Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Polyethylene glycol mediated early stage screening of drought responsive traits for rainfed condition in rice (Oryza sativa L.) germplasm

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14736
Submitted
27 March 2026
Published
11-11-2026

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is an important staple crop and drought stress is a major constraint on its productivity. Early-stage seedling screening offers a rapid means of identifying drought related traits before field evaluation. This study aimed to evaluate genetic variability and identify key physiological and growth-related traits associated with drought tolerance among 25 rice genotypes using a two factor completely randomised design (CRD), comparing normal (control) conditions with polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000) induced drought stress (10 and 15 % PEG, pooled as a single stress treatment for analysis). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant differences among genotypes, treatments and their interactions for most traits, indicating considerable genetic variability. Stress markedly reduced growth and water status traits, including germination percentage (GP), seedling vigour index (SVI) and relative water content (RWC), while proline content increased substantially, reflecting its role in osmotic adjustment. Traits with the highest coefficients of variation under stress, namely proline, SVI and RWC, indicated the greatest potential for genotype selection. Principal component analysis showed a shift from growth dominated variation under normal conditions (principal component 1 (PC1), 50.27 %) to a survival dominated pattern under stress (PC1, 61.67 %), driven primarily by proline, RWC and root length (RL). Based on this integrated analysis, genotypes such as Sahbhagi, CSR-23 and NDR-2064 exhibited superior performance by maintaining higher seedling vigour, water status and osmotic balance under stress conditions, indicating their potential as donor parents for drought tolerance breeding.

