Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Genetic diversity and performance evaluation of long-fruited snake gourd genotypes (Trichosanthes anguina L.) under sodic soil conditions in Tamil Nadu, India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13756
Submitted
20 January 2026
Published
30-04-2026

Abstract

Snake gourd (Trichosanthes anguina L.) is a cucurbitaceous vegetable of economic and nutritional significance, widely cultivated in tropical and subtropical regions. This study evaluated 30 genotypes under sodic soil conditions at Horticultural College and Research Institute for Women, Tiruchirappalli, over 2 seasons (kharif and rabi, 2024–2025) to assess variability for growth, yield, physiological and quality traits. Analysis of variance revealed significant differences among genotypes for all seventeen traits at p≤0.01, indicating the presence of considerable genetic variability. Phenotypic coefficients of variation (PCV) were higher than genotypic coefficients of variation (GCV) for most traits, suggesting that environmental factors contributed to the observed phenotypic expression. However, the relatively small differences between PCV and GCV for several traits indicate that environmental influence was present but moderate and that a considerable proportion of the variability was genetically controlled. High heritability coupled with high genetic advance was observed for fruit yield per plant, single fruit weight, fruit length and number of seeds per fruit, reflecting predominant additive gene action and the potential for improvement through selection. Genotypic correlation analysis showed that fruit yield was positively associated with vine length, number of fruits per plant, single fruit weight, proline content and vitamin C, whereas days to flowering and Na+/K+ ratio were negatively correlated. Principal component analysis (PCA) identified 3 principal components with eigenvalues >1. The 17 traits to 3 major components explaining 83.6 % of the total variability, with PC1 alone contributing 70.7 %, highlighting yield and quality traits as major discriminators among genotypes. Mahalanobis D² cluster analysis grouped genotypes into four clusters, each exhibiting superiority for specific traits. The highest inter-cluster distances were observed between Cluster I & IV and Cluster I & III, indicating substantial genetic divergence, suggesting these clusters as potential parents for heterotic breeding. Genotypes S06, S21, S27, S12, S09, S18 and S16 were identified as superior performers and represent promising parental lines valuable genetic resources for breeding high-yielding, quality-enhanced and sodicity-tolerant snake gourd cultivars.

References

  1. 1. Echo. Snake gourd: Trichosanthes cucumerina L. Echo technical note. Educational Concerns for Hunger Organization; 2006.
  2. 2. Chakrabarti AK, Seshadri VS, De BN. Genetic resources of snake gourd (Trichosanthes anguina L.) in India. J Hortic Sci. 1982;57(3):355–9.
  3. 3. Ojiako OA, Igwe CU. The nutritive, anti-nutritive and hepatotoxic properties of Trichosanthes anguina (snake tomato) fruits from Nigeria. Pak J Nutr. 2008;7(1):85–9. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2008.85.89
  4. 4. Parthasarathy VA, Parthasarathy U, Zachariah TJ. Medicinal plants in India: an overview. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research; 2015.
  5. 5. Chaudhary M, Sharma A, Sharma D. Genetic variability and divergence studies in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria). Int J Chem Stud. 2018;6(1):1791–4.
  6. 6. Tomooka N. Genetic diversity and landrace differentiation of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) and evaluation of its wild relatives and closely related species. Theor Appl Genet. 1991;81(5):566–78.
  7. 7. NRSA. Mapping and monitoring of salt-affected soils in India using remote sensing and GIS. Hyderabad: National Remote Sensing Agency; 2014.
  8. 8. Abrol IP, Yadav JSP, Massoud FI. Salt-affected soils and their management. FAO soils bulletin 39. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1988.
  9. 9. Ashraf M, Foolad MR. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot. 2007;59(2):206–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006
  10. 10. Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agron J. 1955;47(7):314–18. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x
  11. 11. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39(1):205–07. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
  12. 12. Hussain S, Khaliq A, Ali B, Hussain HA, Aziz A. Impact of salt stress on seed germination and early seedling growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2016;14(1):11–25.
  13. 13. Ahmad P, Abdel Latef AA, Hashem A, Abd Allah EF, Gucel S, Tran LSP. Nitric oxide mitigates salt stress by regulating levels of osmolytes and antioxidant enzymes in chickpea. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:136. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00347
  14. 14. Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. 2nd ed. New Delhi: ICAR Publications; 1954.
  15. 15. Singh AK, Maurya IB, Lal G. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(2):1360–66.
  16. 16. Prakash R, Singh AK, Singh DK. Studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(4):2347–53.
  17. 17. Rai N, Yadav DS, Yadav RK. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under salt stress. Veg Sci. 2016;43(2):231–34.
  18. 18. Samadia DK. Genetic variability studies in round melon (Citrullus vulgaris var. fistulosus). Indian J Hortic. 2007;64(2):173–76.
  19. 19. Yadav DK, Meena OP, Singh B. Genetic variability and correlation studies in ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula Roxb.). Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7(1):1119–22.
  20. 20. Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:651–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
  21. 21. Rao PVK, Reddy RVSK, Reddy DS. Studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in snake gourd (Trichosanthes anguina L.). Int J Trop Agric. 2015;33(2):1263–67.
  22. 22. Singh M, Rai M, Kumar R, Kumar S. Genetic variability and heritability studies in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata). Veg Sci. 2017;44(2):237–40.
  23. 23. Mishra S, Kumar S, Kumar R, Kumar A. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Environ Ecol. 2014;32(3A):1039–42.
  24. 24. Ram D, Kumar S, Rai M. Correlation and path analysis in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Indian J Hortic. 2006;63(1):71–75. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v2i1.641
  25. 25. Singh AK, Pandey S, Rai M. Correlation and path analysis in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Indian J Hortic. 2006;63(1):71–75.
  26. 26. Qadir M, Oster JD, Schubert S, Noble AD, Sahrawat KL. Phytoremediation of sodic and saline-sodic soils. Adv Agron. 2006;96:197–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(07)96006-X
  27. 27. Chinnusamy V, Jagendorf A, Zhu JK. Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop Sci. 2005;45(2):437–48. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0437
  28. 28. Shanthakumar G, Manivannan N. Principal component and cluster analyses in bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria). Electron J Plant Breed. 2019;10(1):379–84.
  29. 29. Kumari P, Meena OP, Kumar J. Multivariate analysis for genetic diversity in ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula (Roxb.) L.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2021;10(1):1899–903.
  30. 30. Yadav P, Kumar J, Meena OP. Multivariate analysis of genetic divergence in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2022;11(1):184–89.
  31. 31. Sahoo SC, Mishra HN, Behera TK. Genetic divergence studies in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(4):132–36.
  32. 32. Anitha R, Ponnuswami V. Genetic divergence and variability studies in snake gourd (Trichosanthes anguina L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(2):3483–91.
  33. 33. Ravishankar KV, Reddy MT, Prasad RD. Genetic diversity analysis in cucurbitaceous vegetables using multivariate techniques. Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 2020;80(1):103–11.
  34. 34. Devi P, Reddy RVSK. Genetic divergence studies in ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula Roxb.). Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2017;5(6):634–40.
  35. 35. Singh P, Yadav RK, Singh SK. Physiological and biochemical basis of salinity tolerance in cucurbits. Indian J Plant Physiol. 2021;26(3):532–40

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.