Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Synergistic impact of cotton-legume intercropping and integrated weed management on soil health and productivity

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15324
Submitted
29 April 2026
Published
22-09-2026

Abstract

Cotton is a globally important crop that serves as a major source of fibre and edible oil while supporting millions of livelihoods. With increasing demand for sustainable materials, improving cotton productivity in an eco-friendly way has become essential. One promising approach is the integration of legume intercropping with efficient weed management to reduce the potential yield loss of up to 86 % caused by weed competition. A two-year field experiment during 2021 and 2022 at Agronomy Research Farm, Chaudhary Charan Singh (CCS) Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India, assessed the impact of various management practices on cotton yield, economic returns and soil health. Using a split-plot design, the study contrasted monoculture cotton with a cotton + green gram (1 : 2) intercropping system under 11 weed management treatments. Results revealed that sole cotton recorded greater plant height (177.05 cm) and dry matter accumulation (427.40 g plant-1). However, intercropping with green grams significantly improved soil fertility, with higher available nitrogen (N) (126.7 kg ha-1) and phosphorus (P) (17.6 kg ha-1) observed at harvest. Among the weed management treatments, the weed-free treatment recorded the highest seed cotton yield (26.64 q ha-1), followed by two hoeings at 25–30 and 40–45 days after sowing (24.20 q ha-1). Notably, the integrated application of pendimethalin (1000 g ha-1, PRE) followed by single hoeing at the 35–40 days proved highly effective, increasing seed cotton yield by approximately 40 % compared with herbicide use alone. Cotton-legume intercropping enhances soil fertility and profitability. Combining chemical and cultural weed management practices ensures better weed control, improved productivity and sustainable soil health.

References

  1. 1. FAO. Plant nutrition for food security: a guide for integrated nutrient management. FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin No. 16. Rome: FAO; 2006.
  2. 2. Singh A, Singh T. Effect of proceeding intercrops in Bt cotton on the productivity of succeeding wheat crop and total system productivity. Agricultural Research Journal. 2016;53(3):350–4. https://doi.org/10.5958/2395-146X.2016.00067.3
  3. 3. Nyawade S, Gitari HI, Karanja NN, Nachene CK, Geldermann E, Sharma K, et al. Enhancing climate resilience of rainfed potato through legume intercropping and silicon application. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2020;20(11):1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.566345
  4. 4. Maitra S, Gitari HI. Scope for adoption of intercropping system in organic agriculture. Indian Journal of Natural Sciences. 2020;11(63):28624–31.
  5. 5. Maitra S, Hossain A, Brestic M, Skalicky M, Ondrisik P, Gitari H, et al. Intercropping-a low input agricultural strategy for food and environmental security. Agronomy. 2021;11(2):343. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020343
  6. 6. Nalini K, Chinnusamy C. Weed management effects on cotton growth and yield. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2019;51(1):50–3. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2019.00011.X
  7. 7. Harisudan C, Senthivel SAK, Vaidyanathan R, Manivannan V. Blackgram as intercrop in cotton: a review. Agricultural Reviews. 2019;30(3):219–23.
  8. 8. Ayyadurai RP, Poonguzhalan, Gokila R. Effect of crop weeds competition in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Agriculture Review. 2013;34(2):157–61.
  9. 9. Rani LP, Yakadri M, Ramprakash T. Effect of integrated weed management practices on growth and yield of Bt cotton in Telangana State, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2016;5(2):17–25. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2016.502.002
  10. 10. Chaudhari DD, Patel HK, Mishra A, Patel VJ, Patel BD, Patel RB, et al. Integrated weed management in cotton under irrigated condition of middle Gujarat. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2017;49(2):156–8. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2017.00040.5
  11. 11. Punia SS, Manjeet, Yadav D, Choudhry A. Integrated weed management in cotton under irrigated conditions of Haryana. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2019;51(2):158–62. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2019.00034.0
  12. 12. Nurk L, Grab R, Pekrun C, Wachendorf M. Effect of sowing method and weed control on the performance of maize (Zea mays L.) intercropped with climbing beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agriculture. 2017;7:51. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7070051
  13. 13. Subbaiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure of estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science. 1956;65(7):477–80.
  14. 14. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular. 1954;939.
  15. 15. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall India Pvt Limited; 1973. p. 498.
  16. 16. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1978;42(3):421–8. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
  17. 17. Sheoran OP, Tonk DS, Kaushik LS, Hasija RC, Pannu RS. Statistical software package for agricultural research workers. Hisar: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, CCS HAU; 1998. p. 139–43.
  18. 18. Patel JG, Raj VC, Kumar V, Sutaria CM, Usadadiya VP. Integrated weed management in Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research. 2013;2(2):149–51.
  19. 19. Komal, Singh SP, Yadav RS. Effect of weed management on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of green gram. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2015;47(2):206–10.
  20. 20. Singh K. Evaluation of weed management practices in summer mungbean (Vigna radiata) under zero tillage condition [MSc thesis]. Karnal (Haryana): National Dairy Research Institute; 2020.
  21. 21. Punia R. Evaluation of some herbicides in green gram [Vigna radiata (L.)] and their residual effect on succeeding mustard crop [MSc (Agri) thesis]. Hisar: CCS Haryana Agricultural University; 2014.
  22. 22. Kumar R, Upadhaya B, Kumar P, Kishor K. Effect of plant geometry and weed management on yield and yield attributes of summer mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2018;7(4):2643–7.
  23. 23. Kamble AB, Danawale NJ, Kumar R. Integrated weed management in Bt cotton. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2017;49(4):405–8. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2017.00104.6
  24. 24. Kaur T, Bhullar MS, Kaur S. Weed control in Bt cotton with pre-mix of pyrithiobac sodium plus quizalofop ethyl in north-west India. Crop Protection. 2019;119:69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.01.017
  25. 25. Ningappa BR, Tuppad GB, Madhu G. Sequential application of pre and post emergence herbicides for weed management in chilli + onion + cotton intercropping systems. Trends in Biosciences. 2014;7(18):2818–23.
  26. 26. Singh K, Rathore P. Efficacy evaluation of selected herbicides on weed control and productivity evaluation of Bt cotton in Punjab. Journal of Environmental Biology. 2015;36(4):993–8.
  27. 27. Govind MS. Impact of high density planting and weed management practices on growth and yield of Bt cotton [PhD thesis]. Parbhani (M.S.): Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth; 2022.
  28. 28. Mukhtar AS, Saleem A, Malik NA. Integrated weed management and its effect on the seed cotton yield in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) crop. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research. 2006;12(1-2):111–7.
  29. 29. Nithya C, Chinnusamy C, Prabhakaran NK. Evaluation of weed control efficacy and seed cotton yield in glyphosate tolerant transgenic cotton. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2013;4:1159–63. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.46142
  30. 30. Madhu G, Srinivasulu K, Rani PP, Rao AS. Economics of rainfed Bt cotton as influenced by sequential application of herbicides. Journal of Cotton Research and Development. 2014;28(2):257–9.
  31. 31. Tariq M, Afzal MN, Ahmad M, Qayyum A, Khan MA. Performance of pre and post emergence herbicides for weed control in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research. 2018;24(2):345–51. https://doi.org/10.28941/24-2(2018)-8

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.