References

  1. 1. Kawure S, Garba AA, Fagam AS. Influence of season and sowing method on the growth and yield of lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) at Zigau Bauchi State. J Rice Res Dev. 2022;5(1):378–83. https://doi.org/10.36959/973/436
  2. 2. Vijay D, Roy B. Chapter-4 Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Breeding, Biotechnology and Seed Production of Field Crops. 2013;71–122.
  3. 3. Gnanamanickam SS. Rice and its importance to human life. In: Biological control of rice diseases. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2009. p. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2465-7_1
  4. 4. Food and Agriculture Organization. FAOSTAT statistical database [Internet]. Rome: FAO; 2023.
  5. 5. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. Second advance estimates of production of foodgrains for 2022-23. New Delhi: Government of India; 2023.
  6. 6. Samaddar A, Panemangalore AP, Maliappan S, Borah G, Sikka A, Kumar G. Integrated agroecological rice fish farming in Andhra Pradesh, India: a case study. 2024.
  7. 7. Kothawade S, Padwal V, Bhosale S, Mhaske P, Jedhe R, Makhare S, et al. Neuroprotective potential of paddy rice: advancing nutritional and therapeutic strategies for brain health. Nutr Neurosci. 2025;28(9):1177–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2025.2497036
  8. 8. Fang Y, Xiong L. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72(4):673–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1767-0
  9. 9. Avramova V, Nagel KA, AbdElgawad H, Bustos D, DuPlessis M, Fiorani F, et al. Screening for drought tolerance of maize hybrids by multi-scale analysis of root and shoot traits at the seedling stage. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(8):2453–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw055
  10. 10. Bhandari U, Gajurel A, Khadka B, Thapa I, Chand I, Bhatta D, et al. Morpho-physiological and biochemical response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to drought stress: a review. Heliyon. 2023;9(3):e13744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13744
  11. 11. Yang X, Wang B, Chen L, Li P, Cao C. The different influences of drought stress at the flowering stage on rice physiological traits, grain yield and quality. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40161-0
  12. 12. Barrs HD, Weatherley PE. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci. 1962;15(3):413–28.
  13. 13. 13. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39(1):205–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
  14. 14. Szabados L, Savouré A. Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15(2):89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.009
  15. 15. Kaufmann MR, Eckard AN. Evaluation of water stress control with polyethylene glycols by analysis of guttation. Plant Physiol.1971;47(4):453–6. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.47.4.453
  16. 16. Hajihashemi S, Sofo A. The effect of polyethylene glycol-induced drought stress on photosynthesis, carbohydrates and cell membrane in Stevia rebaudiana grown in greenhouse. Acta Physiol Plant. 2018;40(8):142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-018-2722-8
  17. 17. Lang I, Sassmann S, Schmidt B, Komis G. Plasmolysis: loss of turgor and beyond. Plants. 2014;3(4):583–93. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants3040583
  18. 18. Faisal S, Mujtaba SM, Asma, Mahboob W. Polyethylene glycol mediated osmotic stress impacts on growth and biochemical aspects of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Crop Sci Biotechnol. 2019;22(3):213–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-018-0166-0
  19. 19. Cretescu I, Ropciuc S, Velicevici G, Buzamat G. Evaluation of relative water content (RWC) at four barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes in response to microwave treatment. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology, 16(3), 124–127.
  20. 20. Abdul-Baki AA, Anderson JD. Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Sci. 1973;13(6):630–3. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060013x
  21. 21. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2025.
  22. 22. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016.
  23. 23. Wei T, Simko V. R package 'corrplot': visualization of a correlation matrix (version 0.92). 2021.
  24. 24. Kolde R. pheatmap: pretty heatmaps. R package version 1. 2019.
  25. 25. Kassambara A, Mundt F. factoextra: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. CRAN: Contributed Packages. 2016.
  26. 26. Hussain T, Hussain N, Ahmed M, Nualsri C, Duangpan S. Responses of lowland rice genotypes under terminal water stress and identification of drought tolerance to stabilize rice productivity in southern Thailand. Plants. 2021;10(12):2565. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122565
  27. 27. Kumar S, Dwivedi SK, Singh SS, Jha SK, Lekshmy S, Elanchezhian R, et al. Identification of drought tolerant rice genotypes by analysing drought tolerance indices and morpho-physiological traits. SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2014;46(2). 217–30.
  28. 28. Bhattacharya A. Effect of soil water deficit on growth and development of plants: a review. In: Soil water deficit and physiological issues in plants. 2021. p. 393–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6276-5_5
  29. 29. Shao HB, Chu LY, Jaleel CA, Manivannan P, Panneerselvam R, Shao MA. Understanding water deficit stress-induced changes in the basic metabolism of higher plants-biotechnologically and sustainably improving agriculture and the ecoenvironment in arid regions of the globe. Crit Rev Biotechnol.2009;29(2):131–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388550902869792
  30. 30. Pour-Aboughadareh A, Omidi M, Naghavi MR, Etminan A, Mehrabi AA, Poczai P, et al. Effect of water deficit stress on seedling biomass and physio-chemical characteristics in different species of wheat possessing the D genome. Agronomy. 2019;9(9):522. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090522
  31. 31. Anjum SA, Farooq M, Xie XY, Liu XJ, Ijaz MF. Antioxidant defense system and proline accumulation enables hot pepper to perform better under drought. Sci Hortic. 2012;140:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.03.028
