Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Early Access

Secondary metabolites of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus: Diversity, biosynthesis and biotechnological potential

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13249
Submitted
17 December 2025
Published
02-07-2026
Versions

Abstract

Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus are Gram-negative entomopathogenic bacteria (EPB) that form mutualistic associations with nematodes and play a central role in insect pathogenesis. These bacteria are prolific producers of secondary metabolites, which exhibit remarkable structural diversity and a wide range of biological functions. The various secondary metabolites produced by these genera include peptides, lipopeptides, polyketides, hybrid non-ribosomal peptide synthase-polyketide synthase (NRPS-PKS) compounds, phenolic compounds, indole derivatives, stilbenes and other unique scaffolds. These compounds demonstrate potent antimicrobial, antifungal, cytotoxic, immunosuppressive, antiparasitic and insecticidal properties, which are crucial not only for suppressing insect host immunity and facilitating nematode reproduction but also for outcompeting other microorganisms within the insect cadaver. The biosynthesis of these metabolites is governed by complex gene clusters, often involving modular non-ribosomal peptide synthetases and polyketide synthases that are tightly regulated by global and pathway-specific mechanisms. Despite significant progress, many biosynthetic pathways remain uncharacterised, underscoring the need for more comprehensive genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic investigations. Future research involving genome mining, synthetic biology and heterologous expression hold promise for the discovery of novel bioactive compounds. Given their potent biological activities, these metabolites have strong potential in applied sciences, including their use as environmentally friendly insecticides in agricultural biocontrol and as new antibiotics or immunomodulatory agents in pharmaceutical development. Overall, the metabolic versatility of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus underscores their ecological significance and untapped potential as sources of novel bioactive natural products.

References

  1. 1. Chauhan P, Istkhar, Chaudhary A. Entomopathogenic nematodes and their mutualistic bacteria: enemy of the enemies. In: Upadhyay SK, editor. Parasitology: risks and challenges for health and sustainability. Nova Science Publishers; 2024.
  2. 2. Sajnaga E, Kazimierczak W. Evolution and taxonomy of nematode-associated entomopathogenic bacteria of the genera Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus: an overview. Symbiosis. 2020;80(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-019-00660-0
  3. 3. Stock SP, Hazir S. The bacterial symbionts of entomopathogenic nematodes and their role in and pathogenesis. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2025;211:108295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2025.108295
  4. 4. Tobias NJ, Wolff H, Djahanschiri B, Grundmann F, Kronenwerth M, Shi YM, et al. Natural product diversity associated with the nematode symbionts Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2(12):1676–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-017-0039-9
  5. 5. Afni N. Utilization of natural products as a source of novel antibiotics: a literature review. Hayyan J. 2025;2(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.51574/hayyan.v2i2.3128
  6. 6. Bode HB. Entomopathogenic bacteria as a source of secondary metabolites. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2009;13(2):224–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.02.037
  7. 7. Hamrouni R, Regus F, Farnet Da Silva, Besset-Manzoni Y, Mhamdi R, Ait Barka E, et al. Current status and future trends of microbial and nematode-based biopesticides for biocontrol of crop pathogens. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2025;45(2):333–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2024.2370370
  8. 8. Mollah MMI, Kim Y. Virulent secondary metabolites of entomopathogenic bacteria genera, Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus, inhibit phospholipase A2 to suppress host insect immunity. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-02042-9
  9. 9. Crawford JM, Portmann C, Kontnik R, Walsh CT, Clardy J. NRPS substrate promiscuity diversifies the xenematides. Org Lett. 2011;13(19):5144–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/ol2020237
  10. 10. Meesil W, Bode HB, Rückert-Reed C, Chonhenchob V, Thanwisai A, Vitta A, et al. Genomic analysis for the identification of bioactive compounds in Xenorhabdus stockiae strain RT25.5. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):23672. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08454-9
