Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Role of herbivore-induced plant volatiles from Cnaphalocrocis medinalis infested rice genotypes in mediating host-location behaviour of the larval ectoparasitoid, Habrobracon hebetor

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.17473
Submitted
16 August 2026
Published
03-11-2026

Abstract

Herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) are critical mediators of tritrophic interactions, providing parasitoids with reliable cues for host location and parasitisation. This study investigated whether HIPVs emitted by rice infested (I) with the rice leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee), affect the olfactory perception and behavioural responses of its larval parasitoid, Habrobracon hebetor (Say). Volatiles were collected from six rice genotypes (three resistant and three susceptible), each with three biological replicates. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) identified 37 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in uninfested (U) and C. medinalis-I. plants across all genotypes. Uninfested plants served as the baseline for comparing infestation-related changes in volatile profiles. The antennal perception of female H. hebetor in response to VOCs from C. medinalis-I. rice plants was assessed using gas chromatography–electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD). Ten common VOCs consistently elicited antennal depolarisation across both resistant and susceptible genotypes. These compounds were subsequently evaluated for behavioural responses in female H. hebetor using a Y-tube olfactometer. β-ocimene, β-caryophyllene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene, (R)-limonene, methyl jasmonate and methyl salicylate elicited positive orientation while xylene elicited significant avoidance in female H. hebetor. These findings demonstrate that individual HIPVs from C. medinalis-I. rice genotypes produce distinct behavioural effects on H. hebetor under controlled conditions. The study offers valuable insights into the identification of potential host-location cues for H. hebetor, which may contribute to the sustainable management of C. medinalis, warranting further validation in ecologically relevant volatile blends and field trials.

