Research Articles
Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)
Molecular screening of various apple genotypes against woolly apple aphid
Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar 190 025, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar 190 025, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar 190 025, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Division of Entomology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar 190 025, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Division of Fruit Science, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar 190 025, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Transcriptomic Laboratory (K-Lab), Division of Plant Biotechnology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar 190 025, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Transcriptomic Laboratory (K-Lab), Division of Plant Biotechnology, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar 190 025, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Abstract
The study evaluated 15 apple genotypes (Mitch Gala, Red Jonaprince, King Fuji, Golden Delicious Reinders, Gala Redlum, Fuji Zehn Aztec, Pinova, Red Braeburn, Devil Gala, Red Chief, Elstar, Crab apple, M-7, M-9 T337 and MM-106) for resistance to woolly apple aphid (WAA). Field samples were collected from experimental orchards at Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. Molecular marker analysis was conducted at the transcriptomics K-Lab, Faculty of Horticulture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. The WAA is a serious pest that causing significant yield and quality losses in apple orchards. This study aimed to evaluate the presence of molecular markers associated with WAA resistance genes (Er1, Er2 and Er3) in 15 apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) genotypes. The results indicated that several apple cultivars exhibited differential responses to WAA infestation. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to screen apple cultivars for 8 molecular markers (NZsc_C20, NZsc_GS327, NZsc_O05, NZms_EB145764, NZsn_O05, NZms_EB106753, NZsc_E01, NZsc_A01) associated with the main WAA resistance genes (Er1, Er2 and Er3). The NZms_EB145764 marker is connected to the Er2 resistance gene and detected in the 12 cultivars: Mitch Gala, Red Jonaprince, King Fuji, Golden Delicious Reinders, Gala Redlum, Fuji Zehn Aztec, Pinova, Red Braeburn, Devil Gala, Elstar, Crab apple and M-9 T337. The NZsc_O05 marker is connected to the Er1 resistance gene and is found in the following cultivars: Mitch Gala, Golden Delicious Reinders, fuji Zehn Aztec, Pinova, Red Braeburn, Devil Gala, Red Chief, Elstar, Crab apple, M-7 and M-9 T337. The NZsc_A01 marker is connected to the Er3 resistance gene and is found in the 11 cultivars: Mitch Gala, Red Jonaprince, King Fuji, Golden Delicious Reinders, Gala Redlum, Pinova, Red Braeburn, Devil Gala, Red Chief, Elstar and Crab apple. The NZsn_O05 marker is connected to the Er1/Er3 resistance gene and is found in only one cultivar: Crab apple.
References
- 1. Henríquez C, Almonacid S, Chiffelle I, Valenzuela T, Araya M, Cabezas L, et al. Determination of antioxidant capacity, total phenolic content and mineral composition of different fruit tissue of five apple cultivars grown in Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 2010;70(4):523–36. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392010000400001
- 2. Boyer J, Liu RH. Apple phytochemicals and their health benefits. Nutrition Journal. 2004;3(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-3-5
- 3. Beers EH, Cockfield SD, Gontijo LM. Seasonal phenology of woolly apple aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Central Washington. Environmental Entomology. 2010;39(2):286–94. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN09280
- 4. Tan XM, Yang ZS, Zhou H, Yang QM, Zhou HX. Resistance performance of four principal apple cultivars to woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hemiptera: Pemphigidae), by simulated seasonal temperature in northern China. Arthropod-Plant Interactions. 2021;15(1):59–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-020-09797-y
- 5. Baker AC. The woolly apple aphid. Report No. 101. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture; 1915.
- 6. Misra CS. The American blight or the woolly aphis, Eriosoma (Schizoneura) lanigera Hausmann. 1920:627–35.