  11. 11. Mohamed MS, Elsaman T, Mohamed M, Abdelhameed RFA, Fayez S, Elhady SS, et al. Identification of bacterial oligopeptidase B inhibitors from microbial natural products: molecular insights, docking studies, MD simulations and ADMET predictions. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18(5):709. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18050709
  12. 12. Tobias NJ, Shi YM, Bode HB. Refining the natural product repertoire in entomopathogenic bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26(10):833–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2018.04.007
  13. 13. Shi YM, Bode HB. Chemical language and warfare of bacterial natural products in bacteria–nematode–insect interactions. Nat Prod Rep. 2018;35(4):309–35. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NP00054E
  14. 14. Chaston JM, Suen G, Tucker SL, Andersen AW, Bhasin A, Muratoglu N, et al. The entomopathogenic bacterial endosymbionts Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27909. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027909
  15. 15. Dey Roy S, Kumar Mukhopadhyay A. Entomopathogenic nematodes in pest management: mechanisms, efficacy and future prospects. CABI Rev. 2025;20(1):0042. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews.2025.0042
  16. 16. Machado RA, Bhat AH, Castaneda-Alvarez C, Wüthrich D, Eschbach MN, Thanwisai A, et al. Xenorhabdus aichiensis sp. nov., Xenorhabdus anantnagensis sp. nov. and Xenorhabdus yunnanensis sp. nov., isolated from Steinernema entomopathogenic nematodes. Curr Microbiol. 2023;80(9):300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03373-2
  17. 17. Boemare NE, Akhurst RJ, Mourant RG. DNA relatedness between Xenorhabdus spp. (Enterobacteriaceae), symbiotic bacteria of entomopathogenic nematodes and a proposal to transfer Xenorhabdus luminescens to a new genus, Photorhabdus gen. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993;43(2):249–55. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-43-2-249
  18. 18. Thanwisai A, Machado RA, Bhat AH, Wüthrich D, Vitta A, Kuepdomta S, et al. Xenorhabdus bharatensis sp. nov., Xenorhabdus entomophaga sp. nov., Xenorhabdus siamensis sp. nov. and Xenorhabdus thailandensis sp. nov. isolated from Steinernema entomopathogenic nematodes. Curr Microbiol. 2025;82(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-024-03972-7
  19. 19. Lengyel K, Lang E, Fodor A, Szállás E, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E. Description of four novel species of Xenorhabdus, family Enterobacteriaceae: Xenorhabdus budapestensis sp. nov., Xenorhabdus ehlersii sp. nov., Xenorhabdus innexi sp. nov. and Xenorhabdus szentirmaii sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2005;28(2):115–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2004.10.004
  20. 20. Tailliez P, Pages S, Ginibre N, Boemare N. New insight into diversity in the genus Xenorhabdus, including the description of ten novel species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56(12):2805–18. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64287-0
  21. 21. Kämpfer P, Tobias NJ, Ke LP, Bode HB, Glaeser SP. Xenorhabdus thuongxuanensis sp. nov. and Xenorhabdus eapokensis sp. nov., isolated from Steinernema species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67(5):1107–14. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001770
  22. 22. Somvanshi VS, Lang E, Ganguly S, Singh M, Saxena AK, Stackebrandt E. A novel species of Xenorhabdus, family Enterobacteriaceae: Xenorhabdus indica sp. nov., symbiotically associated with entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema thermophilum Ganguly and Singh, 2000. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2006;29(7):519–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2006.01.004
  23. 23. Kuwata R, Qiu LH, Wang W, Yamanaka S, Nishiwaki H. Xenorhabdus ishibashii sp. nov., isolated from the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema aciari. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63(Pt 5):1690–5. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.041145-0
  24. 24. Nishimura Y, Hagiwara A, Suzuki T, Yamanaka S. Xenorhabdus japonicus sp. nov. associated with the nematode Steinernema kushidai. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1994;10(2):207–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00360889
  25. 25. Ferreira T, Van Reenen C, Pages S, Tailliez P, Malan AP, Dicks LMT. Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. noenieputensis subsp. nov., a symbiotic bacterium associated with a novel Heterorhabditis species related to Heterorhabditis indica. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63(Pt 5):1853–8. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.044388-0
