Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Early Access

Induced mutation breeding: a comprehensive review of genetic enhancement and trait-related findings in gladiolus

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14568
Submitted
24 March 2026
Published
30-10-2026

Abstract

Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) is a commercially important cut flower crop, prized for its striking and colourful floral spikes. The increasing global demand for gladiolus underscores the need for genetic improvement, particularly in developing novel flower colours. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the mutation spectra and trait-specific outcomes achieved through various mutagenesis techniques, including physical methods (gamma rays, X-rays and fast neutrons), chemical methods (ethyl methanesulfonate, colchicine and sodium azide) and in vitro methods in gladiolus. Key findings documented across the literature include the development of novel flower colours, enhanced vegetative growth, enhanced vase life and increased tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. This review comparatively analyses mutagens and categorises gamma ray doses into low dose, moderate dose and high dose ranges based on lethality, blindness and optimal treatment ranges that maximize beneficial trait expression while minimizing deleterious effects. Various studies have shown that high doses of gamma rays (>7 kR or 70 Gy) cause lethality and low mutation frequencies in gladiolus varieties. Challenges related to mutant stability and chimera formation are also discussed with the aim of facilitating targeted, trait-specific breeding. This comprehensive review is intended to serve as a reliable reference for researchers, breeders and students engaged in mutation breeding for the genetic improvement of Gladiolus.

