Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp9 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Soil potassium fractions and crop yield as influenced by inorganic fertilisers, crop residues and green manuring under rice-wheat cropping system in calcareous soil

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.18084
Submitted
10 September 2026
Published
09-11-2026

Abstract

Soil potassium (K) occurs in multiple fractions, but the effects of integrated nutrient management (INM) on K dynamics remain poorly characterised in calcareous alluvial soils of the middle Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP). A field experiment was conducted in an ongoing rice–wheat cropping system (RWCS) at Dr Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University (RPCAU), Pusa, Bihar, to evaluate eight nutrient management treatments involving nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) fertilisation, cereal residue recycling, green manuring and Pusa Decomposer (PD) application on soil K fractions and crop productivity. Treatments combining cereal residue and green manure with residue decomposer (T5) recorded the highest water-soluble potassium (WSK) (7.26 mg kg-1), exchangeable potassium (EK) (64.39 mg kg-1), 1 hr tetraphenylboron-extractable potassium (TBK) (2002.96 mg kg-1) and 1 hr non-exchangeable potassium extracted using sodium tetraphenylboron (NEKNaTPB) (1931.31 mg kg-1). Residue decomposer application enhanced labile and kinetically accessible K within corresponding treatment pairs. At the same time, 168 hr non-exchangeable potassium (NEK), lattice potassium (LK) and total potassium (TK) remained statistically unchanged, indicating limited alteration of stable K reserves over four years. Rice and wheat grain and straw yields were highest under treatments receiving greater proportions of inorganic N and P (T1, T6 and T7), whereas T4 and T5 produced lower yields despite higher labile K. Labile K fractions were positively inter-correlated, with the strongest association between 1 hr TBK and 1 hr NEK (r = 0.82, p ≤0.001), whereas soil K fractions showed weak and non-significant relationships with crop yield. However, nutrient management enhanced labile K pools without significantly altering stable K reserves or explaining yield variation. Recycling cereal residue with a decomposer, together with 25 % substitution of fertiliser N, may sustain rice–wheat productivity while improving labile K availability in calcareous soil.