  26. 26. Castaneda-Alvarez C, Prodan S, Zamorano A, Wüthrich D, Eschbach MN, Thanwisai A, et al. Xenorhabdus lircayensis sp. nov., the symbiotic bacterium associated with the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema unicornum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71(12):005151. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005151
  27. 27. Palma L, Frizzo L, Kaiser S, Fernández F, Vázquez C, D'Alessandro C, et al. Genome sequence analysis of native Xenorhabdus strains isolated from entomopathogenic nematodes in Argentina. Toxins. 2024;16(2):108. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16020108
  28. 28. Thomas GM, Poinar GO. Xenorhabdus gen. nov., a genus of entomopathogenic, nematophilic bacteria of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1979;29(4):352–60. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-29-4-352
  29. 29. Tailliez P, Laroui C, Ginibre N, Paule A, Pages S, Boemare N. Phylogeny of Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus based on universally conserved protein-coding sequences and implications for the taxonomy of these two genera. Proposal of new taxa: Xenorhabdus vietnamensis sp. nov., Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. caribbeanensis subsp. nov., P. luminescens subsp. hainanensis subsp. nov., P. temperata subsp. khanii subsp. nov., P. temperata subsp. tasmaniensis subsp. nov. and the reclassification of P. luminescens subsp. thracensis as P. temperata subsp. thracensis comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60(8):1921–37. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.014308-0
  30. 30. Machado RA, Bhat AH, Castaneda-Alvarez C, Wüthrich D, Eschbach MN, Thanwisai A, et al. Photorhabdus aballayi sp. nov. and Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. venezuelensis subsp. nov., isolated from Heterorhabditis amazonensis entomopathogenic nematodes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2023;73(5):005872. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005872
  31. 31. Duchaud E, Rusniok C, Frangeul L, Buchrieser C, Givaudan A, Taourit S, et al. The genome sequence of the entomopathogenic bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(11):1307–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt886
  32. 32. Clarke DJ. Photorhabdus: a tale of contrasting interactions. Microbiology. 2020;166(4):335–48. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000907
  33. 33. Gerrard JG, Stevens RP. A review of clinical cases of infection with Photorhabdus asymbiotica. In: The molecular biology of Photorhabdus bacteria. Springer; 2017. p. 179–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/82_2016_56
  34. 34. Machado RA, Somvanshi VS, Muller A, Kuhnert P, Eschbach MN, Thanwisai A, et al. Photorhabdus hindustanensis sp. nov., Photorhabdus akhurstii subsp. akhurstii subsp. nov. and Photorhabdus akhurstii subsp. bharatensis subsp. nov., isolated from Heterorhabditis entomopathogenic nematodes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71(9):004998. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004998
  35. 35. Machado RA, Malan AP, Boss A, Wüthrich D, Kuhnert P, Turlings TCJ. Photorhabdus africana sp. nov. isolated from Heterorhabditis entomopathogenic nematodes. Curr Microbiol. 2024;81(8):240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-024-03744-3
  36. 36. Fischer-Le Saux M, Viallard V, Brunel B, Normand P, Boemare NE. Polyphasic classification of the genus Photorhabdus and proposal of new taxa: P. luminescens subsp. luminescens subsp. nov., P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii subsp. nov., P. luminescens subsp. laumondii subsp. nov., P. temperata sp. nov., P. temperata subsp. temperata subsp. nov. and P. asymbiotica sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1999;49(4):1645–56. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-49-4-1645
  37. 37. Machado RA, Wüthrich D, Kuhnert P, Arce CCM, Thönen L, Ruiz C, et al. Whole-genome-based revisit of Photorhabdus phylogeny: proposal for the elevation of most Photorhabdus subspecies to the species level and description of one novel species Photorhabdus bodei sp. nov. and one novel subspecies Photorhabdus laumondii subsp. clarkei subsp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68(8):2664–81. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002820
  38. 38. Castaneda-Alvarez C, Machado RA, Morales-Montero P, Wüthrich D, Eschbach MN, Thanwisai A, et al. Photorhabdus antumapuensis sp. nov., a novel symbiotic bacterial species associated with Heterorhabditis atacamensis entomopathogenic nematodes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022;72(10):005525. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005525
