Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2026)

Regulation of sex expression in pistillate lines and its implications for hybrid breeding in castor (Ricinus communis L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14072
Submitted
12 February 2026
Published
03-06-2026 — Updated on 10-06-2026
Versions

Abstract

Castor is an economically important non-edible oilseed crop cultivated globally for its oil and diverse industrial applications. The crop displays multiple sex forms including pistillate, monoecious, interspersed staminate flowers (ISF) and sex revertants, which complicate hybrid seed production. Hybrid development in castor depends on the pistillate lines, particularly stigma-emerged type (S-type) and non-elongating stigma (NES)-type systems, which are highly responsive to environmental factors such as temperature, photoperiod, nutrition and plant age. Plant growth regulators, such as Ethrel, decrease ISF expression and increase the number of capsules per spike, resulting in higher seed output. Genetic research indicates that 4 pairs of cumulatively acting recessive nuclear genes regulate pistillateness. Advances in genetic and molecular studies have explained the involvement of genes such as SDR2a, WUSCHEL, RcACS5, RcHK1 and glycosyltransferase gene 29916.m000523 in controlling sex differentiation during the floral developmental stage. Despite major advancements in pistillate-line breeding and the release of stable, high-yielding hybrids, constraints such as sex reversion, environmental influence and high roguing costs persist. To overcome this problem, the development of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) is vital for castor improvement. Approaches such as spontaneous mutant screening, intraspecific crosses, wide hybridisation and mutation breeding can be used to identify CMS sources in castor. Identification of CMS would significantly enhance hybrid seed purity, thus increasing production efficiency. This review synthesises current knowledge on genetic, molecular, hormonal and environmental regulation of sex expression in castor and discusses their implications for hybrid breeding strategies.

References

  1. 1. Severino LS. Single-seed selection of fast-germinating genotypes of castor (Ricinus communis). Ind Crop Prod. 2023;194:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116307
  2. 2. Memon J, Patel R, Patel BN, Patel MP, Madariya RB, Patel JK, et al. Genetic diversity, population structure and association mapping of morpho-biochemical traits in castor (Ricinus communis L.) through simple sequence repeat markers. Ind Crop Prod. 2024;221:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119348
  3. 3. Deepika C, Venkatachalam SR, Yuvaraja A, Arutchenthil P, Indra N, Ravichandran V, et al. Morphometric description and genetic diversity in 208 monoecious and pistillate castor (Ricinus communis L.) germplasms/genotypes: an unexplored industrial oil crop in semi-arid tropics. Euphytica. 2022;218:163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-022-03115-8
  4. 4. Deepika C, Venkatachalam SR, Yuvaraja A, Arutchenthil P, Indra N, Ravichandran V, et al. Evaluation of castor pistillate lines and analysis of mode of inheritance for resistance to Fusarium wilt in castor (Ricinus communis L.). Curr Plant Biol. 2024;37:100319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2024.100319
  5. 5. Manjunatha T, Ramya KT, Lavanya C, Sarada C, Senthilvel S, Yamanura M, et al. Genetic nature and environmental role in sex expression and phenological characters of pistillate lines in castor (Ricinus communis L.). Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2920097/v1
  6. 6. Milani M, Nobrega MB de. Castor breeding. In: Plant breeding from laboratories to fields. InTech; 2013. https://doi.org/10.5772/56216
  7. 7. Chakrabarty S, Islam AMA, Yaakob Z, Islam AMM. Castor (Ricinus communis): an underutilized oil crop in the South East Asia. In: Agroecosystems - very complex environmental systems. IntechOpen; 2021. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92746
  8. 8. Kulkarni LG, Ramanamurthy GV. Castor. Indian Council of Agricultural Research; 1977. p.105.