  32. 32. Stanton ML, Roy BA, Thiede DA. Evolution in stressful environments. I. Phenotypic variability, phenotypic selection and response to selection in five distinct environmental stresses. Evolution. 2000;54(1):93–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00011.x
  33. 33. Gomes FP, Oliva MA, Mielke MS, Almeida AA, Aquino LA. Osmotic adjustment, proline accumulation and cell membrane stability in leaves of Cocos nucifera submitted to drought stress. Sci Hortic. 2010;126(3):379–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.07.036
  34. 34. Roy BK. Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters under moderate drought stress in tomato [dissertation]. Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding; 2020.
  35. 35. Baloch MJ, Dunwell J, Khakwani AA, Dennett M, Jatoi WA, Channa SA. Assessment of wheat cultivars for drought tolerance via osmotic stress imposed at early seedling growth stages. J Agric Res. 2012;50(3):299–310.
  36. 36. Mahreen N, Yasmin S, Asif M, Yousaf S, Yahya M, Ejaz K, et al. Integrated analysis of osmotic stress and infrared thermal imaging for the selection of resilient rice under water scarcity. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:834520. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.834520
  37. 37. Padilha MS, Coelho CM, Sommer ÂS. Seed vigor, genotype and proline in common bean seedling formation under drought and saline stress. Rev Cienc Agron. 2022;53:e20228350. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20220056
  38. 38. Mwenye OJ. Root properties and proline as possible indicators for drought tolerance in soybean [dissertation]. University of the Free State. 2017.
  39. 39. Xu H, Feng L, Hao J, Zhang Y, Li R. Water use enhancement and root function compensatory regulation of biomass accumulation in Quinoa under salt stress by photosynthetic drive advantage. Plants. 2025;14(11):1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14111615
  40. 40. Sadhukhan D, Mukherjee T, Sarkar A, Devi ND, Bisarya D, Kumar V, et al. A comprehensive analysis of drought stress responses in rice (Oryza sativa L.): insights into developmental stage variations from germination to grain filling. Int J Environ Clim Chang. 2024;14:141–58. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i74260
  41. 41. Lu Y, Hao Z, Xie C, Crossa J, Araus JL, Gao S, et al. Large-scale screening for maize drought resistance using multiple selection criteria evaluated under water-stressed and well-watered environments. Field Crops Res. 2011;124(1):37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.06.003
  42. 42. Dayala ST, Balakrishnan D, Kar S, Ganguli JL, Rao LS, Sundaram RM. Diversity of Indian rice cultivars and landraces for seedling vigour and their association for yield related traits. Vegetos. 2025;38(2):619–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-023-00777-0
  43. 43. Gaballah MM, Ghoneim AM, Rehman HU, Shehab MM, Ghazy MI, El-Iraqi AS, et al. Evaluation of morpho-physiological traits in rice genotypes for adaptation under irrigated and water-limited environments. Agronomy. 2022;12(8):1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081868
  44. 44. Mohanty SP, Azharudheen TP M, Anilkumar C, Behera S, Pradhan AK, Beena R, et al. Genome-wide association study revealed the genetics of seed vigour traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Breeding. 2025;144(1):122–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.13225
  45. 45. Jarin AS, Islam MM, Rahat A, Ahmed S, Ghosh P, Murata Y. Drought stress tolerance in rice: physiological and biochemical insights. Int J Plant Biol. 2024;15(3):692–718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb15030051
  46. 46. Kunwar UB, Wen J, Subedi R, Bist NS, Pandit NR. Adaptations of rice seed germination to drought and hypoxic conditions: molecular and physiological insights. Seeds. 2024;3(4):656–76. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds3040043
  47. 47. Mohi-Ud-Din M, Hossain MA, Rohman MM, Uddin MN, Haque MS, Ahmed JU, et al. Multivariate analysis of morpho-physiological traits reveals differential drought tolerance potential of bread wheat genotypes at the seedling stage. Plants.2021;10(5):879. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050879
  48. 48. Ahmed K, Shabbir G, Ahmed M. Exploring drought tolerance for germination traits of diverse wheat genotypes at seedling stage: a multivariate analysis approach. BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25(1):390. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06345-9
  49. 49. Kumar S, Dwivedi SK, Singh SS, Bhatt BP, Mehta P, Elanchezhian R, et al. Morpho-physiological traits associated with reproductive stage drought tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes under rain-fed condition of eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain. Indian J Plant Physiol. 2014;19(2):87–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-014-0075-x
  50. 50. Zhang H, Zhao Y, Zhu JK. Thriving under stress: how plants balance growth and the stress response. Dev Cell. 2020;55(5):529–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2020.10.012
  51. 51. Chaya GB, Uday G, Vijeth GM, Sharada HB, Mummigatti UV, Nethra P, et al. Phenotypic diversity and principal component analysis to associate physiological traits contributing to grain yield under moisture stress in durum wheat germplasm. Research Square. 2025. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7230605/v1
  52. 52. Al-Ashkar I, Sallam M, Al-Suhaibani N, Ibrahim A, Alsadon A, Al-Doss A. Multiple stresses of wheat in the detection of traits and genotypes of high-performance and stability for a complex interplay of environment and genotypes. Agronomy. 2022;12(10):2252. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102252
  53. 53. Chakraborty U, Chakraborty BN, Chakraborty AP, Dey PL. Water stress amelioration and plant growth promotion in wheat plants by osmotic stress tolerant bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;29(5):789–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-012-1234-8
  54. 54. Al-Naggar AM, Shafik MM, Musa RY. Genetic diversity based on morphological traits of 19 maize genotypes using principal component analysis and GT biplot. Annu Res Rev Biol. 2020;35(2):68–85. https://doi.org/10.9734/arrb/2020/v35i230191

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.