  39. 39. Akhurst RJ, Boemare NE, Janssen PH, Peel MM, Alfredson DA, Beard CE. Taxonomy of Australian clinical isolates of the genus Photorhabdus and proposal of Photorhabdus asymbiotica subsp. asymbiotica subsp. nov. and P. asymbiotica subsp. australis subsp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54(4):1301–10. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.03005-0
  40. 40. Toth T, Lakatos T. Photorhabdus temperata subsp. cinerea subsp. nov., isolated from Heterorhabditis nematodes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58(11):2579–81. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.2008/000273-0
  41. 41. Ferreira T, van Reenen CA, Endo A, Tailliez P, Pagès S, Vuillet A, et al. Photorhabdus heterorhabditis sp. nov., a symbiont of the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis zealandica. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64(Pt 5):1540–5. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.059840-0
  42. 42. Hazir S, Stackebrandt E, Lang E, Keskin N, Peters A, Ehlers RU, et al. Two new subspecies of Photorhabdus luminescens, isolated from Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Nematoda: Heterorhabditidae): Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. kayaii subsp. nov. and Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. thracensis subsp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2004;27(1):36–42. https://doi.org/10.1078/0723-2020-00255
  43. 43. An R, Grewal PS. Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. kleinii subsp. nov. (Enterobacteriales: Enterobacteriaceae). Curr Microbiol. 2011;62(2):539–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-010-9741-z
  44. 44. Glaeser SP, Tobias NJ, Thanwisai A, Chantratita N, Bode HB, Kämpfer P. Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. namnaonensis subsp. nov., isolated from Heterorhabditis baujardi nematodes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67(4):1046–51. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001761
  45. 45. Machado RA, Malan AP, Abolafia J, Wüthrich D, Kuhnert P, Turlings TCJ. Photorhabdus viridis sp. nov. isolated from Heterorhabditis zealandica entomopathogenic nematodes. Curr Microbiol. 2024;81(12):423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-024-03935-y
  46. 46. Ferreira T, Malan AP. Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus, bacterial symbionts of the entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema and Heterorhabditis and their in vitro liquid mass culture: a review. Afr Entomol. 2014;22(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.4001/003.022.0115
  47. 47. Forst S, Clarke D. Bacteria-nematode symbiosis. In: Entomopathogenic nematology. CABI; 2002. p. 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995670.0057
  48. 48. Goodrich-Blair H, Clarke DJ. Mutualism and pathogenesis in Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus: two roads to the same destination. Mol Microbiol. 2007;64(2):260–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05671.x
  49. 49. Singh S, Forst S. Antimicrobials and the natural biology of a bacterial-nematode symbiosis. In: The mechanistic benefits of microbial symbionts. Springer; 2016. p. 101–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28068-4_5
  50. 50. Berdy J. Bioactive microbial metabolites. J Antibiot. 2005;58(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2005.1
  51. 51. Chevrette MG, Carlson CM, Ortega HE, Thomas C, Ananiev GE, Barns KJ, et al. The antimicrobial potential of Streptomyces from insect microbiomes. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):516. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08438-0
  52. 52. Piel J. Metabolites from symbiotic bacteria. Nat Prod Rep. 2009;26(3):338–62. https://doi.org/10.1039/B703499G
  53. 53. Davidson SK, Allen SW, Lim GE anderson CM, Haygood MG. Evidence for the biosynthesis of bryostatins by the bacterial symbiont “Candidatus Endobugula sertula” of the bryozoan Bugula neritina. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(10):4531–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.10.4531-4537.2001
  54. 54. Wilson MC, Mori T, Rückert C, Uria AR, Helf MJ, Takada K, et al. An environmental bacterial taxon with a large and distinct metabolic repertoire. Nature. 2014;506(7486):58–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12959
  55. 55. Currie CR, Poulsen M, Mendenhall J, Boomsma JJ, Billen J. Coevolved crypts and exocrine glands support mutualistic bacteria in fungus-growing ants. Science. 2006;311(5757):81–3. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1119744
  56. 56. Kaltenpoth M, Göttler W, Herzner G, Strohm E. Symbiotic bacteria protect wasp larvae from fungal infestation. Curr Biol. 2005;15(5):475–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.084
  57. 57. Medema MH, Kottmann R, Yilmaz P, Cummings M, Biggins JB, Blin K, et al. Minimum information about a biosynthetic gene cluster. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11(9):625–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1890