- 7. Smith RG. Wax glands, wax production and the functional significance of wax use in three aphid species (Homoptera: Aphididae). Journal of Natural History. 1999;33(4):513–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/002229399300227
- 8. Stoeckli S, Mody K, Gessler C, Patocchi A, Jermini M, Dorn S. QTL analysis for aphid resistance and growth traits in apple. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 2008;4(4):833–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-008-0156-y
- 9. Bus VG, Chagné D, Bassett HC, Bowatte D, Calenge F, Celton JM, et al. Genome mapping of three major resistance genes to woolly apple aphid (Eriosoma lanigerum Hausm.). Tree Genetics & Genomes. 2008;4(2):223–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-007-0103-3
- 10. Hrotkó K. Advances and challenges in fruit rootstock research. In: VIII International Symposium on Canopy, Rootstocks and Environmental Physiology in Orchard Systems; 2004. p. 33–42.
- 11. Knight RL, Briggs JB, Massee AM, Tydeman HM. The inheritance of resistance to woolly aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hsmnn.), in the apple. Journal of Horticultural Science. 1962;37(3):207–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1962.11514040
- 12. Mohan M, Nair S, Bhagwat A, Krishna TG, Yano M, Bhatia CR, et al. Genome mapping, molecular markers and marker-assisted selection in crop plants. Molecular Breeding. 1997;3(2):87–103. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009651919792
- 13. Patocchi A, Walser M, Tartarini S, Broggini GA, Gennari F, Sansavini S, et al. Identification by genome scanning approach (GSA) of a microsatellite tightly associated with the apple scab resistance gene Vm. Genome. 2005;48(4):630–6. https://doi.org/10.1139/g05-036
- 14. Guilford P, Prakash S, Zhu JM, Rikkerink E, Gardiner S, Bassett H, et al. Microsatellites in Malus × domestica (apple): abundance, polymorphism and cultivar identification. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1997;94(2):249–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050407
- 15. Liebhard R, Gianfranceschi L, Koller B, Ryder CD, Tarchini R, Van de Weg E, et al. Development and characterisation of 140 new microsatellites in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Molecular Breeding. 2002;10(4):217–41. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020525906332
- 16. Liebhard R, Koller B, Gianfranceschi L, Gessler C. Creating a saturated reference map for the apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) genome. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2003;106(8):1497–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1209-0
- 17. Silfverberg-Dilworth E, Matasci CL, Van de Weg WE, Van Kaauwen MP, Walser M, Kodde LP, et al. Microsatellite markers spanning the apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) genome. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 2006;2(4):202–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-006-0045-1
- 18. Preston AP. Apple rootstock studies: Malling-Merton rootstocks. Journal of Horticultural Science. 1955;30(1):25–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1955.11513825
- 19. Webster AD, Wertheim SJ. Apple rootstocks. In: Apples: botany, production and uses. Wallingford (UK): CABI Publishing; 2003. p. 91–124. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995922.0091
- 20. Webster T, Tobutt K, Evans K. Breeding and evaluation of new rootstocks for apple, pear and sweet cherry. Compact Fruit Tree. 2000;33(4):100–4.
- 21. Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location and population dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1984;81(24):8014–18. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.24.8014
- 22. Saeid AR, Ateyyat M. Phenotypic and molecular screening of apple genotypes to woolly apple aphid resistance. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2014;42(1):99–103. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha4219460
- 23. Sandanayaka WR, Bus VG, Connolly P, Newcomb R. Characteristics associated with woolly apple aphid Eriosoma lanigerum resistance of three apple rootstocks. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 2003;109(1):63–72. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.2003.00095.x
- 24. King GJ, Alston FH, Battle I, Chevreau E, Gessler C, Janse J, et al. The European Apple Genome Mapping Project: developing a strategy for mapping genes coding for agronomic characters in tree species. Euphytica. 1991;56(1):89–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041748
- 25. Muzher B, Al-Halabi O. Phenotypic and genetic evaluation of some apple seedling rootstocks for woolly apple aphid (Eriosoma lanigerum Hausm.) resistance in Syria. In: Fifth International Scientific Agricultural Symposium; 2014. p. 390–5.
- 26. Tobutt KR, Bošković R, Roche P. Incompatibility and resistance to woolly apple aphid in apple. Plant Breeding. 2000;119(1):65–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2000.00442.x
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.