Effect of different combinations of plant growth regulators and assessment of clonal fidelity among in vitro raised micro-shoots of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Bhagwa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3125Keywords:
Micropropagation, ISSR marker, pomegranate, plant growth regulators, clonal fidelity, quality maintenance, in vitro cultureAbstract
The role of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in plant development and growth is varied. However, there is currently no reported use of SNP in single or combined treatments for in vitro propagation of pomegranates. This study elaborates the role of SNP combined with different plant growth regulators (PGRs) like kinetin (Kn) and indole acetic acid (IAA) as supplementary in Murashige and Skoog (MS) media for in vitro propagation of pomegranate cv. Bhagwa using nodal segments as explants. The results revealed that treatment T9 (1.5 mg/L SNP + 1.5 mg/L Kn) resulted in the earliest shoot induction (25.03 days), the highest shoot proliferation (86.67 %) and the maximum shoot length (3.10 cm). However, treatment T8 (1.5 mg/L SNP + 1.0 mg/L Kn) produced the highest number of shoots/explant (2.60). In regards to in vitro rooting, the treatment fortified with T14 (2.0 mg/L IAA + 0.1 mg/L SNP) yielded the highest rooting frequency (100 %) with the maximum number of roots (4.77), while the treatment T15 (2.0 mg/L IAA + 0.2 mg/L SNP) exhibited earlier root initiation (13.17 days). The clonal fidelity analysis using ISSR markers revealed that the micro-propagated shoots were genetically uniform, with 88.89 % showing uniformity and a low level of somaclonal variation at 11.11 %.
Downloads
References
Shaygannia E, Bahmani M, Zamanzad B, Rafieian-Kopaei M. A review study on Punica granatum L. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2016;21:221-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156587215598039
Singh NV, Sharma J, Chandra R, Babu KD, Shinde YR, Mundewadikar DM, Pal RK. Bio-hardening of in-vitro raised plants of Bhagwa pomegranate (Punica granatum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2016;86:132-36. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i1.55252
Chauhan RD, Kanwar, K. Biotechnological advances in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant. 2012;48(6):579-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-012-9467-7
NHB. National horticulture board. Hortic Stat Glance, NHB, Gurgaon, India; 2021.
Sharma A, Abrahamian P, Carvalho R, Choudhary M, Paret ML, Vallad GE, Jones JB. Future of bacterial disease management in crop production. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 2022;60(1): 259-82. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-021621-121806
Da Silva JAT, Rana TS, Narzary D, Verma N, Meshram DT, Ranade SA. Pomegranate biology and biotechnology: A review. Scientia Horticulturae. 2013;160:85-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.05.017
Kanwar K, Rana R, Kashyap A. In vitro propagation of wild pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). In: Jindal KK, Bawa R (Eds). Intellectual Property Rights, Shiva Offset Press, Dehradun, India; 2004:209-15.
Kundu S, Sindhusha P, Kumar A. Micro-propagation techniques in horticultural crops and various factors affecting it: A review. Modern Phytomorphology. 2021;15:137-41.
Abdalla N, El-Ramady H, Seliem MK, El-Mahrouk ME, Taha N, Bayoumi Y, et al. An academic and technical overview on plant micropropagation challenges. Horticulturae. 2022;8(8):677. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080677
Pal RK, KD Babu, NV Singh, A Maity, N Gaikwad. Pomegranate research In India-status and future challenges. Progressive Hortic. 2014;46(2):184-201.
Kalalbandi BM, Waskar DP, Khandare VS, Gorad DS. Micropropagation studies on pomegranate var. Bhagwa. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 2014;71(4):564-66.
Dinesh RM, Patel AK, Vibha JB, et al. Cloning of mature pomegranate (Punica granatum) cv. Jalore seedless via in vitro shoot production and ex vitro rooting. Vegetos. 2019;32:181-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-019-00021-8
Raman T, Gupta VS, Shukla. A robust micropropagation protocol for genetically true to type plants of Phule Arakta pomegranate. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 2019;76(1):23-31. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2019.00004.5
Verma V, Zinta G, Kanwar K. Optimization of efficient direct organogenesis protocol for Punica granatum L. cv. Kandhari Kabuli from mature leaf explants. In vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2021;57:48-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-020-10111-x.
Jahan B, Rasheed F, Sehar Z, Fatma M, Iqbal N, Masood A, et al. Coordinated role of nitric oxide, ethylene, nitrogen and sulfur in plant salt stress tolerance. Stresses. 2021;1(3):181-99. doi.org/10.3390/stresses1030014
Hajihashemi S, Jahantigh O. Nitric oxide effect on growth, physiological and biochemical processes, flowering and postharvest performance of Narcissus tazzeta. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2022;7:1-6. doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10596-3.
