Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp9 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Principal component analysis of factors influencing livelihood transformation among Flue-Cured Virginia tobacco farmers in Andhra Pradesh

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.16626
Submitted
7 July 2026
Published
26-10-2026

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the underlying perceived significant dimensions of factors linked with livelihood transformation among Flue-Cured Virginia (FCV) tobacco farmers in the Northern Light Soil (NLS) region of Andhra Pradesh. Understanding these latent factors is essential for designing integrated interventions that enhance livelihood resilience. A multistage sampling technique was employed to select 210 FCV tobacco farmers from five auction floors covering 35 villages in the NLS region of Andhra Pradesh. Principal component analysis (PCA) with Varimax rotation was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 16.0 to identify the underlying factor structure. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure (0.87) and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity (χ² = 4293.0, p < 0.001) confirmed the suitability of the data for factor analysis. Five principal components with eigenvalues greater than one were extracted, accounting for 79.51% of the total variance. The extracted dimensions were crop choice, financial and risk, institutional and governance, market and price and technology and innovation. Crop choice drivers explained the highest proportion of rotated variance (16.41 %), followed by financial and risk (16.12%), institutional & governance (15.98 %), market & price (15.71 %) and technology and innovation (15.26 %). Institutional credit (F₁) (loading = 0.91), profitability (C₁) (0.90), extension services (I₂) (0.90), better price realization (M₃) (0.88) and field demonstrations (T₄) (0.88) emerged as the strongest indicators. The findings, provide empirical evidence for policymakers, extension agencies and development organisations to formulate integrated livelihood enhancement strategies. This study offers a comprehensive empirical assessment of the perceived factors linked with livelihood transformation among FCV tobacco farmers using PCA.

