This is an outdated version published on 14-10-2023. Read the most recent version.
Forthcoming

Biochar-based organic amendments on soil health, nutrient status and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2706

Keywords:

Biochar, labile carbon, organic carbon, particulate organic carbon, potato, starch

Abstract

Cultivation of quality potatoes ensures a good earning compared to low quality, especially in terms of tuber weight and starch content. Therefore, an experiment was laid out to find out the impact of an organic amendment based on the combinations of biochar, vermicompost, poultry manure, and bone meal for the enrichment of soil health and quality of potato crops at the research farm of Lovely Professional University, Punjab. The parameters of pH, EC, organic carbon, soil microbial biomass, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, labile carbon, and particulate organic carbon (POC) were used to understand the soil health improvement, while starch content and grading systems ranging from A to C were used for the quality of the potato. Among the treatments, most of the parameters were recorded as statistically significant at p>0.05. The highest improvement in terms of pH, EC, organic carbon, soil microbial biomass, nitrogen content, labile carbon, and particulate organic carbon (POC) was recorded in T3 (7.58, 0.39 dSm-1, 0.53 %, 333.3 µg g-1, 198.3 kg ha-1, 3.71 and 7.0 g kg-1 of soil) compared to T0 (7.38, 0.32 dSm-1, 0.44 %, 325.33 µg g-1, 171.5 kg ha-1, 2.33 and 3.0 g kg-1 g kg-1), while the phosphorus and potassium contents were estimated highest in T2 (17.4 and 255 kg ha-1). The quality parameters like starch content and grading quality of potato tubers were also influenced positively and estimated significantly highest in T3 (53.60 % and 153.7 q ha-1 of A grade potato). This study has shown the potential to improve the quality of potato tuber by providing a desirable soil environment to coordinate with potato plants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shahane AA, Shivay YS. Soil health and its improvement through novel agronomic and innovative approaches. Front Agron. 2021; 3: 680456.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fagro.2021.680456/full

Lévesque V, Oelbermann M, Ziadi N. Biochar in temperate soils: opportunities and challenges. Can J Soil Sci. 2021;102(1): 1-26.

https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full/10.1139/cjss-2021-0047.

Tenic E, Ghogare R, Dhingra A. Biochar—a panacea for agriculture or just carbon. Horticulturae. 2020; 6(3): 37. https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/6/3/37.

Diatta AA, Fike JH, Battaglia ML, Galbraith JM, Baig MB. Effects of biochar on soil fertility and crop productivity in arid regions: a review. Arab J Geosci. 2020;13: 1-17.

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Effects-of-biochar-on-soil-fertility-and-crop-in-a-Diatta-Fike/b15b5d1767932a41c59e7bae3faa00870e661a0c.

Cen R, Feng W, Yang F, Wu W, Liao H, Qu Z. Effect mechanism of biochar application on soil structure and organic matter in semi-arid areas. J Environ Manage. 2021;286: 112198. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33621846/.

Scott HL, Ponsonby D, Atkinson CJ. Biochar: an improver of nutrient and soil water availability-what is the evidence. CABI Reviews. 2014; 1-19.

https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/PAVSNNR20149019.

Tauqeer HM, Turan V, Farhad M, Iqbal M. Sustainable agriculture and plant production by virtue of biochar in the era of climate change. In Managing plant production under changing environment. 2022; (pp. 21-42). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-16-5059-8_2.

Singh J, Siddique A. Impact of biochar base organic amendment on morphological changes and yield of potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.). Spec Ugdym. 2022; 2(43): 865-871. http://www.sumc.lt/index.php/se/article/view/1293.

Hoover NL, Law JY, Long LAM, Kanwar RS, Soupir ML. Long-term impact of poultry manure on crop yield, soil and water quality, and crop revenue. J Environ Manage. 2019; 252: 109582. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31614262/.

Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science. 1934; 37(1): 29-38.

https://journals.lww.com/soilsci/Citation/1934/01000/AN_EXAMINATION_OF_THE_DEGTJAREFF_METHOD_FOR.3.aspx.

Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Bioch. 1987; 19(6): 703-707.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0038071787900526.

Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid method for the estimation of nitrogen in soil. Curr Sci. 1956; 26: 259-260.

https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=2138694.

Olsen SR. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture; 1954.

https://archive.org/details/estimationofavai939olse/page/n1/mode/2up.

Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis, Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi, India. 1973;498: 151-154.

https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1453838.

Weil RR, Islam KR, Stine MA, Gruver JB, Samson-Liebig SE. Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: A simplified method for laboratory and field use. Amer J Altern Agric. 2003;18(1): 3-17.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-alternative-agriculture/article/abs/estimating-active-carbon-for-soil-quality-assessment-a-simplified-method-for-laboratory-and-field-use/811A21F65E6E272FAC2B76231DD90EDE.

Cambardella C, Elliott ET. Particulate soil organic matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Sci Society Amer J. 1992; 56: 777-783.

https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1928940

McCready RM, Guggloz J, Silviera V, Owens HS. Determination of starch and amylose in vegetables. Anal Chem. 1950; 22, 1156.

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac60045a016.

Silber A, Levkovitch I, Graber ER. pH-dependent mineral release and surface properties of corn straw biochar: agronomic implications. Environ Sci Technol. 2010; 44: 9318-9323. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21090742/.

Zheng H, Wang Z, Deng X, Zhao J, Luo Y, Novak, J, Herbert S, Xing B. Characteristics and nutrient values of biochars produced from giant reed at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol. 2013;130: 463-471.

https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/60820500/Manuscripts/2013/Man918.pdf.

Mollick OA, Paul AK, Alam I, Sumon MM. Effect of biochar on yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber. IJBSM. 2020; 11(5): 445-450.

https://www.pphouse.org/upload_article/69099694_4_IJBSM_October_2020_Mollick_et_al.pdf.

Yuan J, Xu R, Zhang H. The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102: 3488-3497.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21112777/.

Yadav NK, Kumar V, Sharma KR, Choudhary RS, Butter TS, Singh G, Kumar R. Biochar and their impacts on soil properties and crop productivity: a review. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018; 7(4): 49-54.

https://www.phytojournal.com/archives/2018/vol7issue4/PartB/7-3-678-801.pdf.

Schulz H, Dunst G, Glaser B. Positive effects of composted biochar on plant growth and soil fertility. Agron Sustain Develop. 2013; 33(4): 817-827.

https://hal.science/hal-01201399/file/13593_2013_Article_150.pdf.

Thorburn PJ, Meier EA, Collins K, Robertson FA. Changes in soil carbon sequestration, fractionation and soil fertility in response to sugarcane residue retention are site-specific. Soil Tillage Res. 2012; 120: 99-111.

https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20123129548.

Prabha S, Renuka R, Sreekanth NP, Babu P, Thomas AP. A study of the fertility and carbon sequestration potential of rice soil with respect to the application of biochar and selected amendments. Ann Environ Sci. 2013;7: 17–30.

https://openjournals.neu.edu/aes/journal/article/view/v7art2.

Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe R. Valorizing biomass to engineered biochar and its impact on soil, plant, water, and microbial dynamics: A review. Biomass Converv Biorefin. 2020;1-17.

https://www.springerprofessional.de/valorizing-biomass-to-engineered-biochar-and-its-impact-on-soil-/18136288.

Saini I, Kaushik P, Al-Huqail AA, Khan F, Siddiqui MH. Effect of the diverse combinations of useful microbes and chemical fertilizers on important traits of potato. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021; 28(5): 2641-2648. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319562X21001406.

Song J, Kong ZQ, Zhang DD, Chen JY, Dai XF, Li R. Rhizosphere microbiomes of potato cultivated under Bacillus subtilis treatment influence the quality of potato tubers. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(21): 12065. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/21/12065.

Asfaw F. Effect of integrated soil amendment practices on growth and seed tuber yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Jimma Arjo, Western Ethiopia. J Nat Sci Res. 2016; 6(15): 38-63. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234656534.pdf

Published

14-10-2023

Versions

How to Cite

1.
Singh J, Kumar P, Siddique A. Biochar-based organic amendments on soil health, nutrient status and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum). Plant Sci. Today [Internet]. 2023 Oct. 14 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];. Available from: https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/view/2706

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.