References

  1. 1. Global Market Insights. Floriculture market [Internet]. 2026.
  2. 2. Singh N, Rana TS, Datta SK, Cardarelli M, Dobránszki J. Biotechnology advances in gladiolus: a review. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2025;100(3):314–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2024.2443551
  3. 3. Yadav BL, Kumar A, Sharma RK, Kachuli BK, Parihar M. Effect of gamma-irradiation on the performance of different Gladiolus grandiflorus L. cultivars. J Ornamental Hortic. 2025;28(1):36–40. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-880X.2025.00007.6
  4. 4. Belwal S, Srivastava RK, Singh NK, Bhuj BD, Kumar A, Chand S, et al. Morphological and genetic characterization of mutants of Gladiolus cultivar Prince of Orange for two successive vegetative generations. S Afr J Bot. 2024;174:431–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2024.09.020
  5. 5. Devi NS, Jamja T, Tabing R, Tagi N. Influence of gamma radiation on growth, flowers and morphological changes in Gladiolus. Environ Conserv J. 2023;24(2):301–10. https://doi.org/10.36953/ecj.13382384
  6. 6. Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Abdullah N, Hussin G, Ramli A, Rahim HA, et al. Principle and application of plant mutagenesis in crop improvement: a review. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2016;30(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2015.1087333
  7. 7. Awan S, Sadia B, Altaf J, Habib M, Hameed K, Hussain S. Genetic variability through induced mutation. In: Maia RT, Campos de Araújo M, editors. Genetic variation. London: IntechOpen; 2021. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95027
  8. 8. Singh BD. Genetics. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Kalyani Publisher; 2019.
  9. 9. Singh AK, Sisodia AS. Effect of gamma irradiation on morphological changes, flowering and induced mutants in gladiolus. Indian J Hortic. 2015;72(1):84–7.
  10. 10. Patil S, Chawla SL, Chaudhary P. Induction of mutation through mutagens in Gladiolus hybridus cv. American Beauty. Int J Chem Stud. 2017;5(5):2305–8.
  11. 11. Datta SK. Role of mutation breeding in floriculture industry. Singapore: Springer; 2023. p. 141–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5675-3_9
  12. 12. Rawat AS, Bhuj BD, Srivastava R, Chand S, Singh NK, Bisht YS, et al. Determination of lethal and mutation induction doses of gamma rays for Gladiolus grandiflorus Hort. genotypes. Heliyon. 2024;10(17):e37387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37387
  13. 13. Kumari K, Kumar S. Frequency and spectrum of flower colour mutations in gamma irradiated gladiolus varieties. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9:227–33.
  14. 14. Sisodia A, Singh AK, Sisodia V. Morphological changes and induced mutagenesis in gladiolus varieties through gamma irradiation. Indian J Agric Sci. 2015;85(8):1059–64.
  15. 15. Girija M, Dhanavel D. Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of gamma rays, ethyl methane sulphonate and their combined treatments in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Glob J Mol Sci. 2009;4(2):68–75.
  16. 16. Melsen K, van de Wouw M, Contreras R. Mutation breeding in ornamentals. HortScience. 2021;56(10):1154–65. https://doi.org/10.21273/Hortsci16001-21
  17. 17. Baraiya AH, Patil S, Mangroliya RM, Chawla SL, Gujarati N. Induction of variability in Gladiolus grandiflorus L. by chemical mutagens. Ecol Environ Conserv. 2022;28–5. https://doi.org/10.53550/eec.2022.v28i08s.074
  18. 18. El-Tayeb H. Effect of some chemical mutagens on morphological characters and corm productivity of some Gladiolus sp. cultivars. Sci J Flowers Ornam Plants. 2014;1(1):45–53. https://doi.org/10.21608/sjfop.2014.4005
  19. 19. Yadav M, Rajput V, Saharan RS, Sehrawat SK, Ravika R. Influence of gamma radiation and EMS on morphological characteristics of Gladiolus cv. Pink Beauty. Asian J Hortic. 2016;11(1):114–18. https://doi.org/10.15740/has/tajh/11.1/114-118
  20. 20. Datta SK, Teixeira da Silva JA. Role of induced mutagenesis for development of new flower colour and type in ornamentals. In: Teixeira da Silva JA, editor. Floriculture, Ornamental and Plant Biotechnology: Advances and Topical Issues. Vol. 1. Isleworth, UK: Global Science Books; 2006. p. 640–5.
  21. 21. De LC. Improvement of ornamental plants – a review. Int J Hortic. 2017;7(22):180–204. https://doi.org/10.5376/ijh.2017.07.0022
  22. 22. Gruszka D, Szarejko I, Maluszynski M. Sodium azide as a mutagen. In: Shu QY, Forster BP, Nakagawa H, editors. Plant mutation breeding and biotechnology. Wallingford, UK: CABI; 2012. p. 159–66. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780640853.0159
  23. 23. Viana VE, Pegoraro C, Busanello C, Costa de Oliveira A. Mutagenesis in rice: the basis for breeding a new super plant. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1326. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01326
  24. 24. EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), Mullins E, Bresson JL, Dalmay T, Dewhurst IC, Epstein MM, et al. In vivo and in vitro random mutagenesis techniques in plants. EFSA J. 2021;19(11):e6611. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6611
