Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Effect of tillage and weed control approaches on soil biological health and rice crop performance under conservation agriculture

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13251
Submitted
17 December 2025
Published
14-08-2026

Abstract

Conservation agriculture, a climate-resilient approach, improves holistic soil health but is often constrained by severe weed challenges. To assess the effect of tillage and weed management practices on soil biological health, a field experiment was conducted during the kharif seasons of 2019 and 2020 at the Research cum Instructional Farm, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). The experiment with the rice variety “IGKV R1” was laid out in a split-plot design with five tillage practices as main plots, namely two conventional transplanted rice [CT(TPR)], one conventional direct-seeded rice [CT(DSR)], zero tillage (ZT) and zero tillage with residue retention (ZT+R) and three weed management practices as sub-plots, replicated thrice. The results revealed that the conventional transplanted system [CT(TPR)] recorded the highest economic yield, which was of 7.66 % higher than that of ZT+R. Soil biological properties, including dehydrogenase activity (DHA), fluorescein diacetate (FDA) and bacterial, fungal and actinomycete populations, showed significant variation across the observation stages. These parameters increased after herbicide application and declined towards harvest. Among the tillage practices, ZT+R recorded the highest soil biological activity, whereas CT(TPR) recorded the lowest, indicating greater sustainability under conservation agriculture. Among weed management practices, integrated weed management (IWM) i.e. oxadiargyl 80 g ha-1 pre-emergence (PE) followed by hand weeding at 25 days after sowing (DAS)/T resulted in superior performance across all parameters and produced 47 % higher grain yield than the weedy check. Therefore, the combined adoption of ZT+R and IWM is socio-ecologically acceptable and recommended for sustainable rice production.

