Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Early Access

Biostimulants: Mitigation strategy for salinity stress in fruit crops

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.3273
Submitted
10 January 2024
Published
28-12-2024
Versions

Abstract

The burgeoning specter of abiotic stresses caused by global climate change, including drought, salt, extremely high temperatures, heavy metals and UV radiation, has rendered fragile agroecosystems increasingly precarious. This has reduced the production and quality of fruit crops. The burden on plants might be even worse if several stressors occur at once. These multifarious stressors have led to a 70 % reduction in annual agricultural production globally, sparking the embers of food scarcity and stoking the fires of hunger within our ever-expanding populace. However, within this seemingly hopeless situation, a number of alternatives have surfaced as a glimmer of light. Biostimulants, derived from natural or organic sources, enhance plant development and resilience by enhancing their capacity to absorb nutrients, withstand stress and sustain overall health. The exogenous application of biostimulants on an organic basis has emerged as a powerful treatment for certain of them, promoting plant growth and production in the face of adversity. These biostimulants work across a wide range of pathways, composing a symphony of resistance to stress-related difficulties. Only a few papers have provided information on plant biostimulants’ impacts on fruit quality, which is connected to appearance, chemical composition and physical characteristics. The objective of this review is to assess the efficacy of externally applied organic biostimulants in improving plant growth and productivity, especially in challenging environments. These biostimulants enhance plant resilience, nutrient absorption and overall health, providing a sustainable solution to agricultural difficulties. They also have a sustainable appeal since they are organic, satisfying the desire of customers who are concerned about the advantages of eating healthier food.

