Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp9 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Vertical distribution of soil weed seed banks and comparison of seed bank estimation methods in a tropical agroecosystem

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.17119
Submitted
30 July 2026
Published
31-10-2026

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the wet sieve extraction (direct count) and seedling emergence methods for quantifying and characterising soil weed banks across three depth increments in a tropical agroecosystem. Soil seed banks are critical reservoirs of weed propagules, yet accurate and reliable assessment remains methodologically challenging. Both methods were evaluated across soil depths of 0–10, 10–20 and 20–30 cm using a completely randomised design with 10 replicates at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. Wet sieving recovered far more seeds (310, 239 and 73 seeds per sample) than emergence (39, 19 and 12 seedlings per sample), with both methods showing significant depth declines (p < 0.001). Five weed taxa were recorded, namely Portulaca oleracea L., Amaranthus spp., Trianthema portulacastrum L., Echinochloa spp. and Dinebra spp. Wet sieving was appeared to be more effective in recovering the overall seed population, whereas the seedling emergence approach appeared more useful for identifying a wider range of species, particularly grasses. The combined use of both methods may therefore provide complementary information for preliminary assessment of soil weed seed banks under tropical conditions.

References

  1. 1. Kumar S, Rana S, Hetta G, Rana N. Understanding and managing weed seed banks: a review. Agric Rev. 2022. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.R-2401
  2. 2. Chauhan B. Grand challenges in weed management. Front Agron. 2020;1:3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2019.00003
  3. 3. Mesgaran M, Mashhadi H, Zand E, Alizadeh H. Comparison of three methodologies for efficient seed extraction in studies of soil weed seedbanks. Weed Res. 2007;47:472–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2007.00592.x
  4. 4. Gross KL. A comparison of methods for estimating soil seed banks. J Ecol. 1990;78:1079–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/2260953
  5. 5. Padonou E, Akakpo B, Tchigossou B, Djossa B. Methods of soil seed bank estimation: a literature review proposing further work in Africa. iForest. 2022;15(2):121–7. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3850-015
  6. 6. Kalamees R, Zobel M. The role of the seed bank in gap regeneration in a calcareous grassland community. Ecology. 2002;83(4):1017–25. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1017:TROTSB]2.0.CO;2
  7. 7. Espeland E, Perkins L, Leger E. Comparison of seed bank estimation techniques using six weed species in two soil types. Rangeland Ecol Manag. 2010;63(2):243–7. https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-09-00109.1
  8. 8. Kildisheva OA, Dixon KW, Silveira FAO, Chapman T, Di Sacco A, Mondoni A, et al. Dormancy and germination: Making every seed count in restoration. Restor Ecol. 2020;28(S3)–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13140
  9. 9. Klupczyńska E, Pawłowski T. Regulation of seed dormancy and germination mechanisms in a changing environment. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:1357. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031357
  10. 10. Forcella F, Wilson R, Dekker J, Kremer R, Cardina J, Anderson R, et al. Weed seed bank emergence across the Corn Belt. Weed Sci. 1997;45:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500092493
  11. 11. Konstantinović B, Meseldžija M, Korać M, Konstantinovic B. Study of weed seedbank in soybean crop. Afr J Agric Res. 2011;6(10):2316–20.
  12. 12. Martin AC, Barkley WD. Seed Identification Manual. University of California Press; 2023. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.8500978
  13. 13. Heerdt Gt, Bekker RM, Bakker JP, Verweij GL. An improved method for seed-bank analysis: seedling emergence after removing the soil by sieving. Funct Ecol. 1996;10:144–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390273
  14. 14. Baskin C, Baskin JM. Seed Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. 2nd ed. San Diego: Elsevier/Academic Press; 2014. 1–1586 p.
  15. 15. Fenner M, Thompson K. The Ecology of Seeds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614101
  16. 16. Buhler DD, Robert GH, Forcella F. Implications of weed seedbank dynamics to weed management. Weed Sci. 1997;45(3):329–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500092948
  17. 17. Benvenuti S. Weed seed movement and dispersal strategies in the agricultural environment. Weed Biol Manag. 2007;7(3):141–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2007.00249.x
  18. 18. Forcella F, Webster TM, Cardina J. Protocols for weed seedbank determination in agroecosystems. In: Labrada R, editor. Weed Management for Developing Countries, Addendum 1. Rome: FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper; 2003. p. 3–18.
  19. 19. Cardina JA, Sparrow DH. A comparison of methods to predict weed seedling populations from the soil seedbank. Weed Sci. 1996;44:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004317450009353X
  20. 20. Hoste I, Verloove F. Taxonomy of the weed species of the genus Echinochloa (Poaceae, Paniceae) in southwestern Europe: exploring the confused current state of affairs. PhytoKeys.2022;197:1–31. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.197.79499

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.