Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp9 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Residual effects of weed biomass incorporation and nitrogen management in rice on the productivity of field pea in a rice-based cropping system

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13836
Submitted
26 January 2026
Published
28-10-2026

Abstract

This research examines how managing nutrients in a rice crop affects the following field pea crop, a key question for sustaining rice-based systems in South Asia. In a two-year field study, conducted at the College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Umiam from 2023–24 to 2024–25, we tested the residual effects of two practices from the prior rice season: whether weed biomass was incorporated into the soil (5 t ha-1) or not and the application of nitrogen (N) fertiliser at five different rates (0–160 kg N ha-1). The results of the study showed that adding weed biomass consistently improved the field pea performance, resulting in taller plants, higher dry matter and higher crop growth rates (CGR). These benefits likely stem from the slow release of nutrients and improved soil conditions as the weeds decomposed. While adding N fertiliser boosted plant growth, the benefits peaked at 120 kg N ha-1, with no further gains at the higher rate of 160 kg N ha-1. The most significant results were seen in yield, where the combination of weed biomass and N worked together synergistically. This combination increased pod yield by 15 % compared to plots without incorporated biomass and achieved the highest overall yield. The practice also led to a slightly better harvest index, meaning plants were more effective at directing resources toward producing pods. In conclusion, for farmers, incorporating weed residues in rice and applying 120 kg N ha-1 to the rice crop creates a lasting positive effect, setting up the subsequent field pea for stronger growth and higher productivity in a more efficient cropping system.

References

  1. 1. Ladha JK, Tirol-Padre A, Reddy CK, Cassman KG, Verma S, Powlson DS, et al. Global nitrogen budgets in cereals. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19355. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19355
  2. 2. Pathak H. Greenhouse gas emissions from Indian agriculture. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad. 2015;81(5):1133–49. https://doi.org/10.16943/ptinsa/2015/v81i5/48333
  3. 3. Kumar V, Jat HS, Sharma PC, Gathala MK, Malik RK, Kamboj BR, et al. Assessing sustainable intensification options in Indian cereal systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2018;252:132–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.006
  4. 4. Mohanty LK, Singh NK, Raj P, Prakash A, Tiwari AK, Singh V, et al. Agronomy-driven soil health and crop sustainability. J Exp Agric Int. 2024;46(2):46–67. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i22308
  5. 5. Choudhary VK, Gurjar DS, Meena RS. Crop residue and weed biomass incorporation with microbial inoculation improve crop and soil productivity in rice-toria cropping system. Environ Sustain Indic. 2020;7:100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2020.100048
  6. 6. Saurabh K, Kumar R, Mishra JS, Hans H, Kumawat N, Meena RS, et al. Carbon and nitrogen mineralization dynamics. In: Carbon and nitrogen cycling in soil. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 463–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7264-3_14
  7. 7. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe R, Choudhury BU, Mishra VK, Kundu MC, et al. Organic nutrient sources and biochar technology on microbial biomass carbon and soil enzyme activity in maize-black gram system. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2023;13(10):9277–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01625-4
  8. 8. Wang Y, Tu C, Cheng L, Li C, Gentry LF, Hoyt GD, et al. Long-term farming impacts on soil C and N pools. Soil Tillage Res. 2011;117:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.08.002
  9. 9. Ma Q, Wen Y, Wang D, Sun X, Hill PW, Macdonald A, et al. Farmyard manure stimulates soil C and N cycling. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;144:107760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107760
  10. 10. Meena RS, Das A, Yadav GS, Lal R, editors. Legumes for soil health and sustainable management. Singapore: Springer; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0253-4
  11. 11. Singh R, Babu S, Avasthe RK, Singh A, Yadav GS, Pashte V, et al. Screening of field pea varieties in rice-fallow areas. Ann Agric Res. 2018;9(3):246–50.
  12. 12. Singh V, Gupta RK, Kahlon MS, Toor AS, Singh KB, Al-Ansari N, et al. Tillage and residue management effects on soil properties. Land. 2023;12(10):1895. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12101895
  13. 13. Peoples MB, Giller KE, Jensen ES, Herridge DF. Nitrogen fixation by grain legumes. Plant Soil. 2021;469(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05167-6
  14. 14. Ghosh T, Paul A, Chatterjee S. Influence of fertilizer on growth, yield and chlorophyll contents of groundnut. NeuroQuantology. 2022;20(11):1382.
  15. 15. Singh S, Singh RJ, Kumar K, Singh B, Shukla L. Biofertilizers and green manuring for sustainable agriculture. In: Modern technologies for sustainable agriculture. New Delhi: [publisher unknown]; 2013. p. 129–50.
  16. 16. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1984.
  17. 17. Antil RS, Raj D. Integrated nutrient management for sustainable crop production and improving soil health. In: Nutrient dynamics for sustainable crop production. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 67–101.
  18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8660-2_3
  19. 18. Liu M, Hu Z, Fan Y. Effects of organic residue incorporation on soil nutrient cycling and crop growth. J Plant Ecol. 2024;17(6):108–20.
  20. 19. Sharma V, Choudhary U, Changade NM, Kumar A, Singh M, Yadav KK, et al. Growth and yield response of pea under deficit irrigation and nitrogen. Legume Res. 2024:1–8.
  21. 20. Lalmawiberi K, Mehera B. Effect of biofertilizers on growth and yield of field pea varieties. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(18):1111–15. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183377
  22. 21. Fageria NK, Baligar VC. Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Adv Agron. 2005;88:97–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(05)88004-6
  23. 22. Fang Y, Singh BP, Collins D, Li B, Zhu J, Tavakkoli E. Nutrient supply enhanced wheat residue-carbon mineralization and microbial carbon-use efficiency. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;126:168–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.09.003
  24. 23. Muhammad I, Yang L, Ahmad S, Farooq S, Al-Ghamdi AA, Khan A, et al. Nitrogen fertilizer effects under different irrigation regimes. Agronomy. 2022;12(4):845. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040845
  25. 24. Banerjee P, Venugopalan VK, Nath R, Gaber A, Hossain A. Dynamics of growth, physiology, radiation interception, production and quality of autumn black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) as influenced by nutrient scheduling. PLoS One. 2024;19(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304466
  26. 25. Ghosh PK, Venkatesh MS, Hazra KK, Kumar N. Long-term effect of pulses and nutrient management on soil organic carbon dynamics and sustainability on an Inceptisol of Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Exp Agric. 2012;48(4):473–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479712000130
  27. 26. Phillips I, Paungfoo-Lonhienne C, Tahmasbian I, Hunter B, Smith B, Mayer D, et al. Inorganic N plus organic amendments improve NUE. Nitrogen. 2022;3(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen3010004
  28. 27. Sinclair TR, de Wit CT. Photosynthate and nitrogen requirements for seed production by various crops. Science. 1975;189(4202):565–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.189.4202.565
  29. 28. Bennett EJ, Roberts JA, Wagstaff C. The role of the pod in seed development: Strategies for manipulating yield. New Phytol. 2011;190(4):838–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03714.x
  30. 29. Li G, Guo X, Sun W, Hou L, Wang G, Tian R, et al. Nitrogen application in pod zone improves peanut yield and quality. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04725-1
  31. 30. Wu YC, Li Z, Niu YZ. Suitable nitrogen fertilization mode for high yield, quality and high nitrogen use efficiency in high-density direct-sown rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). J Plant Nutr Fertil. 2015;21(5):1184–9.
  32. 31. Singh RK, Upadhyay PK, Dhar S, R GA, Singh VK, Kumar R, et al. System of wheat intensification effects. PLoS One. 2024;19(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299785

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.