Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Genetic architecture and combining ability of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under climate-induced late sown stress: Insights for climate-resilient hybrid breeding

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.16334
Submitted
25 June 2026
Published
13-11-2026

Abstract

Delayed sowing in rice-mustard cropping systems frequently pushes Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) planting beyond optimal windows, exposing the crop to late sown condition associated with terminal heat stress and causing substantial yield reductions. To address the critical gap in late-sown adaptation research, this study evaluated the quantitative genetic basis, combining ability and trait interrelationships of 7 genetically diverse parents and 21 F1 hybrids developed via a half-diallel mating design. The genotypes were evaluated for 12 agro-morphological traits under very late-sown conditions (December) in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. Results revealed significant genetic variability for all traits. Exceptionally high broad-sense heritability and genetic advance as percent of mean (GAM) were observed for seed yield per plant (YPP) (85.77 % and 52.55 %, respectively), test weight (TW) (93.23 % heritability) and the number of siliquae per plant (NSP) (73.39 % heritability and 42.07 % genetic advance). Hybrids generally outperformed parental lines, exhibiting earlier maturity, superior branching and higher yield. Parent P4 exhibited significant positive general combining ability effects for seed YPP and silique number. Additionally, the cross P5 × P6 exhibited the highest specific combining ability for yield and hybrid H17 demonstrated the maximum better-parent heterosis (50.0 %) for seed yield. Path coefficient analysis confirmed that the NSP exerted the strongest direct positive effect (1.045) on seed yield. Furthermore, principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the first four components explained 81.5 % of the total phenotypic variation. These findings demonstrate exploitable genetic variability among mustard genotypes under late-sown stress conditions. Selecting for the NSP and utilising superior heterotic combinations will be highly effective for developing climate-resilient mustard hybrids adapted to delayed sowing environments. Ultimately, deploying these targeted breeding strategies offers a practical pathway to secure crop productivity and stabilise smallholder farm income across late sown rice-mustard cropping systems.

