Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025)

Crop performance, weed dynamics and economics of summer groundnut as influenced by paddy straw mulching and levels of phosphorus in Southern Odisha

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3127
Submitted
24 November 2023
Published
15-07-2025 — Updated on 24-07-2025
Versions

Abstract

Paddy straw is an organic mulch that lowers evaporation, inhibits the growth of weeds and improves soil properties. Phosphorus is the second major essential nutrient element required by the plant after nitrogen. It facilitates the proper development of the crop’s roots, which in turn aids in the greater uptake of water and nutrients from the soil, ultimately enhancing plant growth and production. The objective of the study was to study the effect of paddy straw mulching and phosphorus on the crop performance, weed dynamics and the economics of summer groundnut. The present study was conducted at Post Graduate Research Farm, M.S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Odisha in 2022. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with 12 treatments and 3 replications. Paddy straw mulching was taken in the main plot and the levels of phosphorus were taken under subplots. Phosphorus was applied as basal at the time of sowing. Results indicated that paddy straw mulch at 5 t ha-1 smothered the weeds more effectively and recorded significantly the lowest total weed density (8.4 No.m-2) and total weed dry weight (6.28 g m-2). Maximum pod (2376 kg ha-1) and kernel yield (1726 kg ha-1) of groundnut were recorded from paddy straw mulch at 5 t ha-1 which were 14.72 % and 22.32 % higher than no mulch treatment. Among the levels of phosphorus, 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 recorded significantly higher pod (2447 kg ha-1) and kernel yield (1936 kg ha-1) which were 26.39 % and 35.41 % higher than no phosphorus application. Application of 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 also recorded the lowest weed density and dry weight. Application of 5 t ha-1 paddy straw mulch and 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 was found to be the best treatment combination increasing pod and kernel yield of groundnut, decreasing total weed density as well as total weed dry matter and resulting in maximum economics.