  9. 9. Ramesh M, Lavanya C, Sujatha M, Bhave MHV, Aruna Kumari J. Inheritance of morphological characters and sex expression in castor (Ricinus communis L.). J Oilseeds Res. 2017;34:247–50. https://doi.org/10.56739/jor.v34i4.137823
  10. 10. Vieira C, Evangelista S, Cirillo R, Lippi A, Maggi CA, Manzini S. Effect of ricinoleic acid in acute and sub-chronic experimental models of inflammation. Mediators Inflamm. 2000;9:223–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09629350020025737
  11. 11. Yamanura M, Kumar RM. Study of genetic variability, path coefficient and genetic diversity in castor (Ricinus communis L.). Pharma Innov J. 2020;9:285–92.
  12. 12. Deepika C, Venkatachalam SR, Yuvaraja A, Arutchenthil P, Indra N, Ravichandran V, et al. Deciphering heterotic potential and pistillate character expression in castor (Ricinus communis). Agric Res. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-025-00863-6
  13. 13. Lavanya C, Anjani K, Ganga Rao NVPR. Research achievements in castor. AICRP on Castor; 2006. p.2–3.
  14. 14. Anjani K. Castor genetic resources: a primary gene pool for exploitation. Ind Crop Prod. 2012;35:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.06.011
  15. 15. Prabakaran AJ, Lavanya C, Suresh G, Kumar VD. Guidelines for quality seed production in castor. Directorate of Oilseeds Research; 2009. p.13.
  16. 16. Shifriss O. Sex instability in Ricinus. Genetics. 1956;41:265–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/41.2.265
  17. 17. Parvathy ST, Prabakaran AJ, Jayakrishna T. Probing the floral developmental stages, bisexuality and sex reversions in castor (Ricinus communis L.). Sci Rep. 2021;11:1-22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81781-9
  18. 18. Chaudhari GR, Patel S, Ragi S. Sex expression in castor. Agric Food. 2022.
  19. 19. Shifriss O. Conventional and unconventional systems controlling sex variations in Ricinus. J Genet. 1960;57:361–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987242
  20. 20. Ankineedu G, Rao NGP. Development of pistillate castor. Indian J Genet. 1973;33:416–22.
  21. 21. Zimmerman LH, Smith JD. Production of F1 seed in castor by the use of sex genes sensitive to environment. Crop Sci. 1966;6:406–9. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600050005x
  22. 22. Lavanya C. Sensitivity of sex expression and sex variation in castor (Ricinus communis L.) to environmental changes. Indian J Genet. 2002;62:232–7.
  23. 23. Manjunatha T. Influence of environment on quality hybrid seed production in castor: a case study of participatory seed production. J Oilseeds Res. 2019;36:2. https://doi.org/10.56739/jor.v36i2.126939
  24. 24. Yang J, Wang Z, Du Z, Qu Y, Zhang J, Zhang L, et al. Integrated QTL mapping and transcriptome analysis reveals the genetic and molecular mechanisms determining the development of pistillate lines in castor (Ricinus communis L.). Ind Crop Prod. 2025;230:121019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.121019
  25. 25. Vrânceanu AV, Stoenescu FM. Female unisexuality in castor (Ricinus communis L.) and its employment in hybrid seed production. An Inst Cercet Cereale Plant Teh Fundulea. 1982;49:29–37.
  26. 26. Parkey W. Cytoplasmic influence in the production of the pistillate sex expression in castor beans. Agron J. 1957;49:427–8. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1957.00021962004900080007x
  27. 27. Brigham RD. Inheritance of two female-sterile characters in dwarf-internode castor (Ricinus communis L.). Crop Sci. 1967;7:648–50. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1967.0011183X000700060027x
  28. 28. Claassen CE, Huffman A. The inheritance of pistillate character in castors and its possible utilization in the production of commercial hybrid seed. Agron J. 1950;42:79–82. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1950.00021962004200020002x
  29. 29. Zhu GL, Gu MX. Breeding and genetical regularity of a marked female line in castor. Chin J Oil Crop Sci. 1990;3:25–8.
  30. 30. Vajja V. Inheritance studies for morphological characters and sex expression in pistillate lines of castor (Ricinus communis L.). Indian J Genet. 2008;68:275–82.
  31. 31. Patel ID, Dangaria CJ, Patel VJ. Induction of male sex in pistillate lines of castor. Indian J Agric Sci. 1986;56:556–8.
