Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Physiological and phenological response of pulses to sowing windows: A review

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.16410
Submitted
29 June 2026
Published
14-09-2026

Abstract

Selection of an appropriate sowing window is a low-cost management decision that regulates the thermal, photoperiod and soil-moisture environmental conditions experienced by pulse crops. This review evaluated how sowing time affects phenology, crop establishment, growth, nodulation, stress exposure, yield formation and grain quality in major pulses. A preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) aligned search of Google Scholar, Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and CAB abstracts covered peer-reviewed studies published during 1990–2026. Of the 258 records identified, 197 remained after duplicate removal, 150 full-text articles were assessed and 63 studies met the inclusion criteria. Sowing within a locally suitable window improves crop establishment, thermal-use efficiency, biomass accumulation, pod set and seed filling by aligning critical growth stages with favourable temperature and soil-moisture conditions. In contrast, sowing too early or delaying sowing can alter crop duration and increase exposure to heat stress, drought, waterlogging, pests and diseases. Responses vary among species and genotypes because thermal thresholds, photoperiod sensitivity and stress tolerance differ. Therefore, optimum sowing recommendations cannot be based on a universal calendar date. Integrating thermal-time indices, rainfall probability, soil-moisture conditions, weather forecasts and cultivar duration can support crop-, genotype- and region-specific sowing decisions. Such adaptive scheduling offers a practical approach to reducing avoidable stress exposure, improving yield stability and strengthening the climate resilience of rainfed and irrigated pulse-production systems.

References

  1. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT: crops and livestock products. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2025.
  2. 2. Government of India, Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. Annual report 2024-25. New Delhi: Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India; 2025.
  3. 3. Rajandran V, Ortega R, Vander Schoor JK, Butler JB, Freeman JS, Hecht VF, et al. Genetic analysis of early phenology in lentil identifies distinct loci controlling component traits. J Exp Bot. 2022;73(12):3963–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erac107
  4. 4. Singh RK, Svystun T, AlDahmash B, Jönsson AM, Bhalerao RP. Photoperiod- and temperature-mediated control of phenology in trees: a molecular perspective. New Phytol. 2017;213(2):511–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14346
  5. 5. Meier U, editor. Growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous plants: BBCH monograph. 2nd ed. Berlin and Braunschweig (Germany): Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry; 2001.
  6. 6. Parida PK, Ray LI, Sirisha K, Ram V, Singh A, Singh N. Performance of blackgram (Vigna mungo) cultivars grown during the pre-monsoon season in Meghalaya. Indian J Hill Farming. 2023;36(1):219–26.
  7. 7. Bera A, Nath R, Banerjee P, Ghosh A, Reja MH. Evaluation of lentil genotypes in different sowing windows in the new alluvial zone of West Bengal. Legume Res. 2024;47(6):911–6. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-5086
  8. 8. Gimenez R, Lake L, Cossani CM, Ortega Martinez R, Hayes JE, Dreccer MF, et al. Linking phenology, harvest index and genetics to improve chickpea grain yield. J Exp Bot. 2025;76(6):1658–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erae487
  9. 9. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  10. 10. Mukherjee B, Naskar MK, Nath R, Atta K, Visha Kumari V, Banerjee P, et al. Growth, nodulation, yield, nitrogen uptake and economics of lentil as influenced by sowing time, tillage and management practices. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2023;7:1151111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1151111
  11. 11. Daba K, Warkentin TD, Bueckert R, Todd CD, Tar'an B. Determination of photoperiod-sensitive phase in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:478. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00478
  12. 12. Tijare B, Chorey A, Bhale V, Kakde S. Phenology and heat unit requirement of summer greengram varieties under different sowing windows. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(4):685–91. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.084
  13. 13. Subbulakshmi S. Effect of early sowing on growth and yield of blackgram varieties under rainfed condition. Int J Agric Sci. 2022;18(1):489–95. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAS/18.1/489-495
  14. 14. Singh L, Chauhan Y, Johansen C, Singh S. Prospects for growing extra-short-duration pigeonpea in rotation with winter crops: proceedings of the workshop and monitoring tour; 1995 Oct 16–18. Patancheru (India): International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics; 1996.
