Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Early Access

Pollination bottlenecks in glory lily (Gloriosa superba L., Colchicaceae): Implications for reproductive success and conservation

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.16653
Submitted
8 July 2026
Published
17-10-2026

Abstract

Gloriosa superba L. (Colchicaceae), a tuberous geophyte of tropical Africa and Asia and the principal commercial source of colchicine, depends on biotic vectors for seed production. Its floral architecture enforces outcrossing: a trifid stigma on a style deflexed at 90° to the ovary, six radiating exserted stamens and a pollen-to-ovule ratio of 58333 : 1 together produce approach herkogamy and a predominantly xenogamous breeding system. This review applies a pollination bottleneck framework to the species, tracing sequential constraints on reproduction and distinguishing those demonstrated empirically from those inferred from comparable taxa. Fifty-nine sources retained from a structured search of five databases were assigned to four evidence tiers. Pollen delivery, rather than stigma availability, emerges as the binding constraint: stigmas remain receptive for 3–4 days while viable pollen persists for hours and comparative experiments show fruit set rising from 59.55 % under open pollination to 80.94 % under blower-assisted and 87.31 % under hand pollination. The deficit extends to seed quality, with hand-pollinated seed attaining 54 % germination and a vigour index of 1252. Although assessed globally as least concern (LC), the species is subject to documented regional depletion, with some 75 % of raw material demand being met from wild collection. Mitigation options nonetheless exist: supplemental hand- and blower-assisted pollination, pollen cryopreservation to widen the transfer window, assisted gene flow between characterised ecotypes and cultivation substitution together offer a practical route to improving reproductive output and maintaining genetic diversity. Density thresholds, isolation effects, phenological mismatch and floral volatile chemistry remain inferred rather than demonstrated and are identified as research priorities.