  32. 32. Zhang WF, Liang YG. The genetic study on the pistillate characters in castor. Hered. 1993;15:28–32.
  33. 33. Zhang WF, Liang YG. Genetics and utilization of pistillate castor I. The genetic law of pistillate trait. J Shanxi Agric Sci. 1993;21:8–13.
  34. 34. Zhang WF, Liang YG. Study on technical system about the simulating three-line in castor bean. Acta Agron Sin. 1999;25:392–5.
  35. 35. Lavanya C, Gopinath V. Inheritance studies for morphological characters and sex expression in pistillate lines of castor (Ricinus communis L.). Indian J Genet. 2008;68:275–82.
  36. 36. Chan AP, Crabtree J, Zhao Q, Lorenzi H, Orvis J, Puiu D, et al. Draft genome sequence of the oilseed species Ricinus communis. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:951–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1674
  37. 37. Xu W, Wu D, Yang T, Sun C, Wang Z, Han B, et al. Genomic insights into the origin, domestication and genetic basis of agronomic traits of castor bean. Genome Biol. 2021;22:113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02333-y
  38. 38. Lu J, Pan C, Fan W, Liu W, Zhao H, Li D, et al. A chromosome-level genome assembly of wild castor provides new insights into its adaptive evolution in tropical desert. Genom Proteom Bioinforma. 2022;20:42–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2021.04.003
  39. 39. Zhang CH, Bao HX, Zhu GL. The research of descendiblity law of northeast ecological form pure triqamous castor. J Inn Mong Minzu Univ Nat Sci. 2009;24:158–62.
  40. 40. Lu J, Shi Y, Yin X, Liu S, Liu C, Wen D, et al. The genetic mechanism of sex type, a complex quantitative trait, in Ricinus communis L. Ind Crop Prod. 2019;128:590–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.11.023
  41. 41. Wen DY. Cloning and expression analysis of sex-related genes RcACS5 and RcHK1 in castor (Ricinus communis L.). MA thesis. Guangdong Ocean University; 2014.
  42. 42. Wen YP. Functional study of castor (Ricinus communis L.) pip5k11 gene in Lm female lines. MA thesis. Inner Mongolia Minzu University; 2023.
  43. 43. DeLong A, Calderon-Urrea A, Dellaporta SL. Sex determination gene Tasselseed2 of maize encodes a short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase required for stage-specific floral organ abortion. Cell. 1993;74:757–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90522-R
  44. 44. Calderon-Urrea A, Dellaporta SL. Cell death and cell protection genes determine the fate of pistils in maize. Development. 1999;126:435–41. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.126.3.435
  45. 45. Patel AM, Patel DK, Patel JR, Patel NB, Patel PC, Patel YN. Genetic mechanism of pistillateness in castor: challenges and needs: a review. Pharma Innov J. 2023;12:104–9. https://doi.org/10.22271/tpi.2023.v12.i1a.18104
  46. 46. Ramesh M, Lavanya C, Sujatha MA, Aruna Kumari J. Stability parameters for sex expression in castor (Ricinus communis L.) under different environment. Curr Agric. 2017;1:11–7.
  47. 47. Gopani DD, Kabaria MM, Patel RH. Study of sex reversion in castor. Indian J Agric Sci. 1969;39:255–8.
  48. 48. Kalarani MK, Palanisamy V, Venkatesan S, Venkatachalam SR. Increasing productivity by improving pistillate efficiency and seed set in castor (Ricinus communis L.). J Oilseeds Res. 2010;27(Spec Issue).
  49. 49. Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit ME. Ethylene in plant biology. Academic Press; 1992.
  50. 50. Shakuntala NM, Vasudevan SN, Basavegowda. Physiological manipulation of sex expression in pistillate line of castor by chemicals. J Oilseeds Res. 2010;27(Spec Issue).
  51. 51. Dhedhi KK, Dangaria CJ, Ghelani YH, Joshi HJ. Effects of chemicals on sex expression, growth and yield quality of pistillate parent during castor hybrid seed production. Res Crops. 2010;11:749–52.
