Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Dissecting genetic architecture of quantitative traits using higher order statistics, variability studies and association analysis in rice MAGIC population

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.16175
Submitted
18 June 2026
Published
12-11-2026

Abstract

Rice is cultivated across diverse agro-climatic regions worldwide and its productivity is affected by many biotic and abiotic stresses. With the ever-increasing global population and changing climatic factors, the need to produce 25 % more rice by 2030 is becoming paramount. Improving the yielding ability of rice varieties vis-a-vis reducing the crop loss due to abiotic and biotic stresses is a promising approach. Breeding of varieties was mostly concentrated on developing single-, three-way-, or double-cross hybrids involving two, three or four parents to increase the genetic variation in breeding population. Multi- parental advanced inter-cross (MAGIC) populations provide a useful resource with diverse allelic combinations to be exploited by the rice community. The MAGIC population also presents opportunities for studying interactions of genome introgression and chromosomal recombination. Hence the present investigation was undertaken at Rice Research Station, Tirur during Samba (Aug–Dec), 2024 with two 8-parent MAGIC F3 rice populations to study the nature of trait distribution, genetic variability, heritability (h²), genetic advance as per cent of mean (GAM), genotypic correlation and path coefficient analysis for 15 agro-morphological, grain quality and physiological drought response (DR) traits. Phenotypic frequency distributions of traits indicated substantial phenotypic variation predominantly of quantitative nature as witnessed from the continuous normal curve in both the populations. Variability and h2 studies indicated high genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV), high h² and high GAM were concurrently recorded for productive tillers per plant, number of grains per panicle, root length (RL) at 45 days after sowing and single plant yield (SPY) in Cross I and L/B ratio, RL, root : shoot ratio (RSR), drought recovery and SPY in Cross II. Correlation studies revealed significant positive genotypic correlations of SPY with productive tillers per plant, number of grains per panicle and spikelet fertility in Cross I and these yield-attributing traits are valuable for improving grain yield. Path coefficient analysis revealed that productive tillers per plant and number of grains per panicle were the primary direct contributors to SPY in Cross I. These findings provide a quantitative basis for trait-based selection and genotype advancement in MAGIC rice breeding programmes targeting drought-prone environments.

