Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp9 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) cultivation in India: A critical review of status, constraints and future directions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15408
Submitted
5 May 2026
Published
17-10-2026

Abstract

Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) is an economically important berry crop worldwide, due to its distinctive flavour, nutritional value and health benefits. In recent years, it has been cultivated not only in temperate regions, but also in subtropical and tropical regions. It has become one of the high-value horticultural crops in India, due to the growing consumer demand and good returns to farmers. This review critically examines the trends in yield, constraints and technological factors influencing strawberry cultivation across major strawberry producing states such as Maharashtra, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Jammu and Kashmir and other emerging regions in India. Evidence from existing studies indicates that the adoption of improved cultivation practices such as balanced fertilisation, integrated pest management, mulching, protected cultivation and soilless systems has substantially improved fruit yield and quality compared to conventional open-field methods. Despite these advancements, productivity remains limited by climatic sensitivity, pest and disease factors, soil and nutrient management constraints and postharvest losses due to the highly perishable nature of the fruit. Moreover, disparities in technology adoption and the lack of cold-chain infrastructure continue to constrain sectoral growth. Emerging technologies such as precision agriculture and decision-support systems offer considerable potential to improve resource-use efficiency and sustainable production. The review discusses the status of strawberry production in India and its integration with production trends, challenges and future research in the field. It also points out gaps in the current knowledge and limited production systems and also outlines the future technological interventions needed to enhance the productivity, profitability and sustainability of strawberry production under Indian conditions.

References

  1. 1. Sahoo S, Sahoo D, Sahoo KK. Optimization of an efficient hydroponic cultivation method for high yield of strawberry plants. S Afr J Bot. 2024;167:429–40. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2024.02.033
  2. 2. Punetha S, Oli P, Joshi N, Gupta S, Kumar P, Preet MS, et al. Effects of mulching on soil, growth and biochemical traits of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) under protected cultivation. Appl Fruit Sci. 2025;67(5):385. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-025-01625-y
  3. 3. Bhutia PO, Kewlani P, Pandey A, Rawat S, Bhatt ID. Physico-chemical properties and nutritional composition of fruits of the wild Himalayan strawberry (Fragaria nubicola Lindl.) in different ripening stages. J Berry Res. 2021;11(3):481–96. http://doi.org/10.3233/JBR-210742
  4. 4. Rao V, Swamy GS. Performance of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) genotypes for yield and quality parameters. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(9):1904–8. http://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.234
  5. 5. Bachhal GS, Chahal PK, Kumar P. Prospects of strawberry cultivation in Haryana State, India. J Appl Nat Sci. 2018;10(4):1130. http://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v10i4.1870
  6. 6. Sharma SP, Sharma N. Evaluation of strawberry cultivars for growth and yield characteristics in plain region of Chhattisgarh, India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(2):2835–40. http://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.345
  7. 7. Thakur P, Kumar P, Sharma CL, Sharma U, Sharma N, Ladon T. Ameliorating potential effects of natural biological formulations and biostimulants on plant health and quality attributes in coriander-fenugreek intercropped strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25(1):164. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06184-8
  8. 8. Giampieri F, Tulipani S, Alvarez-Suarez JM, Quiles JL, Mezzetti B, Battino M. The strawberry: Composition, nutritional quality and impact on human health. Nutr. 2012;28(1):9–19. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2011.08.009
  9. 9. Devi N, Singh Y, Slathia D, Gupta G, Pareek S, Kumari S, et al. Interaction effects of different fertigation levels and cultivars on growth, yield, quality and leaf nutrient content of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) under protected cultivation. Appl Fruit Sci. 2025;67(3):121. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-025-01355-1
  10. 10. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT database. 2024.
  11. 11. Simpson D. The economic importance of strawberry crops. In: Harrison R, Hytönen T, Graham J, editors. The genomes of rosaceous berries and their wild relatives. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76020-9_1
  12. 12. Kumar K. Challenges, potential and future strategies. In: Strawberries: Production, postharvest management and protection. CRC Press; 2018. p. 531–7. http://doi.org/10.1201/b21441-219
  13. 13. Harrison R, Hytönen T, Graham J. The genomes of rosaceous berries and their wild relatives: Preface. Springer; 2018. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76020-9
  14. 14. Ramírez Padrón LC, Caamal Cauich I, Pat Fernández VG, Martínez Luis D, Pérez Fernández A. Analysis of the competitiveness indicators of strawberry exports Mexican. Rev Mex Cienc Agríc. 2020;11(4):815–27. http://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v11i4.2049
  15. 15. Fresh Produce. Strawberries annual market report 2024. Fresh Produce; 2024.