  25. 25. Rodriguez-Enriquez J, Dickinson HG, Grant-Downton RT. MicroRNA misregulation: an overlooked factor generating somaclonal variation. Trends Plant Sci. 2011;16(5):242–8.
  26. 26. Ibrahim R, Ahmad Z, Salleh S, Hassan AA, Ariffin S. Mutation breeding in ornamentals. In: Van Huylenbroeck J, editor. Ornamental crops. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90698-0_8
  27. 27. Cai-hua L, Jin-ping F, Shu-fang G, Dai-di C. Study on mutant induction of Gladiolus by in vitro culture of petals. J Northeast Agric Univ (Engl Ed). 2012;19(3):38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-8104(13)60020-3
  28. 28. Datta SK, Chakrabarty D. Classical mutation breeding and molecular methods for genetic improvement of ornamentals. In: Datta SK, editor. Role of classical mutation breeding in crop improvement. Delhi: Daya Publishing House; 2005. p. 260–303.
  29. 29. Patel D, Patil S, More SJ, Dohiya TP. Comparative effect of physical and chemical mutagens in inducing variability in gladiolus variety ‘Psittacinus Hybrid’. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(1):645–52. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.078
  30. 30. Kumari RV, Kumar DP, Mahadevamma M, Arunkumar B. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and floral parameters in Gladiolus hybridus L. cv. American Beauty. Hind Agri Hortic Soc. 2013;8(17):274–9.
  31. 31. Zhang X, Xu Y, Cao J, Li T, Wang J, Tao J, et al. Mechanisms and applications of N-Methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in animal tumor models: current situation and challenges. Front Oncol. 2025;15:1681270.
  32. 32. Jeggo P, Defais M, Samson L, Schendel P. An adaptive response of E. coli to low levels of alkylating agent: comparison with previously characterised DNA repair pathways. Mol Gen Genet. 1977;157(1):1–9.
  33. 33. Ohsawa KI, Furihata C, Mori M, Ikui E. Ability of N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, dimethylnitrosome and NaCl to induce unscheduled DNA synthesis, stimulate replicative DNA synthesis and produce DNA single-strand breaks in pyloric mucosa of rat stomach. Mutat Res Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen. 1993;287(2):307–19.
  34. 34. Mekapogu M, Vasamsetti BM, Kwon OK, Ahn MS, Lim SH, Jung JA. Anthocyanins in floral colors: biosynthesis and regulation in chrysanthemum flowers. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(18):6537. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186537
  35. 35. Sathyanarayana E, Singh J, Das BK. Identification and evaluation of gamma ray induced mutants in Gladiolus grandiflorus L. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2022;12(8):43–56.
  36. 36. Kushwaha Y, Bhuj BD, Srivastava R, Singh NK, Chand S, et al. Development of new mutants using gamma radiation in gladiolus cv. Punjab Dawn. Plant Archives. 2024;24(2):2031–6. https://doi.org/10.51470/PlantArchives.2024.v24.no.2.293
  37. 37. Belwal S, Srivastava R, Singh NK, Bhuj BD, Kumar A, Chand S, et al. Screening of mutants of gladiolus cultivar Prince of Orange in M1 and M2 generations. Pharm Innov J. 2023;12(3):5820–2.
  38. 38. Kashyap M, Sharma G, Tirkey T, Sharma D. Evaluation of VM2 generation in gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) for identification and isolation of promising mutants. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(10):1832–8. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.710.210
  39. 39. Sisodia A, Singh A. Studies on gamma ray-induced mutants in gladiolus. Indian J Agric Sci. 2015;85(1):79–86. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i1.46003
  40. 40. Sisodia A, Singh AK. Influence of gamma irradiation on morphological changes, post harvest life and mutagenesis in gladiolus. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol. 2014;7(3):535–45.
  41. 41. Sahariya K, Kaushik RA, Khan R, Sarolia D. Influence of gamma irradiation on flowering of gladiolus (Gladiolus hybrida L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(11):1362–8. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.162
  42. 42. Tirkey P, Singh D. Effect of induced mutagenesis on different characters of gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(6):650–4. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.811.175
  43. 43. Mazzini-Guedes RB, Guedes Filho O, Bonfim-Silva EM, Couto JC, Pereira MT, da Silva TJ. Management of corm size and soil water content for gladiolus flower production. Ornament Hortic. 2017;23(2):152–9.
  44. 44. Dogra N, Dhatt KK. Morphological variability in Gladiolus hybridus L. variety ‘Punjab glance’ through gamma irradiation. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018;7(3):1057–62.
  45. 45. Rizwi AA, Soni SS, Mishra SK, Singh RK, Singh MK. Effect of gamma radiation on vegetative and floral characters of commercial varieties of gladiolus (Gladiolus hybrida L.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2021;10(1):2015–8.
  46. 46. Aiswarya T, Thomas B. Induction of physical mutations in Gladiolus grandiflorus L. through gamma irradiation. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2024;27(9):1243–53. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i91395