References

  1. 1. Khush GS. What it will take to feed 5.0 billion rice consumers in 2030. Plant Mol Biol. 2005;59:1–6.
  2. 2. Savitha P, Ushakumari. Genetic performance of medicinal landraces and improved cultivars for grain and nutritional quality traits in rice. Oryza. 2015;51(1):6–11.
  3. 3. Bernardo R. Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: learning from the last 20 years. Crop Sci. 2008;48:1649–64.
  4. 4. Cavanagh C, Morell M, Mackay I, Powell W. From mutations to MAGIC: resources for gene discovery, validation and delivery in crop plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008;11:215–21.
  5. 5. Kover PX, Valdar W, Trakalo J, Scarcelli N, Ehrenreich IM, Puruggaban MD, et al. A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross to fine-map quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000551
  6. 6. Huang BE, George AW, Forrest KL, Kilian A, Hayden MJ, Morell MK, et al. A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross population for genetic analysis in wheat. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012;10:826–39.
  7. 7. Dell'Acqua M, Gatti DM, Pea G, Cattonaro F, Coppens F, Magris G, et al. Genetic properties of the MAGIC maize population: a new platform for high definition QTL mapping in Zea mays. Genome Biol. 2015;16:167. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0716-z
  8. 8. Bandillo N, Raghavan C, Muyco PA, Sevilla MA, Lobina IT, Dilla-Ermita CJ, et al. Multi-parent advanced generation inter-crosses (MAGIC) in rice: progress and potential for genetics research and breeding. Rice. 2013;6:11. http://doi.org/10.1186/1939-8433-6-11
  9. 9. Meng L, Li H, Zhang L, Wang J. QTL IciMapping: integrated software for genetic linkage map construction and quantitative trait locus mapping in biparental populations. Crop J. 2015;3:269–83. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2015.01.001
  10. 10. Sivasubramanian S, Madhavamenon P. Genotypic and phenotypic variability in rice. Madras Agric J. 1973;60:1093–96.
  11. 11. Wright S. Correlation and causation. J Agric Res. 1921;20:557–85.
  12. 12. Dewey DR, Lu KH. A correlation and path-coefficient analysis of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agron J. 1959;51:515–8.
  13. 13. Fisher RA, Immer FR, Tedin O. The genetical interpretation of statistics of the third degree in the study of quantitative inheritance. Genetics. 1932;17(2):107–24.
  14. 14. Robson DS. Applications of the k4 statistic to genetic variance component analyses. Biometrics. 1956;12(4):433–44.
  15. 15. International Rice Research Institute. Standard Evaluation System (SES) for Rice. 5th ed. Los Baños, Philippines: IRRI; 2013.
  16. 16. Burton GW, DeVane EH. Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) from replicated clonal material. Agron J. 1953;45(10):478–81.
  17. 17. Allard RW. Principles of Plant Breeding. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1960.
  18. 18. Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agron J. 1955;47:314–8.
  19. 19. Pearson K. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution, XIX; second supplement to a memoir on skew variation. Phil Trans Roy Soc. 1896;216:429–57.
  20. 20. Al-Jibouri HR, Miller PA, Robinson HF. Genotypic and environmental variances and covariances in an upland cotton cross of interspecific origin. Agron J. 1958;50:633–6.
  21. 21. ShaiPrasanna GS, Joshi JL, Muraleedharan A. Utilizing genetic traits distributions to enhance rice breeding programs: a study of skewness and kurtosis in segregating generations. J Exp Agric Int. 2024;46(9):741–60. http://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2024/v46i92871
  22. 22. Nikhitha TC, Pushpham R, Raveendran M, Manonmani S. Genetic variability and frequency distribution studies in F2 population involving traditional variety Mappillai Samba. EJPB.2020;11(3):933–8. http://doi.org/10.37992/2020.1103.151
  23. 23. Shamini K, Selvi B. Assessment of frequency distribution in F3 generation of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench.) for grain yield and its attributed traits. Madras Agric J. 2023;109(4–6):24–8. http://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.000623
  24. 24. Muthuramu S, Ragavan T. Genetic analysis for yield attributes in F3 populations involving traditional rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar Poongar. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(3):428–32.
  25. 25. Cavanagh CR, Chao S, Wang S, Huang BR, Stephen S, Kiani S, et al. Genome-wide comparative diversity uncovers multiple targets of selection for improvement in hexaploid wheat landraces and cultivars. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:8057–62. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217133110
  26. 26. Suresh R, Satheesh Kumar P, Muthuramu S, Jebaraj S. Genetic variability studies for yield and yield attributes in rice (Oryza sativa L.). EJPB. 2014;5:828–31.
  27. 27. Venkatesan M, Prabhakaran N, Vinod KK, Sritharan N, Nair NV. Genetic variability and performance of rice genotypes. J Trop Agric. 2004;42:52–54.
  28. 28. Kumar B, Lal GM, Srivastava SBL. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis among yield and yield contributing characters in rice. Agric Sci Digest. 2009;29:196–99.
  29. 29. Sheeba A, Mohan S. Genetic diversity studies in drought tolerant rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Agric Sci Digest. 2025;45(1):86–90. http://doi.org/10.18805/ag.D-5434
  30. 30. Subramanian S, Ramamoorthy P, Alagesan S, Amalraj JJ, Muthurajan R, Alagarsamy S, et al. Unraveling the genetic potential of Indian rice germplasm for reproductive stage drought tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1454299. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1454299
  31. 31. Prasad KR, Radha Krishna KV, Sudheer Kumar S, Subba Rao LV, Nagaraju P, Senguttuvel P. Studies on correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and its components in hybrid rice. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2025;28(9):331–40. http://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2025/v28i92885
  32. 32. Hassan MA, Dahu N, Hongning T, Qian Z, Yueming Y, Yiru L, et al. Drought stress in rice: morpho-physiological and molecular responses and marker-assisted breeding. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1151198. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1151198
  33. 33. Dharmaraj D, Selvaraj R, Kari B, Govindan S, Muthurajan R, Paramasivam J. Marker-assisted pseudo-backcrossing for developing climate-resilient rice. Sci Rep. 2024;14:30219. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81598-2
  34. 34. Sandhu N, Raman KA, Torres RO. Rice root architectural traits and their interactions with seed size are associated with grain yield under drought stress. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35535. http://doi.org/10.1038/srep35535
  35. 35. Wasson AP, Richards RA, Chatrath R, Misra SC, Prasad SS, Rebetzke GJ, et al. Traits and selection strategies to improve root systems and water uptake in water-limited wheat growing environments. J Exp Bot. 2012;63:3485–98. http://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers111
  36. 36. Lucas K, Wissuwa M, Dinh LT. Heritable variation in root emergence during post-drought recovery reveals potential links to seedling drought recovery in rice. Curr Plant Biol. 2025. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2025.100509
  37. 37. Ikeda M, Miura K, Aya K, Kitano H, Matsuoka M. Genes offering the potential for designing yield-related traits in rice. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2013;16:213–20. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2013.02.002
  38. 38. Kato T, Tamaki K. Relationship between spikelet number and other yield components in recent high-yielding rice varieties. Plant Prod Sci. 2002;5:66–70. http://doi.org/10.1626/pps.5.66
  39. 39. Price AH, Steele KA, Moore BJ, Barraclough PB, Clark LJ. A combined RFLP and AFLP linkage map of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) used to identify QTLs for root-penetration ability. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;100:49–56. http://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050007

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.