Evaluation of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars for some biochemical and agronomic traits under drought stress
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2974Keywords:
AMMI analysis, Drought, MTSI index, Variety, Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)Abstract
This experiment aimed to evaluate quantitative and qualitative characteristics, tolerance to water deficit, and stability of white sugar in sugar beet cultivars. The experimental design was a split plot based on a randomized complete block design with three replications, where the irrigation levels (normal and water shortage) were assigned to the main plots and 18 sugar beet cultivars were assigned to the subplots. The result revealed that Palma achieved the maximum root and white sugar yield under normal and water deficit; furthermore, the highest indices of YP, YS, MP, STI, HM, YI, DI, REI and MRP belonged to the Palma cultivar. The results of the AMMI analysis based on white sugar yield showed that the additive effects of genotype and environment and the multiplicative effect of G×E accounted for 75.52, 17.05 and 6.76 % of the total data variance. Based on AMMI stability value, the Delta, Pars, Paya and Novodoro cultivars were recognized as stable varieties. Also, the first 2 significant components of the interaction effect (G×E) accounted for 99.12 % of interaction effects variation. Based on the biplot results of the first 2 significant components against white sugar yield, Azare and Merak were the appropriate cultivars. Finally, Based on the multi-trait stability index, Azara, Novodoro and Merak cultivars were selected as stable genotypes. In 2 years and 2 conditions, the Palma cultivar was identified as a cultivar with high yield and drought tolerance and low stability and the Merak cultivar was identified as a cultivar with white sugar yield and acceptable stability.
Downloads
References
Akyüz A, Ersus S. Optimization of enzyme assisted extraction of protein from the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaves for alternative plant protein concentrate production. Food Chemistry. 2021;335:127673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127673.
ISO.The Sugar Market, https://www.isosugar.org/sugarsector/sugar (Accessed January 28, 2023.
FAO. Crops production and area harvested. 2019, 2021. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); 2021.
Verma S Deepti. Abiotic stress and crop improvement: Current scenario. Adv Plants Agric Res. 2016;4:345-46. https://doi.org/10.15406/apar.2016.04.00149
Gupta A, Rico-Medina A, Cano-Delgado AI . The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science. 2020;368:266-69. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz7614
Gorin K, Sergeeva Y, Pojidaev V, Konova I, Borgolov A, Gotovtsev. Thaw water treatment under Moscow insolation conditions by microalgae. Results Eng. 2019;4:100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2019.100041
Ortiz N, Armada E, Duque E, Rold´ an A, Azcon R. Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and/or bacteria to enhancing plant drought tolerance under natural soil conditions: Effectiveness of autochthonous or allochthonous strains. J Plant Physiol. 2015;174:87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2014.08.019
Saremirad A, Mostafavi K. Genetic analysis of important agronomic traits in some of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars under normal and drought stress conditions. Cereal Res. 2018;8:397-408.
Ober ES, Luterbacher MC. Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in Beta vulgaris. Ann Bot. 2021;89:917-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf093
Mostafavi K. Effect of salt stress on germination and early seedling growth stage of sugar beet cultivars. American-Eurasian J Sustain Agric. 2012;6:120-25.
Abbasi Z, Bocianowski J. Genotype by environment interaction for physiological traits in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) parents and hybrids using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model. Eur Food Res Technol Ezoic. 2021;247:3063-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-021-03861-4
Taleghani D, Rajabi A, Saremirad A, Fasahat P. Stability analysis and selection of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) genotypes using AMMI, BLUP, GGE biplot and MTSI. Sci Rep. 2023;13:10019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37217-7
Yan W. GGEbiplot- A windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agron J. 2001;93:1111. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.9351111x
Ebdon JS, Gauch HG. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national turfgrass performance trials. Crop Sci. 2002;42(2):497-506. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.0497
Studnicki M, Lenartowicz T , Noras N, El ?zbieta Wójcik G, Wyszy ´nski Z. Assessment of stability and adaptation patterns of white sugar yield from sugar beet cultivars in temperate climate environments. Agronomy. 2019;9:405. doi:10.3390/agronomy9070405. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9070405
Rajabi A, Ahmadi M, Bazrafshan M, Hassani M, Saremirad A. Evaluation of resistance and determination of stability of different sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) genotypes in rhizomania-infected conditions. Nutr Food Sci. 2023;11:1403-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3180.
Ghaffari A, Rajabi A, Izadi Darbandi A, Roozbeh F, Amiri R. Evaluation of new hybrids of sugar beet monogerm in terms of drought tolerance. J Crop Breed. 2016;8(17):8-16. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jcb.8.17.16
Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil. 1973;39:205-07. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
Turner NC, Kramer PJ. Adaptation of plant to water and high temperature stress. Wiley Interscience Pub. New York, NY, USA. 1980;pp. 207-30.
Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK . Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1977;59:309-14. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.59.2.309
Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248-54. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1976.9999
Rosielle A, Hamblin J. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Sci. 1981;21:943-46. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x
Fernandez GC. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Proceeding of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress Vol. Shanhua, Taiwan. 1992; pp. 257-70.
Gavuzzi P, Rizza F, Palumbo M, Campanile R, Ricciardi G, Borghi B. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Can J Plant Sci. 1977;77:523-31. https://doi.org/10.4141/P96-130
Lan J. Comparison of evaluating methods for agronomic drought resistance in crops. Acta Agri Boreali-occidentalis Sinica. 1998;7:85-87.
