Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 4 (2026)

Molecular identification and functional characterisation of efficient indigenous Azotobacter strains conferring salinity tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15625
Submitted
19 May 2026
Published
29-09-2026 — Updated on 01-10-2026
Versions

Abstract

An indigenous Azotobacter vinelandii strain (AztACU1) was isolated from the rice rhizosphere and evaluated for its nitrogen-fixing ability, plant growth-promoting (PGP) traits and potential to enhance salinity tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L. var. IR64). A total of 10 bacterial isolates were obtained from rice rhizosphere soil and characterised using morphological, biochemical and molecular (16S rRNA gene sequencing) approaches. Nitrogen-fixing efficiency was assessed using the acetylene reduction assay (ARA). Among the isolates, A. vinelandii AztACU1 exhibited the highest nitrogenase activity (131.05 ± 3.16 nmol C₂H₄ mg-1 bacterial protein hr-1). The isolate also showed superior plant growth-promoting characteristics, including siderophore production, hydrogen cyanide (HCN) production, phosphate solubilisation, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase activity, ammonia production and synthesis of salicylic acid, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA₃) and zeatin. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of AztACU1 was deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under accession number PZ167826.1. The salinity tolerance-promoting potential of AztACU1 was evaluated in rice plants exposed to 200 mM NaCl. Under salinity stress, inoculated plants exhibited approximately 1.5-fold higher proline accumulation, 2-fold lower malondialdehyde (MDA) content, 2.5-fold lower H₂O₂ accumulation and 1.5-fold lower electrolyte leakage than uninoculated control plants. In addition, inoculated plants showed increased concentrations of endogenous phytohormones (GA₃, IAA and zeatin) and improved growth and yield attributes under saline conditions. These findings demonstrate that the indigenous A. vinelandii strain AztACU1 possesses multifunctional plant growth-promoting traits and effectively enhances salinity tolerance in rice, highlighting its potential as a sustainable biofertiliser for improving productivity in salt-affected agroecosystems.