References

  1. 1. Nagaharu U. Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Japan J Bot. 1935;7:389−452.
  2. 2. Bhagat R, Singh M, Sharma BC, Singh G. Influence of sowing date on growth and productivity of rapeseed-mustard: a review. J Oilseed Brassica. 2023;14(1):1−10.
  3. 3. Verma S, Dubey N, Singh KH, Parmar N, Singh L, Sharma D, et al. Utilization of crop wild relatives for biotic and abiotic stress management in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. & Coss.). Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1277922. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1277922
  4. 4. Balai LP, Singh N, Sharma DR. Impact on cluster frontline demonstrations on the productivity of mustard (Brassica juncea). Int J Bio-resour Stress Manag. 2021;12(4):295−302. https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2021.2360
  5. 5. Kumbhare N, Padaria RN, Ahmad N, Joshi P, Punitha P, Singh YP, et al. Status, yield gap and way forward of mustard (Brassica juncea) production in India. Indian J Agric Sci. 2025;95(10):1275−80. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v95i10.168461
  6. 6. Chauhan JS, Singh KH, Singh VV, Kumar S. Hundred years of rapeseed-mustard breeding in India: Accomplishments and future strategies. Indian J Agric Sci. 2011;81(12):1093−109.
  7. 7. Chand S, Prakash Patidar O, Chaudhary R, Saroj R, Chandra K, Kamal Meena V, et al. Rapeseed-mustard breeding in India: Scenario, achievements and research needs. In: Brassica Breeding and Biotechnology. IntechOpen; 2021. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96319
  8. 8. USDA-FAS. Oilseeds and products update: India. New Delhi: United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service; 2023.
  9. 9. Pandey B, Yadav R, Ramawat N, Vishwakarma H, Pandey S. Optimization of sowing dates in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) to combat yield losses caused by high temperature at reproductive stage. Plant Sci Today. 2023;11(1):81−92. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2605
  10. 10. Bikshapathi M, Srinivas A, Rao VP, Reddy MD. Effect of sowing dates on yield and economics of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under different environments. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2021;10(2):2674−80.
  11. 11. Manjunath S, Shakunatala NM, Macha SI, Suma TC, Arun Kumar B. Effect of date of sowing in mustard (Brassica juncea L.) genotypes on seed growth and yield. J Sci Res Rep.2024;30(10):446−64. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i102473
  12. 12. Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad MR. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview. Environ Exp Bot. 2007;61(3):199−223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011
  13. 13. Hatfield JL, Prueger JH. Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim Extrem. 2015;10:4−10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
  14. 14. Rezaei EE, Webber H, Gaiser T, Naab J, Ewert F. Heat stress in cereals: Mechanisms and modelling. Eur J Agron. 2015;64:98−113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2014.10.003
  15. 15. Vyshnavi RG, Samaiya RK, Babbar A, Behera K, Ramakrishnan RS. Evaluating the impact of sowing time on phenology and yield attributes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm accessions under normal and late sown conditions. Int J Bio-resour Stress Manag. 2024;15(3). https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2024.5114
  16. 16. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR). Crop production under climate stress: Strategies for rabi crops in northern India. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research; 2024.
  17. 17. Singh RS, Chaudhary CS, Mukherji U. Effect of date of sowing and crop geometry on yield, oil content and economics of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7:4599−601.
  18. 18. Gupta A, Chauhan S, Tyagi SD, Singh S. Genetic variability, heritability, genetic advance and cluster analysis in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss.) under timely and late sown conditions. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(19):292−301. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i193554
  19. 19. Hayman BI. The analysis of variance of diallel tables. Biometrics.1954;10(2):235−44. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001877
  20. 20. Griffing B. Concept of general and specific combining ability for quantitative traits in plants. Aust J Biol Sci. 1956;9(4):463−93. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9560463
  21. 21. Kempthorne O. An introduction to genetic statistics. John Wiley & Sons; 1957.
  22. 22. Priyamedha, Arun K, Haider ZA, Bhagirath R, Singh VV, Dhiraj S. Estimation of combining ability and heterosis for yield and yield attributing traits in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian J Agric Sci. 2018;88(4):546−52. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i4.79104
  23. 23. Mandal K, Subba V, Dasgupta T, Kundagrami S. Combining ability and heterosis for seed yield and yield components in indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss). Agric Rev. 2023;44(1). https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-2506
  24. 24. Gupta A, Chauhan S, Tyagi SD, Singh S. Combining ability analysis for yield and its components in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss) using half diallel. Int J. 2024;8(9S):376−80. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i9Se.2124
  25. 25. Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. 2nd ed. ICAR Publications; 1985.
  26. 26. Burton GW, DeVane EH. Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) from replicated clonal material. Agron J.1953;45(2):478−81. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1953.00021962004500100005x
  27. 27. Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agron J. 1955;47(7):314−18.
  28. 28. Hanson GH, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. Biometrical studies of yield in segregating populations of Korean lespedeza. I. A general consideration of quantitative genetics in plants. Agron J.1956;48(11):267−71. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1956.00021962004800060008x
  29. 29. Fonseca S, Patterson FL. Hybrid vigor in a seven-parent diallel cross in common winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop Sci. 1968;8(2):85−88. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1968.0011183X000800010025x
  30. 30. Turner JH Jr. A study of heterosis in upland cotton II. Combining ability and inbreeding effects. Agron J. 1953;45(10):487−90.
  31. 31. Dewey DR, Lu KH. A correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agron J.1959;51(9):515−18. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100090002x
  32. 32. Kumar P, Singh RV, Kaushik S, Kumar P, Kumar A, Yadav V, et al. Effect of sowing dates on performance of different mustard varieties (Brassica juncea L.) in Western Uttar Pradesh, India. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2024;36(6):91−98. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i64609
  33. 33. Yadav AP, Ram B, Sharma HK, Yadav BS, Yadav M. Correlation and path analysis in Indian mustard (B. juncea) for morpho-physiological traits in early maturing genotypes. J Oilseed Brassica. 2023;14(2):142−47.
  34. 34. Gupta P, Chaudhary HB, Lal SK. Heterosis and combining ability analysis for yield and its components in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss). Front Agric China. 2010;4(3):299−307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-010-1016-8
  35. 35. Kumar S, Bhardwaj R, Jhambhulkar SJ, Rai A. Assessment of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in Indian mustard (B. juncea). J Oilseed Brassica. 2023;14:38−43.
  36. 36. Choudhary RR, Avtar R, Kajla SL, Ram M, Dhaka B, Poonia MK. Genetic variability and association studies for morpho-physiological traits under timely and late sown conditions in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). J Oilseed Brassica. 2024;15(2):163−71.
  37. 37. Dinda NK, Ray M, Sarkar P. Effect of sowing date vis-a-vis variety of rapeseed and mustard on growth, yield and aphid infestation in gangetic plains of West Bengal. Ecoscan. 2015;9(1 & 2):21−24.
  38. 38. Gogoi B, Kurmi K, Thakuria K, Ojha NJ, Dutta S. Influence of crop management practices on late sown Toria (B. rapa) under rainfed rice-fallow situation of Assam. J Oilseed Brassica. 2017;8:168−74.
  39. 39. Singh SK, Chakrabarty SK, Kumar M, Prakash K, Kumari S. Phenological, growth and yield response of Indian mustard varieties to temperature at various growth stage. Pharma Innov J. 2023;12(1):3114−25.
  40. 40. Alam MM, Begum F, Roy P. Yield and yield attributes of rapeseed mustard (Brassica) genotypes grown under late sown condition. Bangladesh J Agric Res. 2014;39(2):311−36. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v39i2.20434
  41. 41. Saikia VK, Phukan R, Ojah H, Baruna PK, Baruna M, Kalita P. Heterosis and combining ability analysis for seed yield and its attributes in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss). Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2019;8(12):1090−99. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.812.138
  42. 42. Chaurasiya JP, Singh M, Nageshwar. Heterosis response and combining ability (variance and effect) analysis for seed yield and its components in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under timely sown condition. J Oilseeds Res. 2022;39(1). https://doi.org/10.56739/jor.v39i1.137292
  43. 43. Chakraborty S, Gain N, Fatima K, Chowdhury AK, Harun-Ur-Rashid MD, Rahman J. Combining ability and heterosis for early maturity and yield-contributing traits in field mustard (Brassica rapa L.). SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2025;57(2):435−46. http://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2025.57.2.4
  44. 44. Tian HY, Channa SA, Hu SW. Heterotic grouping and the heterotic pattern among Chinese rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) accessions. Agron J. 2015;107(4):1321−30. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj14.0557
  45. 45. Gadi J, Chakraborty NR, Imam Z. Correlation and path analysis for seed yield and its component traits in indian mustard (Brassica Juncea L. Czern and Coss.). Plant Arch. 2025;25(1).
  46. 46. Pal S, Dubey N, Avinashe H, Khan S, Reddy JP. Estimation of genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for yield and yield contributing characters in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2019;8(1S):102−105.
  47. 47. Banerjee H, Chatterjee S, Sarkar S, Gantait S, Samanta S. Evaluation of rapeseed-mustard cultivars under late sown condition in coastal ecosystem of West Bengal. J Appl Nat Sci. 2017;9(2):940.
  48. 48. Roy RK, Kumar A, Kumar S, Kumar A, Kumar RR. Correlation and path analysis in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern and Coss) under late sown condition. Environ Ecol. 2018;36(1):247−54.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.