  15. 15. Usha N, Patil S, Nandagavi R, Kiran B. Changes in growth and yield of pigeonpea genotypes under different growing environments. J Farm Sci. 2023;36(1):8–15. https://doi.org/10.61475/jfm.v36i01.334
  16. 16. Maphosa L, Preston A, Richards MF. Effect of sowing date and environment on phenology, growth and yield of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus.) genotypes. Plants (Basel). 2023;12(3):474. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030474
  17. 17. Parihar AK, Hazra KK, Lamichaney A, Gupta DS, Kumar J, Singh AK, et al. Spatial variation and adaptive responses of tall-type field peas (Pisum sativum L.) across Indian subcontinent. Plant Cell Environ. 2025; online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.15450
  18. 18. Talukder AHMMR, Ahmed F, Nahar L. Phenology, growth and yield of chickpea under different sowing windows at central region of Bangladesh. Plant Physiol Soil Chem. 2025;5(1):15–20. https://doi.org/10.26480/ppsc.01.2025.15.20
  19. 19. Sabaridheepa K, Ramanathan S, Kokilavani S, Dheebakaran G, Boomiraj K. Thermal time approach under different sowing windows for greengram. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2022;12(11):2172–6. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i1131209
  20. 20. Sagar A, Mahesh N, Sampath O, Shakher KC. Agronomic evaluation of heat tolerant chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under late sown conditions. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(9):3322–30. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i92585
  21. 21. Chauhan YS, Anwar MR, Richards MF, Ip RH, Luckett DJ, Lake L, et al. Accounting for soil water improves prediction of lentil phenology for improved frost and heat stress management. Eur J Agron. 2025;164:127486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2024.127486
  22. 22. Basu S, Mondal S, Dhakre D, Pramanik K, Datta J, Sen A, et al. Effect of sowing time on phenology, growth and yield across lentil varieties in Lower Gangetic Plains of India. Legume Res. 2026;49(1):95–102. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-5444
  23. 23. Jabbari H, Akbari GA, Sima NAKK, Rad AHS, Alahdadi I, Hamed A, et al. Relationships between seedling establishment and soil moisture content for winter and spring rapeseed genotypes. Ind Crops Prod. 2013;49:177–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.04.036
  24. 24. Jena D, Mohapatra A, Rath B, Baliarsingh A. Assessment of sowing window of rice-pulse cropping system according to the length of growing period and different climatic parameter analysis in Dhenkanal District of Odisha, India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(5):1819–30. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.905.207
  25. 25. Palsaniya S, Puniya R, Sharma A, Bazaya B, Kachroo D. Effect of sowing dates and varieties on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of summer mungbean (Vigna radiata). Indian J Agron. 2016;61(2):256–8. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v61i2.4359
  26. 26. Subbulakshmi S. Performance of rainfed greengram (Vigna radiata L.) under various sowing dates and weed management practices. J Crop Weed. 2021;17(3):225–32. https://doi.org/10.22271/09746315.2021.v17.i3.1514
  27. 27. Gochar PS, Andhale RP, Sinare BT, Wagh RS, Patil MR, Surendra SK, et al. The effect of sowing windows on phenology and heat unit accumulation of summer soybean for seed production. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(12):1278–81.
  28. 28. Ahmed F, Talukder AMR, Mosaddek Ahmed I, Hossain MS, Chaki AK, Zahan T, et al. Optimizing sowing window for mungbean and its adaptation option for the south-central zone of Bangladesh in future climate change scenario using APSIM model. PLOS Clim. 2023;2(7):e0000180. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000180
  29. 29. Haj Sghaier A, Tarnawa Á, Khaeim H, Kovács GP, Gyuricza C, Kende Z. The effects of temperature and water on the seed germination and seedling development of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Plants (Basel). 2022;11(21):2819. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212819
  30. 30. Vignesh HM, Girijesh G, Kumar Naik A, Salimath S, Nandish M. Effect of varieties and sowing windows on the dry matter production, partitioning and yield of chickpea. Int J Adv Biochem Res. 2024;8(10):1408–13. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i10r.2774
  31. 31. Honnaiah PA, Sridhara S, Gopakkali P, Ramesh N, Mahmoud EA, Abdelmohsen SA, et al. Influence of sowing windows and genotypes on growth, radiation interception, conversion efficiency and yield of guar. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(6):3453–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.03.010
  32. 32. Jarecki W, Bobrecka-Jamro D. Effect of sowing date on the yield and seed quality of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). J Elem. 2021;26(1):7–18. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2020.25.4.2054
  33. 33. Sümer FÖ. The effects of different sowing times on the phenological characteristics and seed yield of the pea. Turk J Field Crops. 2023;28(2):301–12. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1391483
  34. 34. Patidar K, Singh T. Effect of varieties and dates of sowing on growth, yield and quality of black gram (Vigna mungo L.). Ann Plant Soil Res. 2018;20(4):428–31.