References

  1. 1. Çakmakçı R, Salık MA, Çakmakçı S. Assessment and principles of environmentally sustainable food and agriculture systems. Agriculture. 2023;13(5):1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13051073
  2. 2. Tagkas CF, Rizos EC, Markozannes G, Karalexi MA, Wairegi L, Ntzani EE. Fertilizers and human health: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. Toxics. 2024;12(10):694. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12100694
  3. 3. Nuruzzaman M, Bahar MM, Naidu R. Diffuse soil pollution from agriculture: impacts and remediation. Sci Total Environ. 2025;962:178398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178398
  4. 4. Zhan P, Zhu W, Zhang T, Li N. Regional inequalities of future climate change impact on rice (Oryza sativa L.) yield in China. Sci Total Environ. 2023;898:165495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165495
  5. 5. Zhu JK. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell. 2016;167(2):313–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029
  6. 6. Yadav RK, Tripathi MK, Tiwari S, Tripathi N, Asati R, Chauhan S, et al. Genome editing and improvement of abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Life. 2023;13(7):1456. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13071456
  7. 7. KhokharVoytas A, Shahbaz M, Maqsood MF, Zulfiqar U, Naz N, Iqbal UZ, et al. Genetic modification strategies for enhancing plant resilience to abiotic stresses in the context of climate change. Funct Integr Genomics. 2023;23(3):283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-023-01202-0
  8. 8. Mohapatra R, HM HK, Naan T, Chitra M, Ashwini R, Rout A, et al. A review on biotechnological innovations in developing stress-tolerant crops for adverse environmental conditions. J Sci Res Rep. 2024;30(7):901–20. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i72200
  9. 9. Sahoo RK, Ansari MW, Dangar TK, Mohanty S, Tuteja N. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of efficient nitrogen-fixing Azotobacter strains from rice fields for crop improvement. Protoplasma. 2014;251(3):511–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-013-0547-2
  10. 10. Pradhan M, Sahoo RK, Swain DM, Dangar TK, Mohanty S. Inoculation of Azotobacter vinelandii (SRI Az3) to rice plants increases stress tolerance during drought stress. Oryza. 2018;55:406–12. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-5266.2018.00049.8
  11. 11. Ladha JK, Peoples MB, Reddy PM, Biswas JC, Bennett A, Jat ML, et al. Biological nitrogen fixation and prospects for ecological intensification in cereal-based cropping systems. Field Crops Res. 2022;283:108541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108541
  12. 12. Yu X, Zhang X, Yang S, Zhao X, Wang K, Rushimisha IE, et al. Promoting soil management ways: bioelectrochemical technology. Resour Environ Sustain. 2025;19:100191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2025.100191
  13. 13. Kumar S, Sindhu SS, Kumar R. Biofertilizers: an ecofriendly technology for nutrient recycling and environmental sustainability. Curr Res Microb Sci. 2022;3:100094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100094
  14. 14. Sumbul A, Ansari RA, Rizvi R, Mahmood I. Azotobacter: a potential biofertilizer for soil and plant health management. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020;27(12):3634–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.004
  15. 15. Tejera N, Lluch C, Martìnez-Toledo MV, Gonzàlez-López J. Isolation and characterization of Azotobacter and Azospirillum strains from the sugarcane rhizosphere. Plant Soil. 2005;270(1):223–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-1522-7
  16. 16. Prusty S, Sahoo RK, Sharaya R, Tuteja N, Gill SS. Unraveling the potential of native Azotobacter and Azospirillum spp. formulations for sustainable crop production of rice (Oryza sativa L. var. Khandagiri). S Afr J Bot. 2023;162:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2023.08.060
  17. 17. Sahoo RK, Ansari MW, Pradhan M, Dangar TK, Mohanty S, Tuteja N. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of native Azospirillum strains from rice fields to improve crop productivity. Protoplasma. 2014;251(4):943–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-013-0607-7
  18. 18. Gupta PK. Methods in environmental analysis: water, soil and air. Jodhpur: Agrobios; 2004. p. 242–45.
  19. 19. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  20. 20. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1958.
  21. 21. Page AL. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and mineralogical properties. 2nd ed. Madison (WI): American Society of Agronomy; 1982.
  22. 22. Surleva O, Chavdarova K, Kazanlaklieva V, Angelova L, Surleva A. Contribution to the turbidimetric method for sulphur determination in arable soils. Plant Soil Environ. 2025;71(10):695–707. https://doi.org/10.17221/250/2025-PSE
  23. 23. Tucker BB, Kurtz LT. Calcium and magnesium determinations by EDTA titrations. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1961;25(1):27–9. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1961.03615995002500010016x
  24. 24. Wakarera PW, Ojola P, Njeru EM. Characterization and diversity of native Azotobacter spp. isolated from semi-arid agroecosystems of eastern Kenya. Biol Lett. 2022;18(3). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2021.0612
  25. 25. Paray AA, Singh M, Mir MA, Kaur A. Gram staining: a brief review. Int J Res Rev. 2023;10(9):336–41. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230934
  26. 26. Bergey DH. Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology. 9th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994.
  27. 27. Patel K, Patel S, Parekh V, Jha S. Isolation and characterization of salt tolerant phosphate-solubilizing Serratia marcescens isolated from coastal area. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2016;10(3):2401–8. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.10.3.84
  28. 28. Kamal N, Saharan BS. Evaluation of plant growth-promoting traits in Azotobacter and Trichoderma strains isolated from natural farms in India. Vegetos. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-025-01498-2
  29. 29. Hardy RWF, Holsten RD, Jackson EK, Burns RC. The acetylene-ethylene assay for N₂ fixation: laboratory and field evaluation. Plant Physiol. 1968;43:1185–207. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.43.8.1185
  30. 30. Tuteja N, Sahoo RK, Garg B, Tuteja R. OsSUV3 dual helicase functions in salinity stress tolerance by maintaining photosynthesis and antioxidant machinery in rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. IR64). Plant J. 2013;76(1):115–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12277
  31. 31. Chen H, Lei Y, Sun J, Ma M, Deng P, Quan JE, et al. Effects of different growth hormones on rooting and endogenous hormone content of two Morus alba L. cuttings. Horticulturae. 2023;9(5):552. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9050552
  32. 32. Kumar BL, Gopal DVRS. Effective role of indigenous microorganisms for sustainable environment. 3 Biotech. 2015;5:867–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-015-0293-6
  33. 33. Hill S, Sawers G. Azotobacter. In: Lederberg J, editor. Encyclopedia of microbiology. New York: Academic Press; 2000. p. 359–71.
  34. 34. Dasgupta D, Kumar K, Rashi M, Mishra R, Panda AK, Bisht SS. Microbial biofertilizers: recent trends and future outlook. In: Recent advancement in microbial biotechnology. Academic Press; 2021. p. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822098-6.00001-X
  35. 35. Fasusi OA, Cruz C, Babalola OO. Agricultural sustainability: microbial biofertilizers in rhizosphere management. Agriculture. 2021;11(2):163. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020163
  36. 36. Dutta P, Muthukrishnan O, Gopalasubramaiam SK, Dharmaraj R, Karuppaiah A, Loganathan K, et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and its mechanisms against plant diseases for sustainable agriculture and better productivity. Biocell. 2022;46(8):1843–66. https://doi.org/10.32604/biocell.2022.019291
  37. 37. Saeed Q, Xiukang W, Haider FU, Kučerik J, Mumtaz MZ, Holatko J, et al. Rhizosphere bacteria in plant growth promotion, biocontrol, and bioremediation of contaminated sites: a comprehensive review of effects and mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):10529. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910529
  38. 38. Bhat MA, Mishra AK, Jan S, Bhat MA, Kamal MA, Rahman SA, et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in plant health: a perspective study of the underground interaction. Plants (Basel). 2023;12(3):629. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030629
  39. 39. Voronina E, Sokolova E, Tromenschleger I, Mishukova O, Hlistun I, Miroshnik M. Properties of potential plant growth-promoting bacteria and their effect on wheat growth (Triticum aestivum) and soil characteristics. Microbiol Res. 2023;15(1):20–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres15010002
  40. 40. Giri BR, Chattaraj S, Rath S, Pattnaik MM, Mitra D, Thatoi H. Unveiling the molecular mechanism of Azospirillum in plant growth promotion. Bacteria. 2025;4(3):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/bacteria4030036

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.