Mahendran G, Kumar D, Verma SK, Chandran A, Warsi ZI, Husain Z, et al. Sodium nitroprusside enhances biomass and gymnemic acids production in cell suspension of Gymnema sylvestre (Retz.) R. Br. ex. Sm. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 2021;146(1):161-70. doi.org/10.1007/s11240-021-02058-7
Tan BC, Chin CF, Alderson P. Effects of sodium nitroprusside on shoot multiplication and regeneration of Vanilla planifolia Andrews. In vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2013;49:626-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-013-9526-8
Arun M, Naing AH, Jeon SM, Ai TN, Aye T, Kim CK. Sodium nitroprusside stimulates growth and shoot regeneration in chrysanthemum. Horticulture, Environment and Biotechnology. 2017;58(1):78-84. doi.org/10.1007/s13580-017-0070-z.
Krishna H, Alizadeh M, Singh D, Singh U, Chauhan N, Eftekhari M, Sadh RK. Somaclonal variations and their applications in horticultural crops improvement. 3 Biotech. 2016;6(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0389-7
Chen C, Lan J, Xie S, Cui S, Li A. In vitro propagation and quality evaluation of long-term micropropagated and conventionally grown Fagopyrum dibotrys Hara mutant, an important medicinal plant. Journal of Medicinal Plant Research. 2016;6:3003-12. https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPR11.1508
Reddy MP, Sarla N, Siddiq EA. Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism and its application in plant breeding. Euphytica. 2002;128:9-17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020691618797
Rohela GK, Jogam P, Prasad B, Christopher R. Indirect regeneration and assessment of genetic fidelity of acclimated plantlets by SCoT, ISSR and RAPD markers in Rauwolfia tetraphylla L.: An endangered medicinal plant. BioMed Res Intern. 2019. doi.org/10.1155/2019/3698742.
Alhani MC, Wilkinson MJ. Inter simple sequence repeat polymerase chain reaction for the detection of somaclonal variation. Plant Breeding. 1998;117(6):573-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998.tb02210.x
Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Physiology. 1962;15;473-97.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
Doyle Jeffrey. DNA protocols for plants. In: Molecular Techniques in Taxonomy. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1991:283-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83962-7_18
Liu X, Yang G. Assessment of clonal fidelity of micro-propagated guava (Psidium guajava) plants by ISSR markers. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2012;6(2):291-95.
Gaba VP. Plant growth regulators in plant tissue culture and development. N Trigiano Robert, J G Dennis (Eds.). Plant Development and Biotechnology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 2005;87-99. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203506561.ch8
Arasimowicz M, Floryszak-Wieczorek J. Nitric oxide as a bioactive signalling molecule in plant stress responses. Plant Sci. 2007;172:876-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.02.005
Sarropoulou V, Maloupa E. Effect of the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP), the ethylene inhibitor cobalt chloride (CoCl2) and the antioxidant vitamin E “?-tocopherol”on in vitro shoot proliferation of Sideritis raeseri Boiss & Heldr subsp. raeseri. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2017;128:619-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-016-1139-6
Subiramani S, Sundararajan S, Sivakumar HP, Rajendran V, Ramalingam S. Sodium nitroprusside enhances callus induction and shoot regeneration in high value medicinal plant Canscora diffusa. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 2019;139:65-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-019-01663-x
Pandey S, Sundararajan S, Ramalingam S, et al. Effects of sodium nitroprusside and growth regulators on callus, multiple shoot induction and tissue browning in commercially important Valeriana jatamansi Jones. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2020;142:653-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-020-01890-7
Hosseini R, Parsa M. Micropropagation of Aloe vera L. grown in South Iran. Pak J Biol Sci. 2007;10(7):1134-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023959
Hesami M, Tohidfar M, Alizadeh M, Daneshvar MH. Effects of sodium nitroprusside on callus browning of Ficus religiosa: an important medicinal plant. J For Res. 2020;31(3):789-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0860-x
Xu J, Yin H, Wang W, Mi Q, Liu X. Effects of sodium nitroprusside on callus induction and shoot regeneration in micro-propagated Dioscorea opposita. Plant Growth Regulation. 2009;59(3):279-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-009-9410-z
Tun NN, Holk A, Scherer GF. Rapid increase of NO release in plant cell cultures induced by cytokinin. FEBS Letters. 2001;509(2):174-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03164-7
Dong YJ, Jinc SS, Liu S, Xu LL, Kong J. Effects of exogenous nitric oxide on growth of cotton seedlings under NaCl stress. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2014;14:1-13. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162014005000001
Jafari M, Daneshvar MH. Effects of sodium nitroprusside on indirect shoot organogenesis and in vitro root formation of Tagetes erecta: an important medicinal plant. Polish Journal of Applied Sciences. 2020;5(3):14-19.
