Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp8 (2026): International Conference On Recent Trends In Smart And Sustainable Agriculture For Food And Nutritional Security (SSAFNS 2025)

Sargassum-derived biostimulant improves drought tolerance and yield performance in Zea mays L.

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.16357
Submitted
26 June 2026
Published
28-09-2026

Abstract

Drought stress, a major constraint in maize (Zea mays L.) productivity around the world. This study assessed the effectiveness of a phosphoric acid (H₃PO₄)-hydrolysed Sargassum-based biostimulant in improving drought tolerance and sustaining maize productivity under water-deficit conditions. A field experiment was conducted during the 2025–26 rabi season at Sakkampatty, Theni District, Tamil Nadu, India, using a randomised block design (RBD) with nine treatments and three replications. Biochemical characterisation of the biostimulant identified phenolics, flavonoids, tannins, terpenoids, phytosterols, carbohydrates, proteins and biologically active functional groups. The biostimulant significantly improved physiological traits, growth, yield attributes and grain yield compared with the drought-stressed control. Among the drought-stressed treatments, application at 3.0 kg ha-1 (T₇) recorded the highest chlorophyll stability index (CSI),
membrane stability index (MSI), relative water content (RWC), proline accumulation, antioxidant enzyme activities and grain yield (39.58 g plant-1), representing an approximately 115 % increase over the drought-stressed control (T₂). These findings suggest that the H₃PO₄-hydrolysed Sargassum biostimulant has potential as an eco-friendly approach for enhancing drought tolerance and sustaining maize productivity under water-limited conditions. Multi-location and multi-season studies are required to validate its effectiveness across diverse agro-climatic conditions.

References

  1. 1. Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil. 2014;383(1-2):3–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8
  2. 2. Craigie JS. Seaweed extract stimuli in plant science and agriculture. J Appl Phycol. 2011;23(3):371–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9560-4
  3. 3. Mukherjee A, Patel JS. Seaweed extract: Biostimulant of plant defense and plant productivity. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2020;17(1):553–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02442-z
  4. 4. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. In: Lichtfouse E, Navarrete M, Debaeke P, Véronique S, Alberola C, editors. Sustainable agriculture. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. p.153–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_12
  5. 5. Lesk C, Rowhani P, Ramankutty N. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature. 2016;529(7584):84–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16467
  6. 6. El Boukhari MEM, Barakate M, Bouhia Y, Lyamlouli K. Trends in seaweed extract-based biostimulants: Manufacturing process and beneficial effects on soil-plant systems. Plants (Basel). 2020;9(3):359. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9030359
  7. 7. Erenstein O, Jaleta M, Sonder K, Mottaleb KA, Prasanna BM. Global maize production, consumption and trade: Trends and R & D implications. Food Secur. 2022;14(5):1295–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01288-7
  8. 8. Holdt SL, Kraan S. Bioactive compounds in seaweed: Functional food applications and legislation. J Appl Phycol. 2011;23(3):543–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9632-5
  9. 9. Jiao G, Yu G, Zhang J, Ewart HS. Chemical structures and bioactivities of sulfated polysaccharides from marine algae. Mar Drugs. 2011;9(2):196–223. https://doi.org/10.3390/md9020196
  10. 10. Arioli T, Mattner SW, Winberg PC. Applications of seaweed extracts in Australian agriculture: Past, present and future. J Appl Phycol. 2015;27(5):2007–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0574-9
  11. 11. Khan W, Rayirath UP, Subramanian S, Jithesh MN, Rayorath P, Hodges DM, et al. Seaweed extracts as biostimulants of plant growth and development. J Plant Growth Regul. 2009;28(4):386–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-009-9103-x
  12. 12. Kadam SU, Tiwari BK, O'Donnell CP. Extraction, structure and biofunctional activities of laminarin from brown algae. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2015;50(1):24–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12692
  13. 13. Sharma HSS, Fleming C, Selby C, Rao JR, Martin T. Plant biostimulants: A review on the processing of macroalgae and use of extracts for crop management to reduce abiotic and biotic stresses. J Appl Phycol. 2014;26(1):465–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-013-0101-9
  14. 14. Marschner H. Marschner's mineral nutrition of higher plants. 3rd ed. London: Academic Press; 2012.
  15. 15. Singleton VL, Rossi JA Jr. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic. 1965;16(3):144–58. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144
  16. 16. Makkar HPS. Quantification of tannins in tree and shrub foliage: A laboratory manual. Dordrecht: Springer; 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0273-7
  17. 17. Chang CC, Yang MH, Wen HM, Chern JC. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J Food Drug Anal. 2002;10(3):178–82. https://doi.org/10.38212/2224-6614.2748
  18. 18. Ghorai N, Chakraborty S, Gucchait S, Saha SK, Biswas S. Estimation of total terpenoids concentration in plant tissues using a monoterpene, linalool, as standard reagent. Nat Protoc Exch. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/protex.2012.055
  19. 19. Harborne JB. Phytochemical methods: A guide to modern techniques of plant analysis. 3rd ed. London: Chapman & Hall; 1998.
  20. 20. DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem. 1956;28(3):350–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
  21. 21. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1–2):248–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
  22. 22. Murphy KS. Modifications of the technique for determination of chlorophyll stability index in relation to studies of drought resistance in rice. Curr Sci. 1962;31:470–1.
  23. 23. Barrs HD, Weatherley PE. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci. 1962;15(3):413–28. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9620413
  24. 24. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39(1):205–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
  25. 25. Premachandra GS, Saneoka H, Kanaya M, Ogata S. Cell membrane stability and leaf surface wax content as affected by increasing water deficits in maize. J Exp Bot. 1991;42(2):167–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/42.2.167
  26. 26. Chance B, Maehly AC. Assay of catalases and peroxidases. In: Colowick SP, Kaplan NO, editors. Methods Enzymol. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press; 1955. p.764–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(55)02300-8
  27. 27. Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans. 1983;11(5):591–2. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0110591
  28. 28. Watson DJ. Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. I. Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties and within and between years. Ann Bot. 1947;11(41):41–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083148
  29. 29. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1984.
  30. 30. Bhattacharyya D, Babgohari MZ, Rathor P, Prithiviraj B. Seaweed extracts as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 2015;196:39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.012
  31. 31. Ali O, Ramsubhag A, Jayaraman J. Biostimulant properties of seaweed extracts in plants: Implications towards sustainable crop production. Plants (Basel). 2021;10(3):531. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030531
  32. 32. Van Oosten MJ, Pepe O, De Pascale S, Silletti S, Maggio A. The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2017;4(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-017-0089-5
  33. 33. Trivedi K, Vijay Anand KG, Kubavat D, Patidar R, Ghosh A. Drought alleviatory potential of Kappaphycus seaweed extract and the role of quaternary ammonium compounds as its constituents towards imparting drought tolerance in Zea mays L. J Appl Phycol. 2018;30(3):2001–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-017-1375-0
  34. 34. Shukla PS, Mantin EG, Adil M, Bajpai S, Critchley AT, Prithiviraj B. Ascophyllum nodosum-based biostimulants: Sustainable applications in agriculture for the stimulation of plant growth, stress tolerance and disease management. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00655

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.