Fischer R, Maurer R. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. grain yield responses. Aust J Agr Res. 1978;29:897-912. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897
Mousavi S, Yazdi Samadi B, Naghavi M, Zali A, Dashti H, Pourshahbazi A. Introduction of new indices to identify relative drought tolerance and resistance in wheat genotypes. Desert. 2008;12:165-78.
Bouslama M, Schapaugh W. Stress tolerance in soybeans. I. evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Sci. 1984;24:933-37. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050026x
Fischer R, Wood J. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. III. yield associations with morpho-physiological traits. Aust J Agric Res. 1979;30:1001-20. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9791001
Hossain A, Sears R, Cox TS, Paulsen G. Desiccation tolerance and its relationship to assimilate partitioning in winter wheat. Crop Sci. 1990;30:622-27. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000030030x
Purchase JL, Hatting H, Vandeventer CS. Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: ?. stability analysis of yield performance. South Afr J Plant Soil. 2000;17:101-07. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2000.10634878
Olivoto T, Lúcio AD, da Silva JA, Sari BG, Diel MI. Mean performance and stability in multi-environment trials II: selection based on multiple traits. Agron J. 2019;111:2961-69. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2019.03.0221
Mir Mahmoudi T, Hamze H, Golabi lak I. Impact of biofertiliser and zinc nanoparticles on enzymatic, biochemical and agronomic properties of sugar beet under different irrigation regimes. Zemdirbyste. 2023;110:217-24. DOI 10.13080/z-a.2023.110.025
Wisniewska A, Andryka-Dudek P, Czerwinski M, Choluj D. Fodder beet is a reservoir of drought tolerance alleles for sugar beet breeding. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019;145:120-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.10.031
Islam MJ, Kim JW, Begum MK, Sohel MAT, Lim YS. Physiological and biochemical changes in sugar beet seedlings to confer stress adaptability under drought condition. Plants. 2020;9:1511. DOI: 10.3390/plants9111511
Skorupa M, Golebiewski M, Kurnik K, Niedojadlo J, Kesy J, Klamkowski K et al. Salt stress vs. salt shock-the case of sugar beet and its halophytic ancestor. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1661-x
Liu L, Wang B, Liu D, Zou C, Wu P, Wang Z et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses reveal mechanisms of adaptation to salinity in which carbon and nitrogen metabolism is altered in sugar beet roots. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20:138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02349-9
Wang Y, StevanatoP, Lv C, Li R, Geng G. Comparative physiological and proteomic analysis of two sugar beet genotypes with contrasting salt tolerance. J Agric Food. 2019;67:6056-73. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b00244
Vitali V, Sutka M, Ojeda L, Aroca R, Amodeo G. Root hydraulics adjustment is governed by a dominant cell-to-cell pathway in Beta vulgaris seedlings exposed to salt stress. Plant Sci. 2021;306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.110873
Li J, Cui J, Cheng D, Dai C, Liu T, Wang C, Luo C. iTRAQ protein profile analysis of sugar beet under salt stress: Different coping mechanisms in leaves and roots. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20:347. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02552-8
AlKahtani MDF, Hafez YM, Attia K, Rashwan E, Husnain LA, AlGwaiz HIM, Abdelaal KAA. Evaluation of silicon and proline application on the oxidative machinery in drought-stressed sugar beet. Antioxidants. 2021;10:398. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10030398.
Li J, Cui J, Dai C, Liu T, Cheng D, Luo C. Whole-transcriptome RNA sequencing reveals the global molecular responses and CeRNA regulatory network of mRNAs, lncRNAs, miRNAs and circRNAs in response to salt stress in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:289. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010289
Cho?uj D, Karwowska R, Jasi?ska M, Haber G. Growth and dry matter partitioning in sugar beet plants (Beta vulgaris L.) under moderate drought. Plant Soil Environ. 2004;50:265-72. https://doi.org/10.17221/4031-PSE
Bloch D, Hoffmann CM, Märländer B. Impact of water supply on photosynthesis, water use and carbon isotope discrimination of sugar beet genotypes. Eur J Agron. 2006;24:218-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2005.08.004
Mehrandish M, Moeini MJ, Armin M. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) response to potassium application under full and deficit irrigation. Eur J Exp Biol. 2012;2:2113-19.
Foyer CH, Descourvieres P, Kunert KJ. Protection against oxygen radicals: An important defence mechanism studied in transgenic plants. Plant, Plant Cell Environ. 1994;17:507-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00146.x
Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48:909-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016
Hussein HAA, Mekki BB, El-Sadek MEA, El Lateef EE. Effect of L-ornithine application on improving drought tolerance in sugar beet plants. Heliyon. 2019;5:e02631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02631.
Göring H, Thien BH. Influence of nutrient deficiency on proline accumulation in the cytoplasm of Zea mays L. seedlings. Biochem Physiol Pflanz. 1997;174:9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-3796(17)30541-3
Singh SP, Ter´ an H, Gutierrez JA. Registration of SEA 5 and SEA 13 drought tolerant dry bean germplasm. Crop Sci. 2001;41:276-76. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.411276x
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 01-06-2024 (2)
- 22-05-2024 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Azad Ebrahimi, Esmail nabizadeh, Heydar Azizi, Rahim Mohammadian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
