Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)

Identification of markers for yield and yield-related traits using association mapping analysis in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under rainfed conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13374
Submitted
26 December 2025
Published
28-09-2026 — Updated on 30-09-2026
Versions

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) grain yield is determined by multiple factors, including ideal plant architecture, appropriate flowering time and adaptability to diverse agro-climatic conditions. However, inadequate water availability in major rice-growing regions has led to increased incidence of drought and other abiotic stresses.  The present investigation was undertaken to identify marker-trait associations for yield and yield-related traits, as well as to assess genetic diversity and population structure under rainfed conditions. A set of 100 genetically diverse rice genotypes, classified into wild, cultivated and germplasm groups, were evaluated under rainfed conditions using 151 Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers and marker-trait associations were analysed through general linear model (GLM) and mixed linear model (MLM)  models using TASSEL and STRUCTURE software during 2020–2021 in the Agriculture Research cum Instructional farm and Department of Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, College of Agriculture, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, India. A total of 414 alleles were amplified across 151 SSR markers (alleles/locus: 3 to 11 with mean 2.77). The polymorphism information content (PIC) values ranged from 0.019 to 0.498 (mean 0.263) the most informative markers were CS-62, RM28160, RGS-1 and RM-408 (PIC > 0.49). STRUCTURE Harvester (ΔK, K = 3) classified 100 genotypes into three sub-populations (POP1: 85; POP2: 13; POP3: 2). The GLM and MLM identified 90 and 42 significant marker-trait associations respectively (False discovery rate (FDR): 50.1 %), with 10 SSR markers associated with multiple yield-related traits under both models. Eight SSR markers (RM-242, RM-178, RM-154, RM-21, 18646, IND-1, CS-62 and PPC-1SET1) were tightly linked with grain yield across all linkage groups, confirming their suitability for marker-assisted selection. Sarmatia (250.05 g/plot) and IBD-1 (234.55 g/plot) are recommended as donor parents for breeding drought-tolerant rainfed rice varieties.

References

  1. 1. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India. Second advance estimates of production of major agricultural crops 2024–25. New Delhi: Government of India; 2025.
  2. 2. Awad-Allah MMA, Shafie WWM, Alsubeie MS, Alatawi A, Safhi FA, ALshamrani SM, et al. Utilisation of genetic resources, genetic diversity and genetic variability for selecting new restorer lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genes (Basel). 2022;13(12):2227. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122227
  3. 3. Sweeney M, McCouch S. The complex history of the domestication of rice. Ann Bot. 2007;100(5):951–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm048
  4. 4. Saini PS. Candidate gene-based association mapping of rice (Oryza sativa L.) germplasm accessions for qDTY1.1 and qDTY12.1. Raipur: Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya; 2020.
  5. 5. Zeng L, Kwon TR, Liu X, Wilson C, Grieve CM, Gregorio GB. Genetic diversity analysed by microsatellite markers among rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes with different adaptations to saline soils. Plant Sci. 2004;166(5):1275–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.01.005
  6. 6. Yi Y, Hassan MA, Cheng X, Li Y, Liu H, Fang W, et al. QTL mapping and analysis for drought tolerance in rice by genome-wide association study. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1223782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1223782
  7. 7. Hassan MA, Dahu N, Hongning T, Qian Z, Yueming Y, Yiru L, et al. Drought stress in rice: morpho-physiological and molecular responses and marker-assisted breeding. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1215371. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1215371
  8. 8. Nei M. Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat. 1972;106(949):283–92. https://doi.org/10.1086/282771
  9. 9. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 1990;12:13–5. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419362
  10. 10. Anderson JA, Churchill GA, Autrique JE, Tanksley SD, Sorrells ME. Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome. 1993;36(1):181–6. https://doi.org/10.1139/g93-024
  11. 11. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet. 1980;32(3):314–31.
  12. 12. Liu K, Muse SV. PowerMarker: integrated analysis environment for genetic marker data. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(9):2128–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti282
  13. 13. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/155.2.945
  14. 14. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(8):2611–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
  15. 15. Earl DA, VonHoldt BM. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 2012;4(2):359–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7
  16. 16. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(19):2633–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308
  17. 17. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
  18. 18. Green MR, Sambrook J. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2020;(12). https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot100412
  19. 19. Jin L, Lu Y, Xiao P, Sun M, Corke H, Bao J. Genetic diversity and population structure of a diverse set of rice germplasm for association mapping. Theor Appl Genet. 2010;121(3):475–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1324-7
  20. 20. Donde R, Mohapatra S, Baksh SY, Padhy B, Mukherjee M, Roy S, et al. Identification of QTLs for high grain yield and component traits in new plant types of rice. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0227785. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227785
  21. 21. Kumbhar SD, Kulwal PL, Patil JV, Sarawate CD, Gaikwad AP, Jadhav AS. Genetic diversity and population structure in landraces and improved rice varieties from India. Rice Sci. 2015;22(3):99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2015.05.013
  22. 22. Courtois B, Frouin J, Greco R, Bruschi G, Droc G, Hamelin C, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure in a European collection of rice. Crop Sci. 2012;52(4):1663–75. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2011.11.0588
  23. 23. Das B, Sengupta S, Prasad M, Ghose TK. Genetic diversity and population structure of rice landraces from eastern and north-eastern India using SSR markers. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40(2):1119–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-2197-3
  24. 24. Uga Y, Okuno K, Yano M. Fine mapping of Sta1, a quantitative trait locus determining stele transversal area, on rice chromosome 9. Mol Breed. 2010;26(3):533–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-010-9450-0
  25. 25. Agrama HA, Eizenga GC, Yan W. Association mapping of yield and its components in rice cultivars. Mol Breed. 2007;19(4):341–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-006-9066-6
  26. 26. Yu J, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, Vroh Bi I, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat Genet. 2006;38(2):203–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1702
  27. 27. Nachimuthu VV, Robin S, Sudhakar D, Raveendran M, Rajeswari S, Manonmani S. Evaluation of rice genetic diversity and population structure using SSR markers and association analysis for grain yield traits. J Genet. 2015;94(2):215–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-015-0521-3
  28. 28. Anandan A, Anumalla M, Pradhan SK, Ali J. Population structure, diversity and trait association analysis in rice (Oryza sativa L.) germplasm for early seedling vigour using trait linked SSR markers. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0152406. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152406
  29. 29. Zhou L, Wang JK, Yi Q, Wang YZ, Zhu YG, Zhang ZH. Quantitative trait loci for seedling vigour in rice under field conditions. Field Crops Res. 2006;100:294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.08.004
  30. 30. Freeg HA, Anis GB, Abo-Shousha AA, El-Banna AN, Sabagh AE. Genetic diversity among some rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes with different drought tolerance based on SSR markers. Cercet Agron Mold. 2016;49(3):39–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/cerce-2016-0024
  31. 31. Ghazy MI, EL-Naem SA, Hefeina AG, et al. Genome-wide association study of rice diversity panel reveals new QTLs for tolerance to water deficit under the Egyptian conditions. Rice. 2024;17:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-024-00703-1
  32. 32. Tanksley SD. Mapping polygenes. Annu Rev Genet. 1993;27(1):205–33. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ge.27.120193.001225
  33. 33. Emon RM. Molecular markers, marker assisted selection for rice in relation to biotic and abiotic stress. Discov Agric. 2025;3:102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-025-00265-w

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.