References

  1. 1. Nath CP, Dutta A, Hazra KK, Kumar N, Praharaj CS, Kumar M, et al. Influence of legume diversification and fertilization on soil potassium pools under distinct cropping system ecologies: insight from 14-years study. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2025;9:1660079. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1660079
  2. 2. Walia SS, Dhaliwal SS, Gill RS, Kaur T, Kaur K, Randhawa MK, et al. Improvement of soil health and nutrient transformations under balanced fertilization with integrated nutrient management in a rice-wheat system in Indo-Gangetic Plains – A 34-year research outcome. Heliyon. 2024;10(4):e25113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25113
  3. 3. Pal DK, Srivastava P, Durge SL, Bhattacharyya T. Role of weathering of fine-grained micas in potassium management of Indian soils. Appl Clay Sci. 2001;20(1-2):39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-1317(01)00044-8
  4. 4. Sarkar GK, Debnath A, Chattopadhyay AP, Sanyal SK. Depletion of soil potassium under exhaustive cropping in Inceptisol and Alfisol. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2014;45(1):61–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2013.848880
  5. 5. Das D, Dwivedi BS, Datta SP, Datta SC, Meena MC, Agarwal BK, et al. Potassium supplying capacity of a red soil from eastern India after forty-two years of continuous cropping and fertilization. Geoderma. 2019;341:76–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.041
  6. 6. Aman H, Ghosh AK, Panda D, Pradhan C, Mahapatra P, Paul R, et al. Changes in clay mineral composition and soil potassium pools under 50 years of soybean–wheat cropping in an Alfisol. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2025;188(4):712–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.12023
  7. 7. Das D, Nayak AK, Thilagam VK, Chatterjee D, Shahid M, Tripathi R, et al. Measuring potassium fractions is not sufficient to assess the long-term impact of fertilization and manuring on soil's potassium supplying capacity. J Soils Sediments. 2018;18:1806–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-1922-6
  8. 8. Ghosh S, Mondal G, Chakraborty S, Banerjee S, Kumar S, Basu R, et al. Geogenic perspectives on potassium dynamics and plant uptake: insights from natural and submerged conditions across different soil types with machine learning predictions. Front Soil Sci. 2025;5:1539477. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2025.1539477
  9. 9. Jalali M, Zarabi M. Kinetics of nonexchangeable-potassium release and plant response in some calcareous soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2006;169(2):196–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200521772
  10. 10. Sparks DL, Huang PM. Physical chemistry of soil potassium. In: Potassium in Agriculture. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy; 1985. p. 201–76. https://doi.org/10.2134/1985.potassium.c9
  11. 11. Liao YL, Zheng SX, Nie J, Xie J, Lu YH, Qin XB. Long-term effect of fertiliser and rice straw on mineral composition and potassium adsorption in a reddish paddy soil. J Integr Agric. 2013;12(4):694–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60288-9
  12. 12. Singh M, Ram S, Wanjari RH, Sharma P. Balance and forms of potassium under rice–wheat system in a 40-year-old long-term experiment on Mollisols of Pantnagar. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2014;62(1):38–44. https://indianjournals.com/api/article-view/jisss-62-1-005
  13. 13. Prabha S, Prasad SS, Chandan SK. Correlation study of soil properties on various forms of potassium in soils of North Bihar. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(1):2147–52.
  14. 14. Sharma S, Singh P, Ali HM, Siddiqui MH, Iqbal J. Tillage, green manuring and crop residue management impacts on crop productivity, potassium use efficiency and potassium fractions under rice-wheat system. Heliyon. 2023;9(7):e17828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17828
  15. 15. Aravindharajan STM, Shukla L, Vijaysri D, Singh SK, Kumar R, Kumar R, et al. Comparative paddy straw degradation potential of psychrotrophic fungal consortia and Pusa Decomposer at low temperatures. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2025;102314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102314
  16. 16. Hanway JJ, Heidel H. Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa State College Soil Testing Laboratory. Iowa State College Agric Bull. 1952;57:1–31.
  17. 17. Jackson ML. Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.; 1973.
  18. 18. Black CA. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I and II. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy, Inc.; 1965.
  19. 19. Jackson ML. Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.; 1967. 498 p.
  20. 20. Jackson BLJ. A modified sodium tetraphenylboron method for the routine determination of reserve-potassium status of soil. N Z J Exp Agric. 1985;13(3):253–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03015521.1985.10426091
  21. 21. Carey PL, Metherell AK. Rates of release of non-exchangeable potassium in New Zealand soils measured by a modified sodium tetraphenylboron method. N Z J Agric Res. 2003;46:185–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2003.9513546
  22. 22. Cox AE, Joern BC, Brouder SM, Gao D. Plant-available potassium assessment with a modified sodium tetraphenylboron method. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1999;63:902–11. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.634902x
  23. 23. Bilias F, Barbayiannis N. Potassium availability: an approach using thermodynamic parameters derived from quantity-intensity relationships. Geoderma. 2019;338:355–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.12.026
  24. 24. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1984.
  25. 25. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2026. https://doi.org/10.32614/R.manuals
  26. 26. Sardans J, Peñuelas J. Potassium control of plant functions: ecological and agricultural implications. Plants. 2021;10(2):419. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020419
  27. 27. Guo XX, Liu HT, Wu SB. Humic substances developed during organic waste composting: formation mechanisms, structural properties and agronomic functions. Sci Total Environ. 2019;662:501–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.137
  28. 28. Hemati A, Nazari M, Asgari Lajayer B, Smith DL, Astatkie T. Lignocellulosics in plant cell wall and their potential biological degradation. Folia Microbiol. 2022;67(5):671–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-022-00974-5
  29. 29. Rich CI. Mineralogy of soil potassium. In: The Role of Potassium in Agriculture. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy; 1968. p.79–108. https://doi.org/10.2134/1968.roleofpotassium.c5
  30. 30. Cox AE, Joern BC, Roth CB. Nonexchangeable ammonium and potassium determination in soils with a modified sodium tetraphenylboron method. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1996;60:114–20. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000010019x
  31. 31. Römheld V, Kirkby EA. Research on potassium in agriculture: needs and prospects. Plant Soil. 2010;335(1):155–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0520-1
  32. 32. Dutta D, Meena AL, Ghasal PC, Bhanu C, Choudhary J, Fagodiya RK, et al. Assessing potassium availability and Q/I relationship under long-term fertilization strategies in rice based cropping systems of Upper Indo-Gangetic Plain of India. Soil Tillage Res. 2026;261:107140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2026.107140
  33. 33. Gao Y, Liang A, Zhang Y, McLaughlin N, Zhang S, Chen X, et al. Dynamics of microbial biomass, nitrogen mineralization and crop uptake in response to placement of maize residue returned to Chinese Mollisols over the maize growing season. Atmosphere. 2021;12(9):1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12091166
  34. 34. Chaves B, Redin M, Giacomini SJ, Schmatz R, Léonard J, Ferchaud F, et al. The combination of residue quality, residue placement and soil mineral N content drives C and N dynamics by modifying N availability to microbial decomposers. Soil Biol Biochem. 2021;163:108434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108434
  35. 35. Bhardwaj AK, Malik K, Chejara S, Rajwar D, Narjary B, Chandra P. Integration of organics in nutrient management for rice-wheat system improves nitrogen use efficiency via favorable soil biological and electrochemical responses. Front Plant Sci. 2023;13:1075011. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1075011
  36. 36. Adnan M, Fahad S, Saleem MH, Lal R. Sustainable phosphorus management in calcareous soils: problems and prospects. J Plant Nutr. 2025;48(13):2179–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2025.2477269
  37. 37. Fontaine S, Abbadie L, Aubert M, Barot S, Bloor JM, Derrien D, et al. Plant–soil synchrony in nutrient cycles: learning from ecosystems to design sustainable agrosystems. Glob Change Biol. 2024;30(1):e17034. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17034
  38. 38. Zhao S, He P, Qiu S, Jia L, Liu M, Jin J, et al. Long-term effects of potassium fertilization and straw return on soil potassium levels and crop yields in north-central China. Field Crops Res. 2014;169:116–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.09.017
  39. 39. Celi L, Said-Pullicino D, Bol R, Lang F, Luster J. Interconnecting soil organic matter with nitrogen and phosphorus cycling. In: Multi-scale Biogeochemical Processes in Soil Ecosystems: Critical Reactions and Resilience to Climate Changes. 2022. p.51–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119480419.ch3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.