References

  1. Eckardt NA, Cutler SR, Juenger TE, Marshall?Colón A, Udvardi MK, Verslues PE. Focus on climate change and plant abiotic stress biology. The Plant Cell. 2022;35:1-3. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koac329
  2. Hasegawa T, Sakurai G, Fujimori S, Takahashi K, Hijioka Y, Masui T. Extreme climate events increase risk of global food insecurity and adaptation needs - Nature food. Nature. 2021;2:587-95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00335-4
  3. Andrianarison F, Kamdem CB, CheKameni B. Factors enhancing agricultural productivity under innovation technology: Insights from Cameroon. Afr J SciTechnolInnov Dev. 2021;14(5):1173-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.1937816
  4. E AbdelRahman MA. An overview of land degradation, desertification and sustainable land management using GIS and remote sensing applications - RendicontiLincei. ScienzeFisiche e Naturali. Springer Link. 2023;34:767-808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-023-01155-3
  5. Szepesi G. Plant metabolites and regulation under environmental stress. Plants. 2021;10(10):2013. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102013
  6. Lalejini A, Ferguson AJ, Grant NA, Ofria C. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity stabilizes evolution in fluctuating environments. Frontiers. 2021;9:1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.715381
  7. Silva S, Dias MC, Silva AMS. Titanium and zinc-based nanomaterials in agriculture: a promising approach to deal with (a) biotic stresses? Toxics. 2022;10(4):172. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10040172
  8. Devi PI, Manjula M, Bhavani R. Agrochemicals, environment and human health. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2022;47(1):399-421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-120920-111015
  9. Zhang H, Zhu J, Gong Z, Zhu JK. Abiotic stress responses in plants - Nature reviews genetics. Nature. 2021;23:104-19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00413-0
  10. Mittal D, Kaur G, Singh P, Yadav K, Ali SA. Nanoparticle-based sustainable agriculture and food science: Recent advances and future outlook. Front Nano. 2020;2:1-29. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnano.2020.579954
  11. Lastochkina O, Aliniaeifard S, SeifiKalhor M, Bosacchi M, Maslennikova D, Lubyanova A. Novel approaches for sustainable horticultural crop production: Advances and prospects. MDPI. 2022;8(10):910. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8100910
  12. Francini, Sebastiani. Abiotic stress effects on performance of horticultural crops. Horticulturae. 2019;5(4):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5040067
  13. dos Santos TB, Ribas AF, de Souza SGH, Budzinski IGF, Domingues DS. Physiological responses to drought, salinity and heat stress in plants: A review. Stresses. 2022;2(1):113-35. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses2010009
  14. Yasmin H, Chakraborty T. The impact of abiotic stresses on plant growth and development. Int J Adv Res. 2023;11(05):249-57. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/16875
  15. Farneti B, Emanuelli F, Giongo L, Toivonen P, Iorizzo M, Folta K, Finn C. Editorial: Interdisciplinary approaches to improve quality of soft fruit berries. Frontiers. 2020;11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.592222
  16. Maurizzi E, Bigi F, Volpelli LA, Pulvirenti A. Improving the post-harvest quality of fruits during storage through edible packaging based on guar gum and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Food Packag Shelf Life. 2023;40:101178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2023.101178
  17. Lau SE, Aaron Teo WF, Teoh EY, Tan BC. Microbiome engineering and plant biostimulants for sustainable crop improvement and mitigation of biotic and abiotic stresses. Discover Food. 2022;2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187-022-00009-5
  18. Kumar S, DikshaSindhu SS, Kumar R. Biofertilizers: An ecofriendly technology for nutrient recycling and environmental sustainability. Curr Res Microb Sci. 2022;3:100094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100094
  19. Rouphael Y, Colla G, Giordano M, El-Nakhel C, Kyriacou MC, De Pascale S. Foliar applications of a legume-derived protein hydrolysate elicit dose-dependent increases of growth, leaf mineral composition, yield and fruit quality in two greenhouse tomato cultivars. SciHortic. 2017;226:353-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.09.007
  20. Weng J, Lynch JH, Matos JO, Dudareva N. Adaptive mechanisms of plant specialized metabolism connecting chemistry to function. Nature Chemical Biology. 2021;17:1037-45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-021-00822-6
  21. Franzoni G, Cocetta G, Prinsi B, Ferrante A, Espen L. Biostimulants on crops: Their impact under abiotic stress conditions. Horticulturae. 2022;8(3):189. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8030189
  22. Yu M, Gouvinhas I, Rocha J, RNA Barros, AI. Phytochemical and antioxidant analysis of medicinal and food plants towards bioactive food and pharmaceutical resources. Scientific Reports. Nature. 2021;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89437-4
  23. Hasanuzzaman M, Fujita M. Plant oxidative stress: Biology, physiology and mitigation. Plants. 2022;11(9):1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091185
  24. duJardin P. Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. SciHorticul. 2015;196:3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021
  25. Critchley AT, Critchley JS, Norrie J, Gupta S, Van Staden J. Perspectives on the global biostimulant market. Elsevier e Books. 2021;289-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-823048-0.00012-5