Jafari M, Shahsavar AR. Sodium nitroprusside: its beneficial role in drought stress tolerance of Mexican lime (Citrus aurantifolia (Christ.) Swingle) under in vitro conditions. In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant. 2022;58(1):155-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-021-10218-9
Karthik S, Pavan G, Krishnan V, Sathish S, Manickavasagam M. Sodium nitroprusside enhances regeneration and alleviates salinity stress in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Biocat Agric Biotechnol. 2019;19:101173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101173
Han X, Yang H, Duan K, Zhang X, Zhao H, You S, Jiang Q. Sodium nitroprusside promotes multiplication and regeneration of Malus hupehensis in vitro plantlets. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2009;96:29-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9456-z
Kalra C, Babbar SB. Nitric oxide promotes in vitro organogenesis in Linum usitatissimum L. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2010;103:353-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9788-3
Kalra C, Babbar SB. Stimulatory and period-specific effect of nitric oxide on in vitro caulogenesis in Albizzia lebbeck (L.) Benth. Acta Physiol Plant. 2012;34:387-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0798-5
Lizárraga A, et al. In vitro propagation and recovery of eight apple and two pear cultivars held in a germplasm bank. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2017;8:2238-54. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.89150
Bettoni JC, et al. Cryotherapy by encapsulation-dehydration is effective for in vitro eradication of latent viruses from ‘Marubakaido’ apple rootstock. Journal of Biotechnology. 2018;269:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.01.014
Pagnussat GC, Lanteri ML, Lamattina L. Nitric oxide and cyclic GMP are messengers in the indole acetic acid-induced adventitious rooting process. Plant Physiol. 2003;132:1241-48. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.022228
Sarropoulou V, Dimassi-Theriou K, Therios I. Effect of sodium nitroprusside on micropropagation and biochemical parameters of CAB-6P and Gisela 6 cherry rootstocks. Turk J Biol. 2015;39(4):595-610. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1409-68
Zafarghandi MSR, Joneidabad RM. Indirect shoot organogenesis and in vitro root formation of Antirrhinum majus L. by using of sodium nitroprusside. Advances in Horticultural Science. 2020;34(1):105-11.
Tewari RK, Kim S, Hahn EJ, et al. Involvement of nitric oxide-induced NADPH oxidase in adventitious root growth and antioxidant defense in Panax ginseng. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2008;2:113-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-008-0052-9
Gougerdchi V, Dorani E, Valizadeh M, Agazadeh R. Effect of sodium nitroprusside and some plant growth regulators on shoot regeneration and plantlet development in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Journal of Plant Molecular Breeding. 2021;9(2):43-51.
Ghimire B, Rogan J, Galiano VR, Panday P, Neeti N. An evaluation of bagging, boosting and random forests for land-cover classification in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA. GIScience and Remote Sensing. 2012;49(5):623-43. https://doi.org/10.2747/1548-1603.49.5.623
Martinez O. Selection of molecular markers for the estimation of somaclonal variation. Methods. Mol Biol. 2018;1815:103-29. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8594-4_6
Nilkanta H, Amom T, Tikendra L, Rahaman H, Nongdam P. ISSR marker based ppulation genetic study of Melocanna baccifera (Roxb.) Kurz: a commercially important bamboo of Manipur, North-East India. Scientifica (Cairo). 2017. https://doi.org/ 10.1155/2017/3757238
Baghel S, Bansal YK. In vitro regeneration of Guizotia abyssinica Cass. and evaluation of genetic fidelity through RAPD markers. South Afr J of Bot. 2017;109:294-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.01.002
Cichorz S, Go?ka M, Ma?kowski DR. Miscanthus×giganteus: regeneration system with assessment of genetic and epigenetic stability in long-term in vitro culture. Ind Crop Prod. 2018;116:150-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02. 055
Tikendra L, Koijam AS, Nongdam P. Molecular markers based genetic fidelity assessment of micropropagated Dendrobium chrysotoxum Lindl. Meta Gene. 2019;100562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mgene.2019.100562
Kumar S, Mangal M, Dhawan AK, Singh N. Assessment of genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants of Simmondsia chinensis (Link) Schneider using RAPD and ISSR markers. Acta Physiologia Plantarum. 2011;33:2541-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0767-z
Venkatasalam EP, Tiwari JK, Richa Sood RS, Tavleen Kaur TK, Aarti Bairwa AB. Morphological and molecular based genetic stability assessment of in vitro propagated potato micro-plants. Int J of Tropical Agriculture. 2016;289-301.
Bhatia R, Singh KP, Sharma TR, Jhang T. Evaluation of the genetic fidelity of in vitro-propagated gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii Bolus) using DNA-based markers. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture. 2011;104:131-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9806-5
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 04-12-2024 (2)
- 29-11-2024 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Devendra Pal, Mukesh Kumar, Manoj Kumar Yadav, Chetan Chauhan, Varsha Rani, Anuj Pal, Vibhu Pandey
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licence details of published articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Open Access Policy
Plant Science Today is an open access journal. There is no registration required to read any article. All published articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
