Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2026)

Best linear unbiased prediction based trait association and multivariate analysis in maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13840
Submitted
26 January 2026
Published
14-04-2026 — Updated on 21-04-2026
Versions

Abstract

Ninety-four CIMMYT maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids, along with 6 commercial checks, were evaluated at Kovilpatti, Tamil Nadu, India, during the rabi 2024 and kharif 2025 seasons using an alpha lattice design with two replications to identify major traits associated with grain yield. Significant variability was observed among the hybrids for grain yield and its related traits. Grain yield showed positive association with ear height, number of plants per plot, ear length and ear girth, indicating that ear related traits play a critical role in yield improvement. Path coefficient analysis revealed that number of plants per plot, ear girth and ear length exerted the highest positive direct effects on grain yield, suggesting that these traits can be effectively used as selection criteria in maize breeding programs. Phenotypic correlations followed similar
trends but with relatively lower magnitudes, reflecting the influence of environmental factors on trait expression. In contrast, best linear unbiased predictors (BLUP) based correlations were more conservative and provided stable estimates across environments. However, the major trait associations remained consistent across seasons. Hierarchical cluster analysis grouped the hybrids into three distinct clusters, demonstrating substantial variability for grain yield and related traits. Principal component analysis (PCA) further confirmed that ear-related and plant architectural traits contributed significantly to the total phenotypic variation. Overall, integrating BLUP based correlation, path coefficient and multivariate analyses enhances selection efficiency and accelerates genetic gain in multi-environment maize breeding
programs.

References

  1. 1. Shiferaw B, Prasanna BM, Hellin J, Bänziger M. Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Security. 2011;3(3):307–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-011-0140-5
  2. 2. Prasanna B, Huesing JE, Peschke VM, Nagoshi RN, Jia X, Wu K, et al. Fall armyworm in Asia: invasion, impacts, and strategies for sustainable management. In. CIMMYT; 2021.
  3. 3. Hallauer AR, Carena MJ, Miranda Filho J de. Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Vol. 6. Springer Science & Business Media; 2010.
  4. 4. Falconer DS. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Pearson Education India; 1996.
  5. 5. Henderson CR. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics. 1975;423–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529430
  6. 6. Piepho H, Möhring J, Melchinger A, Büchse A. BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica. 2008;161(1):209–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9449-8
  7. 7. Dewey DR, Lu K. A correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production 1. Agronomy Journal. 1959;51(9):515–18. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100090002x
  8. 8. Mohammadi SA, Prasanna B. Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants—salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Science. 2003;43(4):1235–48. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1235
  9. 9. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2016.
  10. 10. Sedgwick P. Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Bmj. 2012;345. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4483
  11. 11. Ward Jr JH. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1963;58(301):236–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2282967
  12. 12. Bänziger M, Edmeades GO, Beck D, Bellon MR. Breeding for drought and nitrogen stress tolerance in maize: from theory to practice. 2000.
  13. 13. Bello O, Abdulmaliq S, Afolabi M, Ige S. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield and agronomic characters among open pollinated maize varieties and their F1 hybrids in a diallel cross. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2010;9(18):2633–39. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajb.v9i18
  14. 14. Dar Z, Lone A, Alaie B, Ali G, Gazal A, Gulzar S, et al. Correlation studies in temperate maize (Zea maysL.) inbred lines. Plant Archives. 2015;15(2):1191–94. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:90801374
  15. 15. Mather K, Jinks J. Biometrical Genetics. Chapman and Hall. London, UK. 1982.
  16. 16. Hammer GL, Dong Z, McLean G, Doherty A, Messina C, Schussler J, et al. Can changes in canopy and/or root system architecture explain historical maize yield trends in the US corn belt? Crop Science. 2009;49(1):299–312. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0152
  17. 17. Araus JL, Serret MD, Edmeades GO. Phenotyping maize for adaptation to drought. Frontiers in Physiology. 2012;3:305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00305
  18. 18. Cairns JE, Crossa J, Zaidi PH, Grudloyma P, Sanchez C, Araus JL, et al. Identification of drought, heat, and combined drought and heat tolerant donors in maize. Crop Science. 2013;53(4):1335–46. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.09.0545
  19. 19. Smith AB, Cullis BR, Thompson R. The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 2005;143(6):449–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859605005587
  20. 20. Zarei B, Kahrizi D, Aboughadareh AP, Sadeghi F. Correlation and path coefficient analysis for determining interrelationships among grain yield and related characters in corn hybrids (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 2012;4(20):1519–22.
  21. 21. Pavan R, Lohithaswa H, Wali M, Prakash G, Shekara B. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of grain yield and yield contributing traits in single cross hybrids of maize (Zea mays L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 2011;2(2):253–57.
  22. 22. Sadek S, Ahmed M, Abd El-Ghaney H. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in five parents inbred lines and their six white maize (Zea mays L.) single crosses developed and grown in Egypt. Journal of Applied Sciences Research. 2006;2(3):159–67.
  23. 23. Reddy VR, Jabeen F. Narrow sense heritability, correlation and path analysis in maize (Zea mays L.). SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics. 2016;48(2):120-26.
  24. 24. Begum S, Ahmed A, Omy S, Rohman M, Amiruzzaman M. Genetic variability, character association and path analysis in maize (Zea mays L.). Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research. 2016;41(1):173–82. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v41i1.27682
  25. 25. Subramanian A, Subbaraman N. Hierarchical cluster analysis of genetic diversity in maize germplasm. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 2010;1(4):431–36.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.