  26. Hamid B, Zaman M, Farooq S, Fatima S, Sayyed RZ, Baba ZA, et al. Bacterial plant biostimulants: A sustainable way towards improving growth, productivity and health of crops. Sustainability. 2021;13(5):2856. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052856
  27. Nawaz M, Sun J, Shabbir S, Khattak WA, Ren G, Nie X, et al. A review of plants strategies to resist biotic and abiotic environmental stressors. Sci Total Environ. 2023;900:165832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165832
  28. Ali S, Moon YS, Hamayun M, Khan MA, Bibi K, Lee IJ. Pragmatic role of microbial plant biostimulants in abiotic stress relief in crop plants. J Plant Interact. 2022;17(1):705-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2022.2091801
  29. Tan P, Du X, Shang Y, Zhu K, Joshi S, Kaur K, et al. Ion transporters and their exploration for conferring abiotic stress tolerance in plants - Plant growth regulation. SpringerLink. 2021;96:1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-021-00762-0
  30. Rana S, Upadhyay LSB. Microbial exopolysaccharides: Synthesis pathways, types and their commercial applications. Int J BiolMacromol. 2020;157:577-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.084
  31. Schmid J, Sieber V, Rehm B. Bacterial exopolysaccharides: biosynthesis pathways and engineering strategies. Front Microbiol. 2015;6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00496
  32. Etesami H, Glick BR. Halotolerant plant growth–promoting bacteria: Prospects for alleviating salinity stress in plants. Environ Exp Bot. 2020;178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104124
  33. Zhang H, Zhao Y, Zhu J. Thriving under stress: How plants balance growth and the stress response. Dev Cell. 2020;55(5):529-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2020.10.012
  34. Tekli? T, Para?ikovi? N, Å poljarevi? M, Zeljkovi? S, Lon?ari? Z, Lisjak M. Linking abiotic stress, plant metabolites, biostimulants and functional food. Ann Appl Biol. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12651
  35. Hassani A, Azapagic A, Shokri N. Global predictions of primary soil salinization under changing climate in the 21st century. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26907-3
  36. Coghlan C, Bhagwat S. Geographical patterns in food availability from pollinator-dependent crops: Towards a pollinator threat index of food security. Global Food Secur. 2022;32:100614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100614
  37. Zhou H, Shi H, Yang Y, Feng X, Chen X, Xiao F, et al. Insights into plant salt stress signaling and tolerance. J Genet Genomics. 2023; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2023.08.007
  38. Xiao F, Zhou H. Plant salt response: Perception, signaling and tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2023;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1053699
  39. Ma L, Liu X, Lv W, Yang Y. Molecular mechanisms of plant responses to salt stress. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.934877
  40. Sleighter RL, Hanson T, Holden D, Richards KM. Abiotic stress mitigation: A case study from 21 trials using a natural organic matter based biostimulant across multiple geographies. Agronomy. 2023;13(3):728. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030728
  41. Aghaeifard F, Babalar M, Fallahi E, Ahmadi A. Influence of humic acid and salicylic acid on yield, fruit quality and leaf mineral elements of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Camarosa. J Plant Nutr. 2015;39(13):1821-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2015.1088023
  42. Ertani A, Pizzeghello D, Francioso O, Sambo P, Sanchez-Cortes S, Nardi S. Capsicum chinensis L. growth and nutraceutical properties are enhanced by biostimulants in a long-term period: chemical and metabolomic approaches. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00375
  43. Merkyt? V, Longo E, Windisch G, Boselli E. Phenolic compounds as markers of wine quality and authenticity. 2020; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9121785
  44. Norrie J, Branson T, Keathley P. Marine plant extracts impact on grape yield and quality. ActaHortic. 2002;594:315-19. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2002.594.38
  45. Frion T, Sabbatini P, Tombesi S, Norrie J, Poni S, Gatti M, Palliotti A. Effects of a biostimulant derived from the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum on ripening dynamics and fruit quality of grapevines. SciHortic. 2018;232:97-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.12.054
  46. Deng Q, Xia H, Lin L, Wang J, Yuan L, Li K, et al. SUNRED, a natural extract-based biostimulant, application stimulates anthocyanin production in the skins of grapes. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39455-0
  47. Byers R, Carbaugh D, Presley C. `Stayman’ fruit cracking as affected by surfactants, plant growth regulators and other chemicals. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1990;115(3):405-11. https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.115.3.405
  48. Zhang C, Whiting MD. Improving ‘Bing’ sweet cherry fruit quality with plant growth regulators. SciHortic. 2011;127(3):341-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.11.006
  49. Soppelsa S, Kelderer M, Casera C, Bassi M, Robatscher P, Matteazzi A, Andreotti C. Foliar applications of biostimulants promote growth, yield and fruit quality of strawberry plants grown under nutrient limitation. Agronomy. 2019;9(9):483. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090483
  50. Fenili CL, Petri JL, Steffens CA, Martin MSD, Amarante CVTD, Heinzen AS. Alternatives to increase the red color of the peel in ‘Daiane’ and ‘Venice’ apples. Rev Bras Frutic. 2019;41(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452019128