  58. 58. Charlop-Powers Z, Owen JG, Reddy BVB, Ternei MA, Guimaraes DO, de Frias UA, et al. Global biogeographic sampling of bacterial secondary metabolism. eLife. 2015;4:e05048. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05048
  59. 59. Park D, Ciezki K, Van Der Hoeven R, Singh S, Reimer D, Bode HB, et al. Genetic analysis of xenocoumacin antibiotic production in the mutualistic bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila. Mol Microbiol. 2009;73(5):938–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06817.x
  60. 60. Clarke DJ. Photorhabdus: a model for the analysis of pathogenicity and mutualism. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(11):2159–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01209.x
  61. 61. Joyce SA, Brachmann AO, Glazer I, Lango L, Schwär G, Clarke DJ, et al. Bacterial biosynthesis of a multipotent stilbene. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47(10):1942–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200705148
  62. 62. Eleftherianos IG. Novel antibiotic compounds produced by the insect pathogenic bacterium Photorhabdus. Recent Pat Anti Infect Drug Discov. 2009;4(2):81–9. https://doi.org/10.2174/157489109788490280
  63. 63. Crawford JM, Portmann C, Zhang X, Roeffaers MBJ, Clardy J. Small molecule perimeter defense in entomopathogenic bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(27):10821–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201160109
  64. 64. Bode HB, Brachmann AO, Jadhav KB, Seyfarth L, Dauth C, Fuchs SW, et al. Structure elucidation and activity of Kolossin A, the D-/L-pentadecapeptide product of a giant nonribosomal peptide synthetase. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54(35):10352–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201502835
  65. 65. Brachmann AO, Forst S, Furgani GM, Fodor A, Bode HB. Xenofuranones A and B: phenylpyruvate dimers from Xenorhabdus szentirmaii. J Nat Prod. 2006;69(12):1830–2. https://doi.org/10.1021/np060409n
  66. 66. Zhao L, Kaiser M, Bode HB. Rhabdopeptide/xenortide-like peptides from Xenorhabdus innexi with terminal amines showing potent antiprotozoal activity. Org Lett. 2018;20(17):5116–20. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01975
  67. 67. Houard J, Aumelas A, Noël T, Pages S, Givaudan A, Fitton-Ouhabi V, et al. Cabanillasin, a new antifungal metabolite, produced by entomopathogenic Xenorhabdus cabanillasii JM26. J Antibiot. 2013;66(10):617–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2013.58
  68. 68. Vicente-Díez I, Pou A, Campos-Herrera R. Xenorhabdus- and Photorhabdus-based products: status and future perspective in agriculture. In: Development and commercialization of biopesticides. Academic Press; 2023. p. 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95290-3.00012-1
  69. 69. Park HB, Perez CE, Perry EK, Crawford JM. Activating and attenuating the amicoumacin antibiotics. Molecules. 2016;21(7):824. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21070824
  70. 70. Fuchs SW, Grundmann F, Kurz M, Kaiser M, Bode HB. Fabclavines: bioactive peptide-polyketide-polyamino hybrids from Xenorhabdus. ChemBioChem. 2014;15(4):512–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201300802
  71. 71. Theodore CM, King JB, You J, Cichewicz RH. Production of cytotoxic glidobactins/luminmycins by Photorhabdus asymbiotica in liquid media and live crickets. J Nat Prod. 2012;75(11):2007–11. https://doi.org/10.1021/np300623x
  72. 72. Brachmann AO, Joyce SA, Jenke-Kodama H, Schwär G, Clarke DJ, Bode HB. A type II polyketide synthase is responsible for anthraquinone biosynthesis in Photorhabdus luminescens. ChemBioChem. 2007;8(14):1721–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200700300
  73. 73. Goodrich-Blair H. They’ve got a ticket to ride: Xenorhabdus nematophila–Steinernema carpocapsae symbiosis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007;10(3):225–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2007.05.006
  74. 74. Joyce SA, Lango L, Clarke DJ. The regulation of secondary metabolism and mutualism in the insect pathogenic bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2011;76:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387048-3.00001-5
  75. 75. Gulsen SH, Tileklioglu E, Bode E, Gulsen N, Gulcu B, Bode HB, et al. Antiprotozoal activity of different Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacterial secondary metabolites and identification of bioactive compounds using the easyPACId approach. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):10779. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13722-z
  76. 76. Wolff H, Bode HB. The benzodiazepine-like natural product tilivalline is produced by the entomopathogenic bacterium Xenorhabdus eapokensis. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0194297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194297