  47. 47. Tiwari H, Pandey AK. Effect of physical and chemical mutagens on morphological characters and vegetative abnormalities in commercial varieties of gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.). Ecol Environ Conserv. 2024;30:S402–7. https://doi.org/10.53550/eec.2024.v30i06s.059
  48. 48. Manzoor A, Ahmad T, Naveed MS, Rehman AU, Bashir MA, Ahmad R, et al. Assessment of biological damage and toxic potency of colchicine in gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus) plants. Agric Sci J. 2023;5(2):72–92. https://doi.org/10.56520/asj.v5i2.259
  49. 49. Hassan M, Shaaban SA, El Ziat RA, Khaled KA. Laser-induced changes in the gene expression, growth and development of Gladiolus grandiflorus cv. “White prosperity”. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):6257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56430-6
  50. 50. Datta SK. Induced mutations: technological advancement for development of new ornamental varieties. Nucleus. 2020;63(2):119–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-020-00310-7
  51. 51. Pathania NS, Misra RL. In vitro mutagenesis studies in gladiolus for induction of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli. Acta Hortic. 2003;624:487–94. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.624.6
  52. 52. Choudhary R, Kumar A. Response of Gladiolus varieties on floral quality and post-harvest parameters as influenced by gamma irradiation. Environ Ecol. 2024;42(4A):1720–5. https://doi.org/10.60151/envec/YCBV8833
  53. 53. Patel D, Patil S, Patel AI, Patel N. Influence of chemical mutagen DES on the vegetative and floral attributes of Gladiolus var. ‘Psittacinus Hybrid’. Trends Biosci. 2015;8(20):5553–8.
  54. 54. Kamo K, Lakshman D, Bauchan G, Rajasekaran K, Cary J, Jaynes J. Expression of a synthetic antimicrobial peptide, D4E1, in Gladiolus plants for resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. gladioli. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015;121(2):459–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-015-0716-4
  55. 55. Boutigny AL, Dohin N, Pornin D, Rolland M. Overview and detectability of the genetic modifications in ornamental plants. Hortic Res. 2020;7:11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-019-0232-5
  56. 56. Nasir IA, Jamal AR, Rahman ZI, Husnain TA. Molecular analyses of Gladiolus lines with improved resistance against fusarium wilt. Pak J Bot. 2012;44(1):73–9.
  57. 57. Kim SH, Kim SW, Ahn JW, Ryu J, Kwon SJ, Kang BC, et al. Frequency, spectrum and stability of leaf mutants induced by diverse γ-ray treatments in two Cymbidium hybrids. Plants. 2020;9(4):546. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040546
  58. 58. Wibowo AT, Antunez-Sanchez J, Dawson A, Price J, Meehan C, Wrightsman T, et al. Predictable and stable epimutations induced during clonal plant propagation with embryonic transcription factor. PLoS Genet. 2022;18(11):e1010479. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010479
  59. 59. Li P, An Z, Xu N, Li J, Li Q, He C. Phenotypic plasticity and stability in plants: genetic mechanisms, environmental adaptation, evolutionary implications and future directions. Plant Cell Environ. 2025;48(8):5847–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.15566
  60. 60. Cabahug RA, Tran MK, Ahn YJ, Hwang YJ. Retention of mutations in colchicine-induced ornamental succulent Echeveria ‘Peerless’. Plants. 2022;11(24):3420. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243420
  61. 61. Nasri F, Zakizadeh H, Vafaee Y, Mozafari AA. In vitro mutagenesis of Chrysanthemum morifolium cultivars using ethyl methanesulphonate (EMS) and mutation assessment by ISSR and IRAP markers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2022;149(3):657–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-021-02163-7
  62. 62. Hatzilazarou S, Kantere C, Kotoula AA, Economou A, Bertsouklis K, Darras A, et al. In-vitro propagation and genetic stability assessment using the ISSR markers of Stachys byzantina K. Koch, a promising ornamental species. Horticulturae. 2025;11(5):530. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11050530
  63. 63. Karunananda D, Ranathunga R, Abeysinghe W. 60Co gamma irradiation-induced mutation in vegetatively propagated Philodendron erubescens 'Gold'. In: Mutation breeding, genetic diversity and crop adaptation to climate change. Wallingford, UK: CABI; 2021. p. 386–98. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789249095.0040
  64. 64. Padhi M, Singh AK. Effect of physical mutation on gladiolus traits and studies on gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus) mutant. Indian J Agric Sci. 2026;96(1):40–50. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v96i1.167693
  65. 65. Mandal AKA, Chakrabarty D, Datta SK. Application of in vitro techniques in mutation breeding of chrysanthemum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2000;60(1):33–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006442316050

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.