References

  1. 1. Bandumula N. Rice production in Asia: key to global food security. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci. 2018;88(4):1323–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-017-0867-7
  2. 2. Bin Rahman AR, Zhang J. Trends in rice research: 2030 and beyond. Food Energy Secur. 2023;12(2):e390. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.390
  3. 3. Padmavathi C, Katti G, Padmakumari AP, Voleti SR, Subba Rao LV. The effect of leaffolder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) injury on plant physiology and yield loss in rice. J Appl Entomol. 2013;137(4):249–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2012.01741.x
  4. 4. Adhikari B, Mohapatra LN, Mohapatra SD, Senapati R, Singh R, Satapathy SN. Effect of differential pest load of leaf folder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée), on leaf damage and biochemical composition in rice. Int J Plant Soil Sci.2022;34(22):1360–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2231507
  5. 5. Kumari P, Jasrotia P, Kumar D, Kashyap PL, Kumar S, Mishra CN, et al. Biotechnological approaches for host plant resistance to insect pests. Front Genet. 2022;13:914029. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.914029
  6. 6. Sun Y, Liu ST, Ling Y, Wang L, Ni H, Guo D, et al. Insecticide resistance monitoring of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and its mechanism to chlorantraniliprole. Pest Manag Sci. 2023;79(9):3290–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7512
  7. 7. Shah FM, Razaq M, Islam Y. Contemporary management of insect pests in rice. In: Modern techniques of rice crop production. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 349–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4955-4_20
  8. 8. Pattanaik KP, Jena S, Mahanty A, Gadratagi BG, Patil N, Guru-Pirasanna-Pandi G, et al. Exploitation of volatile organic compounds for rice field insect pest management: current status and future prospects. Physiol Plant. 2025;177(3):e70240. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70240
  9. 9. Pradhan PP, Gadratagi BG, Nayak U, Adak T, Govindharaj GP, Patil NB, et al. Comparative toxicity and risk assessment of some pesticides on the parasitoid Habrobracon hebetor (Say). Ann Biol Res. 2025;27(1). https://doi.org/10.48165/abr.2025.27.01.25
  10. 10. Sun Y, Tian C, Xu P, Dong J, Wang S. Semiochemicals used by insect parasitoids and hyperparasitoids in complex chemical environments and their application in insect pest management. Horticulturae. 2025;12(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12010002
  11. 11. Kutty NN, Mishra M. Dynamic distress calls: volatile infochemicals induce and regulate defence responses during herbivory. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1135000. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1135000
  12. 12. Ye M, Glauser G, Lou Y, Erb M, Hu L. Molecular dissection of early defence signalling underlying volatile-mediated defence regulation and herbivore resistance in rice. Plant Cell.2019;31(3):687–98. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.18.00569
  13. 13. Ali MY, Naseem T, Holopainen JK, Liu T, Zhang J, Zhang F. Tritrophic interactions among arthropod natural enemies, herbivores and plants considering volatile blends at different scale levels. Cells. 2023;12(2):251. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12020251
  14. 14. Gurr GM, Read DM, Catindig JL, Cheng J, Liu J, Lan LP, et al. Parasitoids of the rice leaffolder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis and prospects for enhancing biological control with nectar plants. Agric For Entomol. 2012;14(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-9563.2011.00550.x
  15. 15. Meiners T, Peri E. Chemical ecology of insect parasitoids: essential elements for developing effective biological control programmes. In: Wajnberg E, Colazza S, editors. Chemical ecology of insect parasitoids. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 191–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118409589.ch9
  16. 16. Padmavathi C, Javvaji S, Gururaj K. A rapid field screening method for evaluation of resistance to leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenée in rice. J Rice Res. 2017;10(1):67–70.
  17. 17. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Standard Evaluation System of Rice. 2013;13–17.
  18. 18. Adak T, Mahanty A, Jena S, Gadratagi BG, Patil N, Guru-Pirasanna-Pandi G, et al. Volatolomics to decrypt the monophagous nature of a rice pest, Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker). J Chem Ecol. 2024;50(7):373–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-024-01498-7
  19. 19. Gowda GB, Adak T, Jayanthi PD, Kumar P, Guru-Pirasanna-Pandi G, Patil NB, et al. Volatile cues from Corcyra cephalonica larvae elicit behavioural responses in the parasitoid Habrobracon hebetor. Curr Sci. 2023;125(2):166–72. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v125/i2/183-190
  20. 20. Gowda GB, Sahu M, Ullah F, Patil NB, Adak T, Pokhare S, et al. Insecticide-induced hormesis in a factitious host, Corcyra cephalonica, stimulates the development of its gregarious ectoparasitoid, Habrobracon hebetor. Biol Control.2021;160:104680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104680
  21. 21. Mbata GN, Eason J, Payton ME, Davis MF. Putative host volatiles used by Habrobracon hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to locate larvae of Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Insect Behav. 2017;30(3):287–299. doi:10.1007/s10905-017-9619-z.
  22. 22. Chen P, Dai C, Liu H, Hou M. Identification of key headspace volatile compounds signaling preference for rice over corn in adult females of the rice leaf folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. J Agric Food Chem. 2022;70(32):9826–33. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c01948
  23. 23. Aartsma Y, Bianchi FJJA, van der Werf W, Poelman EH, Dicke M. Herbivore-induced plant volatiles and tritrophic interactions across spatial scales. New Phytol. 2017;216(4):1054–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14475
  24. 24. Michereff MF, Magalhães DM, Hassemer MJ, Laumann RA, Zhou JJ, Ribeiro PE, et al. Variability in herbivore-induced defence signalling across different maize genotypes impacts significantly on natural enemy foraging behaviour. J Pest Sci. 2019;92(2):723–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-1033-6
  25. 25. Kessler A, Mueller MB. Induced resistance to herbivory and the intelligent plant. Plant Signal Behav. 2024;19(1):2345985. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2024.2345985
  26. 26. Shi JH, Sun Z, Hu XJ, Jin H, Foba CN, Liu H, et al. Rice defense responses are induced upon leaf rolling by an insect herbivore. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:514. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2116-0
  27. 27. Li Y, Cheah BH, Fang YF, Kuang YH, Lin SC, Liao CT, et al. Transcriptomics identifies key defence mechanisms in rice resistant to both leaf-feeding and phloem-feeding herbivores. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21:306. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03068-5
  28. 28. Suby SB, Sailwal M, Kumar N, Shabeer TA, Kumar K, Vasmatkar PD, et al. Jasmonic acid-mediated defence activation underlies Chilo partellus tolerance in maize: evidence from integrative multi-omics analyses. Curr Plant Biol.2026;46:100594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2026.100594
  29. 29. Ye M, Veyrat N, Xu H, Hu L, Turlings TCJ, Erb M. An herbivore-induced plant volatile reduces parasitoid attraction by changing the smell of caterpillars. Sci Adv. 2018;4(5):eaar4767. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar4767
  30. 30. Köllner TG, Lenk C, Schnee C, Köpke S, Lindemann P, Gershenzon J, et al. Localization of sesquiterpene formation and emission in maize leaves after herbivore damage. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-15
  31. 31. Cai PM, Song YZ, Huo D, Lin J, Zhang HM, Zhang ZH, et al. Chemical cues mediating behavioural and electrophysiological responses of Fopius arisanus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): the role of herbivore-induced plant volatiles. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2020;18(4):5475–89. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1804_54755489
  32. 32. Fiaboe KR, Yusuf AA, Torto B, Khamis FM. Herbivore intraguild interactions decrease ectoparasitoid Bracon nigricans parasitism of Phthorimaea absoluta and responses to tomato volatiles. Front Ecol Evol. 2023;11:1200040. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1200040
  33. 33. Zimba K, Hill MP, Moore SD, Heshula U. Agathis bishopi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) as a potential tool for detecting oranges infested with Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J Insect Behav. 2015;28(5):618–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-015-9526-0
  34. 34. Tamiru A, Bruce TJA, Woodcock CM, Birkett MA, Midega CAO, Pickett JA, et al. Chemical cues modulating electrophysiological and behavioural responses in the parasitic wasp Cotesia sesamiae. Can J Zool. 2015;93(4):281–7. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2014-0266
  35. 35. Shiojiri K, Ozawa R, Kugimiya S, Uefune M, van Wijk M, Sabelis MW, et al. Herbivore-specific, density-dependent induction of plant volatiles: honest or "cry wolf" signals? PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e12161. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012161
  36. 36. Liu CM, Matsuyama S, Kainoh Y. Synergistic effects of volatiles from host-infested plants on host-searching behaviour in the parasitoid wasp Lytopylus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J Chem Ecol. 2019;45(8):684–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-019-01088-y
  37. 37. Beyaert I, Wäschke N, Scholz A, Varama M, Reinecke A, Hilker M. Relevance of resource-indicating key volatiles and habitat odour for insect orientation. Anim Behav. 2010;79(5):1077–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.001
  38. 38. Wang Q, Gu H, Dorn S. Selection on olfactory response to semiochemicals from a plant–host complex in a parasitic wasp. Heredity. 2003;91:430–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800340
  39. 39. Drost YC, Lewis WJ, Tumlinson JH. Beneficial arthropod behaviour mediated by airborne semiochemicals V: influence of rearing method, host plant and adult experience on host-searching behaviour of Microplitis croceipes (Cresson), a larval parasitoid of Heliothis. J Chem Ecol. 1988;14(7):1607–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01012526
  40. 40. Uefune M, Kugimiya S, Ozawa R, Takabayashi J. Parasitic wasp females are attracted to blends of host-induced plant volatiles: do qualitative and quantitative differences in the blend matter? F1000Research. 2013;2:57. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-57.v2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.