  35. 35. Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH, Ellis RH. Crop physiology and productivity in the cool season food legumes: recent advances in the measurement and prediction of photothermal effects on flowering. In: Muehlbauer FJ, Kaiser WJ, editors. Expanding the production and use of cool season food legumes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994. p.755–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0798-3_46
  36. 36. Singh G, Kaur H, Aggarwal N, Ram H, Gill K, Khanna V. Symbiotic efficiency, thermal requirement and yield of blackgram (Vigna mungo) genotypes as influenced by sowing time. Indian J Agric Sci. 2013;83:953–8.
  37. 37. Pavithra N, Jayalalitha K, Sujatha T, Harisatyanarayana N, Lakshmi NJ, Roja V. Influence of high temperature stress on morpho-physiological and yield traits of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) genotypes. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2024;14(2):856–66. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i23999
  38. 38. Lamichaney A, Parihar AK, Hazra KK, Dixit GP, Katiyar PK, Singh D, et al. Untangling the influence of heat stress on crop phenology, seed set, seed weight and germination in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:635868. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.635868
  39. 39. Haq M, Ahmed M. Effect of sowing date on growth and yield performance of pea (Pisum sativum L.). J ELT Educ. 2021;4(4):75–9.
  40. 40. Ali M, Aziz M, Sarker M, Mazumder S, Paul S, Mujahidi T, et al. Effect of sowing time based temperature variations on growth, yield and seed quality of garden pea. Bangladesh Agron J. 2016;19(1):29–36. https://doi.org/10.3329/baj.v19i1.29866
  41. 41. Ahmad M, Chattha M, Khan I, Chattha M, Anjum F, Afzal S, et al. Effect of different sowing dates and cultivars on growth and productivity of mungbean crop. J Innov Sci. 2021;7(1):190–8. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.jis/2021/7.1.190.198
  42. 42. Ahmed B, Hasan AK, Karmakar B, Hasan MS, Akter F, Saha PS, et al. Influence of date of sowing on growth and yield performance of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes. Asian Res J Agric. 2020;13(2):26–34. https://doi.org/10.9734/arja/2020/v13i230099
  43. 43. Vocanson A, Roger-Estrade J, Boizard H, Jeuffroy MH. Effects of soil structure on pea (Pisum sativum L.) root development according to sowing date and cultivar. Plant Soil. 2006;281(1):121–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-3938-0
  44. 44. Kumar K, Kumar R. Effect of different dates of sowing on growth, yield attributes and yield of various cultivars of kharif blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) under Amritsar conditions. Agric Sci Dig. 2022;42(1):84–7. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.D-5297
  45. 45. Banerjee P, Mukherjee B, Venugopalan VK, Nath R, Chandran MAS, Dessoky ES, et al. Thermal response of spring-summer-grown black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) in Indian subtropics. Atmosphere (Basel). 2021;12(11):1489. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12111489
  46. 46. Singh G, Ram H, Sekhon H, Gill K, Khanna V. Effect of time of planting on nodulation, growth and seed yield of kharif urdbean genotypes. J Food Legumes. 2012;25(2):125–7.
