Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 4 (2026)

Genetic analysis of yield and physiological traits in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] under drought stress

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13786
Submitted
22 January 2026
Published
27-10-2026 — Updated on 02-11-2026
Versions

Abstract

The present investigation on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] was conducted at the Post Graduate Research Farm, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (MPKV), Rahuri, during the academic years 2023–25. Under drought conditions, P1 flowered and matured significantly earlier, F1 showed superior yield traits, P2 and F1 excelled in plant height (PH) and number of pods per cluster (NPC), while F2 and F3 displayed only intermediate performance across traits. P1 generally performed best for earliness and chlorophyll content (CC), P2 for leaf area (LA) and relative water content (RWC) related traits and F1 consistently excelled in canopy temperature depression (CTD) and harvest index (HI). F2 and F3 showed mostly average or desirable leaf senescence performance, depending on the cross. All four crosses showed additive gene action for flowering and maturity, while Crosses I, II and III showed the same pattern for number of pods per plant (NPP) and Cross I alone for PH. Dominance and dominance × dominance effects were expressed for multiple traits across crosses, with Cross I showing them for 3 traits, Cross II for four, Cross III for four and Cross IV for six yield traits. Duplicate epistasis was observed for seed index (SI) (Crosses I and IV), DF (Crosses II and III) and NPP (Crosses II and IV). However, complementary epistasis was observed for maturity (Crosses I and IV), PH (Crosses II and IV) and NPP and yield per plant (YPP) (Cross III).

References

  1. 1. Kaushik DK, Patel SR, Chandrawanshi SK, Khavse R, Chaudhary JL. Study on agrometeorological indices for soybean crop under different sowing dates in Chhattisgarh region of India. Indian J Agric Res. 2015;49(3):282–5. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-058X.2015.00046.3
  2. 2. Parmar D, Ramgiry SR. Stability analysis for growth and yield attributes in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Soybean Res. 2012;18:1–6.
  3. 3. Pathrikar DT, Perke DS, More SS. Growth rates in area, production and productivity of soybean in Marathwada region of Maharashtra state. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(1):1009–12.
  4. 4. World Agricultural Production. Soybean area, yield and production. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service; 2025.
  5. 5. Sionit N, Kramer PJ. Effect of water stress during different stages of growth of soybean. Agron J. 1977;69:274–8. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1977.00021962006900020018x
  6. 6. Saitoh K, Mahmood T, Kurada T. Effect of moisture stress at different growth stages on flowering and pod set in determinate and indeterminate soybean cultivars. Jpn J Crop Sci. 1999;68:537–44. https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.68.537
  7. 7. Specht JE, Hume DJ, Kumudini SV. Soybean yield potential: a genetic and physiological perspective. Crop Sci. 1999;39:1560–70. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961560x
  8. 8. Turner NC. Drought resistance: a comparison of two frameworks. In: Saxena NP, Johansen C, Chauhan YS, Rao RCN, editors. Management of agriculture and drought: agronomic and genetic options. Enfield (NH): Scientific Publishers Inc.; 2003. p. 89–102.
  9. 9. Kebede H, Fisher DK, Sui R, Reddy KN. Irrigation methods and scheduling in the delta region of Mississippi: current status and strategies to improve irrigation efficiency. Am J Plant Sci. 2014;5:2917–28. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.520307
  10. 10. Devi MJ, Sinclair TR, Chen P, Carter TE. Evaluation of elite southern maturity soybean breeding lines for drought tolerant traits. Agron J. 2014;106:1947–54. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj14.0242
  11. 11. Ye H, Song L, Chen H, Valliyodan B, Cheng P, Ali L, et al. A major natural genetic variation associated with root system architecture and plasticity improves waterlogging tolerance and yield in soybean. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41(9):2169–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13190
  12. 12. Blum A. Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crops Res. 2009;112:119–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.03.009
  13. 13. Sinclair TR. Challenges in breeding for yield increase for drought. Trends Plant Sci. 2011;16:289–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.02.008
  14. 14. Blum A. Plant breeding for stress environments. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1998.
  15. 15. Minolta Camera Co Ltd. Manual for chlorophyll meter SPAD-502. Osaka (Japan): Minolta Camera Co Ltd; 1989.
  16. 16. Heng Y, Li S, William TS, Md LA, Thomas RS, Mandeep KR, et al. The importance of slow canopy wilting in drought tolerance in soybean. J Exp Bot. 2020;71(2):642–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz150
  17. 17. Barrs HD, Weatherley PE. A re-examination of the relative turgidity techniques for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci. 1962;15:413–28. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9620413
  18. 18. Donald CM. In search of yield. J Aust Inst Agric Sci. 1962;28:171–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.28.317.171
  19. 19. Patil RY, Chimote VP, Shinde GC, Deshmukh MP. Genetic study for yield and yield components in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Int J Adv Biochem Res. 2024;8(12):918–21. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i12Sl.3243
  20. 20. Thakare DS, Chimote VP, Deshmukh MP, Bhailume MS, Adsul AT. Inheritance of yield and yield components in soybean. Electron J Plant Breed. 2017;8(1):176–81. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2017.00025.4
  21. 21. Pawale ST, Bhor TJ, Shinde GC, Deshmukh MP, Nimbalkar CA, Chimote VP. Genetic study for yield and yield components in crosses between trypsin inhibitor-free and expressing soybean genotypes. Electron J Plant Breed. 2020;11(1):25–9. https://doi.org/10.37992/2020.1101.005
  22. 22. Adsul AT, Chimote VP, Deshmukh MP, Thakare DS. Genetic analysis of yield and its components in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2016;48(3):247–57.
  23. 23. Singh M, Nag SK, Yadav RK. Determination of gene effects and inheritance of genes for various generations of soybean crosses (Glycine max L. Merrill). Biol Forum. 2023;15(4):243–5.
  24. 24. Shinde SR, Patil JV, Pawar RM. Genetic analysis of yield and yield components in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Int J Plant Sci. 2016;11(1):8–15. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJPS/11.1/8-15
  25. 25. Bhor TJ, Chimote VP, Deshmukh MP. Genetic analysis of yield and yield components in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Indian J Agric Res. 2014;48:446–52. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-058X.2014.01328.6
  26. 26. Ünay A, Cinar VM. Elucidating the inheritance pattern of some physiological characteristics in soybean (Glycine max L.) under heat stress. In: Proceedings of the International Food, Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences Congress; 2023 Mar 17–19; Kars, Türkiye. Vol. 1.
  27. 27. Rahangdale SR, Raut VM. Gene effects for oil content and other quantitative traits in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 2002;62(4):322–7.
  28. 28. Maloo SR, Nair S. Generation means analysis for seed yield and its components in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 2005;65(2):139–40.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.