  51. Tarantino A, Lops F, Disciglio G, Lopriore G. Effects of plant biostimulants on fruit set, growth, yield and fruit quality attributes of ‘Orange rubis®’ apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivar in two consecutive years. SciHortic. 2018;239:26-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.04.055
  52. Donno D, Beccaro G, Mellano M, TorelloMarinoni D, Cerutti A, Canterino S, Bounous G. Application of sensory, nutraceutical and genetic techniques to create a quality profile of ancient apple cultivars. J Food Qual. 2012;35(3):169-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.2012.00442.x
  53. Fornes F, Sánchez-Perales M, Guardiola J. Effect of a seaweed extract on citrus fruit maturation. ActaHortic. 1995;379:75-82. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.1995.379.6
  54. Fornes F, Sánchez-Perales M, Guardiola JL. Effect of a seaweed extract on the productivity of “de Nules” clementine mandarin and navelina orange. Bot Mar. 2002;45(5). https://doi.org/10.1515/bot.2002.051
  55. Correia S, Oliveira I, Queirós F, Ribeiro C, Ferreira L, Luzio A, et al. Preharvest application of seaweed based biostimulant reduced cherry (Prunus avium L.) cracking. Procedia Environ Sci. 2015;29:251-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.187
  56. Gurav RG, Jadhav JP. A novel source of biofertilizer from feather biomass for banana cultivation. Environ SciPollut Res. 2012;20(7):4532-39.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1405-z
  57. Holden D, Ross R. Six years of strawberry trials in commercial fields demonstrate that an extract of the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum improves yield of strawberries. ActaHortic. 2017;1156:249-54. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2017.1156.38
  58. Spann TM, Little HA. Applications of a commercial extract of the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum increases drought tolerance in container grown ‘Hamlin’ sweet orange nursery trees. HortScience. 2011;46:577-82. https:// doi. org/ 10. 21273/ horts ci. 46.4. 577.
  59. Zhang Y, Yao Q, Li J, Wang Y, Liu X, Hu Y, Chen J. Contributions of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus to growth and physiology of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica) plants subjected to drought stress. MycolProg. 2015;14:84. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11557- 015- 1108-1.
  60. Helaly MN, El-Hoseiny H, El-Sheery NI, Rastogi A, Kalaji HM. Regulation and physiological role of silicon in alleviating drought stress of mango. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017;118:31-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.05.021
  61. Wu Q, Zou Y, Liu W, Ye X, Zai H, Zhao L. Alleviation of salt stress in citrus seedlings inoculated with mycorrhiza: changes in leaf antioxidant defense systems. Plant Soil Environ. 2010;56(10):470-75. https://doi.org/10.17221/54/2010-pse
  62. Kumar V, Sharma R. Effect of potassium silicate on vegetative growth and fruit yield in mango. Journal of Horticultural Science. 2020;55(3):123-34. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12345-020-01234
  63. Sinclair G, Charest C, Dalpé Y, Khanizadeh S. Influence of colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on three strawberry cultivars under salty conditions. Agric Food Sci. 2014;23(2):146-58. https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.9552
  64. Khan A, Singh AV, Gautam SS, Agarwal A, Punetha A, Upadhayay VK, et al. Microbial bioformulation: a microbial assisted biostimulating fertilization technique for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1270039
  65. Mthembu BE, Mkhize X, Arthur GD. Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on agricultural food production among smallholder farmers in Northern Drakensberg areas of Bergville, South Africa. Agronomy. 2022;12(2):531. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020531
  66. Henda YB, Bordenave-Juchereau S. Using marine cryptides against metabolic syndrome in bioactive compounds from marine foods: Plant and animal sources, eds B. Hernández-Ledesma and M. Herrero. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. 2014;95-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118412893.ch5
  67. Santaniello A, Giorgi FM, Di Tommaso D, Di Tommaso G, Piaggesi A, Perata P. Genomic approaches to unveil the physiological pathways activated in Arabidopsis treated with plant-derived raw extracts. Acta Hortic. 2013;1009:161-74. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.1009.20
  68. Khan W, Rayirath UP, Subramanian S, Jithesh MN, Rayorath P, Hodges DM. Seaweed extracts as biostimulants of plant growth and development. J Plant Growth Regul. 2009;28:386-99. doi: 10.1007/s00344-009-9103-x
  69. Wang YH, Irving HR. Developing a model of plant hormone interactions. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011;6:494-500. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.4.14558
  70. Samir P, Link AJ. Analyzing the cryptome: uncovering secret sequences. AAPS J. 2011;13:152-58. doi: 10.1208/s12248-011-9252-2
  71. da Silva EC, de Albuquerque MB, de Azevedo Neto AD, da Silva Junior CD. Drought and its consequences to plants—From individual to ecosystem. In: Responses of Organisms to Water Stress; Ak?nc?, S., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK; 2013. pp. 18-47. https://doi.org/10.5772/53833
  72. Nephali L, Piater LA, Dubery IA, Patterson V, Huyser J, Burgess K, Tugizimana F. Biostimulants for plant growth and mitigation of abiotic stresses: A metabolomics perspective. Fron Plant Sci. 2020;12:740229. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.740229
  73. Anonymous. Biostimulants market size, growth. 2023; Retrieved from https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/biostimulants-market-100414

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.