References

  1. 1. Statista. Total area of cultivation for rice across India from financial year 2014 to 2021, with an estimate for 2022; 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/765691/india-area-of-cultivation-for-rice/
  2. 2. Bhatt R, Kukal SS, Busari MA, Arora S, Yadav M. Sustainability issues on rice–wheat cropping system. Int Soil Water Conserv Res. 2016;4:64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.12.001
  3. 3. Kukal SS, Aggarwal GC. Puddling depth and intensity effects in rice–wheat system on a sandy loam soil. Soil Tillage Res. 2003;72:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00093-X
  4. 4. Das TK, Sharma AR, Rana DS, Paul T. Conservation agriculture. In: Rana DS, Ghosh PK, Shivay YS, Singh G, editors. Modern concept of agronomy. New Delhi: Indian Society of Agronomy; 2016. p. 62–85.
  5. 5. Das A, Lal R, Patel D, Idapuganti R, Layek J, Ngachan S, et al. Effects of tillage and biomass on soil quality and productivity of low land rice cultivation by small-scale farmers in Northeastern India. Soil Tillage Res. 2014;143:50–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.05.012
  6. 6. Sharma AR, Behera UK, Das TK. Conventional and conservation agriculture system. In: Weed science and sustainable agriculture: environment and biodiversity. Proc 25th Asian-Pacific Weed Sci Soc Conf; Hyderabad, India; 2015. p. 321–31.
  7. 7. Sharma DK, Jat HS. Sustainable intensification of cereal-based cropping system in north-west India. In: Agricultural diversification for sustainable livelihood and environmental security. Proc Natl Symp; Ludhiana, India; 2014. p. 8–10.
  8. 8. Cordeau S, Gatere L, Jat ML, Pittelkow CM, Thierfelder C. Editorial: Conservation agriculture—knowledge frontiers around the world. Front Agron. 2023;5:1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2023.1177412
  9. 9. FAO. Conservation agriculture principles. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2021. https://www.fao.org/conservation-agriculture/overview/principles-of-ca/en/
  10. 10. Sow P, Mukhopadhyay P, Sinha AK, Roy N. Long-term effect of tillage, residue and biofertilizer on soil microbial biomass carbon and dehydrogenase activity under rice–wheat cropping system in Terai region of West Bengal. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2025;37:28–40. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2025/v37i25299
  11. 11. Tillage, microbial biomass and soil biological fertility [Internet]; 2025 [cited 2026 Jun 15]. https://www.soilquality.org.au/factsheets/tillage-microbial-biomass-and-soil-biological-fertility
  12. 12. Kesharwani A, Goyal G, Kumar D, Kumari R, Pandey AK, Innazent A, et al. Evaluating the impact of tillage on soil biological communities: fungi, bacteria and actinomycetes. Orient J Chem. 2025;41(5). https://doi.org/10.13005/ojc/410533
  13. 13. Panda N, Raha P, Kumar A. Microbial activity and plant nutrient transformation as influenced by herbicide application in soil. Oryza. 2018;55(3):452–8. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-5266.2018.00054.1
  14. 14. Meena RS, Kumar S, Datta R, Lal R, Vijayakumar V, Brtnicky M, et al. Impact of agrochemicals on soil microbiota and management: a review. Land. 2020;9(2):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9020034
  15. 15. Bhattacharyya R, Das TK, Sudhishri S, Dudwal B, Sharma AR, Bhatia A, et al. Conservation agriculture effects on soil organic carbon accumulation and crop productivity under rice–wheat system. Eur J Agron. 2015;70:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.06.006
  16. 16. Casida LE, Klein DA, Santoro T. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci. 1964;98:371–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004
  17. 17. Adam G, Duncan H. Development of a sensitive method for measuring total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate. Soil Biol Biochem. 2001;33:943–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00244-3
  18. 18. Schmidt EL, Cadwell AC. A practical manual on soil microbiology laboratory methods. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1967.
  19. 19. Chandra P, Khippal AK, Prajapat K, Barman A, Singh G, Rai AK, et al. Influence of tillage and residue management practices on productivity, sustainability and soil biological properties of rice-barley cropping systems in Indo-Gangetic plain of India. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1130397. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1130397
  20. 20. Meher S, Saha S, Tiwari N, Panneerselvam P, Munda S, Mahapatra A, et al. Herbicide-mediated effects on soil microbes, enzymes and yield in direct-sown rice. Agric Res. 2021;10:592–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-020-00536-6
  21. 21. Choudhary M, Datta A, Jat HS, Sharma PC, Yadav AK, Singh R, et al. Changes in soil microbial properties under long-term conservation agriculture in rice-based systems. Soil Tillage Res. 2022;218:105312.
  22. 22. Arya SR, Ameena M. Herbicide effects on soil enzyme dynamics in direct-seeded rice. Indian J Weed Sci. 2016;48(3):316–8. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2016.00077.0
  23. 23. Bhardwaj L, Kumar D, Singh UP, Yadav P, Verma A, Kumar S, et al. Herbicide application impacted soil microbial community composition and biochemical properties in flooded rice field. Sci Total Environ. 2024;914:169911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169911
  24. 24. Kumar R, Rana A, Rana SS, Rana MC, Sharma N, Sharma GD. Influence of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl on soil microflora, weed count and yield of transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(2):1757–64. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.213
  25. 25. Pattanayak S, Mishra KN, Nayak SK, Mohanty AK, Sahoo S, Pradhan A, et al. Weed management and crop establishment methods in rice influence soil microbial population and enzyme activity. Plants. 2022;11(9):1071. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11081071