  52. 52. Gopala Krishna Murthy K, Reddy AVV, Lakshmamma P, Rao TN. Manipulation of sex expression in castor (Ricinus communis L.) by chemical treatments. J Oilseeds Res. 2003;20:113–5.
  53. 53. Ramesh T, Reddy DVV, Reddy T, Prasad MMK. Effect of ethrel on sex expression and yield in castor (Ricinus communis L.). J Oilseeds Res. 2000;17:279–81.
  54. 54. Varkey M, Nigam RK, Reuhen DE. Variation in number and length of panicle of castor (Ricinus communis L.) with Chloroflurenol, Ethephon and NIA. Indian J Agric Res. 1982;16:244–50.
  55. 55. Neeraja P, Lavanya C, Ganesh M. Quality hybrid seed production by manipulation of pistillate character. J Oilseeds Res. 2010;27(Spec Issue).
  56. 56. Vema P, Reddy SN. Role of Ethrel in manipulation of sex expression in pistillate and monoecious lines of castor (Ricinus communis L.) at different concentrations. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6:1637–46. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.196
  57. 57. Lau OL, Yang SF. Inhibition of ethylene production by cobaltous ions. Plant Physiol. 1976;58:114–7. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.58.1.114
  58. 58. Beyer E. Silver ion: a potent antiethylene agent in cucumber and tomato. HortScience. 1976;11:195–6. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.11.3.195
  59. 59. Mohan Ram HY, Sett R. Induction of male flowers in pistillate line of Ricinus communis L. by silver and cobalt ions. Planta. 1980;149:413–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571179
  60. 60. Shifriss O. Gibberellin as a sex regulator in Ricinus communis. Science. 1961;133:2061–2. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.133.3470.2061
  61. 61. Juneja A. Effect of gibberellic acid on the morphology, histology and flowering of castor bean (Ricinus communis). Phytomorphology. 1971;21:235–46.
  62. 62. Nickell LG. Plant growth regulator. Chem Eng News. 1978;56:18–34. https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-v056n041.p018
  63. 63. Krishnamoorthy HN. Plant growth substances. McGraw Hill; 1981.
  64. 64. Chauhan SVS, Saxena BK, Kinoshita T. Effect of Daminozide (B9) on sex expression and seed setting in castor bean (Ricinus communis L.). Jpn J Breed. 1987;37:262. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.37.262
  65. 65. Onkarappa T, Shivanna H, Mohan Rao A, Ramesh S. Stability of pistillateness in hybrid castor seed parents of castor (Ricinus communis L.). Res Environ Life Sci. 2014;7:147–58.
  66. 66. Tan M, Xue J, Wang L, Huang J, Fu C, Yan X, et al. Transcriptomic analysis for different sex types of Ricinus communis L. during development from apical buds to inflorescences by digital gene expression profiling. Front Plant Sci. 2016;6:1208. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01208
  67. 67. Zaveri PP. Castor hybrid seed production experiences in India. AAIC Meeting; 2015.
  68. 68. Lavanya C, Dhule MY, Zaveri PP, Meena HP. Exploitation of cytoplasmic male sterility sources in castor - a concept note. J Oilseeds Res. 2010;27(Spec Issue):164–66.
  69. 69. Zaveri PP. Studies on induction/identification of cytoplasmic male sterility in pigeon pea. ICRISAT; 1992.
  70. 70. Zaveri PP, Lavanya C, Hegde DM. Public private partnership in increasing productivity in castor. In: Research and development in castor: present status and future strategies. ISOR; 2010. p.210–24.
  71. 71. Kaul MLH. Male-sterility in higher plants. Monogr Theor Appl Genet. 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83139-3
  72. 72. Zaveri PP. Potential methodologies for developing cytoplasmic genic male sterility in pigeon pea. ICRISAT training course; 2002.
  73. 73. Rao AN, Zaveri PP, Ariyanayagam RP, Singh L, Saxena KB. Development of cytoplasmic-genetic male sterility in pigeon pea: a status report. ICRISAT; 1994

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.