  16. 16. Ranasingha R, Perera A, Tabugbo K, Vasilev V. Enhancing plant growth and yield under reduced water and nutrient conditions: The role of biostimulants in improving irrigation efficiency and drought resilience in soilless strawberry cultivation under glasshouse conditions. J Sustain Agric Environ. 2025;4(3). http://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.70082
  17. 17. Asinlu KP, Nimbolkar PK, Singh S, Mailappa AS, Singh B, Shukla R, et al. Effect of different growing media on growth, yield and fruit quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. ‘Winter Dawn’. Appl Fruit Sci. 2025;67(4):251. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-025-01489-2
  18. 18. Maurya JK, Singh JP, Tomar S, Kumar R. Optimization of NPK fertilizers for higher yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) fruits. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(8):1534–8. http://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.188
  19. 19. Manivannan MI, Win L, Kennedy R, Premalakshmi V, Paramasivan M, Rajinimala N, et al. Genetic variability studies using principal component analysis and single linkage cluster analysis for growth, yield and quality in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) at upper Pulney hills of southern India. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2025;23(2). http://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/2302_27932806
  20. 20. Singh R, Sharma RR, Jain RK. Planting time and mulching influenced vegetative and reproductive traits in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) in India. Fruits. 2005;60(6):395–403. http://doi.org/10.1051/fruits:2005045
  21. 21. Pramanick KK, Kishore DK, Sharma SK, Das BK, Murthy BN. Strawberry cultivation under diverse agro-climatic conditions of India. Int J Fruit Sci. 2013;13(1–2):36–51. http://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2012.696969
  22. 22. Sharma I, Topno SE, Joseph AV. Evaluation of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) runner production in different growing media under semi-automated polyhouse. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2024;27(6):574–80. http://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i6917
  23. 23. Thakur M, Shylla B. Effect of different soilless substrates on flowering, yield and fruit quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Chandler under protected conditions. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(4):2830–6. http://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.704.322
  24. 24. Dutta C, Nath DJ, Chinir J, Medhi S, Luikham S. Morphological and biochemical characterization of seven strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivars grown in Meghalaya, India. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2025;28(4):877–88. http://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2025/v28i42244
  25. 25. Verma GK, Panigrahi HK, Lodhi Y. Evaluation of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivars for growth, flowering and fruiting behavior under farmer’s field condition (Baadi) in Chhattisgarh plain region. Curr J Appl Sci Technol. 2022;41(47):34–40. http://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2022/v41i474027
  26. 26. Pandey P, Nandre DR, Patil SD, Patil RV, Shirsath R. Growth and yield performance of strawberry cultivars under different growing conditions in Maharashtra, India. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2024;27(12):1–7. http://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i121748
  27. 27. Gogoi B, Dutta S, Basumatary P, Barthakur S. Study on morpho-physico traits of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivars under open and protected condition. Int J Agric Ext Soc Dev. 2025;8(4):157–63. http://doi.org/10.33545/26180723.2025.v8.i4c.1756
  28. 28. Ahmadi E, Honnabyraiah MK, Alur AS, Adiga JD, Rao V. Impact of integrated nutrient management on yield and quality parameters of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Sabrina under polyhouse. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6:3481–7. http://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.427
  29. 29. Chauhan N, Bakshi M, Singh SK, Sharma JB. Comparative evaluation of strawberry cultivars under Subhash Palekar natural farming and conventional farming regimes in Doaba region of Punjab conditions. J Appl Nat Sci. 2024;16(1):282. http://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v16i1.5309
  30. 30. Bhobhria V, Selvan S, Patel KK, Kantwa RC, Kumar R, Raj P, et al. From fields to markets: The rise of strawberry farming in Abohar, Punjab, India. Asian Res J Agric. 2025;18(2):30–9. http://doi.org/10.9734/arja/2025/v18i2677
  31. 31. Haghighat F, Miri SM, Hassani D. Morpho-physiological performance of seven short-day and day-neutral strawberry cultivars in the soilless culture. 2020. http://doi.org/10.22034/jppb.2020.12573
  32. 32. Durner EF, Barden JA, Himelrick DG, Poling EB. Photoperiod and temperature effects on flower and runner development in day-neutral, June-bearing and everbearing strawberries. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1984;109(3):396–400. http://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.109.3.396
  33. 33. Heide OM, Stavang JA, Sønsteby A. Physiology and genetics of flowering in cultivated and wild strawberries: A review. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2013;88(1):1–8. http://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2013.11512930
  34. 34. Karthikeyan S, Thamaraiselvi SP, Sivakumar V, Lourdusamy DK. Performance of strawberry cultivars under different growing environments in Nilgiris. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(12):942–6. http://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i123757
  35. 35. Rana VS, Lingwal K, Sharma S, Rana N, Pawar R, Kumar V, et al. Enhancement in growth, yield and nutritive characteristics of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) by the application of biostimulant: Seaweed extract. Acta Physiol Plant. 2023;45(10):122. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-023-03602-y
  36. 36. Husaini AM, Abdin MZ, Khan S, Xu YW, Aquil S, Anis M. Modifying strawberry for better adaptability to adverse impact of climate change. Curr Sci. 2012;102(12):1660–73.