  47. 47. Banerjee P, Venugopalan VK, Nath R, Althobaiti YS, Gaber A, Al-Yasi H, et al. Physiology, growth and productivity of spring-summer black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) as influenced by heat and moisture stresses in different dates of sowing and nutrient management conditions. Agronomy (Basel). 2021;11(11):2329. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112329
  48. 48. Subbulakshmi S, Sudhakar G, Rao AS, Bal SK, Baskar K. Performance of mungbean (Vigna radiata) genotypes to different sowing dates under varied weather rainfed conditions. In: Proceedings of the Virtual National Conference on Strategic Reorientation for Climate Smart Agriculture (V-AGMET 2021). Vol. 3; 2021.
  49. 49. Gupta V, Shrivastava GK, Yadav R, Deewan SK, Krishna, Ekka S. Effect of date of sowing and genotypes on productivity and profitability of urdbean (Vigna mungo L.). Int J Res Agron. 2024;7(9):341–7. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2024.v7.i9e.1530
  50. 50. Miah M, Anwar M, Begum M, Juraimi AS, Islam M. Influence of sowing date on growth and yield of summer mungbean varieties. J Agric Soc Sci. 2009;5(3):73–6.
  51. 51. Marimuthu S, Byrareddy VM, Dhanalakshmi A, Mushtaq S, Surendran U. Strategic cultivar and sowing time selection for weed management and higher redgram productivity in semi-arid Indian regions. Front Environ Sci. 2024;12:1420078. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1420078
  52. 52. Guilioni L, Wéry J, Lecoeur J. High temperature and water deficit may reduce seed number in field pea purely by decreasing plant growth rate. Funct Plant Biol. 2003;30(11):1151–64. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP03105
  53. 53. Choukri H, El Haddad N, Aloui K, Hejjaoui K, El-Baouchi A, Smouni A, et al. Effect of high temperature stress during the reproductive stage on grain yield and nutritional quality of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus). Front Nutr. 2022;9:857469. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.857469
  54. 54. Ram H, Singh G, Sekhon H, Khanna V. Effect of sowing time on the performance of pigeonpea genotypes. J Food Legumes. 2011;24(3):207–10.
  55. 55. Subbulakshmi S. Influence of sowing dates on yield of black gram varieties under rainfed condition. J Crop Weed. 2021;17(3):41–6. https://doi.org/10.22271/09746315.2021.v17.i3.1489
  56. 56. Nam N, Chauhan Y, Johansen C. Effect of timing of drought stress on growth and grain yield of extra-short-duration pigeonpea lines. J Agric Sci. 2001;136(2):179–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859601008607
  57. 57. Kumar A, Kumar N, Devi S, Dhaka AK, Khokhar S. Physiology and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes in response to different sowing dates in semi-arid regions of North India. Legume Res. 2023;46(7):843–8. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-5108
  58. 58. Duhan S, Sheokand S, Kumari A, Sharma N. Independent and interactive effects of waterlogging and salinity on carbohydrate metabolism and root anatomy in pigeonpea genotypes at different growth stages. Indian J Agric Res. 2017;51(3):197–205. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijare.v51i03.7907
  59. 59. Dobhal P, Maurya R, Bhatnagar V, Brijwal L. Effect of different dates of sowing on dynamics of insect pests of pigeonpea in Tarai region of Uttarakhand. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2018;6(6):513–8.
  60. 60. Panickar B, Patel M, Patel R. Impact of date of sowing and weather parameters on insect pests infesting summer mungbean. Environ Ecol. 2023;41(4C):2832–7. https://doi.org/10.60151/envec/HYGF4397
  61. 61. Rashid MH, Aktar MS, Hossain I, Rahman MM, Hasnat MR, Nair R. Effect of dates of sowing on incidence and severity of mungbean yellow mosaic virus and Cercospora leaf spot of mungbean. Int J Adv Res Technol. 2013;2(9):96–105.
  62. 62. Tupe A, Chorey A, Ganvir M, Patode R, Morey S, Gawai P, et al. Agrometeorological assessment of thermal indices, phenology and canopy temperature dynamics in green gram under different sowing windows and varieties. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2026;16(3):393–402. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2026/v16i35340
  63. 63. Sandya NR, Dujeshwer K, Nandhini Y, Singh RS. Enhancing productivity, nutrient uptake and weed pressure reduction in short-duration pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) through optimum sowing window and integrated weed management. Discover Plants. 2026;3(1):220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00712-y

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.