, Yun BW. Abiotic stress in plants; stress perception to molecular response and role of biotechnological tools in stress resistance. Agronomy. 2021;11(8):1579. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081579
  17. 17. Das T, Banerjee A. Distribution, molecular characterization and diversity of Banana bunchy top virus in Tripura, India. Virus Dis. 2018;29:157–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-018-0451-7
  18. 18. Jekayinoluwa T, Tripathi L, Tripathi JN, Ntui VO, Obiero G, Muge E, et al. RNAi technology for management of banana bunchy top disease. Food Energy Secur. 2020;9(4):e247. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.247
  19. 19. Clark MF, Adams AN. Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J Gen Virol. 1977;34:475–83. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-34-3-475
  20. 20. Hamed N, Gamal Edeen A, Sallam A. Cytopathological effects of banana bunchy top virus and production of BBTV-free banana plants using in vitro culture technique. J Appl Plant Prot. 2024;13(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.21608/japp.2024.252904.1007
  21. 21. Gadhave AD, Joshi MS, Sahane PA, Sawardekar SV, Patil PD, Shinde BD. Assessing banana varieties for their response to banana bunchy top virus (BBTV) infection. Red. 2023;3(6):9.
  22. 22. Chabi M, Dassou AG, Adoukonou-Sagbadja H, Thomas J, Omondi AB. Variation in symptom development and infectivity of Banana bunchy top disease among four cultivars of Musa sp. Crops. 2023;3(2):158–69. https://doi.org/10.3390/crops3020016
  23. 23. Kumar PL, Selvarajan R, Iskra-Caruana ML, Chabannes M, Hanna R. Biology, etiology and control of virus diseases of banana and plantain. Adv Virus Res. 2015;91:229–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aivir.2014.10.006
  24. 24. Jebakumar RM, Balasubramanian V, Krishnan N, Selvarajan R. Unveiling host-virus-vector interaction and latency phenomenon of banana bunchy top virus (BBTV) infecting banana. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2025;31:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-025-01610-5
  25. 25. Morel G, Martin C. Guerison de pommes de terre atteintes de maladies à virus. Comptes Rendus Acad Agric Fr. 1955;41:471–4.
  26. 26. Nandhakumar N, Soorianathasundaram K, Sudhakar D, Kumar KK. Genetic fidelity analysis in the micropropagated banana derived from immature primordial male flower bud. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(4):1759–69. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.211
  27. 27. Punyarani K, Devi KD, Singh CH, Singh NS, Singh HH, Singh TD, et al. In vitro production of genetically stable and virus-free plantlets of Musa sp. var. Meitei Hei using male inflorescence as explant. Sci Hortic. 2013;164:440–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.10.004
  28. 28. Hrahsel L, Basu A, Sahoo L, Thangjam R. In vitro propagation and assessment of the genetic fidelity of Musa acuminata (AAA) cv. Vaibalhla derived from immature male flowers. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014;172:1530–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-013-0637-9
  29. 29. Nair AR, Ravichandran P, Bejoy M. Direct shoot regeneration from male immature flower buds of Musa paradisiaca Linn. cv. Poovan (AAB). Plant Sci Today. 2018;5(4):142–8. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2018.5.4.403
  30. 30. Kavitha N, Saraswathi MS, Sajith KP, Bathrinath M, Kannan G, Backiyarani S, et al. Development of a direct regeneration protocol for mass multiplication of banana cultivar ‘Rasthali’ (AAB, Silk) using immature floral hands as explants. Acta Hortic. 2020;1272:105–12. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1272.13
  31. 31. Elayabalan S, Kalaiponmani K, Pillay M, Chandrasekar A, Selvarajan R, Kumar KK, et al. Efficient regeneration of the endangered banana cultivar ‘Virupakshi’ (AAB) via embryogenic cell suspension from immature male flowers. Afr J Biotechnol. 2013;12(6):563–9. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB12.2660
  32. 32. Nandhakumar N, Kumar K, Sudhakar D, Soorianathasundaram K. Plant regeneration, developmental pattern and genetic fidelity of somatic embryogenesis-derived Musa spp. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2018;16(2):587–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.10.001
  33. 33. Roux NS, Toloza A, Radecki Z, Zapata-Arias FJ, Doležel J. Rapid detection of aneuploidy in Musa using flow cytometry. Plant Cell Rep. 2003;21:483–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-002-0512-6
  34. 34. Natarajan RB, Pathania P, Singh H, Agrawal A, Subramani R. A flow cytometry-based assessment of the genomic size and ploidy level of wild Musa species in India. Plants. 2023;12:3605. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12203605
  35. 35. Thingnam SS, Lourembam DS, Tongbram PS, Lokya V, Tiwari S, Khan MK, et al. A perspective review on understanding drought stress tolerance in wild banana genetic resources of Northeast India. Genes. 2023;14:370. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14020370
  36. 36. Thangjam R, Maibam D, Sharma JG. A simple and rapid method for isolation of DNA from imbibed embryos of Parkia timoriana (DC.) Merr. for PCR analysis. J Food Agric Environ. 2003;1:36–8.
  37. 37. Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962;15(3):473–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
  38. 38. Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(9):2233–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.310
  39. 39. Zuhry ALM, Razmy AM. Micropropagation of banana from male flower of banana spike. Int J Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;4(1):1–4.
  40. 40. Vuylsteke D, Swennen R, De Langhe E. Somaclonal variation in plantains (Musa spp., AAB group) derived from shoot-tip culture. Fruits. 1991;46(4):429–39.
  41. 41. Strosse H, Andre E, Sági L, Swennen R, Panis B. Adventitious shoot formation is not inherent to micropropagation of banana as it is in maize. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2008;95:321–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9446-1
  42. 42. Endang Y, Yunian TA. Development of banana in vitro from male bud culture supplemented with some concentration of sucrose and benzyladenine. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;724(1):012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/724/1/012007
  43. 43. Konieczny R, Sliwinska E, Pilarska M, Tuleja M. Morphohistological and flow cytometric analyses of somatic embryogenesis in Trifolium nigrescens Viv. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2012;109:131–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-011-0081-x
  44. 44. Choudhary D, Kajla S, Poonia AK, Brar B, Duhan JS. Molecular assessment of genetic stability using ISSR and RAPD markers in in vitro multiplied copies of commercial banana cv. Robusta. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;34(9):141.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.