  37. 37. Supreetha GB, Singh NP, Sharma S. Influence of mulching on fruit development and quality attributes of strawberry. Indian J Hortic. 2022;79(2):221–8.
  38. 38. Kaur K, Singh A, Kaur A. Comparative analysis of morphological and biochemical traits in Fragaria × ananassa (cv. Chandler) under varied cultivation systems. J Sci Res Rep. 2024;30(4):259–65. http://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i41912
  39. 39. Ullah MR, Chhetri S, Kundu P, Kundu S. Performance of strawberry cultivars in new alluvial zone of West Bengal. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(7):436–40.
  40. 40. Gaikwad SP, Sali VM, Chalak SU. Performance of strawberry cultivars under Mahabaleshwar conditions. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018;7(4):1850–2.
  41. 41. Belakud B, Bahadur V, Prasad VM. Performance of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) varieties for yield and biochemical parameters. Pharma Innov J. 2015;4(10 Pt A):5.
  42. 42. Singh R, Sangwan AK, Singh N, Singh S. Evaluation of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivars for fruit quality and biochemical characters under North-Western plains of India. HortFlora Res Spectr. 2016;5(4):295–300.
  43. 43. Singh KK, Kaur A. Evaluation of growth and yield of strawberry cultivars under open and protected conditions in subtropical conditions of Punjab. HortFlora Res Spectr. 2020;9(1–2):28–33.
  44. 44. Singh A, Patel RK, De LC, Pereira LS. Performance of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) cultivars under sub-tropics of Meghalaya. Indian J Agric Sci. 2008;78(7):575.
  45. 45. Singh P, Kour A, Mahajan M. Characterization of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) genotypes based upon the morphological and biochemical quality attributes grown in south-western Punjab. Indian J Agric Sci. 2025;95(1):109–11. http://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i1.148222
  46. 46. Neetu SP, Verma G. Varietal screening of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) under open field condition for fruit quality and yield in plain region of Chhattisgarh, India. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(1):405–7.
  47. 47. Kumar S, Prakash S, Singh MK, Kumar V, Kumar A. Growth and floral behavior of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) varieties under western Uttar Pradesh condition. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(9):2064–8. http://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.909.257
  48. 48. Ayall TA, Li A, Beddows M, Markovic M, Leontidis G. Enhancing strawberry yield forecasting with backcasted IoT sensor data and machine learning. arXiv. 2025;arXiv:2504.18451. http://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.18451
  49. 49. Keerthika B, Thilagavathi M, Rani CI, Prahadeeswaran M, Vasanthi R. An overview of processed fruits export from India: Growth, status and trend. Int J Econ Plants. 2024;11. http://doi.org/10.23910/2/2024.5278b
  50. 50. Anuradha, Goyal RK, Godara AK, Sindhu SS. Strawberry runner production enhanced by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(11):3236–8. http://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.711.372
  51. 51. Agnihotri H, Rehal J. Transforming strawberry processing in India: New developments, challenges and opportunities: A review. Int J Hortic Food Sci. 2025;7(4):45–50. http://doi.org/10.33545/26631067.2025.v7.i3a.279
  52. 52. Rahman MM. Interactive influence of planting date and cultivar on growth, yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). J Hortic For. 2014;6(3):31–7. http://doi.org/10.5897/JHF2014.0337
  53. 53. VC A, Ajithkumar B, MT C, PM Z. Yield variability in response to planting dates and weather conditions for strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) at Kerala’s high ranges (Wayanad), India. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2024;14(12):757–65. http://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i124660
  54. 54. Singh L, Sadawarti RK, Thakur D, Singh SK, Mirza AA. Nanoagrochemicals: Ensuring sustainable productivity through nutrient and pest management in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2025:103737. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2025.103737
  55. 55. Dhiman A. Urban horticulture via vertical farming: Unlocking the potential, addressing challenges and exploring future prospects for fruit crops: A review. Biol Agric Sci Technol Environ. 2025;5:19–27.