  77. 77. Sajnaga E, Kazimierczak W, Karaś MA, Wójcik K, Matuszewska A, Jankiewicz U, et al. Exploring Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus nematode symbionts in search of novel therapeutics. Molecules. 2024;29(21):5151. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29215151
  78. 78. Ahmed S, Hrithik MTH, Roy MC, Kim J, Kim Y. Phurealipids, produced by the entomopathogenic bacteria Photorhabdus, mimic juvenile hormone to suppress insect immunity and immature development. J Invertebr Pathol. 2022;193:107799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2022.107799
  79. 79. Joyce SA, Watson RJ, Clarke DJ. The regulation of pathogenicity and mutualism in Photorhabdus. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2006;9(2):127–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2006.01.004
  80. 80. Fuchs SW, Proschak A, Jaskolla TW, Karas M, Bode HB. Structure elucidation and biosynthesis of lysine-rich cyclic peptides in Xenorhabdus nematophila. Org Biomol Chem. 2011;9(9):3130–2. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ob05097d
  81. 81. Proschak A, Zhou Q, Schöner T, Thanwisai A, Kresovic D, Dowling A, et al. Biosynthesis of the insecticidal xenocycloins in Xenorhabdus bovienii. ChemBioChem. 2014;15(3):369–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201300694
  82. 82. Lang G, Kalvelage T, Peters A, Wiese J, Imhoff JF. Linear and cyclic peptides from the entomopathogenic bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophilus. J Nat Prod. 2008;71(6):1074–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/np800053n
  83. 83. Bargabos R. Functional elucidation of Photorhabdus-produced small molecule antimicrobials against Escherichia coli and Borrelia burgdorferi [doctoral dissertation]. Northeastern University; 2024.
  84. 84. Nollmann FI, Heinrich AK, Brachmann AO, Morisseau C, Mukherjee K, Drescher S, et al. A Photorhabdus natural product inhibits insect juvenile hormone epoxide hydrolase. ChemBioChem. 2015;16(5):766–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201402650
  85. 85. Xiao Y, Meng F, Qiu D, Yang X. Two novel antimicrobial peptides purified from the symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus budapestensis NMC-10. Peptides. 2012;35(2):253–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2012.03.027
  86. 86. Kronenwerth M, Bozhüyük KA, Kahnt AS, Steinhilber D, Gaudriault S, Kaiser M, et al. Characterisation of Taxlllaids A-G, natural products from Xenorhabdus indica. Chem Eur J. 2014;20(52):17478–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201403979
  87. 87. Yuan B, Li B, Shen H, Zhang X, Wang J, Liu H, et al. Identification of fabclavine derivatives, Fcl-7 and Fcl-8, from Xenorhabdus budapestensis as major antifungal natural products against Rhizoctonia solani. J Appl Microbiol. 2023;134(9):lxad190. https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxad190
  88. 88. Zhao L, Awori RM, Kaiser M, Bode HB. Structure, biosynthesis and bioactivity of photoditritide from Photorhabdus temperata Meg1. J Nat Prod. 2019;82(12):3499–503. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b00932
  89. 89. Tobias NJ, Mishra B, Gupta DK, Glaser R, Bode HB. Genome comparisons provide insights into the role of secondary metabolites in the pathogenic phase of the Photorhabdus life cycle. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:537. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2862-4
  90. 90. Brachmann AO. Isolation and identification of natural products and biosynthetic pathways from Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus. PhD Thesis. Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken; 2009.
  91. 91. Maher AM, Asaiyah M, Quinn S, Griffin CT, Clarke DJ. Competition and co-existence of two Photorhabdus symbionts with a nematode host. Microb Ecol. 2021;81:223–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-020-01573-y
  92. 92. Ullah I, Khan AL, Ali L, Khan AR, Waqas M, Hussain J, et al. An insecticidal compound produced by an insect-pathogenic bacterium suppresses host defenses through phenoloxidase inhibition. Molecules. 2014;19(12):20913–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules191220913
  93. 93. Challinor VL, Bode HB. Bioactive natural products from novel microbial sources. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015;1354(1):82–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12954
  94. 94. Zhao L, Vo TD, Kaiser M, Bode HB. Phototemtide A, a cyclic lipopeptide heterologously expressed from Photorhabdus temperata Meg1, shows selective antiprotozoal activity. ChemBioChem. 2020;21(9):1288–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201900665

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.