References

  1. 1. Bogler DJ, Pires JC, Francisco-Ortega J. Phylogeny of Agavaceae based on ndhF, rbcL and ITS sequences: implications of molecular data for classification. Aliso. 2006;22:313–28. https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.20062201.26
  2. 2. Christopher DA, Mitchell RJ, Karron JD. Pollination intensity and paternity in flowering plants. Ann Bot. 2020;125(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcz159
  3. 3. Ashman TL, Knight TM, Steets JA, Amarasekare P, Burd M, Campbell DR, et al. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology. 2004;85(9):2408–21. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-8024
  4. 4. Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25(6):345–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007
  5. 5. Goulson D, Nicholls E, Botías C, Rotheray EL. Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides and lack of flowers. Science. 2015;347(6229):1255957. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255957
  6. 6. Vanbergen AJ, Insect pollinators initiative. Threats to an ecosystem service: pressures on pollinators. Front Ecol Environ. 2013;11(5):251–9. https://doi.org/10.1890/120126
  7. 7. Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M, Ohlemüller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, et al. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science. 2006;313(5785):351–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127863
  8. 8. Contu S. Gloriosa superba. The IUCN red list of threatened species. 2013:e.T44393073A44403733.
  9. 9. Jana S, Shekhawat GS. Critical review on medicinally potent plant species: Gloriosa superba. Fitoterapia. 2011;82(3):293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2010.11.008
  10. 10. Padmapriya S, Rajamani K, Sathiyamurthy VA. Glory lily (Gloriosa superba L.) - a review. Int J Curr Pharm Rev Res. 2015;7(1):43–9.
  11. 11. Daniels RJ, Johnson SD, Peter CI. Flower orientation in Gloriosa superba (Colchicaceae) promotes cross-pollination via butterfly wings. Ann Bot. 2020;125(7):1137–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaa048
  12. 12. Tiwari P, Uniyal PL, Chaudhary E. Effect of sucrose on in vitro pollen germination of Gloriosa superba L. - a medicinal plant from the Garhwal Himalaya, India. Environ Conserv J. 2017;18(1–2):183–7. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2017.181225
  13. 13. Rani P, Thakur RK, Sharma YP. Floral biology vis-à-vis pollination ecology of glory lily Gloriosa superba L. Indian J Entomol. 2026;88(2):453–8. https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2025.2378
  14. 14. Yadav K, Aggarwal A, Singh N. Actions for ex situ conservation of Gloriosa superba L. - an endangered ornamental cum medicinal plant. J Crop Sci Biotechnol. 2012;15(4):297–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-012-0045-7
  15. 15. Aronne G. Identification of bottlenecks in the plant life cycle for sustainable conservation of rare and endangered species. Front Ecol Evol. 2017;5:76. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00076
  16. 16. Ade R, Rai MK. Current advances in Gloriosa superba L. Biodiversitas. 2009;10(4):210–4. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d100409
  17. 17. Maroyi A, van der Maesen LJG. Gloriosa superba L. (family Colchicaceae): remedy or poison? J Med Plants Res. 2011;5(26):6112–21. https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPR11.913
  18. 18. Rani P, Thakur RK, Sharma YP, Thakur M, Waseem MA, Soni K, et al. Pollination ecology and flowering rhythm of Gloriosa superba L.: behavioural insights into principal pollinators. Plant Sci Today. 2025;12(2):1–8.
  19. 19. Sahana KS, Gnanam R, Rajesh S, Rajamani K. Evaluation of genetic diversity in Gloriosa superba L., an endangered medicinal plant, using molecular markers. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(6):2125–34. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.806.252
  20. 20. Rajasekharan PE, Rohini MR, Harsha R, Anilkumar GS. Pollen cryopreservation protocol for Gloriosa superba L. In: Pollen cryopreservation protocols. New York: Springer; 2023. p. 383–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2843-0_33
  21. 21. Jaeger S, Freedman M, Alexander C, Hilpman E, Weber M, LoPresti E. Increased reliance on diurnal pollination in a geographically and morphologically atypical sand verbena. J Pollinat Ecol. 2025;38:58–75. https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2025)824
  22. 22. Johnson SD. Butterfly pollination in Platycoryne (Orchidaceae): evidence for a key pollinator shift in the large Habenaria clade. Plant Syst Evol. 2024;310(4):21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-024-01895-1
  23. 23. Sudarjat S, Bari IN, Supratman U. Identification of volatile compounds of oil palm flower (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry based on the difference in time. Indones J Chem. 2023;23(4). https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.78682
  24. 24. Vereecken NJ, Dafni A, Cozzolino S. Pollination syndromes in Mediterranean orchids - implications for speciation, taxonomy and conservation. Bot Rev. 2010;76(2):220–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-010-9049-5
  25. 25. le Roux LG, Robbertse PJ. Aspects relating to seed production in Gloriosa superba L. S Afr J Bot. 1997;63(4):191–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-6299(15)30743-2
  26. 26. Gérard M, Vanderplanck M, Wood T, Michez D. Global warming and plant–pollinator mismatches. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2020;4(1):77–86. https://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20190139
  27. 27. Mayer C, Adler L, Armbruster WS, Dafni A, Eardley C, Huang SQ, et al. Pollination ecology in the 21st century: key questions for future research. J Pollinat Ecol. 2011;3:8–23. https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2011)1
  28. 28. Chen M, Zuo XA. Effect of pollen limitation and pollinator visitation on pollination success of Haloxylon ammodendron (C.A. Mey.) Bunge in fragmented habitats. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00327
  29. 29. Forsyth SA. Density-dependent seed set in the Haleakala silversword: evidence for an Allee effect. Oecologia. 2003;136(4):551–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1295-3
  30. 30. Patrício-Roberto GB, Campos MJO. Aspects of landscape and pollinators — what is important to bee conservation? Diversity. 2014;6(1):158–75. https://doi.org/10.3390/d6010158
  31. 31. Hadley AS, Betts MG. The effects of landscape fragmentation on pollination dynamics: absence of evidence not evidence of absence. Biol Rev. 2012;87(3):526–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00205.x
