Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp3 (2026): Climate-Weed Nexus: Innovations for Sustainable Farming (CWIS 2025)

Weed dynamics, nutrient removal and weed smothering efficiency in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) - based intercropping systems under lowland summer rice fallows

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13481
Submitted
1 January 2026
Published
30-04-2026

Abstract

Weed infestation is a major constraint to crop productivity in lowland summer rice fallows. In southern India, high residual soil moisture and nutrient availability during summer fallows favour rapid weed proliferation, leading to nutrient depletion and increased weed pressure in the succeeding rice crop. However, information on weed suppression and nutrient removal in pearl millet-legume-based intercropping under lowland summer rice fallows is limited. A field experiment was carried out during the summer season of 2024–2025 at the Integrated Farming Systems Research Station, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, to investigate the weed dynamics, nutrient removal and weed smothering efficiency of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) - based intercropping systems in lowland rice fallows. The experiment comprised 13 intercropping treatments involving pearl millet with bush cowpea, fodder cowpea, green gram and black gram in 1:1 and 2:1 planting ratios under an additive series (an intercropping system, where the base crop population is maintained at 100 % and intercrops are added according to main crop geometry), along with their respective sole crops. The treatments were laid out in a randomised block design (RBD) with three replications. The predominant weed flora observed during the crop growth period consisted mainly of broad-leaf weeds at 30 and 60 days after sowing (DAS). Weed growth and nutrient depletion were significantly influenced by the intercropping systems. The lowest total weed dry matter (87.50 g m-2 at 60 DAS) and the highest weed smothering efficiency (56.72 %) were recorded in pearl millet + bush cowpea (1:1). In contrast, the highest weed dry matter (202.15 g m-2) was observed in the sole crop of pearl millet. The inclusion of legumes significantly reduced nutrient depletion by weeds due to complementary resource use and efficient canopy closure. Intercropping systems, pearl millet + bush cowpea (1:1) and pearl millet + black gram (1:1), were more efficient in suppressing weed growth, reducing nutrient losses and improving crop competitiveness compared to sole cropping. The study concluded that legume-based intercropping effectively minimised weed interference, conserved soil nutrients and enhanced ecological weed control in summer rice fallows.

References

  1. 1. Chauhan BS, Johnson DE. Row spacing and weed control timing affect yield of aerobic rice. Field Crops Res. 2011;121:226–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.12.008
  2. 2. Mathukia RK, Mathukia PR, Polara AM. Intercropping and weed management in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) under rainfed condition. Agric Sci Digest. 2015;35(2):138–41. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0547.2015.00025.7
  3. 3. Kiroriwal A, Yadav RS, Kumawat A. Weed management in pearl millet based intercropping system. Indian J Weed Sci. 2012;44(3):200–3.
  4. 4. Mondal MH. Crop agriculture of Bangladesh: challenges and opportunities. Bangladesh J Agric Res. 2010;35(2):235–45. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v35i2.5886
  5. 5. Shah SN, Shroff JC, Patel RH, Usadadiya VP. Influence of intercropping and weed management practices on weed growth and yield of maize. Int J Sci Nat. 2011;2:47–50.
  6. 6. Sharma GD, Ghosh G, Singh S. Weed-control efficiency, weed-smothering efficiency, weed competition index, productivity and profitability of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) as influenced by intercropping system and weed management practices. Natl Acad Sci Lett. 2011;34(9–10):327–32.
  7. 7. Ansari MA, Rana KS. Effect of transpiration suppressants and nutrients on productivity and moisture use efficiency of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum)–pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) intercropping system under rainfed conditions. Indian J Agric Res. 2012;82(8):676–80. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i8.23048
  8. 8. Mantovanelli GC, Silva AA, Ricardo LL, Kagami FL, de Almeida JD, Barbosa MC, et al. Pearl millet cover crop extract inhibits the development of the weed Ipomoea grandifolia by inducing oxidative stress in primary roots and affecting photosynthesis efficiency. Plants. 2025;14:222. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14020222
  9. 9. Maitra S. Intercropping system and agricultural sustainability. In: Biradar N, Shah RA, Ahmad A, editors. Intercropping system: Principles and practices. New Delhi: Ariana Publishers and Distributors; 2023. p. 79–90. https://doi.org/10.59317/9789394490468
  10. 10. Sahoo U, Maitra S, Sairam M, Sagar L. Potential and advantage of pearl millet–legume intercropping system: A review. Int J Bioresource Sci. 2023;10(1):99–106. https://doi.org/10.30954/2347-9655.01.2023.10
  11. 11. Directorate of Agriculture; Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. Crop production guide: Agriculture 2020. Chennai: Directorate of Agriculture; Coimbatore: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University; 2020. p. 463.
  12. 12. Kerala Agricultural University. Package of practices recommendations: crops. 16th ed. Thrissur: Kerala Agricultural University; 2024. p. 434.
  13. 13. Kaur A, Koul B, Upadhyay H. Studies on weed competition in intercropping systems of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) with legumes as fodder. Ann Agri-Bio Res. 2023;28(1):80–4.
  14. 14. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024.
  15. 15. Hisham MM, Chandran J, Gopinath PP. RAISINS: Integrating R and AI for agricultural data analysis. J Sustain Technol Agric. 2025;1(1):1–11.
  16. 16. Ram B, Chaudhary GR, Jat AS. Nutrient depletion by weeds, weed-control efficiency and productivity of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) as influenced by intercropping systems and integrated weed management. Indian J Agric Sci. 2004;74(10):534–8.
  17. 17. Choudhary VK, Dixit A, Suresh Kumar P, Chauhan BS. Productivity, weed dynamics, nutrient mining and monetary advantage of maize-legume intercropping in the Eastern Himalayan region of India. Plant Prod Sci. 2014;17(4):342–52. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.17.342
  18. 18. Chaudhary R, Gupta SK, Singh MK, Kohli A. Effect of intercropping on growth, yield and profitability of sorghum, pearl millet and cowpea. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(5):179–82. https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2020.v9.i5Sd.12576
  19. 19. Goswami VK, Kaushik SK, Gautam RC. Effect of intercropping and weed control on nutrient uptake and water-use efficiency of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) under rainfed conditions. Indian J Agron. 2002;47(4):504–8. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v47i4.3196

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.