References

  1. 1. Chambers R, Conway GR. Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper No. 296. Brighton (UK): Institute of Development Studies; 1992.
  2. 2. Scoones I. Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper No. 72. Brighton (UK): Institute of Development Studies; 1998.
  3. 3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The state of food and agriculture 2022. Rome (Italy): Food and Agriculture Organization; 2022.
  4. 4. Serrat O. The sustainable livelihoods approach. In: Knowledge solutions: tools, methods and approaches to drive organizational performance. Singapore: Springer; 2022.
  5. 5. United Nations Development Programme. Human development report 2023/2024: breaking the gridlock—reimagining cooperation in a polarized world. New York: United Nations Development Programme; 2023.
  6. 6. Singh G, Sharma LK, Behuria PR, Shibani. Identifying key determinants of pulse crop productivity in Jammu region using principal component analysis. Plant Sci Today. 2025;12(1):2348–1900.
  7. 7. He Y, Ahmed T. Farmers' livelihood capital and its impact on sustainable livelihood strategies: evidence from the poverty-stricken areas of Southwest China. Sustainability. 2022;14(9):4955. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14094955
  8. 8. Yang A, Ye J, Wang Y. Coupling and coordination relationship between livelihood capital and livelihood stability of farmers in different agricultural regions. Land. 2022;11(11):2049. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11112049
  9. 9. Hema B, Sheshu Madhav M, Jyothi V, Prasad LK, Subbaiah Y, Sravya V, et al. Livelihood dynamics of tobacco farmers: a review based on the sustainable livelihood framework. Int J Agric Ext Soc Dev. 2026;9(6):744–53. https://doi.org/10.33545/26180723.2026.v9.i6j.3766
  10. 10. Department for International Development. Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. London: Department for International Development; 1999.
  11. 11. Aguilar FX, Hendrawan D, Cai Z, Roshetko JM, Stallmann JI. Smallholder farmer resilience to water scarcity: the role of adaptive capacity and livelihood diversification. Environ Dev Sustain. 2022;24(2):2543–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01545-3
  12. 12. Rahut DB, Mottaleb KA, Ali A. Rural livelihood diversification strategies and household welfare in Bhutan. Eur J Dev Res. 2018;30(4):718–48. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0120-5
  13. 13. Wang X, Liu Y, Chen H. Institutional support and rural livelihood sustainability: evidence from developing economies. Sustainability.2023;15(4):3256. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310246
  14. 14. Ellis F. Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198296959.001.0001
  15. 15. Barrett CB, Reardon T, Webb P. Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa. Food Policy. 2001;26(4):315–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(01)00014-8
  16. 16. Habib N, Ariyawardana A, Aziz AA. The influence of livelihood capitals on livelihood diversification strategies: a systematic literature review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2023;30(27):69882–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27638-2
  17. 17. Tobacco Board of India. Annual report 2022–23. Guntur (India): Tobacco Board, Ministry of Commerce and Industry; 2023.
  18. 18. Government of India. Agricultural statistics at a glance 2024. New Delhi (India): Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare; 2024.
  19. 19. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT statistical database. Rome (Italy): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2024.
  20. 20. Pitombo CS, Kawamoto E, Sousa AJ. An exploratory analysis of relationships between socioeconomic, land use, activity participation variables and travel patterns. Transp Policy.2011;18(2):347–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.10.010
  21. 21. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 9th ed. Boston (MA): Cengage Learning; 2022.
  22. 22. Ramilan T, Kumar S, Haileslassie A, Craufurd P, Scrimgeour F, Kattarkandi B, et al. Quantifying farm household resilience and livelihood heterogeneity in the semi-arid tropics of India. Agriculture.2022;12(4):466. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12040466
  23. 23. Kumar P, Chand R. Applications of principal component analysis in agricultural and socio-economic research. Indian J Agric Econ. 2004;59(2):303–15.
  24. 24. Jolliffe IT, Cadima J. Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016;374(2065):20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
  25. 25. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 8th ed. Boston (MA): Cengage Learning; 2019.
  26. 26. Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: a step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. 8th ed. London (UK): McGraw-Hill Education; 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117445
  27. 27. Maurya AS, Yadav B, Narain S, Supriya, Kumar A. Socio-economic determinants of agricultural households in Punjab: a principal component analysis. Indian J Ext Educ. 2026;62(1):41–7. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2026.62107
  28. 28. Thompson B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: understanding concepts and applications. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2004. https://doi.org/10.1037/10694-000
  29. 29. Knekta E, Runyon C, Eddy S. One size doesn't fit all: using factor analysis to gather validity evidence when using surveys in your research. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019;18(1):rM₁. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064
  30. 30. Pareek J, Jacob J. Data compression and visualization using PCA and T-SNE. In: Goar V, Kuri M, Kumar R, Senjyu T, editors. Advances in information communication technology and computing: proceedings of AICTC 2019. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 327–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5421-6_34
  31. 31. Kyriazos T, Poga M. Dealing with multicollinearity in factor analysis: the problem, detections and solutions. Open J Stat.2023;13(3):404–24. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2023.133020
  32. 32. Kaiser HF. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1958;23(3):187–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289233
  33. 33. Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39(1):31–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
  34. 34. Bartlett MS. A note on the multiplying factors for various chi-square approximations. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1954;16(2):296–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1954.tb00174.x
  35. 35. Demšar U, Harris P, Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, McLoone S. Principal component analysis on spatial data: an overview. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2013;103(1):106–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.689236
  36. 36. Schreiber JB. Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021;17(5):1004–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.027
  37. 37. Sigudla J, Maritz JE. Exploratory factor analysis of constructs used for investigating research uptake for public healthcare practice and policy in a resource-limited setting, South Africa. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):1423. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10165-8
  38. 38. Watkins MW. A step-by-step guide to exploratory factor analysis with SPSS. New York (NY): Routledge; 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003149347
  39. 39. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. Boston (MA): Pearson Education; 2013.
  40. 40. Yong AG, Pearce S. A beginner's guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2013;9(2):79–94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
  41. 41. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2015.
  42. 42. Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2005;10(7):1–9.
  43. 43. Serrat O. Knowledge solutions: tools, methods and approaches to drive organizational performance. Singapore: Springer; 2017.
  44. 44. Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20(1):141–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
  45. 45. Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966;1(2):245–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
  46. 46. Pingali PL, Rosegrant MW. Agricultural commercialization and diversification: processes and policies. Food Policy. 1995;20(3):171–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9192(95)00012-4
  47. 47. Hazell P, Wood S. Drivers of change in global agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363(1491):495–515. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2166
  48. 48. Birthal PS, Negi DS, Jha AK, Singh D. Income sources of farm households in India: determinants, distributional consequences and policy implications. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2014;27(1):37–48. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0974-0279.27.1.003
  49. 49. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The state of food and agriculture 2021: making agrifood systems more resilient to shocks and stresses. Rome (Italy): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2021.
  50. 50. World Bank. World development report 2023: migrants, refugees and societies. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2023.
  51. 51. Kaur J, Prusty AK, Ravisankar N, Panwar AS, Shamim M, Walia SS, et al. Farm typology for planning targeted farming systems interventions for smallholders in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):20978. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00372-w
  52. 52. Innazent A, Jacob D, Bindhu JS, Joseph B, Anith KN, Ravisankar N, et al. Farm typology of smallholders integrated farming systems in Southern Coastal Plains of Kerala, India. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):333. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04148-0
  53. 53. Kumar A, Mishra AK, Saroj S, Joshi PK. Institutional versus non-institutional credit to agricultural households in India: evidence on impact from a national farmers’ survey. Econ Syst. 2017;41(3):420–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.10.005
  54. 54. Varshney D, Joshi PK, Kumar A, Mishra AK, Dubey SK. Examining the transfer of knowledge and training to smallholders in India: direct and spillover effects of agricultural advisory services in an emerging economy. World Dev. 2022;160:106067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106067
  55. 55. Negi DS, Birthal PS, Roy D, Khan MT. Farmers’ choice of market channels and producer prices in India: role of transportation and communication networks. Food Policy. 2018;81:106–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.10.008

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.