  32. 32. Chen M, Zhao XY, Zuo XA, Wang SK, Qu H, Ping Y, et al. Comparative effects of pollen limitation, floral traits and pollinators on reproductive success of Hedysarum scoparium Fisch. et Mey. in different habitats. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):426. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03211-2
  33. 33. Morgan JW, Meyer MJ, Young AG. Severe habitat fragmentation leads to declines in genetic variation, mate availability and reproductive success in small populations of a once-common Australian grassland daisy. Int J Plant Sci. 2013;174(9):1209–18. https://doi.org/10.1086/673242
  34. 34. Lepcha P. Climate change and its impact on mountainous plant species: a review. In: Sustainable forest management - surpassing climate change and land degradation. London: IntechOpen;2024. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1004445
  35. 35. Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Mougal J, Whittington AE, Valentin T, Gabriel R, Olesen JM, et al. Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function. Nature. 2017;542(7640):223–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21071
  36. 36. Valido A, Rodríguez-Rodríguez MC, Jordano P. Honeybees disrupt the structure and functionality of plant–pollinator networks. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4711. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41271-5
  37. 37. Hung KLJ, Kingston JM, Albrecht M, Holway DA, Kohn JR. The worldwide importance of honey bees as pollinators in natural habitats. Proc Biol Sci. 2018;285(1870):20172140. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2140
  38. 38. Day Briggs S, Anderson JT. The effect of global change on the expression and evolution of floral traits. Ann Bot. 2025;135(1–2):9–24.
  39. 39. Winfree R, Aguilar R, Vázquez DP, LeBuhn G, Aizen MA. A meta-analysis of bees' responses to anthropogenic disturbance. Ecology. 2009;90(8):2068–76. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1245.1
  40. 40. Henry M, Béguin M, Requier F, Rollin O, Odoux JF, Aupinel P, et al. A common pesticide decreases foraging success and survival in honey bees. Science. 2012;336(6079):348–50. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215039
  41. 41. Stanley DA, Garratt MPD, Wickens JB, Wickens VJ, Potts SG, Raine NE. Neonicotinoid pesticide exposure impairs crop pollination services provided by bumblebees. Nature. 2015;528(7583):548–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16167
  42. 42. Whitehorn PR, O'Connor S, Wäckers FL, Goulson D. Neonicotinoid pesticide reduces bumble bee colony growth and queen production. Science. 2012;336(6079):351–2. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215025
  43. 43. Knop E, Zoller L, Ryser R, Gerpe C, Hörler M, Fontaine C. Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination. Nature. 2017;548(7666):206–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23288
  44. 44. Verma S, Sofi II, Ganie AH, Shah MA, Sharma N. Meiotic behavior and its impact on sexual reproductive output in Gloriosa superba L. from Siwalik sub-Himalayan range of J&K, India. Cytologia. 2025;90(3):179–86. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.90.179
  45. 45. Mahajan YA, Shinde BA, Torris A, Gade AB, Patil VS, John CK, et al. Pre-sowing treatments, seed components and water imbibition aids seed germination of Gloriosa superba. Seeds. 2023;2(1):15–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds2010002
  46. 46. Venudevan B, Sundareswaran S, Vijayakumar A, Rajamani K. Studies on improving seed set and quality in glory lily through pollination methods. Madras Agric J. 2011;98(1–3):33–5. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.100236
  47. 47. Jasmine JP, Balakrishnan V. Intraspecific analysis of Gloriosa superba (L.) through ISSR fingerprinting and DNA sequencing of ecotypes collected from different accessions of Tamil Nadu State, India. Res Plant Biol. 2018;8:17–21. https://doi.org/10.25081/ripb.2018.v8.3600
  48. 48. Rajagopal C, Kandhasamy R. Assessment of genetic diversity of Gloriosa superba L. accessions detected by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. J Med Plants Res. 2013;7(28):2122–7. https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPR12.805
  49. 49. Mahajan YA, Shinde BA, Mulani FA, Gade AB, Kasodekar AK, Thulasiram HV, et al. Diversity assessment of Gloriosa superba accessions from Western Ghats of India based on morphological traits, ISSR markers and metabolite content. J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants. 2022;30:100388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2022.100388
  50. 50. Selvarasu A, Kandhasamy R. Intraspecific hybridization in glory lily. Floric Ornam Biotechnol. 2013;7(1):99–102.
  51. 51. Das M, Sahu SP, Tiwari A. De novo transcriptome assembly and mining of EST-SSR markers in Gloriosa superba. J Genet. 2020;99(1):77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-020-01235-5
  52. 52. Paudel S, Bhandari S, Upadhaya S. Agroforestry for pollinator support and food security: a review. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2025;9:1703823. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1703823
  53. 53. Arumugam A, Gopinath K. In vitro micropropagation using corm bud explants: an endangered medicinal plant of Gloriosa superba L. Asian J Biotechnol. 2012;4(3):120–8. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajbkr.2012.120.128
  54. 54. Mosoh DA, Khandel AK, Verma SK, Vendrame WA. Optimizing callus induction and indirect organogenesis in non-dormant corm explants of Gloriosa superba (L.) via media priming. Front Hortic. 2024;3:1378098. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhort.2024.1378098
  55. 55. Sivakumar G, Krishnamurthy KV, Rajendran TD. Embryoidogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf tissue of Gloriosa superba. Planta Med. 2003;69(5):479–81. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-39700
  56. 56. Mosoh DA, Prakash O, Khandel AK, Vendrame WA. Preserving earth's flora in the 21st century: climate, biodiversity and global change factors since the mid-1940s. Front Conserv Sci. 2024;5:1383370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2024.1383370
  57. 57. Klein AM, Vaissière BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc Biol Sci. 2007;274(1608):303–13. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3721
  58. 58. Khalifa SAM, Elshafiey EH, Shetaia AA, El-Wahed AAA, Algethami AF, Musharraf SG, et al. Overview of bee pollination and its economic value for crop production. Insects.2021;12(8):688. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080688
  59. 59. IPBES. Summary for policymakers of the assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production. Bonn: IPBES Secretariat; 2016.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.