  56. 56. Ullah I, Toor MD, Yerlikaya BA, Mohamed HI, Yerlikaya S, Basit A, et al. High-temperature stress in strawberry: Understanding physiological, biochemical and molecular responses. Planta. 2024;260(5):118. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-024-04544-6
  57. 57. Choudhary A, Sharma N, Bakshi P, Jamwal M, Jasrotia A, Devi S, et al. Deciphering the effect of triacontanol and salicylic acid on growth, fruit quality and shelf life of strawberry cv. ‘Chandler’. Appl Fruit Sci. 2025;67(5):401. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-025-01630-1
  58. 58. Hu X, Xu C, Tao H, Wang S, Zhang M, Chen Q, et al. The effect of low temperature and low illumination intensity on the photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant enzyme activity in the strawberry. Agronomy. 2025;15(4):860. http://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15040860
  59. 59. Rana K, Chauhan N, Sharma JB. Effect of photoperiod and gibberellic acid (GA3) on flowering and fruiting of strawberry: A review. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(6):1651–5. http://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2020.v9.i6x.13185
  60. 60. David S, Ficová G, Marcelis LF, Verdonk JC. Photoperiodic effects on early plant development in everbearing and seasonal flowering strawberry. bioRxiv. 2025:2025-07. http://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.08.662500
  61. 61. Singh T, Rajan R, Vamsi T, Kumar A, Ramprasad RR, Gopichand GB, et al. A review on the impact of organic and biofertilizer amendments on growth, yield and quality of strawberry. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(14):147–58. http://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i143030
  62. 62. Morresi V, Capocasa F, Balducci F, Diamanti J, Mezzetti B. Nursery propagation systems for high-quality strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) plug plant production from micropropagated, soilless-grown mother plants. Horticulturae. 2025;11(8):888. http://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11080888
  63. 63. Thind SK, Kaur S, Kamboj I. Symptomatology and pathology of strawberry diseases causing leaf blight and fruit rot in Punjab. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9:4035–45. http://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.907.473
  64. 64. Kumar V, Sahay S, Rashmi K, Adarsh A, Shukla P, Kumar V, et al. Optimizing in vitro runner production and survival of strawberry (cv. Camarosa) under subtropical conditions. AATCC Rev. 2025;13(2):175–81. http://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2025.13.02.175
  65. 65. Jothini Varsha IS, Rajendran L, Karthikeyan G, Vinothkumar B, Anandham R, Saravanakumari K. Secondary metabolites of biocontrol agents and its exploitation with VAM on the management of wilt disease in strawberry. Appl Biochem Microbiol. 2025;61(4):720–31. http://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683824606334
  66. 66. Singh V, Kumar S, Yadav S, Kumar L, Shukla U, Darshan D. Effect of nutrients and mulches on qualitative aspects of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Chandler. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(2):18–21.
  67. 67. Shylla B, Sharma A, Thakur M, Handa A. Perlite: An effective soilless substrate for producing strawberry plants free from nematode-transmitted viruses. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(3):398–403. http://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.703.046
  68. 68. Mishra A, Mishra PK, Kishor S. Reducing post-harvest losses in Indian strawberries: Current practices and future directions based on latest research. World J Adv Res Rev. 2025;28(1):704–10. http://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.1.3487
  69. 69. Feliziani E, Romanazzi G. Postharvest decay of strawberry fruit: Etiology, epidemiology and disease management. J Berry Res. 2016;6(1):47–63. http://doi.org/10.3233/JBR-150113
  70. 70. Nayak SL, Sethi S, Sharma RR, Singh D, Singh S. Improved control on decay and postharvest quality deterioration of strawberry by microbial antagonists. Indian J Hortic. 2019;76(3):502–7. http://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2019.00079.3
  71. 71. Sharma SK, Pal J, Sharma A. Postharvest diseases of strawberry and their management. In: Postharvest handling and diseases of horticultural produce. CRC Press; 2021. p. 281–6.
  72. 72. Dwivedi M, Rai RK, Singh P. Fungal diversity associated with strawberry fruit loss in the Gorakhpur division, UP, India. Agric Sci Dig. 2024:1–9.
  73. 73. Singh N, Mishra S, Bahadur V. Production of strawberry through closed hydroponics system under NFT (nutrient film). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2019;8(4):2958–60.
  74. 74. Li Y, Jeong BR, Huang P, Qiu X, Zhu F, He J, et al. Factors controlling runner formation in strawberries. Agronomy. 2025;15(9):2235. http://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15092235
  75. 75. Verma P, Singh G, Singh SK, Mirza AA, Bakshi M, Anmol, et al. Modulating productivity of strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) through artificial full-spectrum light in indoor vertical farming. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2025;25(1):1219–33. http://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-02197-8
  76. 76. Pandey AK, Singh AK, Singh SK, Kumar A. Improving strawberry productivity and quality through drip irrigation and polythene mulch in Bihar. Environ Ecol. 2012;30(3A):760–3.