  26. 26. Jat HS, Datta A, Choudhary M, Sharma PC, Yadav AK, Singh R, et al. Soil microbial population and enzyme activities under different tillage and residue management in rice-wheat system. Field Crops Res. 2021;268:108164.
  27. 27. Panneerselvam P, Saha S, Senapati A, Nayak AK, Kumar U, Mitra D, et al. New generation post-emergence herbicides and their impact on arbuscular mycorrhizae fungal association in rice. Curr Res Microb Sci. 2021;2:100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100067
  28. 28. Sapkota TB, Jat ML, Aryal JP, Jat RK, Khatri-Chhetri A, Jat HS, et al. Soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities under conservation agriculture in rice-wheat rotation. Soil Use Manage. 2020;36(4):678–90.
  29. 29. Akter T, Islam MR, Jahangir MMR, Hossain MA, Rahman MM, Islam MA, et al. Herbicides influence on soil microbial community and nutrient cycling in rice ecosystem. J Environ Sci Health B. 2022;57(3):189–98.
  30. 30. Luo Y, Wang Z, Li J, Liu X, Zhang Y, Chen H, et al. Long-term no-tillage and straw retention management impacts on soil bacterial community in a double-cropping rice field. Agronomy. 2020;10(9):1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091233
  31. 31. Nannipieri P, Trasar-Cepeda C, Dick RP. Soil enzyme activity: a brief history and biochemistry. Soil Biol Biochem. 2017;107:12–25.
  32. 32. Malik AA, Thomson BC, Whiteley AS, Bailey M, Griffiths RI. Bacterial physiological adaptations to contrasting edaphic conditions. Microbiome. 2018;6:1–12.
  33. 33. Kuzyakov Y, Razavi BS. Rhizosphere size and shape: temporal dynamics and spatial stationarity. Soil Biol Biochem. 2019;135:343–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.05.011
  34. 34. Chen QL, Ding J, Zhu YG, He JZ, Hu HW. Soil bacterial and fungal communities under different land-use types. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;148:107889.
  35. 35. Barka EA, Vatsa P, Sanchez L, Gavaut-Vaillant N, Jacquard C, Klenk HP, et al. Taxonomy, physiology and natural products of Actinobacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016;80(1):1–43. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00019-15
  36. 36. Zhang B, Penton CR, Xue C, Quensen JF, Roley SS, Guo J, et al. Soil depth and crop determinants of bacterial communities under conservation agriculture. Soil Biol Biochem. 2019;135:170–8.
  37. 37. Douibi M, Hachicha M, Ksibi M, Benzarti S, Jedidi N, Mahjoub O, et al. Changes in soil microbial parameters after herbicide application in no-till and conventional tillage systems. Processes. 2024;12(4):827. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040827
  38. 38. Li Y, Chang SX, Tian L, Zhang Q. Conservation agriculture practices increase soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen: a global meta-analysis. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;126:186–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.02.024
  39. 39. Malobane ME, Manyevere A, Bangira C, van Tol J, Ceronio GM. Microbial biomass carbon and enzyme activities as influenced by tillage, crop rotation and residue management in a sweet sorghum cropping system in marginal soils of South Africa. Heliyon. 2020;6(11):e05552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05513
  40. 40. Gorgy RN. Effect of land preparation and planting methods on rice yield. J Agric Res. 2010;36:259–77.
  41. 41. Kiran YD, Subramanyam D, Sumathi V. Growth and yield of transplanted rice influenced by sequential herbicide application. Indian J Weed Sci. 2010;42(3&4):226–8.
  42. 42. Mishra JS, Singh VP. Tillage and weed control effects in dry-seeded rice–wheat system. Soil Tillage Res. 2012;123:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.02.003
  43. 43. Ahmed S, Chauhan BS. Performance of herbicides in dry-seeded rice in Bangladesh. Sci World J. 2014;2014:729418. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/729418
  44. 44. Sapkota TB, Jat ML, Aryal JP, Jat RK, Khatri-Chhetri A. Climate change adaptation and profitability of conservation agriculture. J Integr Agric. 2015;14:1524–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61093-0
  45. 45. Meher S, Tiwari N, Saha S, Mahapatra A, Jangde HK. Efficacy of herbicide mixtures on yield and yield attributes in wet direct seeded rice. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(7):4071–6. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.707.473
  46. 46. Rahman M, Haque M, Salam M. Effect of tillage practices on transplant Aman rice. J Agron. 2004;3:103–10. https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2004.103.110
  47. 47. Saharawat Y, Singh B, Malik RK, Ladha JK, Gathala M, Jat ML,et al. Alternative tillage and crop establishment in rice–wheat rotation in North Western IGP. Field Crops Res. 2010;116:260–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.01.003
  48. 48. Sairamesh KV, Rao AS, Subbaiah G, Rani PP. Bio-efficacy of sequential herbicide application in wet-seeded rice. Indian J Weed Sci. 2015;47:201–2.
  49. 49. Medo J, Maková J, Kovácsová S, Majerčíková K, Hricáková N, Hricová A. Changes in soil microbial community and activity caused by application of dimethachlor and linuron. Sci Rep. 2021;11:12790. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91755-6
  50. 50. Page KL, Dang YP, Dalal RC. The ability of conservation agriculture to conserve soil organic carbon and the subsequent impact on soil physical, chemical and biological properties and yield. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2020;4:31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00031
  51. 51. Mead R, Curnow RN, Hasted AM. Statistical methods in agriculture and experimental biology. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2003.
  52. 52. Teng J, Tian J, Sapkota TB, Zhang M, Li X, Wang S, et al. Conservation agriculture improves soil health and sustains crop yields under climate warming. Nat Commun. 2024;15:9312. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53169-6

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.