References

  1. 1. Chaudhari R, Choudhary R. Yield trends changes in groundnut under different sources of nutrient management. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(2):1088–90.
  2. 2. Sireesha V, Dawson J. Effect of potassium and magnesium on growth and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(5):591–4.
  3. 3. Nautiyal PC, Seed development in groundnut - floral biology and peg development. Seed Res. 2022. 50 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v50i1.154395
  4. 4. Sreelatha P, Sudhakar P, Umamahesh, V. Review on morpho physiological attributes of groundnut at various growth stages. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2018; 7(12): 2233–46. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.712.254
  5. 5. Nagaraj G. Oilseeds: properties, processing, products and procedures. New Delhi: New India Publishing Agency; 2009. https://doi.org/10.59317/9789390083305
  6. 6. Jopale NS, Pacharne DP, Danawale NJ, Deshmukh PH, Bhosale AM. Weed management in summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Biol Forum Int. J. 2024; 16(5): 109–13.
  7. 7. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2021. Government of India. 2021. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363409158_Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2021
  8. 8. Satasiya RM, Sojitra MA, Kothiya AV, Chauhan PM. Performance of summer groundnut under different types of plastic mulch. Agric Res J. 2022; 59(3): 418–22. https://doi.org/10.5958/2395-146X.2022.00063.1
  9. 9. Hoque1 MM, Begum S, Rahman MS, Alam ABMS, Zhuma MAA, Manik MMH. Effect of different types of mulches on the growth and yield of turmeric. Bangladesh J. Nucl Agric. 202; 38(2): 161–7. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjnag.v38i2.79586
  10. 10. Emilia, Ray LIP, Mishra GP, DAS J. Bio-mulching for conservation of in-situ soil moisture under mid hills of Meghalaya. J Soil Water Conserv. 2024; 23(3): 240–9. https://doi.org/10.5958/2455-7145.2024.00029.2
  11. 11. Prem M, Ranjan P, Seth N, Patle GT. Mulching techniques to conserve the soil water and advance the crop production- A Review. Curr World Environ. 2020; 15:(Special Issue 1): 10–30. https://doi.org/10.12944/cwe.15.special-issue1.02
  12. 12. Demo AH., Bogale GA. Enhancing crop yield and conserving soil moisture through mulching practices in dryland agriculture. Front Agron. 2024;6:1361697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2024.1361697
  13. 13. Filippelli GM. The global phosphorus cycle. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2002;48(1):391–425. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2002.48.10
  14. 14. Weil RR, Brady NC. Soil phosphorus and potassium. The Nature and Properties of Soils. 2017: 643–95.
  15. 15. Sikka R, Kaur S, Gupta RK. Effect of phosphorus application on yield and its uptake by soybean (Glycine max L.) in different cropping systems. Indian J Agric Res. 2022; 56(3):308–12. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-5742
  16. 16. Grant CA, Flaten DN, Tomasiewicz DJ, Sheppard SC. The importance of early-season phosphorus nutrition. Can J Plant Sci. 2001;81: 211–24. https://doi.org/10.4141/P00-093
  17. 17. Goswami SB, Mondal R, Mandi SK. Crop residue management options in rice–rice system: a review. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2020;66(9):1218–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1661994
  18. 18. Vance CP. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition. Plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiol. 2001;127(2):390–7. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010331
  19. 19. Sulieman S, Tran LS. Phosphorus homeostasis in legume nodules as an adaptive strategy to phosphorus deficiency. Plant Sci.2015;239:36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.06.018
  20. 20. Nath S, Dhyani VC, Singh VP, Chaturvedi S, Praharaj, Sarvadamana, AK. Biochar and herbicide application effects on weed dynamics and yield of dry direct-seeded rice. Indian J Ecol.2020:47(2):280–2. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2020.00054.4
  21. 21. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley & Sons; 1984. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479700014496
  22. 22. Richardson AE. Richardson AE, Barea JM, McNeill AM, Prigent-Combaret C. Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant roots. Plant Soil. 2009; 321(1–2):305–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9895-2
  23. 23. Anand DD, Sumarjit Singh M, Jamkhogin Lhungdim N, Devi S, Gopimohan S. Effect of mulching on growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max L.) Merrill Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(9):3313–8. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.909.412
  24. 24. Mouri SJ, Sarkar MA, Uddin MR, Sarker UK, Hoque MM. Effect of variety and phosphorus on the yield components and yield of groundnut. Progressive Agriculture. 2018;29(2):117–26. https://doi.org/10.3329/pa.v29i2.38295
  25. 25. Kumar DP, Mandal TK, Zaman A, Pal A. Studies on the effect of phosphorus levels on yield attributes and yield of groundnut in south Odisha condition. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol. 2019;12(4):339–44. https://doi.org/10.30954/0974-1712.12.2019.7
  26. 26. Trivedi KR, Gupta RA. Study on the use of mulches in summer Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) production. AGRES Int e-J. 2016;5(4):398–405.
  27. 27. Minh TX, Thanh NC, Thin TH, Giang NTH Tieng NT. Effect of mulching on growth and yield of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) on the coastal sandy land in Nghe An Province, Vietnam. Indian J Agric Res.2023.57(4): 487–91. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.AF-689
  28. 28. Verma SK, Singh SB, Rai OP, Singh G. Effect of mulching and irrigation on weeds and yield of summer greengram (Vigna radiata) in saline soil. Indian J Agric Sci. 2008;78(12):1082.
  29. 29. Chavan ML. Effect of organic mulches on soil moisture conservation and yield of rabi sorghum (M-35–1). Int J Agric Eng. 2009;2(2).
  30. 30. Mathukia RK, Mathukia PR, Polara AM. Effect of preparatory tillage and mulch on productivity of rainfed pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp.]. Indian J Dryland Agric Res Dev. 2015; 30(2):58–61. https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6701.2015.00026.3
  31. 31. Tak HI, Ahmad F, Babalola OO, Inam A. Growth, photosynthesis and yield of chickpea as influenced by urban wastewater and different levels of phosphorus. Int J Plant Res. 2012;2(2):6–13. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.plant.20120202.02
  32. 32. Nazir R, Sayedi SA, Zaryal K, Khaleeq K, Godara S, Bamboriya SD, et al. Effects of phosphorus application on bunch and spreading genotypes of groundnut. J Agric Ecol. 2002;14:26–31. https://doi.org/10.58628/jae-2214-24
  33. 33. Singh A, Singh S, Kaur S, Singh M. Influence of straw mulch and nitrogen management on yield and input use efficiency of maize (Zea mays L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(12):2304–16. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.812.272
  34. 34. Yadav GS, Datta M, Babu S, Saha P, Singh R. Effect of sources and levels of phosphorus on productivity, economics, nutrient acquisition and phosphorus-use efficiency of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under hilly ecosystems of North-East India. Indian J Agron. 2001;60(2): 307–11. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v60i2.4456

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.