  77. 77. Vishwakarma G, Kumar Shukla A, Zaman F, Singh A, Kumar Shukla S. Assessment of strawberry to integrated nutrient management for different yield attributes and quality parameters. Applied Fruit Science. 2024;66(3):833–41. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-024-01082-z
  78. 78. Rodge RR, Rajan R, Pandey K, Kaur H, Jabroot K, Chaudhuri M, et al. Optimization of gamma irradiation doses (60Co) for mutagenesis in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Winter Dawn. Plant Sci Today. 2025. http://doi.org/10.14719/pst.6270
  79. 79. Kumar M, Rajbhar YP, Kumar V, Yadav L, Kumar J, Singh BP, et al. Studies on the effect of different surface sterilization agents under in vitro culture of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) variety “Chandler”. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(6):1833–5.
  80. 80. Guru GR, Ramteke PW, Veres C, Vágvölgyi C. Potential impacts of nanoparticles integration on micropropagation efficiency: Current achievements and prospects. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1629548. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1629548
  81. 81. Kumar A, Karuna K, Mankar A, Mandal SK, Kumari N. Pre-harvest spray of chitosan, calcium chloride and low temperature storage (7 °C) effect on biochemical attributes of strawberry cv. Camarosa. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(3):1097–102.
  82. 82. Kumar R, Bakshi M, Singh DB. Influence of plant growth regulators on growth, yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) under UP sub-tropics. Asian J Hortic. 2012;7:434–6.
  83. 83. Han Y, Chen C, Yan Z, Li J, Wang Y. The methyl jasmonate accelerates the strawberry fruits ripening process. Sci Hortic. 2019;249:250–6. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.01.061
  84. 84. Jayakrishna SS, Ganesh SS, Das U, Babu S, Jayaker PA. Slowing down the ripening process of frozen strawberries activates Botrytis cinerea and Rhizopus mycelium fungus: Inspect through AI-based SSFI model. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2026;232:113984. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2025.113984
  85. 85. Cruz M, Mafra S, Teixeira E, Figueiredo F. Smart strawberry farming using edge computing and IoT. Sensors. 2022;22(15):5866. http://doi.org/10.3390/s22155866
  86. 86. Karki S, Basak JK, Tamrakar N, Deb NC, Paudel B, Kook JH, et al. Strawberry disease detection using transfer learning of deep convolutional neural networks. Sci Hortic. 2024;332:113241. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113241
  87. 87. Mirbod O, Choi D, Schueller JK. From simulation to field validation: A digital twin-driven Sim2real transfer approach for strawberry fruit detection and sizing. AgriEngineering. 2025;7(3):81. http://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7030081
  88. 88. Chen Z, Mei J, Xie J. Impact of different precooling methods on the storage and quality of strawberries (Fragaria vesca L.). Food Qual Saf. 2025;9. http://doi.org/10.1093/fqsafe/fyaf012
  89. 89. Menzel CM. A review of strawberry under protected cultivation: Yields are higher under tunnels than in the open field. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2025;100(3):286–313. http://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2024.2449026
  90. 90. Bai JK, Biradar MS, Shashidhar TR, Salakinkop SR. Growth and yield response of strawberry cultivars under northern transitional tract of Karnataka. J Farm Sci. 2023;36(1):106–8. http://doi.org/10.61475/jfm.v36i01.326
  91. 91. Pandey S, Singh J, Singh SK, Mourya IB. Influence of growing environment on growth, yield and chemical composition of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) fruits under open vs naturally ventilated polyhouse conditions. Indian J Agric Sci. 2015;85:1540–5.
  92. 92. Kouloumprouka Zacharaki A, Monaghan JM, Bromley JR, Vickers LH. Opportunities and challenges for strawberry cultivation in urban food production systems. Plants People Planet. 2024;6(3):611–21. http://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10475
  93. 93. Gokulakrishnan G, Tamilselvan D, Sanjeevkumar S, Devaganesh A, Janani N, Arunadevi K. Vertical farming: Innovations, challenges and the future of sustainable urban agriculture. Madras Agric J. 2025;112(10–12):1. http://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.901236
  94. 94. Verma P, Singh SK, Upadhyay P, Singh S, Bakshi M. Evaluation of agromorphological and yield traits in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) genotypes under hydroponic cultivation. Appl Fruit Sci. 2025;67(5):373. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-025-01583-5

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.